A fad is defined as an “intense and widely shared enthusiasm for something” and is perpetuated by man’s nature to seek comfort in conformity and avoid the fear of being outcast for being different. Existentialists view this comfort as pointless. Existentialists believe that to live, means to simply exist. They believe to exist, one should not focus on finding the purpose to life, as the majority of humans typically do, but instead, focus on finding purpose within one’s self. Existentialism is an uncommon perspective because it is radically different than how most humans live their lives, but it has realistic merit. This is the driving force behind Jean Paul Sartre’s play, The Flies, in which he utilizes a town in Ancient Greece to portray the importance of living on one’s own accord; he believes man should stray from the restricting comforts of religion and …show more content…
instead seek validation solely within himself. Sartre intentionally sets the play in a mythological town where institutionalized religion is predominant and houses characters in its deceivingly safe arms.
In addition, Sartre uses the foreign setting of Ancient Greece to create a separation between characters and audience to encourage readers to identify the characters’ flaws. This allows his readers to recognize the parallel to themselves, therefore delivering Sartre’s existentialist message about the change that should be made within society.
One of the fundamental problems Sartre tries to identify regarding religion is that it serves primarily as a comfort device, which causes its followers to blindly conform to its values. In the town of Argos, Sartre creates the culture to revolve around the Dead Men’s Day celebration, in which they allow the dead to haunt them for the night as a form of repentance. Sartre designs the townspeople to find comfort in believing they are repenting for their sins and participate in the celebration religiously, without a thought of their own, to portray the dangers of conforming entirely to a religious institutions’ will. The townspeople are
encompassed by their sins; their only concern is public confession, which Sartre conceives as “their national pastime” (68). The celebration is so encompassing that even the children “never [play] or [laugh], for thinking of [their] original sin” and claim they “didn’t want to be born” (54, 78). Sartre damns the innocence of children with the blind following of Aegistheus’ lie, to exemplify while having full faith is comforting, these beliefs ultimately dictate the person’s thinking, rather than the person thinking for himself. The townspeople are consumed by fear, so they repent because “they know how bad they smell”; however, Sartre shows they never really stop and think if they smell as bad as they believe. On top of all the craze of the Dead Men’s Day celebration, Sartre ironically reveals it was all made up by King Aegistheus; however, even Aegistheus ended up living and believing in his own lie (96). By focusing on the townspeople’s ungrudging involvement, and Aegistheus’ belief in this figment of his own imagination, Sartre portrays how easily man is lured by faith and how quickly he forgets the importance of maintaining his own thoughts. By creating a permanently miserable environment, Sartre portrays the bleak effects and condemnation of blindly following an institution. Sartre parallels the Dead Men’s Day celebration to man’s repentance during prayer, which serves primarily as a comfort device. Furthermore, he creates a parallel between the townspeople’s participation and man’s blindly following institutionalized religion, suggesting a change in human behavior – take a step back to truly inspect the institution one is following and one’s own beliefs, to determine if the two are congruent. Sartre illustrates that, due to this human need for comfort and familiarity, people tend to resist any form of change for fear of the uncertain result. This does not, however, apply to Electra; Sartre uses Electra as the original form of dissidence and a momentary model of existentialism within Argos as she attempts to show people it is possible to not fear the dead and simply have “a fine day” (81). Although the citizens begin to consider Electra’s argument, they immediately reject her once the rock holding the dead in the cave moves, reminding them of their need to “[mourn] unceasingly, and weep for [the dead] from dawn till dusk” (82, 78). By showing how quickly the citizens oppose any threat of change to their accustomed “national pastime” and reject the source of the change, Sartre demonstrates how fear of change restricts individuals from possibly achieving greater potential (68). In addition, Sartre uses the citizen’s rejection of Electra to show stubbornness of people who refuse to listen to any opposition because they are engrossed in their beliefs and do not want to think their faith could be wrong. Also, while Electra was giving her speech to the people, she was dancing in a white dress, which Sartre uses to provide stark contrast to the rest of the citizens on two levels (81). Firstly, he uses her dancing to represent freedom, as opposed to the ball and chains which constrict the Argives. Secondly, he dresses her in white, because “everyone wears black at Argos” (53). Sartre is trying to show the freedom Electra gains by bravely resisting what all the Argives helplessly succumb to by housing themselves in the comforts of their religion. Sartre is suggesting that, by giving into the comforts of institutionalized religion and refusing to change, humans are losing themselves and restricting themselves from their own potential. Clearly, the comforts of conformity are deceiving and ultimately lead to restriction; however, Sartre shows his audience that it is possible to choose whether or not they will be oppressed. Sartre exemplifies how religion is a method of control that man gives his power over