In George Orwell’s 1984, the speaker reaches out to the audience on an emotional level about the loss of individuality due to governmental control and uses the delight of the main character, Winston Smith, in his job to reiterate the disenfranchisement of society through governmental domination. Through the concepts of Newspeak and thoughtcrime, Orwell instills a sense of fear within the audience about the dangers of conformity and invasion of privacy in discouraging individuality amongst the society. The ideas of Newspeak and thoughtcrime both aim toward the same goal: controlling all aspects of citizen’s lives, in the forms of language and thought respectively. By changing the number of words available and known to the citizens, the government …show more content…
in turn prevents the rise of any discrepancies, as the people do not even know the words to describe their feelings. And through brainwashing of individual expression by means of vocabulary, citizens such as Winston’s friend, Syme, begin to view “the destruction of words” as a “beautiful thing” (Orwell, 51).
Such sentiments alarm the audience of the government’s ability exert such extreme measure over the people, and eliminating language as a form of expression. The punishment for thoughtcrime, the reprimand for thoughts about rebellion, invaded the sovereignty of privacy to stamp out dissent at the source. Citizens had to live in “the assumption that every sound...was overheard” and “every movement scrutinized” (3). The concept of entering into one’s mind terrifies the audience as unspoken basic rights now seem a privilege. Through controlling individuals in talk and thought, the government diminishes all forms of individuality to prevent rebellion. By exploring Winston’s enjoyment for his occupation of altering the data of past events, Orwell reveals the enormity of the faux portrayal of improvement rather than the actual account of events to the, leading to and subjugation of people through government control of all elements of history. Winston’s “greatest pleasure in life was in his work,” (43) changing previous publications to match the situation at
present. By altering history, the government eliminates a source of education from the people, as all records of previous prediction match the current results. The use of history as a means of knowledge completely disappears, as “all history was a palimpsest,” (40) a modified version of the truth. By denying the people of history and truth, Orwell uses Winston’s pleasure as a caveat: a sad result of government brainwashing. Emotional appeal and cautioning of brainwashing through example, Orwell establishes the audience’s fear of government abuse of power over the individual.
This itself alludes to America’s extreme response to communism during the Cold War era, under the influence of Senator Joe McCarthy. Similar to the paranoia that characterized the McCarthy era, Orwell’s dystopian society was expected to betray their friends, family and co-workers for the benefit of the state and themselves. This is made explicitly evident during Winston’s visit to the cafe, in which the telescreen sang; “Under the spreading chestnut tree/ I sold you and you sold me…”Foreshadowing Winston’s eventual betrayal of Maria in order to save himself, and his conformity to the party. Furthermore, the notion that “nothing was your own except the few cubic centimetres in your skull” becomes ironic as the novel develops in which the criminalisation of unorthodox ideologies leads to the punishment of “thoughtcrime”, and the eventual “vaporisation” of dissidents. This itself alludes to the ‘great purges’ that took place under the terror that characterized Joseph Stalin’s reign. Likewise, the inherent fear of eccentricity amongst the oppressed citizens of “Airstrip one” is highlighted by the nature of “facecrime” in which the presence of an improper expression or any suggestion of abnormality could be punished. Thus, through Orwell 's effective use of allusion and characterisation, contextual audiences are provided with a didactic warning regarding the nature of a totalitarian reign, in which a “hideous ecstasy of fear” influences society’s
One of the most essential ways in which feelings are expressed by humans is through language. Without language people are merely robotic figures that can not express their thoughts because language is in fact thought. When this speech is taken away through complete governmental power, a portion of human nature is also taken away. In 1984, due to totalitarianism, language has begun to transform into a poor representation of humanity and natural human expression. Orwell states, “But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.” In the novel, a new language, Newspeak, has emerged. Newspeak has drastically limited the vocabulary of the English language
Readers often find themselves constantly drawn back to the topic of George Orwell’s 1984 as it follows a dystopian community which is set in a world that has been in continuous war, has no privacy by means of surveillance and has complete mind control and is known by the name of Oceania. The story follows a man by the name of Winston who possesses the features of “A smallish, frail figure… his hair very fair, his face naturally sanguine [and] his skin roughened” (Orwell 2). The novel illustrates to readers what it would be like if under complete control of the government. As a result, this book poses a couple of motifs’, For instance part one tackles “Collectivism” which means the government controls you, while part two fights with “Romance” with Winston and Julia’s sexual tension as well the alteration of love in the community, and part three struggles with “Fear” and how it can control someone physically and mentally.
David R. Morrow stated in his article, When Technologies Makes Good People Do Bad Things: Another Argument Against the Value-Neutrality of Technologies, “the use or invention of technology is not wrong it is the users who have ‘‘vicious’’ or condemnable preferences that will affect the outcome.” Orwell used technology in a way that many people of that time would never have imagined possible and created a fear of the future for his readers. How could a man, who was unaware of what the future would hold, be so acute and on point with how the world would be today? In his last interview Orwell said, “Always there will be the intoxication of power and always and every moment there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on the enemy who is helpless.” Orwell tried to warn people not of the technology but of the danger technology might cause in the future if it landed in the wrong hands. In this paper, I will be exploring how the world of technology mimics that of Winston’s world and how “privacy” has lost its meaning due to technology just like in 1984 but the biggest issue I will research is why do we allow it the government to monitor our
George Orwell’s haunting dystopian novel 1984 delves into the closely monitored lives of the citizens of Oceania as the Party tries to take control of society. In totalitarianism, propaganda and terrorism are ways of subjugation with a main goal: total obedience. He aimed to create a “what if” novel, what would happen if totalitarian regimes, such as the Nazis and Soviets, were to take over the world. If totalitarianism were to happen, the leader would be the brain of the whole system. Orwell emphasizes the theme of individualism versus collective identity through Winston, the protagonist, and his defiance to the Party and Big Brother, with a frightening tone, surreal imagery and a third person limited point of view.
