Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Study of emotional intelligence
What is emotional intelligence
Study of emotional intelligence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Camouflaged within the restless streets in New York, a homeless man stood, staring at those who passed by. His eyes were beating and weary, irises staring out in the distance. The man’s appearance was repulsing to many. After forty minutes, thousands passed the man, but not a single glance was given in his direction. To the onlookers, the homeless man had no name or value, undeserving of their attention. However, little did they know, this man was none other than Richard Gere—a beloved, idolized, A-list celebrity.
Human connection goes beyond words, but rather intimate, nonverbal gestures. One of these powerful gestures is through eye contact. To stare into someone’s eyes is like whispering to them that they are worthy of recognition. Celebrities
…show more content…
While some cultures, such as the Chinese, do not appreciate staring, eye contact is key to show honor. American culture especially puts a great emphasis in eye contact, and it stands for diverse kinds of respect such as attraction, admiration, and dignity. People give eye contact to show the other person respect for their existence; however, there is a common folkway to avoid the eyes of the homeless. There are a variety of reasons that a person avoids eye contact with the homeless, but it all boils down to a matter of respect. According to Community West, “it’s not that people are bad”, but it is uncomfortable for a person “to admit that (the homeless individual) exists” and that they have “a basic human need to care” when making eye contact. In other words, it is comfortable to avoid acknowledging a person’s existence. Eye contact is an invitation, or sometimes an obligation, to care. People are comfortable with giving eye contact to those who they love, but there is a great difficulty when they see a homeless person. Very few homeless individuals have had “someone give them their undivided attention” throughout their day; yet when a person considers their eyes, it is the silent way of “reaffirming their dignity” and “believing in their self-worth” (Palestine). As a homeless person is ignored, their self-confidence and hopes lower until they feel less than human. Onlookers ignore this …show more content…
People tend to believe that homeless individuals will beg for money, only to spend it on drugs. Contrary to this, however, statistics prove otherwise. According to a recent survey across the United States, “94% of panhandlers”, or commonly known as the homeless, use the money that they receive to solely “purchase the food that they need” (Gaille). People who follow the folkway of avoiding eye contact need to understand that their donations are often for beneficial use. They also need to understand that avoiding eye contact is a means of ignorance. According to the Mic organization, ignoring the “existence of any social issue” influences an “ignorance is bliss attitude”; yet when an individual “recognizes the human component” of homelessness, they can “come away enlightened”. Ignorance does not benefit the world. By making minimal means of kindness such as eye contact, an individual can be enlightened and discover their place in humanity. The folkway of avoiding eye contact should not stop them; yet rather, this folkway should challenge them to act with
Theories of Relativity by Barbara Haworth-Attard enlightens the reader that the way in which people observe an individual is not always dependant on their socioeconomic status, it is dependent on the individual who is making the judgement. Some individuals may take advantage of the homeless in sexual way. They believe since they are homeless they would do anything for money. A confined amount of individuals may detect hope or a future of well-being for the homeless. Affectionate individuals may gain the tenderness to stop and actively give guidance to a homeless person because they foresee hope. The vast majority of people obtain a feeling of irritation toward the homeless due to them constantly asking for change. People with limited patience
Today's world is filled with both great tragedy and abundant joy. In a densely populated metropolis like New York City, on a quick walk down a street you encounter homeless people walking among the most prosperous. Unfortunately, nine times out of ten the prosperous person will trudge straight past the one in need without a second thought. A serious problem arises when this happens continually. The problem worsens when you enter a different neighborhood and the well-to-do are far from sight. Many neighborhoods are inhabited only by the most hopeless of poverty - ridden people while others downtown or across the park do not care, or are glad to be separated from them. Such is the problem in New York City today and in Mott Haven in Jonathan Kozol's Amazing Grace. I have lived in New York City all my life and I had no idea that these problems were going on so close to home. If I live about three miles away from Mott Haven and I am not aware of the situation there, then who is?
