Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Dante's inferno critical analysis
Dante's inferno critical analysis
Dante's inferno critical analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
A sin can be judged as easily as right or wrong, but when it comes to the sinner belonging to either the just or malicious category, the judgement becomes less clear due to the idea that one who commits a sin can still be a virtuous being. The perception of a sinner is not as easy as black and white, for whoever is judging the sinner has gone through different life experiences. This fundamental concept of the sin and sinner is demonstrated in the epic The Inferno by Dante Alighieri. The author is known for his deep love he has for his country Florence and how he lived there during a time of corruption with several political rivals. It was after he was exiled from the city on false accusations that he wrote this famous piece of work. The Inferno …show more content…
resembles a religious allegory that tells the story of how the narrator Dante, who represents the poet Alighieri, is led through the different layers of Hell by his guide Virgil; where he sees the different sinners and their symbolic punishments. The sinners often depict people Alighieri knew in real life, especially those who influenced his hometown in some way. Throughout the epic, Alighieri expresses certain emotions towards those living in hell, which is conveyed by Dante’s interactions with them. Alighieri's feelings aren't simply associated towards the sin, but rather primarily influenced by his actual relations with many of the sinners. This imperative idea is heavily shown by the sinners of: Filippo Argentini, a political enemy of Alighieri, Ser Brunetto Latino, a mentor of Dante, and Bocca Degli Abbati, who betrayed the country of Florence. Alighieri frequently uses literary devices to indicate his feelings that can often lead to others coming into effect. Through the literary devices of diction, reaction of characters, and dialogue, Dante is able to depict compassion towards Brunetto and hostility regarding Filipo and Bocca. Alighieri uses diction to demonstrate hostility towards Filippo Argenti.
An example of this is when Virgil and Dante travel through the marsh of Styx by boat in order to reach the Gate of Dis. The marsh is filled with sinners covered in mud, and one of them is Alighieri's political enemy, Filippo Argenti. Dante notices him, without knowing his identity yet, and calls him out on his distorted appearance. In response, Argenti longingly stretches his hands towards the boat, which causes Virgil to act in a new manner: “but warily the Master shoved him back, crying, ‘Down! Down! with the other dogs!’ Then he embraced me saying: ‘Indignant spirit, I kiss you as you frown’” (VIII, 40-42). Alighieri's true emotions can be revealed through the many examples of diction such as “shoved”. The word “shoved” is used to depict Virgil’s emotions towards the sinner by having the character not only push Argenti off the boat, but to do so in a violent manner. Virgil forcefully sends Filippo back down into the water reflects how he feels disdain towards the sinner. It is also important to note that Virgil resembles the symbol of Human Reason, and to have Alighieri write him act in such a hostile way is a direct reflection of how the author feels. Additionally, Virgil is an immensely virtuous character and has never depicted such roughness to another sinner in the epic. Consequently, having Alighieri write Virgil as the one to push Argenti with an intense amount of force illustrates the author’s adverse feelings toward Argenti. Moreover, the diction of “Down” strengthens the portrayal of Alighieri’s feelings. Although “Down” refers to Virgil pushing Argenti back in the marsh, it is also written by Alighieri to demonstrate on the figurative level that Argenti is below them. While Virgil and Dante are on the boat above the river, Argenti is forced to stay with the other sinners in the water below the two. Through the placement of the characters, Alighieri is able to express the negative
aspects of Argenti and how he is a lesser being when compared to Virgil and Dante. When Argenti attempts to get out of the marsh, and therefore go above his established status, he immediately gets told by Virgil to go back “Down” where he belongs. Alighieri chooses to write Argenti being put in his place, which not only illustrates that he feels hostility towards Argenti but how strongly as well. In addition, the word choice of “embrace” and “kiss” are associated with the feeling of love and fondness since they are common actions in joyous and endearing situations. It is through these words that Alighieri is able to demonstrate an affectionate image of Virgil, which has not been seen in this epic as intensely. Even though Dante has expressed reactions towards sinners before, Virgil has not shown such strong affection because of it. Alighieri’s choice of writing this irregular acute side of endearment, further emphasizes the pride felt by Virgil towards Dante for brutally rejecting Argenti. It is through the diction of these words that Alighieri’s disdain for Argentine is able to be expressed. To emphasize his emotions even more, Alighieri also uses diction in the passage where Dante sees Argenti being attacked by the other sinners after he pushed by Virgil: “I saw the loathsome spirit so mangled by a swarm of muddy wraiths that to this I praise and thank God for it. ‘After Filippo Argenti!’ all cried together. The maddog Florentine wheeled at their cry and bit himself in rage” (VIII, 55-60). This passage contains diction because Alighieri uses certain words in order to exemplify his emotions. For instance, “loathsome” means to cause repulsion and by having Alighieri purposely describe Argenti in such a manner, reflects how he truly feels. The word isn’t necessarily mandatory in this passage because it doesn’t assist in setting the scene or furthering the plot, but is rather one of Alighieri’s primary uses to express how he feels towards Argenti.
