Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on the nazi experiments
Racism in ww2 a short note
Racism during World War 2
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on the nazi experiments
“The Reality is that the Nazi’s are men like ourselves; the nightmare is that they have shown, have proven beyond doubt, what man is capable of” (Arendt 1945 quote taken from Kohn 1994).
The aim of this essay is to address the theory of “radical evil” and to establish how it has been incorporated into Hannah Arendt’s thesis the “Banality of evil”. This will be done by first addressing Immanuel Kant’s main concept of evil been “radical” and concluding what he meant by this. Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the Banality of Evil (1963) will then be analyzed to explore how Kant’s main propositions have influenced and to some extent been transformed by Arendt to explain the horrors of the holocaust. We will conclude by looking at how the nature of evil should be addressed following the Holocaust.
Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher working in the late seventeenth century and has been considered “The greatest member of the idealist school of German philosophy” (Aquila 1989). Kant’s work regarding evil especially that covered in his work Religion has received more attention since the start of the twenty first century than it did in his time (Hanson 2012). This rise in attention could be accounted for due to a wider search for answers in regards to “evil”. Previously unimaginable events that have occurred in modern times from the Holocaust to the 9/11 atrocities, make us question morality and ourselves as a human race, leading to questions such as, “are the people responsible for these crimes normal?” “Are these people born evil?”
To answers the latter question from Kant’s perspective, yes these people are born evil, or at least they are born with an intrinsic ability to become “evil”. To answer the former, ye...
... middle of paper ...
...964) “All There Is to Know about Adolph Eichmann” FLOWERS FOR HITLER. London: Jonathan Cape Ltd
Coeckelbergh, M (2003) “Can we Choose Evil? A Discussion of the Problem of Radical Evil as a Modern and Ancient Problem of Freedom” The Metaphysics of Autonomy: The Reconciliation of Ancient and Modern. [Date Accessed 12/11/13] http://doc.utwente.nl/76157/1/Can_We_Choose_Evil_in_Keen_and_Keen.pdf
Formosa, P (2007) Kant on the Radical Evil of Human Nature. The Philosophical Forum, Inc [Date accessed 1/11/13] http://www.academia.edu/175810/Kant_on_the_Radical_Evil_of_Human_Nature
Giddens, A (1990) The consequence of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press
Hanson, E. M (2012) “Immanuel Kant: Radical Evil” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy . [Date Accessed 9/11/13] http://www.iep.utm.edu/rad-evil/
Rees, L (2006) The Nazis: A Warning From History. London: BBC Books
An Analysis of Peter van Inwagen’s The Magnitude, Duration, and Distribution of Evil: a Theodicy
Claudia Card begins by questioning the difference between wrong and evil. How do we know when something crosses the line between being just wrong, to being an evil act? How does hatred and motive play a part in this? How can people psychologically maintain a sense of who they are when they have been the victims of evil? Card attempts to explain these fundamental questions using her theory of evil; the Atrocity Paradigm (Card, pg.3).
Bailey, T. (2010). Analysing the Good Will: Kant's Argument in the First Section of the Groundwork. British Journal For The History Of Philosophy, 18(4), 635-662. doi:10.1080/09608788.2010.502349 Retrieved from http://ehis.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=9f0eb1ba-edf5-4b35-a15a-37588479a493%40sessionmgr112&vid=10&hid=115
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Norman Kempsmith. New York: The Humanities P, 1950.
Johnson, R 2014, ‘Kant's Moral Philosophy,’ The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (Spring Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), .
Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. Trans. H. J. Paton. 1964. Reprint. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Thought, 2009. Print.
O'Neill, O. (1986). A Simplified Account of Kantian Ethics. Matters of life and death (pp. 44-50). n.a.: McGraw-Hill.
Immanuel Kant is a popular modern day philosopher. He was a modest and humble man of his time. He never left his hometown, never married and never strayed from his schedule. Kant may come off as boring, while he was an introvert but he had a great amount to offer. His thoughts and concepts from the 1700s are still observed today. His most recognized work is from the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Here Kant expresses his idea of ‘The Good Will’ and the ‘Categorical Imperative’.
Using Adolf Eichmann as a subject and poster-boy of a new threat to society, author Hannah Arendt is able to penetrate the limitations of the trial itself and create her thesis, which revolves around the idea of the banality of evil. This phrase accents the limitations of the term evil, along with the ideology surrounding it. This ideology becomes more complex in a world in which theories of evil are ever-changing. "Arendt's thesis points to an understanding of evil as particular, evolving, and nonessentialist" (Geddes).
Kant, Immanuel, and Mary J. Gregor. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge UP, 1998. Print.
Bailey, T. (2010). Analysing the Good Will: Kant's Argument in the First Section of the Groundwork. British Journal For The History Of Philosophy, 18(4), 635-662. doi:10.1080/09608788.2010.502349 Retrieved from http://ehis.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=9f0eb1ba-edf5-4b35-a15a-37588479a493%40sessionmgr112&vid=10&hid=115
Fred Feldman, 'Kant's Ethics Theory: Exposition and Critique' from H. J. Curzer, ed Ethical Theory and Moral Problems, Belmont, Ca: Wadsworth Publishing Co. 1999.
...929 and Germany in 1933. In short, Arendt’s goal in writing this book was searching for the intellectual roots of the movement that had displaced her and so many others from her native Germany, and many more in other totalitarian regimes such as the one of Joseph Stalin in the Soviet Union. In the book, Arendt also deals with other, more broad themes that are present in her political writings throughout her life. Some of these themes are the inquiry into the conditions of the possibility for a humane and democratic public life, the historical, social and economic forces that had come to threaten it, and the conflictual relationship between private interests and the public good. “The Origins of Totalitarianism” was published in 1951 and is divided into three sections: “Antisemitism”, “Imperialism” and “Totalitarianism”; the last two parts were revised in the 1958
‘Kantian Ethics’ in [EBQ] James P Sterba (ed) Ethics: the Big Questions, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1998, 185-198. 2) Kant, Immanuel. ‘Morality and Rationality’ in [MPS] 410-429. 3) Rachel, James. The Elements of Moral Philosophy, fourth edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003.
O’Neill, Onora. “Kantian Ethics.” A Companion to Ethics. Ed. Peter Singer. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 1991. 175-185. Print.