Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Psychology studies on child development flashcards
Nature of childhood development
Psychological development of early childhood
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Psychology studies on child development flashcards
Nature Versus Nurture: The Formation of Personalities in Childhood In psychology field, there is a long-lasting discussion about whether one’s behaviors are determined by the environment or natural instinct. The terms of “nature” and “nurture” have been used since at least 16th century. The definitions of nature and nurture are various among different schools and change along with time. No matter which dimensions of meanings are taken for research, childhood is definitely one of the most crucial life period for this topic because the effects of both nature and nurture are reflected most apparently in childhood. Children are growing both mentally and physically. Therefore, they are easily affected by the environment and unlikely to cover up …show more content…
The diversified kinds of significance of nature and nurture are depicted and interpreted in numerous children’s literature started from the 18th century which is a significant era for later production because the controversy about childhood and education first came to light (Hollindale 161). One of the most remarkable works among them is Frances Hodgson Burnett’s The Secret Garden, which tells the story of the children’s self-redemption in the love of nature. Through the analysis of the distinct personalities of main characters in The Secret Garden, a new and unique perspective which adds complexity in regard to the long debatable topic can be learned. Nature and Nurture cannot solely determine the formation of personality and they can be interacted with each other. The environment largely influences the formation of personalities and traits, but at the same time nature is a power of self-determinism and is able to reconstruct the self fabricated by …show more content…
Some scholars believe that human behaviors are exclusively determined by environmental factors early in the early centuries while some state that humans are actually genetically influenced and actively seek for the environment corresponding to their genetic preference. However, extreme genetic or environmental conditions are rare. Nature versus nurture is a topic with more complexity and the two concepts both contribute substantially to the formation of personality, which can be explored later in The Secret Garden. Nature is not a solely mechanistic concept with the implication of biological gene but also a culturally constructed notion indicating “innate ideas” or “instincts” on the base of ethics in moral philosophy. According to Peter Hollindale’s citing in his book Keywords in Children’s Literature, nature has multiple meanings in different literature works: Chaucer’s three dimensions of nature include a corporate power of all living beings, external growth and alternation, and inner disposition of intelligent creatures especially humans; for Shakespeare, nature is the will of God and humans should act corresponding to the feudal ethics coming form the metaphysical absolute; Edmund believes that nature is an ungoverned state of humans who are dominated by their primary
In the well-received novel “Pudd’nhead Wilson,” Mark Twain skillfully addresses the ancient argument about the origin of one’s character and whether it’s derived from his nature or his surroundings. We can best see this battle between nature versus nurture by inspecting the plot lines that follow the characters Thomas a Becket Driscoll, Valet de Chambre, and Roxana the slave. Thomas was born into a wealthy white family while Roxy birthed Chambers into a life of slavery. It seemed as though each would have gone their separate ways into opposite walks of life, but Roxy secretly swapped the children, which destined each to their counterintuitive fates. Through their words and actions, Tom, Chambers, and Roxy have proven the idea that one’s behaviors and desires are a result of his upbringings and the environment he lives in rather than by his innate nature.
American psychologist and well renowned author Jerome Kagan states “Genes and family may determine the foundation of the house, but time and place determine its form.” The topic of nature vs. nurture is highly known to the English literature community and is classified as a major aspect of gothic works. In the novel Frankenstein the author Mary Shelley uses the monster’s constant rejection from society to demonstrate that an individual’s traits are affected more by their environment and their surroundings than by nature.
Nature versus Nurture is the name of a long running debate on whether an individual’s behavior is determined by their genes or by how they were raised. John Locke famously held the view that humans had a “blank slate”, which means that human’s personality and character traits are determined by a person’s environment and what they experience. But, many argue against this: for instance, twins are raised similarly, but can have completely different personalities. The real question is this: are people born monsters, or do they become monsters? In Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein and in Oscar Wilde’s novel The Picture of Dorian Gray, both authors provide a clear warning of what makes a monster: society’s superficial nature creates monsters, and
Nature versus nurture is an argument in psychology over whether a person’s innate qualities and behaviors are caused from their environment or if they’re born with it. Vygotsky places more emphasis on the social factors that contribute to cognitive development, in other words he is in favor of the nurture argument. He believes that everyone learns from their culture, environment, and social interactions. He talks about a few of his theories like the zone of proximal development, and a more knowledgeable other. He also expresses his thoughts on developmental tools and the importance of language to cognitive development. All of these factors together support his idea that children’s behavior is learned.