God states that we treat each other with the love he gives to us as individuals; while us stating violent acts against love, fraud constituting a corruption and, greed becoming normal thing amongst people defines everything god had envisioned for mankind. Yet, while Inferno implies these moral arguments, it generally states very little about them. Dante discusses with each of the souls in the different circles of hell although it is not truly stated as to why they are specifically in that circle. Only because God justifies there sin belonged there. In the end, it declares that evil is evil, simply because it contradicts God’s will and justification, and since God is God, he thus does not need to be questioned about his morals. Dante’s journey of evil progressed as he winded down the depths of hell pitiless and was driven to make it to purgatory. Inferno is not the normal text that most people would read, then think about how it relates to todays morals; its intention is not to think about the evil discussed but, rather to emphasize the Christian beliefs that Dante followed through his journey.
Dante Alighieri presents a vivid and awakening view of the depths of Hell in the first book of his Divine Comedy, the Inferno. The reader is allowed to contemplate the state of his own soul as Dante "visits" and views the state of the souls of those eternally assigned to Hell's hallows. While any one of the cantos written in Inferno will offer an excellent description of the suffering and justice of hell, Canto V offers a poignant view of the assignment of punishment based on the committed sin. Through this close reading, we will examine three distinct areas of Dante's hell: the geography and punishment the sinner is restricted to, the character of the sinner, and the "fairness" or justice of the punishment in relation to the sin. Dante's Inferno is an ordered and descriptive journey that allows the reader the chance to see his own shortcomings in the sinners presented in the text.
In analyzing this gradient of morality, it is useful first to examine a work from early literature whose strong purity of morality is unwavering; for the purposes of this discussion, Dante’s Inferno provides this model. It is fairly straightforward to discover Dante’s dualistic construction of morality in his winding caverns of Hell; each stern, finite circle of Hell is associated with a clear sin that is both definable and directly punishable. As Dante moves downwards in this moral machination, he notes that
Moreover, Dante, the narrator of the Inferno, has succeeded in not only telling the frightening story of the Inferno, but also pointing out the importance of the relationship between human’s sins and God’s retribution, using the monsters as the symbols for each kind of sin and its punishment throughout the progress of the story, which teaches his readers to be well aware of their sins through the literature – a part of humanities; the disciplines that teach a man to be a human.
“If you would not be forgotten as soon as you are dead and rotten, either write things worth reading or do things worth writing.” This maxim applies to the poet Dante Alighieri, writer of The Inferno in the 1300s, because it asserts the need to establish oneself as a contributor to society. Indeed, Dante’s work contributes much to Renaissance Italy as his work is the first of its scope and size to be written in the vernacular. Due to its readability and availability, The Inferno is a nationalistic symbol. With this widespread availability also comes a certain social responsibility; even though Dante’s audience would have been familiar with the religious dogma, he assumes the didactic role of illustrating his own version of Christian justice and emphasizes the need for a personal understanding of divine wisdom and contrapasso, the idea of the perfect punishment for the crime. Dante acts as both author and narrator, completing a physical and spiritual journey into the underworld with Virgil as his guide and mentor. The journey from darkness into light is an allegory full of symbolism, much like that of Plato’s Allegory of the Cave, which shows a philosopher’s journey towards truth. Therefore, Dante would also agree with the maxim, “Wise men learn by others’ harms; fools scarcely by their own,” because on the road to gaining knowledge and spiritual enlightenment, characters who learn valuable lessons from the misfortunes of others strengthen their own paradigms. Nonetheless, the only true way to gain knowledge is to experience it first hand. Dante’s character finds truth by way of his own personal quest.
Throughout his life, Dante Alighieri faced many hardships and accumulated many rivals, stemming from his association with the Florentine White Guelphs, who adamantly believed in the independence from the papacy. After being exiled from his home city of Florence on false allegations of being a grafter, he wrote The Inferno, a religious allegory, in which Alighieri blatantly attacks many of his rivals, among them Filippo Argenti and Bocca degli Abbati through use of literary devices as dialogue, imagery, juxtaposition, diction, tone and characterization. However, Alighieri does not show resentment towards all the sinners in his epic poem, he fluctuates between hostility and benevolence. In one specific case, Alighieri shows a sense of pity and compassion towards a specific sinner, one guilty of sodomy, Ser Brunetto Latino. Alighieri’s compassion derives from his great admiration for the fellow writer who had been a lifelong inspiration. His compassion is shown through the utilization of diction, dialogue, and imagery. Alighieri integrates many techniques in his writings to deliver his judgment of the sinners, fluctuating between feelings of hostility and benevolence.
Inferno, the first part of Divina Commedia, or the Divine Comedy, by Dante Alighieri, is the story of a man's journey through Hell and the observance of punishments incurred as a result of the committance of sin. In all cases the severity of the punishment, and the punishment itself, has a direct correlation to the sin committed. The punishments are fitting in that they are symbolic of the actual sin; in other words, "They got what they wanted." (Literature of the Western World, p.1409) According to Dante, Hell has two divisions: Upper Hell, devoted to those who perpetrated sins of incontinence, and Lower Hell, devoted to those who perpetrated sins of malice. The divisions of Hell are likewise split into levels corresponding to sin. Each of the levels and the divisions within levels 7,8, and 9 have an analogous historical or mythological figure used to illustrate and exemplify the sin.