In the dystopian text, 1984, by George Orwell the reader is exposed to an environment where the government or ‘party’ exerts complete control over the public. They maintain this power through the use of technology and depriving the public of any privacy or personal opinions. Throughout the novel we experience different character’s views and uses of technology; O’Brien’s use of technology to establish control, Charington use of technology to prevent rebellion against the party and Winston and Julia’s avoidance of technology to try to establish their own lives, away from the control of the government.
Much can happen in a matter of minutes; a man can go from thinking he is happy to thinking his life is falling apart, or can change from hating someone to loving them. These experiences sound outlandish, but they happened to Guy Montag, the main character in Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, and Winston Smith, the main character in George Orwell’s 1984. These two dystopian novels are about the characters discovering major problems in their societies, and then trying to fix them. Montag lives in a society where television controls people’s lives and books have become illegal. On the other hand Smith lives in Oceania, a territory led by a totalitarian regime. This regime is headed by Big Brother and is referred to as the Party. By examining Fahrenheit 451 and 1984, it is seen, not only through the dehumanized nature of society, but also through the theme of lies and manipulation that both Orwell and Bradbury wish to warn of a horrifying future society.
Orwell argues that society is completely oblivious to the constraint that is involved in every day life. There is no individual in society and that everyone remains the same. “Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought?” (46) Not only does a limiting of words show society that by controlling methods of co...
In George Orwell’s dystopian novel, the government blocks almost all forms of self-expression in order to assert its authority over the people. Those within the society who show signs of defiance against the set rules, even those who act unwillingly, are seen as a threat to the success of the regime are wiped from existence. In Orwell’s 1984, the government uses different forms of propaganda and brainwashing to achieve complete control of society for their own personal benefit.
Psychological manipulation the Party uses on the citizens is one of the first themes Orwell exposes in this dystopian society. The Party maintains this manipulation by constantly overwhelming citizens with useless information and propaganda. And when memory failed and written records were falsified—when that happened, the claim of the Party to have improved the conditions of human life had got to be accepted, because there did not exist, and never again could exist, any standard against which it could be tested. (Orwell 82) Winston Smith, the protagonist, is having a frustrating conversation with an old man about life before the Revolution.
In the novel 1984, George Orwell predicts the world’s future, when human rights, such as freedom of speech, do not exist anymore. Everyone has to obey the government. The government controls its citizens’ lives. No one speaks up against the government yet because they do not even have a chance to make up a thought about it. The government dominates the citizens’ thoughts by using technologies and the thought polices to make sure no one will have any thoughts, that is against the government. George Orwell wrote:“Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows,” (Orwell.2.7.69) the government tries to control Winston knowledge and change it to fit into the purpose of the Party. To Winston, O’Brien said: “Whatever the Party holds to be truth is truth. It is impossible to see reality except by looking through the eyes of the Party.” (Orwell.3.2.205). As a citizen, no one get to look at or tal...
Double think is a central idea in the novel 1984, written by George Orwell, and is used in our world today. Orwell describes double think as “’the power to hold two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them’” (Orwell 322). Therefore, double thing allows the Party to control its population by controlling their thoughts. This is because the citizens can accept both of their beliefs, even if they are contradictory. For example, O’Brien has Winston believe that two plus two equals five even though Winston knows the correct number is four. This concept of double think can be found in 1984, today’s news, and in everyday life.
Set in a dystopian society where deceit is common amongst the population, George Orwell's 1984 is an investigation of the concept of truth. Since its publication in 1949, the novel has been consistently referenced to throughout history in response to dictating leaders and power-thirsty politicians. Its popularity is a result of readers identifying themselves with the main protagonist, Winston Smith and his rebellion against the totalitarian government. The Party's recreation of reality, Winston's struggle with authenticity and his eventual submission to the Party's ideology contributes to the novel's exploration of truth.
At the extreme of power, totalitarian government have formed a dystopian world where there is complete rejection of liberal ideas and absolute conformity. Citizens of this world have no rights and no freedom to choose their own occupation and lifestyle. The key aspects of a totalitarian society are that the government holds power and implement ideas, a concept initially created to treat everyone equally but then it took a major turn. 1984 by George Orwell is a story of winsten smith , the protagonist’s struggle against a totalitarian government that control ideas and thoughts of its citizens. They use advance technology to keep an eye on every citizen and control their minds to have full power and control over everyone and every action.
In his novel 1984, George Orwell illustrates a society in which language is politicized and used by the totalitarian government to control its citizens. Language is a system used by all humans to communicate ideas and thoughts, and society would be impossible without the culture that is stored in language (“Discuss the Nature…”). However, while language can be used to increase our understanding of the world, when left in the power of the political leaders, it can be used to control people’s thoughts. Language can be used as mind-control to create a society in which the people obey and believe the government’s propaganda without question. Therefore, language structures—and limits— what humans are capable of thinking and expressing.