to by creating Zeus to be the driving force behind the religious practice of the Dead Men’s Day celebration, therefore making him the implementer of the townspeople’s despair; however, Sartre reveals a weakness that could wreak havoc on Zeus’ power – the power of choice. In traditional Greek mythology, Zeus is the leader of all gods, so it is no wonder Sartre places Zeus as the one who oversees all of the activities in Argos, especially the celebration. He was the one who moved the rock when Electra was dancing, brought the flies to Argos to punish the people, and ordered Aegistheus to implement the celebration in the first place. Although Zeus holds all the power in the world and can control the citizens of Argos at his will, there is one man who completely undermines Zeus’ power -- Orestes. Interestingly, Sartre has Zeus recognize that “the bane of gods and kings [is] the bitterness of knowing men are free,” which brings awareness to the crippling effect of Orestes’ realization of freedom (100). Sartre contrasts Zeus’ power over the Argives, who do not realize their freedom, with Orestes freedom from Zeus’ control. Sartre makes it clear that Orestes has the ability to resist Zeus’ demands simply because Orestes strays from the societal norm; he does what he thinks is right. Sartre utilizes the power of separation between fiction and reality when he creates Zeus’ position to be strikingly similar to that of a god, priest, or another higher religious power figure. By placing control in Zeus’s hands, Sartre is portraying the power institutionalized religion holds over its followers and how these followers permit their oppression under one mighty hand. Sartre intends for his readers to perceive Zeus as manipulative and relate him to their own religious figures to realize the possibility that these figures are not as godly as previously perceived. Furthermore, Sartre reveals the importance of preventing man’s confinement by realizing man has the freedom to choose his beliefs and way of life, even though this directly defies the power figure man is so accustomed to obeying.
Importance of Leadership Leadership is something that stands out in people. In a group, people tend to look for the strongest person to follow. However, the strongest person may not be the best choice to follow. In Lord of the Flies by William Golding, Ralph and Jack each have leadership qualities. Jack is probably the stronger of the two; however, Ralph is a better leader.
reflects upon the theme of the novel. As it highlights the fact that if people in the society
In his lecture, Existentialism is a Humanism, Jean-Paul Sartre discusses common misconceptions people, specifically Communists and Christians, have about existentialism and extentanitalists (18). He wants to explain why these misconceptions are wrong and defend existentialism for what he believes it is. Sartre argues people are free to create themselves through their decisions and actions. This idea is illustrated in the movie 13 Going on Thirty, where one characters’ decision at her thirteenth birthday party and her actions afterwards make her become awful person by the time she turns thirty. She was free to make these decisions but she was also alone. Often the idea of having complete free will at first sounds refreshing, but when people
Lord of the Flies is a novel written by William Golding in 1954 about a group of young British boys who have been stranded alone together on an island with no adults. During the novel the diverse group of boys struggle to create structure within a society that they constructed by themselves. Golding uses many unique literary devices including characterization, imagery, symbolism and many more. The three main characters, Ralph, Piggy, and Jack are each representative of the three main literary devices, ethos, logos, and pathos. Beyond the characterization the novel stands out because of Golding’s dramatic use of objective symbolism, throughout the novel he uses symbols like the conch, fire, and Piggy’s glasses to represent how power has evolved and to show how civilized or uncivilized the boys are acting. It is almost inarguable that the entire novel is one big allegory in itself, the way that Golding portrays the development of savagery among the boys is a clear representation of how society was changing during the time the novel was published. Golding is writing during
Much of history’s most renown literature have real-world connections hidden in them, although they may be taxing uncover. William Golding’s classic, Lord of the Flies, is no exception. In this work of art, Golding uses the three main characters, Piggy, Jack, and Ralph, to symbolize various aspects of human nature through their behaviors, actions, and responses.
It could be said that tragedies serve as Humanity’s catalysts of thought. When we line up literary eras with wars, the shifts in eras are always marked by some war- especially in America. The Romantic period was broken by the dawn of the civil war, and took a little magic from the world of writing. Writing shifted to realism, which was the polar opposite of romantic thought. When the First World War broke out, the modernist movement overshadowed realism. Similarly, the Second World War produced postmodernism. Should there be another horrible tragedy, the view will shift similarly. Whatever the implications may be, tragedies seem to change how us humans think and act. In William Golding’s Lord of the Flies, he tells the story of a group of schoolboys
Addressing the critics of Existentialism was a necessity for both Sartre and de Beauvoir, as it was initially dismissed by many critics, such as the Communists and the Christians, as nihilistic or overly pessimistic. While understandable at a superficial level, Sartre and de Beauvoir challenged these critics to rethink their idea of existentialism and foster a deeper meaning of the philosophy of existentialism.
