Explain Why A Democracy Voting Should Not Be Compulsory

513 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Critiques of john stuart mill's politics

Rebuttals:
In my debate I argued that in a democracy voting should not be compulsory. I argued that a democracy gives you rights and freedoms which should not be violated by making voting mandatory. Also that not everyone can vote because they aren't educated which can either be because they don’t have the resources or don’t want to. In either of those cases they can’t make the best decision for the people.
Would you say that it is important in a democracy to have freedom of expression? My first contention states that we shouldn’t be forced to do anything in a democracy. My contention means that a democracy gives us freedoms and rights which can’t be taken away. If I asked my partner if freedom of expression was important he would agree that it is. Then how could he argue that voting should be mandatory in a democracy because there are two sides to freedom of expression. You can either choose to voice your opinion or keep it quiet and he would be saying that it is important but …show more content…

This means that if the government is violating its citizens’ rights than the government isn’t valid which means the society won’t be able to function without a valid government. If I asked my opponent if it was more important to make the collective good happy or individuals happy he would argue that the collective good was more important. However he would be missing the fact that the individuals make up the society as a whole and so if the individuals aren’t happy than the majority of people or the collective good won’t be happy. As I said in my debate, John Stewart Mill believes that since each individual is different they should be given full freedom in order to achieve their goals and interests. Therefore, voting should not be mandatory because each individual should be valued over the collective good so that the government will run smoothly by assuring the citizens their

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of The Article 'Telling Americans To Vote Or Else'

    218 Words  | 1 Pages

    There is an argument in the article “Telling Americans to Vote, or Else”, that is written by William A. Galston. The article states that voting should be necessary for everyone. The author contrasts American voting with Australian voting. In the text, it says,

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Voting In The United States

    1903 Words  | 4 Pages

    The most critiqued argument is that mandating voting is just un-American. The con side argues that forcing people to vote violates our freedom of speech. But they don’t feel that the requirement to pay taxes and serve as a jure are unjust. This seems contradictory. The second argument is that requiring all citizens to vote would result in many uninformed and carelessly voters. They continue this argument by stating many people would cast “donkey votes” which are votes for a random candidate because they are required to vote by law. There are many arguments for and against compulsory voting but it comes down to what makes something

    Read More

  • Compulsory Voting In Australia Essay

    756 Words  | 2 Pages

    Governments should require compulsory voting because a higher percentage of citizens will educate themselves when they are required to vote. All campaigns will have to focus

    Read More

  • Voting Should Be Compulsory In Uk Essay

    747 Words  | 2 Pages

    Firstly, the idea of compulsory voting that involves every citizen having a civic duty, rather then a right to vote, which has been introduced in over 20 countries worldwide, a good example being Australia. In Australia, the system has been a success, producing an impressive turnout of 94% in the 2013 election, which therefore means that the Australian government will have a much higher level of legitimacy compared to the UK. However, critics of compulsory voting argue that such a system is undemocratic by itself as it does not provide a citizen with a choice on whether to vote or not, resulting in a serious debate around the issue. However, I must agree with the critics of the system, as the people voting because they have to, are likely to be less passionate and well informed about the person they have to

    Read More

  • Should Americans Be Required To Vote Essay

    537 Words  | 2 Pages

    First, one reason why Americans should be required to vote is that it will educate the citizens. Evidence supporting this reason is in “Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma, American Political Science Review” Aaron Lijphart stated that “By compelling people to vote, we are likely to arouse in them an intelligent interest and to give them a political knowledge that do not at present possess.” This evidence helps explain why Americans should be required to vote because when citizens are required to vote it gives them a political understanding that they didn't have before voting. Most citizens will research

    Read More

  • Essay On Mandatory Voting

    627 Words  | 2 Pages

    To enforce voting to be mandatory , this will prompt more Americans to pay attention to the choices for their representatives. Mandating would stimulate the demand side, motivating voters to understand and acknowledge who they are voting for. Therefore , voting is to be a responsibility than a option.

    Read More

  • John Stuart Mill's Civil And Social Liberty

    130 Words  | 1 Pages

    For Mill, the freedom that enables each individual to explore his or her own particular way of life is essential for a generous and diverse development of humanity. The only source of potential within society to further continue human development is the spontaneity or creativity that lies within each individual. Mill has a utilitarian view on freedom. He was especially keen on individual liberty because it allowed the greatest measure of happiness. His concern is not to declare liberty as a natural right but to rather set out the appropriate constraints within ‘Civil or Social liberty’. Civil liberty is defined as the limit society can exert its legitimate power over each individual and social liberty has much to do with a political principle

