Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pursuaive argument for gun control
Why guns should not be banned
The argument against gun control
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pursuaive argument for gun control
Ever since September 11, 2001, America has been on high alert, and understandably considering gun control, however, there are many reasons America needs the guns they have. America should not ban guns in this country because guns don’t kill people, they are used for much more than killing things and they are our right, and there is no logical way to confiscate all the guns in the country. Although there are many valuable, and viable reasons guns should be banned in America, there are many more reasons guns should not be banned in America. Many people say guns kill people, when in all reality, there are many components that go into firing a firearm. Other people may tell you that guns is only used for killing people, and other negative things. Then there are some people who will tell you that guns just need to be confiscated. However, people who say that guns should be confiscated from everyone, do not have a very structured understanding of guns. For instance, where they originated, how they have impacted America, or the safety they provide us with. Guns are not a bad thing, it simply depends on who is using them, and what they are using them for. The first firearms to surface were cannons, originating in Europe around the middle of the 14th …show more content…
According to Wikipedia, domestic violence is defined as all acts of physical, sexual, psychological, or economic violence, that may be committed by a family member or partner (Wikipedia, 2018, para 1). A domestic shooting evolves from domestic violence, when the violence becomes more than assault, often becoming deadly. The reason for domestic shooting is the same as the reasons for a mass shooting, school shooting, and gang shooting. In all cases the shooter has some form of mental health issues, whether that be anger, isolation failure or empathy, they all relay back to mental
For hundreds of years Americans have been growing up with the notion that it is a right to own a gun. Since the creation of the second amendment, people all over the United States have been able to guns for private use. Guns operated by the public are said to have a variety of uses such as, being able to protect oneself if conflict arises, grants the ability to put food on the table, and are used in competitions shooting targets against other people. But for many people guns have been seen as the root of all evil. Anti-gun users think that guns cause a variety of unexpected and innocent deaths. They also think that there are not enough laws in place that allow just about anyone to purchase a gun. The question of should guns be legal to all citizens has plagued our society. Do you think it is morally right for anyone to arm themselves and use it when they deem it to be necessary? Or do you think that the 2rd amendment seem unnecessary and outdated law that needs to be rewritten? These questions are just two of many that have thrown back and forth between pro-gun and anti-gun users.
One of the biggest reasons that handguns should not be banned is because of the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” People who argue that guns should be banned state the Second Amendment was not intended for the regular civilian, but rather the militia. This is where they are wrong. The Supreme court has taken a case like this in Heller vs District of Columbia. Heller had been caught using a handgun and sued the U.S. on the right for civilians to bear arms. The Court decided and interpreted the Second Amendment as the right for all the civilians to bear arms and not just the militia. Also along with amendments and acts, there are two different acts that put restrictions on who can and cannot buy guns. The Gun Act of 1968 and the Brady Act both put different restrictions on who can buy guns. The Gun Act of 1968 has te...
Americans are faced with a huge problem of violence in the streets, these streets have become a place where old people are beaten for their social security checks, where little women are attacked and raped, where teen aged thugs shoot it out for some turf to sell their illegal drugs, and finally where small children everyday are caught in the way of bullets during drive by shootings. We try to ignore the criminals in our society and how they hurt it, but we shouldn’t. We should take actions to stop these acts of crazy people. And people try, but the hard work of some misguided individuals to stop the legal ownership of guns doesn’t really affect the problem at all, and takes the guns from the innocent citizens, who simply want means of self defense.
“More then 30,000 people are killed by firearms each year in this country”(USA Gun Violence Statistics). Because of the U.S. Government allows U.S. citizens to buy firearms more than 30,000 people are killed each year (USA Gun Violence Statistics). The rate of people dying each year by guns is about to pass the number of deaths by car. Guns are very dangerous and if the legal age of having a gun is 21, then why is it so many teenagers have one. On average, mass shootings occur every two weeks and school shootings occur once a month (CNN). Statistics show that people are mimicking some of the mass shootings that there has been, for example theater shootings have been more and more frequent (CNN). If guns cause such a problem then why are they still legal in the United States? Aside from homicide people use guns for suicide. 15 through 21 years old is the age where suicide is more common then any other ages. Teens should not be able to have access to a gun like so many do.