They are automatically prejudged and looked at as being dirty and having diseases. According to the story “Authorities were forced to justify this action by declaring them, in the words of the city council, ‘a threat to public safety.’”(Jonathan 277). The homeless are assumed to be a threat because they have no where to take a bath and have no where to go if they do get sick. Since authorities have put this thought in American’s heads we now watch that we do not touch them when giving out change. Jonathan explains how he, himself responds to the homeless when it comes to touching them; prejudging them also. “Every so often, someone stops to put a coin into his hand. I noticed the care with which the people drop their coins, in order that their hands do not touch his. When I pass that spot some hours later he will still be there. I’ll do the same” (Jonathan 276). The fact that people watch the order in how they drop the coins coveys that they are dirty and if they touch the homeless they too will become dirty. Jonathan explains to us that they are sparingly viewed as “trash,” because Government officials makes society feel and encourages the thought of them being
Statistically, over 670,000 Americans are homeless with a growing number. 48 million people go to bed hungry every night. Although we do provide shelters and opportunities in America, millions of people are homeless worldwide. Even on a more minor level there are still hundreds homeless within hometowns. Everyday we encounter the homeless whether by seeing them holding their personal signs at stoplights, confronts with beggars, or viewing them from afar under bridges. In her essay titled “On Compassion”, writer Barbara Ascher uses rhetorical techniques detailing some of her personal homeless experiences within the city life, Asher does effectively use logos, pathos,
When people are in need you want to help them but you don’t know how. If you see a homeless person asking for money and food, buy the something to eat and when you give the the food give them some money while you're at it.
Principally, to a homeless person, if there was only one thing they hated, it would be pity. The only way society at this point knows how to deal with the homeless is by pitying them. They take the individuals and they put them in a group basically labeled “displaced”, then it is expected that it is up to the state to help them. Many say they try, but because homelessness deals on such a personal level, many don’t get helped because they are grouped. On the personal level, when one sees a homeless person, many, if not most people, shy away thinking that “someone else will help them”. In most cases, they are ignored. Because everyone is thinking this way, not many local homeless people get assistance. In this country, homelessness is one of the last issues to be thought of, which is why the homeless population is now flooding into small cities and towns. Homelessness should be combatted one person at a time and not as a group. I agree that everyone needs to pitch in and help rehumanize these lifeless souls, and with everyone’s help, it can be done on a personal level.
Imagine passing by a homeless man, holding up a sign saying homeless hunger, what do you do? you can do two things walk past it and ignore the man or give money. When you walk past the men then you need View A and View B. These views are the views of yours and the man, meaning that if you walk past the man you probably think “this is just one person, he can find a job and work rather than living in the street” that is View A. As you walk past the man he probably feels worthless, unwanted, not important etc. I feel like the person can only understand what the homeless man is going through if they experienced it themselves. You just say it’s just one person and he will survive, but what you don't realize is that, what if there are many more of these kind of people in a country who are suffering and dying. These people are at poverty and not a lot of people know about poverty because there is not a lot of awareness on it.
...on the homeless community. I previously held preconceived notions that the homeless consisted of people who were either unable to connect and form relationships with others or didn’t desire to do so. Yet, I observed most everyone greeting one another and reminiscing with those who have been absent from the community for a while, as well as, expressing concern for those missing. I recognized that the homeless may live in a non-traditional way, but they have established their own communities and are successful in forming and maintaining cohesive relationships.
People in America tend to think that a shelter is best for the homeless, but most of these people do not go to shelters for a reason. For example, in paragraph 7, on page 191, Anna says, “certainly some prefer to do so because they are emotionally ill, because they have been locked in before and they are damned if they will be locked in again.” These homeless people can have emotional or physical problems preventing them from going. Also, people will criticize the homeless and not look at these people as humans. People do not see the homeless as regular humans, instead they just criticize them. Even if they do not know the situation. I also look at these people differently. I feel sorrow for them and think they should find a shelter to live in like most Americans. This is the stereotype of the homeless people. We all think that they aren’t normal and should find a shelter to get help. Finally, Americans always look over the fact that they need help, but we shouldn’t go to drastic measures to help them. I will pass hundreds of homeless people, and helping them will never even cross my mind. Sometimes I won’t even notice them when I walk past where they are sleeping. A lot of people are too selfish to help a person in need. Even if that person is begging for help, most people still won’t help them. People should just put the
.... The homeless community is a growing problem that only worsens with time. If we don’t make an effort now, to help the most vulnerable among us, then we are only contributing to this problem. With our unsure economy, nothing is guaranteed, so just be considerate for others who are in an inferior situation, because who knows when you might need a hand.