    Read More

  • Argument Against Mandatory Voting In Canada

    673 Words  | 2 Pages

    In fact, according to Elections Canada, during the 2011 federal elections, only 61.1% of Canadians exerted their duty as citizen. Hence, some think compulsory voting can remediate the situation. However, mandatory voting is what really could hurt democracy. By forcing every eligible voter to go to the polls, misinformed voters will randomly cast their ballot. Sceptics may believe that by fining individuals who refuse to go to the polls, there will be less ignorant voters. For example, in Australia, where voting is compulsory, Australians who do not cast their ballots have to “pay a 20$ penalty” (Australian Electoral Commission). However, by financially penalising citizens who do not exert their duty, many will be so dissatisfied by the incumbent government that they will simply vote for a party that would not make voting an obligation. These people would ignore the party’s other policies instead of being informed on all the challenges that the country faces and how each party plans on solving them. Nonetheless, the elections are an occasion to elect a leader whose ideologies on many aspects, from immigration to the environment, matches the voter’s most. As a responsible voter, one has to know the policies of each party and has to try to obtain enough “social-scientific knowledge to [assess] these positions” (Brennan 11), which takes a lot of time. Therefore, compulsory voting would make voters more informed, but only on a narrow aspect while ignoring the other issues that should be taken into consideration when choosing the party they will vote for. All in all, mandatory voting would hurt democracy despite the higher participation

    Read More

  • The Value Of Individuality In John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    1748 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the On liberty, Mill also highlights the aspect of individuality as one of the elements of well-being. John Stuart Mill points out the inherent value of individuality, since individuality is by definition the thriving of the human person through the higher pleasures. He argues that a safe society ought to attempt to promote individuality as it is the pre- requisite for creativity and diversity. Therefore Mill concludes that actions themselves don’t matter, rather the person behind the action and the action together are valuable. However on the limits to the authority of society over the individual, generally he holds that a person should be left as free to pursue his own interests as long as this does not harm the interests of others. In

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Mill's On Liberty

    1009 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of the main arguments that Mill expressed in On Liberty deals with his liberty principle. This apparently, is "one very simple principle" which defines "the nature and limits of the power which can legitimately be exercised by society over the individual". According to Mill, liberty is what defines the legitimacy of a society - "any society that fails to honor the liberty of the individual is illegitimate. Its use of power cannot be justified if it trespasses on the rightful sphere of individuality".

    Read More

  • Why We Should Be Required To Vote

    517 Words  | 2 Pages

    On the contrary, citizens should be required to vote. For example, text 1 line 20 states "A democracy can't be strong, if its citizenship is weak"; therefore when being forced to vote against our own will, it is to strengthen our nation. In addition, if the turnout rates are high, then political parties reaches out to the citizens. As a result, the voices of the less educated and the poorer Americans will be heard and not ignored. Not to mention, William A. Galston states that voting evens out the inequalities stemming from income, education, and age in text 1. Most importantly, mandatory voting only benefits us a nation and individually. Clearly, compulsory voting should be enforced.

    Read More

  • Mandatory Voting Essay

    652 Words  | 2 Pages

    Lisa Hill a professor at the University of Adelaide who spreads the yes, in mandatory voting, “If voting were mandatory in the U.S., people would be inspired to pay more attention to campaigns... ” (Junior Scholastic). Many might think their vote doesn't count, so government should express how it does and not make it a unpleasurable activity by making it mandatory. However much, there is truth in that point, an election simplifies down to one person over another other. My point still stands that unwanted force is never good and America should not accept that. It is human nature to show displeasure to forced activities that weren't done by will before hand. It isn't convenient for some citizens, and if registering for voting was much easier that there might be a higher voter turnout (Scholastic Magazine).If the government wants a higher turnout, than people shouldn't be making time for the government, the government should make more time for the people and not stripping us of our freedom.

    Read More

  • Essay On Compulsory Voting

    797 Words  | 2 Pages

    In answering the essay question, it can be concluded that compulsory voting is a necessary and essential aspect of the Australian political system as it ensures the beliefs and values of society are reflected in parliament and lawmaking. This is consistent with the concept of democracy as it allows much of the power to reside with the citizens of Australia, guaranteeing that those persons elected are held accountable to the people.

    Read More

  • A Critical Analysis of John Stuart Mill’s "On Liberty"

    1403 Words  | 3 Pages

    middle of paper ... ... Philosophers, such as John Stuart Mill, have debated the role and the extension of government in the people’s lives for centuries. Mill presents a clear and insightful argument, claiming that the government should not be concerned with the free will of the people unless explicit harm has been done to an individual. However, such ideals do not build a strong and lasting community. It is the role of the government to act in the best interests at all times through the prevention of harm and the encouragement of free thought.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Why We Should Vote

    1216 Words  | 3 Pages

    Everyone has the right to vote, or not to vote in the years we live today. People decide whether they wish to participate in the nation’s future or just walk aimlessly and allow it to take its own path. Over decades, centuries, our country continued growing but just recently did it allow all to vote as long as they call this nation home. Run-on Sentence: Over decades, centuries, our country continued growing, but just recently did it allow all to vote as long as they call this nation home. However, large amounts of people still do not vote in any politics. Today everyone should understand what differences a vote could make like what can happen, why it matters, and benefits of voting.

    Read More

More about Explain Why A Democracy Voting Should Not Be Compulsory

Open Document