Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Stereotypes of gender and sexuality mass media
Religion and LGBT issues
Stereotypes of gender and sexuality mass media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Stereotypes of gender and sexuality mass media
Moral panic occurs when a certain group of people pose a threat to the norms of a specific society and because their behaviour challenges societal norms and expectations they are perceived to be deviant. When a moral panic occurs, there are two groups involved, the moral entrepreneur who practices and promotes the obedience of societal norms and the folk devil who rejects this and does not conform to these norms. In this essay, I will be using sexual orientation as an example of a moral panic, I will analyse the role conservative individuals in a society undertake as the moral entrepreneur and how the non-conforming queer individuals are viewed as the folk devil.
The media, particularly in South Africa, has a crucial role to play regarding
…show more content…
In laymen’s terms, we could understand this as liking someone of the same gender. However, the definition is quite broad and one does not necessarily have to engage sexually to fit the description. Adding to the broad definition of homosexuality it is also defined by society and religion. In conservative community’s homosexuals do not express themselves freely because they fear they might be rejected, isolated or even victimised. Many people frown upon homosexuality viewing it as “abnormal.” The fact that one does not like someone of the opposite sex is problematised and in the religious context it is viewed as a sin (Maziti, 2015). These negative connotations regarding gay people has resulted in them, merely being themselves, becoming a moral …show more content…
Accompanied with their orthodox ways are the rejection of gay people. It is prevalent in many religions, the most popular being Christians, Muslims, and Hindus. Christians also have a strong belief in the bible but there is a tendency to misinterpret scriptures. Some of the popular scriptures in the bible used by the religious folk does not, however, directly refer to the actions of homosexuality. If we look at the scripture in Genesis 19 pertaining Sodom and Gomorrah which delved into issues “such as gang rape, violence, and the flagrant disregard for the sacred obligation to provide hospitality” we can see that there is no relation to homosexuality (Masango, 2002). Subsequent texts suggest that this merely refers to the judgement of God and not homosexuality. Another popular debate by Christians is that being gay is immoral unnatural. (Masango, 2002) suggests that the official teaching of the church is well captured by Nilson as he states that: “Homosexuality constitute a deviation from the order of nature according to which humans are created male and female by God; moral norms based on the truth of human nature are unchangeable since „human nature‟ is complete and finished” (Nilson 2001:61). There are also strong beliefs that when something goes wrong, it is the work of an evil spirit and being gay would mean that you are possessed. (Farias, 2014) argues that “Homosexuality is actually a demon spirit. It is such a
In the debate over homosexuality, Christian ethicists have many authorities to draw from. From the mixture of biblical sources, traditional authorities, empirical and descriptive accounts, and cultural norms, Cahill chooses general biblical themes and modern culture as the primary authorities for her ethic. This departure from traditional Roman Catholic teaching implies some flaw in the connection between the Holy Spirit, the church, and common believers. Cahill’s decision is her method of fixing this disconnect and reuniting Christ’s message with all believers.
In the article, “Moral Panics: Culture, Politics, and Social Construction” the authors Erich Goode and Nachman Ben-Yehuda discuss two different perspectives of moral panics. Each perspective give a different way of looking at how moral panics are portrayed to come about in society. The Objectivist perspective and the Constructionist perspective show how people view moral panics. However, the Constructionist perspective is more important and valuable to society than the Objectivist perspective.
The sociological concept of ‘moral panic’ is said to be used by the mass media in an attempt to entertain audiences. Cohen (1980: p. 9) suggests that a fear-provoking event or condition is covered by the media, with individuals who may have political agendas suggesting their own methods of prevention to the listening audiences (as cited in Altheide 2009, p. 79-80). Moral panic in relation to certain crimes can be seen as a possible explanation to the growing prison population. Chiricos (n.d.) furthers this notion by stating that “over the past fifteen years, the United States has had an expanding underclass, a declining crime rate and an exploding prison population” (p. 44). Thus, it seems possible to suggest that moral panic among citizens
The term 'homosexual' is not nowadays sex specific. It was first used by Victorian scientists who regarded same-sex attraction ...
