Executive Impeachment

933 Words2 Pages

originated, who shall ... proceed to reconsider it." (Art.I, Sec.7). The political calendar is fixed, predictable and stable, and cannot be altered. The president has a fixed term of office. Elections cannot be held outside of the scheduled time and cannot be triggered by a confidence vote or other such parliamentary processes (SZILAGYI). Presidents are usually secure in office except in rare cases of impeachment. Removal of an executive by the legislature as stated by (Masilamani) is in exceptional cases through a process called impeachment as it is necessary in extreme cases, for instance where it is deemed that the executive has broken the law to be able to remove him from power as no one should be above the law. There is also an automatic …show more content…

Van Deth explains how the power is not held by one individual but in reality it is being shared by the president and assembly, thereby not allowing a hundred percent of the power to be held by one individual in other not to abuse it, but rather, over a continuum of individuals and in effect over two different branches of government, the executive and legislative branches. The presidential system strives to avoid a concentration of power in one branch of government, or at least this was what the presidential system was designed for. There is a rigorous separation of powers among the executive, the legislature, and the judiciary (Masilamani), meaning that these bodies are independent of each other and do not allow control of one over the other. The congressional form of government also gives the legislature a more eloquent function as a regulation body. Rand dyck’s book stated that “presidentialism also gives the legislature a more meaningful role as a lawmaking body by allowing members of the congress to defeat, or substantially amend a bill sponsored by the president without automatically removing the president from office” (Dyck 197). This statement shows how independent the legislature is from the president’s office and the effective separation of powers that occur in this system of government between the legislature and the executive. “The separation of executive and legislative, each with its independent authority derived from popular election, is a deliberate part of the system of checks and balances. In theory both have powers and are independent of each other, but in practice, presidents and assemblies usually have to share power. They must cooperate to get their work done, and the result is not so much a separation of powers as a complex mix of them, consisting of a separation of institutions but a mix of powers in the daily give-and-take of their political relations” (Newton and Deth

Open Document