In the early hours of the morning on Thursday, January 3, 2013, James G. Fulmer was found frozen to death on the steps of a Nashville Church. James Fulmer was 50 years old, homeless, and physically handicapped (wsmv.com). His tragic story is just one of almost 1,000 homeless men and women will suffer death caused by hypothermia each year. (nationalhomeless.org). Every night in the United States, over 600,000 people encounter homelessness. Their stories are diverse and their paths to homelessness, varied. Many have found themselves on the streets due to domestic violence, job loss and mental illness (npr.org). Some were teachers, accountants, musicians, painters, and even doctors. So many of the homeless population once lead normal lives. Yet, there is a social stigma that views the homeless as lazy, unwilling to work, uneducated and even untrustworthy. In a Capitalist society that places the highest value on image and the almighty dollar, there seems to be little desire to interact with these “outcasts”.
At any given time, approximately 600,000 homeless survive at the front door of America. They are sleeping in parks, living in cardboard boxes, sitting on street corners, and resting under bridges. Terrible hunger gnaws at their stomachs as they search for food. Society labels the homeless as useless and worthless, but they are not. They are children, grandmothers, grandfathers, mothers, and fathers that need a place to sleep, eat, and live. What does society do to help? Nothing. Society hurries home from work, shopping, and leisure, worrying about who will win the next football game. Society is not worried about where their next meal will come from, where they will sleep, or where they will be tomorrow. Although it is difficult for society not to feel discomfort at seeing homeless people, it is the homeless who pay for the way people feel about them. Alienation of the homeless in America is a direct result of injustice, health issues, and societal attitudes; however, solutions are available to society as they are obligated to all of their citizenry, including the homeless.
So why shouldn’t people give money directly to pan-handlers? It is a common thought that the homeless will simply spend their hard “earned” money on cigarettes, alcohol, and drugs. It is debated whether or not this belief is based on any truth or not. One group in San Francisco decided to find out. They found that “25 percent are alcoholics” and “32 percent are addicted to drugs” (Keyes) thus they claimed that the homeless are spending the majority of their profits on food. However, other surveys say that approximately “80% of people begging do so to support a drug habit” (Doward). So here are two sources that disagree with each other. Which one is valid? The first results were come by after a team of GLS researchers to survey the homeless people on the streets and came up with the results by their answers. The second conclusion was made by looking at police records. In places where it is illegal to panhandle, police would arrest the panhandlers and, among other things, preform a drug test on them. The results of the second statistics were deduced from these ...
During my career, I saw a lot of cases indicate that homeless go to hospitals or pharmacies to find a charity or to get help by doctors or pharmacists. Through my Professional working in one of the pharmacies. I faced many of these cases that sick people with low income or homeless, especially in the winter asking for medications against Cough or Flu, through my moral and my profession. I tried to give some donations or humanitarian aid to whom needs. My ethical value is to help people when needed. Hence Beneficence is one of the important qualities that should every doctor or pharmacist that infuses. A smile or handshaking to the homeless can build hope and help to make his day better. Back in Syria I worked with a group of colleagues to collect medications for pressure, diabetes diseases, gave them to the associations that provide medications for the homeless who suffer from such chronic diseases. Thus In my opinion, it 's a right of any person, whatever his circumstances, can get the required treatment and to be treated fully
Another major cause for begging having a shameful connotation in America is for the reason that many pretend to be homeless or panhandling when it is obvious that it is not necessary. Matthew J. Reynolds recor...