Dante introduces Satan in the “Inferno” as the worst sinner of all times, and he relates his complexity with the sins that he committed and his punishment. Satan is described as the angel who rebelled against God, and hence he has wings. The wings of Lucifer are not the wings that an angel would have; instead he has bat-like wings, which demonstrates that now he has the wings the dark creatures as bats have. He is firstly in the story presented as an impure monster that is trapped in ice and unable to escape. “No feathers had they, but as of a bat their fashion was, and he was waving them, so that three winds proceeded forth therefrom” (Canto 34, 50).Dante’s depiction of Satan is different from the common known version of Satan, which is
Dante’s Inferno presents the reader with many questions and thought provoking dialogue to interpret. These crossroads provide points of contemplation and thought. Dante’s graphic depiction of hell and its eternal punishment is filled with imagery and allegorical meanings. Examining one of these cruxes of why there is a rift in the pits of hell, can lead the reader to interpret why Dante used the language he did to relate the Idea of a Just and perfect punishment by God.
“How stern the power of Almighty God who crushes sinners with such righteous blows(Canto XXIV lines 109-110)!” In Dante’s Inferno, Dante Alighieri describes a trip through Hell, visiting the various sinners and circles of Hell. Dante also uses many experiences and beliefs from his real life to enrich his views of Hell and his idea of Divine Punishment. Dante’s perception of Divine Justice includes sinners whom he places in Hell for committing crimes without regret, they are placed lower in Hell according to the severity of their sins. Dante is not always just in his placement of sinners, his personal grudges and archaic Catholic beliefs get in the way of true Divine Justice.
One of the most interesting literary techniques an author or poet could include in his or her literary work is the use of cruxes. A crux is a crossroad which consists of a difficult or ambiguous passage in a literary text that can determine a certain direction of the literary work as a whole, depending on the reader’s interpretation of such passage. Within Dante’s The Inferno there are a variety of instances in which he provides an example of a crossroad. The Inferno contains the journey through hell that Dante the pilgrim undertakes, guided by the poet Virgil, in order to eventually reach heaven. One example of a significant crux in the poem is the instance in which Dante (the pilgrim) and Virgil explicitly demonstrate the act of being wrathful
Like some people, sometimes it just feels nice to see your own thoughts in the written word. Well, Dante wrote down these thoughts into these two works, how he felt about others at the time, how he felt about himself, what he believed about Catholicism, and the church at the time, what he believed hell would be like, and how he felt about sin, which is in fact the main subjects of his two works. So this brings us back to, Why did Dante write the Inferno? Because, he wanted to put his own thoughts down into paper In the form of a story, to let all read what he was thinking and feeling about everything is his life at the moment, as well as to in a way inform others about sin, what happens when you sin, and where sin causes you to go. It teaches moral lessons along with this, but also claims which sins he feels are the worst, the greatest of sins if you will. So this is why I believe Dante wrote the Inferno, to share his thoughts with the world, and imprint them on the mind for better or worse. Well I feel that for Mister Alighieri that he wrote to inform, and spread his ideas, his beliefs. Like some people, sometimes it just feels nice to see your own thoughts in the written
Both authors each are conveying a different idea to the public. It is true that both authors are venting their frustration against society through their work, but the origin of their distress is different and in the end yields two different conclusions. For Dante, it includes the frauds in Florence and the Roman Catholic Church. The most iconic people like Filippo Argenti in Circle V who was a political enemy of Dante is targeted (65). “After Filippo Argenti! All cried together. The maddog Florentine wheeled at their cry and bit himself for rage. I saw them gather. And there we left him (62).” Dante is trying to humiliate a lifetime enemy in his book. Going lower into Dante’s hell, the people closest to Satan are simoniacs and those who betray. As Dante even included Popes like Boniface VIII and Clement V below murderers, he saw the Catholic Church as a huge threat to society. The purpose for Dante writing The Inferno was to take revenge on his enemies while also pointing out significant flaws he perceived permeated Florentine
Seeing as this work was written by Dante, and the journey is taken by Dante, he has a unique opportunity to judge his fellow man and decide how they will be punished. He also gets to place his enemies in hell, forever besmirching their names for generations to remember. Perhaps unknowing to Dante, that is worse than any of the punishments that he placed his enemies in. The reality of The Inferno is unlikely and therefore these punishments are nothing but a fictiona...
With that in mind, one can look at Inferno as a handbook on what not to do during a lifetime in order to avoid Hell. In the book, Dante creates a moral lifestyle that one must follow in order to live a morally good, Catholic life. This explains why Aristotle and Dante disagree on a few key points about what it means to be virtuous. Aristotle is adamant about not having excess nor deficiency and rather finding a middle ground (mean), whereas Dante abides by the virtues laid out in the Bible.