The nature side of the debate expresses that our decisions and end results are stemmed from only our genealogical make up such as, hair color and even diseases. Nurture on the other hand is the actualization that our actions and decisions are brought upon us not by our DNA makeup but actually from the environment around us, including our culture and upbringing. Although many people usually pick a side to be on I feel as if our end result is brought upon us by both our DNA makeup and the way our surroundings affect us on a daily basis (2014, retrieved from http://psychology.about.com/od/nindex/g/nature-nurture.htm).
For this first analytical essay, I have decided to have a go at analyzing the Nature Vs. Nurture using my own viewpoint as a sibling. No doubt this is a topic that has been debated to mental death already, but I think it is something I will benefit from thinking about. Also, at the end of my main topic, I will quickly address a topic brushed on in the book.
The Battle of Nature vs. Nurture In Nancy Kress' "In Memoriam", the philosophical issue of identity becomes apparent. As a son pleads to his mother to take part in a medical procedure, which wipes your mind clear of memories, the question of "what makes me'me'?" arises. Set in the future, the mother is faced with a decision: whether or not she wants to die as a result of having too many memories, or as a result of having none at all. The son, Aaron, takes quite a different approach however as he feels that it is not a question of death, rather a question of life.
We assume that duplication is the same as cloning and therefore the two Calvins are
Human nature is a concept that can be influenced by many factors. Nature can determine some of our traits so as can nurturing. Nature impacts what one is made of- what they are born with. Nurturing is how one is raised. Both ideas are needed to be successful in life. These ideas can be applied to everyone, especially the creature in Mary Shelley’s book, Frankenstein. In the book, an ugly creature is crafted by a Victor Frankenstein. He soons abandons it upon seeing it’s appearance. From there, the creature is not nurtured. Based on the theory of Nature versus Nurture, the creature, in Frankenstein, will not be successful.
Undoubtedly, humans are unique and intricate creatures and their development is a complex process. It is this process that leads people to question, is a child’s development influenced by genetics or their environment? This long debate has been at the forefront of psychology for countless decades now and is better known as “Nature versus Nurture”. The continuous controversy over whether or not children develop their psychological attributes based on genetics (nature) or the way in which they have been raised (nurture) has occupied the minds of psychologists for years. Through thorough reading of experiments, studies, and discussions however, it is easy to be convinced that nurture does play a far more important in the development of a human than nature.
Nature by itself can affect a child’s development. If the child is born with a disease or mental illness, they may develop at a slower pace. For example, if a child is born with Asperger’s syndrome, the child will have a difficult time with social skills and understanding emotions. Nurture deals with the environment. If a child was raised in a hostile environment, that child is more likely to be hostile when they get older. Environment may play a larger role in most cases due to everyday lifestyle, from the city you live in to the way you are raised. If one was raised in a healthy house hold, someone who lived in a toxic household may behave differently.
Nature is described as our physical attributes and genes from when we are born. Our genetics that make us who we are include our eye colour, height and hair colour, as well as our natural talents, abilities and our intelligence level.
Nature vs nurture debate is one of the oldest arguments in the history of psychology. It is the scientific cultural, and philosophical debate about whether human culture, behavior, and personality are caused primarily by nature or nurture. Nature and nurture are both equally important. They are the two are major influences that affect the person you grow to be and will determine what your children will be tomorrow. Nature refers to heredity, which are traits and features that are inherited from your parents and ancestors. At birth you, as a person, inherits 50% of each parent 's genetic material that are passed along through the chromosomes found in the DNA. Hair color, height, body type, and eye color are some examples of characteristics
Child growth and development is a process that consists of some building blocks, which are components that combine in an infinite number of ways (Cherry, n.d.). As a result of the variations of building blocks in a child’s development, educators, psychologists, and philosophers have been constantly engaged in the debate of nature versus nurture debate. Many researchers agree that child development is a complex interaction between his/her genetic background (nature) and his/her environment (nurture). In essence, some developmental aspects are strongly affected by biology whereas other aspects are influenced by environmental factors. From the onset of an individu...
In the study of child development, nature and nurture are two essential concepts that immensely influence future abilities and characteristics of developing children. Nature refers to the genetically obtained characteristics and abilities that influence development while nurture refers to the surrounding environmental conditions that influence development. Without one or the other, a child may not develop some important skills, such as communication and walking. The roles of physiological and psychological needs in a person’s life are also crucial for developing children. Humanistic psychologist, Abraham Maslow, suggested that humans don’t only aim towards survival, but also aim towards self-actualization (Rathus, P. 94).