writings where people as humans struggle to find purpose and ask themselves what is the meaning of life to which the universe responses by simply showing a complete and utter disregard for such a question or any questions as a matter of fact. It is “This paradoxical situation, then, between our impulse to ask ultimate questions and the impossibility of achieving any adequate answer, is what Camus calls the absurd.” Existentialism essentially deals with the absurd which had been “cultural movement that flourished in Europe in the 1940s and 1950s.” and besides Albert Camus there was other Philosophers who adopted such ideas like “Karl Jaspers, Martin Heidegger, and Martin Buber in Germany, Jean Wahl and Gabriel Marcel in France, etc.….. [with]
the play may be pass to modern society, that one may not learn, or even
Orleans defines the “Fun Imperative” as “the sensation that a Saturday night not devoted to having a good time is a major human failure and evidence of a possible character flaw” (Orleans). She places lofty expectations onto Saturday night, and responsibility on her readers to participate in and enjoy it. This creates a multifaceted dilemma in the eyes of the existentialist; Orlean’s lofty expectations place limitations on individuals’ enjoyment to just one of seven evenings, restricts that enjoyment to socialization, and leave Saturday night susceptible to failing to live up to those expectations for a variety of reasons. For one, Orlean notes that the “Fear Imperative” is an ever-present reminder of negative consequences of a hedonistic Saturday night, specifically citing the AIDS epidemic. Today, one could add unplanned pregnancy, drug abuse, accidental death/injury, potential relationship problems et al. to the list of potential negative and problematic consequences. The existentialist would argue that these concerns are irrelevant, because human existence is only quantified in the present. Additionally, Sartre writes “whatever unexpected happening was going to meet my eye, it seemed to me that it was fundamentally impoverished” (Sartre). Fundamentally impoverished is precisely the phrase an existentialist would use to describe an evening filled with obligation and expectation that has been planned
The novel; “Lord of the Flies” is a highly renowned novel written by William Golding and published in 1954. The novel embodies many themes and events that are mysterious and unanticipated for the reader. During the course of the essay I will explain how the conch shell that is found at the foundation of the first chapter plays a significant role throughout the novel and how diverse themes are brought on from this influential shell. This essay will express an opinion on the conch shell, in the end has more power and order than the actual ‘beast’ that is signified on the island. I will also explore the social leadership of the conch throughout the novel which will also touch on a few themes that the conch shell plays a role in. The conch shell is one of the first real theme/symbol that readers are introduced too and stands its power for most of the novel which is why it should be explored in further detail in this essay.
Existentialism is a term that was coined specifically by Jean-Paul Sartre in regards to his own life. Sartre had adopted the Atheistic approach to life and its meaning, and while he was not the first or only one to do so, was the first and only one to come up with a way to describe it. Under Existentialism, man lives without higher power or guidance and must rely solely on himself and what he is aiming to do in order to lead a fulfilling life. This can be anything. Critics of Sartre propose that, because such a vast array of options exists within the meaningfulness of life, this philosophy is obsolete and trivial in nature. This is not true, as it is seen in everyday examples – celebrities, namely – that a thirst
Existentialism is the epitome of the unknown. There is no straightforward explanation of what exactly it is, there is only certain characteristics and behaviors that describe existentialist views. Throughout today’s world, there are examples of it everywhere, it’s found in movies, books, songs, and just people in general. Existentialists are known to think and do for themselves only. They believe that to understand what it means to be human requires understanding of themselves first. Some very well known pieces of entertainment existentialism is found in are: Hamlet by William Shakespeare, The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka, “The Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, The Stranger by Albert Camus, and The Breakfast Club by John Hughes. The Stranger is a book written about a young man whose mother dies, which soon leads him to becoming acquainted with the feeling of not caring about what his actions do to others or himself. The main character Meursault starts helping his friend Raymond, carry out ways to torment his mistress. Out of nowhere while at the beach, Meursault shoots Raymond’s mistress’s brother. He is thrown into jail and tried, but he seems to not be affected as much as he should about his actions. He first finds it hard to live without cigarettes, women, and nature, but he soon finds out he doesn’t need any of those. After being sentenced to death, he is suggested to turn away from his atheism but later realizes that human existence has no greater meaning. This realization and acceptance is what truly makes him happy (Camus). Next, The Breakfast Club is a very relatable movie about high school students suffering the consequences of their actions in detention. The kids are all of ...
The authors' relations to us on the characters' places in society help us to relate to and comprehend their actions. If Meursault hadn't been so detached from society, Noboru so discontented with society, and Medea so vengeful toward society, we wouldn't have half of the justification needed to understand the murders that took place in the works. Given the presented material about conformity, I conclude that the stories' plots indeed grow around the unique attributes of the non-conformers, and as result, spark the reader's imagination to the fullest.
Jean Paul Sartre is a philosopher that supports the philosophy of existentialism. Existentialism is a twentieth century philosophy that denies any crucial human nature and embraces that each of us produces our own essence through our free actions. Existentialists like Sartre believe there isn’t a God that determines people’s nature. So, existentialists believe that humans have no purpose or nature except the ones that they create for themselves. We are free and responsible for what we are and our engagements; even though we are mindful that this can cause agony.