Should handgun ownership be banned? I don't believe so. You would think America would learn from examples from other countries. When you take away handguns the crime rate rises. American citizens need to know their rights, responsibilities and safety of owning a handgun.
There are many criminals that are roaming the streets of our neighborhoods and families should have the right to protect themselves and their family. Many innocent families do not deserve that their children go through the fear of criminals that get in houses. An Example is a family in West Bloomfield, Michigan that went through the fear of being hurt. They were in their house when two armed robbers went in their house and tied them up so they could take objects of high value ( Washington Times).This is one of the major causes that will occur if guns are banned. Banning guns in our society will only raise the crime rates in the U.S. and create more problems similar to the prohibition of drugs. Guns should not be banned because parents should
All handguns must be banned because they are the cause (s) of many deaths amongst the people of the world today. Gun violence result in fifty percent of today’s tragedies. Handguns causes too many deaths, the government need to make gun less accessible, and the law/law enforcement need to really enforce the laws they make.
Gun violence has been a big issue in the United State as of the passing years and currently. There are those who debate guns should be banned and those who are against banning guns, those who are pro-gun banning agree that guns are the cost of most deaths in America, those who are anti-gun banning believe that banning guns takes away our rights.
Robert Dallek, an American historian, said “for those of us who cry out for gun control, our fears cannot be eliminated as long as the country remains an armed camp in which the most troubled can find ways to appropriate one of the easily available weapons in our communities.” There is ever week shooting in some schools in other states. Guns should not be allowed in schools.
Many people believe that guns are needed for protection, While some think you need guns to protect yourself and your home, The truth is guns are used more for violent crimes than self-defense. In reality the reason so much killing is going around is because of gun violence. Research shows that more than 30,000 people are killed by firearms each year in this country. Banning guns is the best because it has been proven that more guns in circulation will cause more homicides, In other words banning guns would make the community much safer.
In my opinion, if guns are the leading cause of deaths or problems in America, then why should they have laws permitting the right to have them? The Americans believe that if they have more guns, all their problems will disappear. They believe that if they have a gun, they can stop anyone who tries to harm them. When expressed as such this may seem logical; that by having a weapon one can stop other people who have a weapon from hurting them. They do not have to wait for the police to defend themselves because they already have the materials to do so. However, this is somewhat illogical because no one will attack another person unless provoked; so unless they are a criminal, guns are unnecessary. Americans try to justify it by blaming the second
In summary, firearms are a great form of protection but, they need to be taken more seriously and should not be used as toys. The need for a total ban is slightly extreme because of a need for protection, but a restriction would help, that is because there are already too many firearms in America. As I said in my introduction there are over 270 million firearms, around 86 per 100 people. America would do a good deed for itself, if it just reduced the apparent need and want for
There are many points that can be argued about whether guns should be legal or not on the topic of gun control. I think guns should be legal due to the lack of self-defense people are left with in dangerous situations and have no way of protecting themselves. Though with many pros on the subject come many cons. There are many crimes in today’s society and with those crimes innocent people are involved, but sometimes guns are used improperly that’s why the U.S. should legalize guns, but with a strict restraint against how they have to be stored and carried.
I am leaning on to Dalmia’s side. Banning guns isn’t right ( in my own opinion). I think that by banning guns like I previously said above, it’s not going to fix problems by that mean it’s going to be causing even more problems. Not only is there a bad rate of shootings but it’s not gonna get any better because you can’t possibly get every gun out there. For the people out there that “act if they don’t /lie” about having a gun will still be able to start things (as shootings) while others think that they didn’t even have a gun to be able to shoot up anything they choose
“Yes, people pull the trigger - but guns are the instrument of death. Gun control is necessary, and delay means more death and horror” (Eliot Spitzer). When Eliot Spitzer conceived those words, he was trying to explain that the weapon and the type of person behind the weapon’s actions are both important variables to the devastation that could come. People with mental illnesses, or a history of mental illnesses, should not be able to purchase and carry firearms. It would be a stress and danger to everyone. People with mental illnesses can be sensitive and unable to interpret things correctly. This could cause them to react harshly and irrationally, maybe even pull their weapon out on a civilian. The risks are too high and it should not be allowed.