All sins are forgivable and we are all sinners, but sin has to be recognized for what it is if divine mercy is to be had. So much of the talk about homosexuality is an understandable human effort to change the subject. Any reference to the wrongness of homosexuality is likely to invite the charge of homophobia, turning the accusation on the supposed accuser. But of course the moral law is not the property of anyone, and invoking it need not be an accusation. The problem is not how others react to homosexuality but the plight of the homosexual. And reaching out to the homosexual in his plight is the subject of this paper.
Sexual orientation is a term used to describe a person’s physical, sexual, and romantic attraction to another person, whether they be Male or Female. The term is relatively new and the idea of having a homosexual identity has only been around for one-hundred years at the most (APA).
Moral Panics and the Media. Oxford: Oxford University Goode, E and Ben- Yehuda, N. (1994) Moral Panics. The social construction of deviance. Oxford: Blackwells.
The Holy Bible and its various renditions is the most common religious book that many religions have founded from. The first collection of writings of the bible can be dated back as far as 1500 years, which is 3500 years after homosexuality existed. The bible looks at homosexuality as an abomination and sinful, “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination” (Leviticus 18:22), “Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality . . .” (1 Corinthians 1:26-28). There are nearly eighty bible verses about homosexuality being sinful and sacrilegious (Open Bible). Not all religions had the same view on homosexuals,
Religion has been a big issue with judging homosexual. Some Christians believe that the Bible speaks with one clear voice in condemning homosexuality. In many Anti-gay Christians groups see homosexuality as sinful. Using the Bible to justify their hate against anything they do not understand.
The acceptance of “abnormal” sexualities has been a prolonged, controversial battle. The segregation is excruciating and the prejudice remarks are so spiteful that some people never truly recover. Homosexuals have been left suffering for ages. Life, for most homosexuals during the first half of the twentieth century, was mostly one of hiding: having to constantly hide their true feelings and tastes. Instead of restaurants and movies, they had to sit quiet in the dark and meet each other in concealed places such as bars. Homosexuals were those with “mental and psychic abnormalities” and were the victim of medical prejudice, police harassment, and church condemnation (Jagose 24). The minuscule mention or assumption of one’s homosexuality could easily lead to the loss of family, livelihood, and sometimes even their lives. It was only after the Stonewall riots and the organization of gay/lesbian groups that times for homosexuals started to look brighter.
...(women are naturally suited for traditional female- specific gender roles); and Heterosexual Intimacy (heterosexual romantic relationships are essential) (Burn 177).” Now days many religions welcome LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) persons, some conservative religions condemn homosexuality and compel followers to view it as a sickness (Burn 178). With this sickness they believe the only way to overcome it is through spiritual practice (Burn 178).
A moral panic can be defined as a phenomenon, frequently initiated by disquieting media and reinforced by responsive laws and public policies, of embellished public concern, angst or anger over a perceived danger to societal order (Krinsky, 2013). The media plays a crucial role in emphasizing a current moral panic. In Jock Young’s chapter Images of Deviance (1971), he comments on the phenomenon of deviance magnification, he deems dramatic media coverage of deviant behaviours to be ironic, owing to the fact that it unintentionally increases rather than restrains the apparent deviance. In hind sight the media create social problems, owing to the fact that they can present them dramatically and are able to do it swiftly (Young & Cohen, 1971: 37).
Homosexuality is a sensitive topic and often avoided in conversation. For centuries the human race has oppressed and persecuted others strictly because they are gay, lesbian, bisexual etc. Although it is disturbing to most of us, these actions still occur in our society today, as many believe that homosexuality is abnormal and disgraceful. One supporter of this belief is Michael Levin, who strongly believes that homosexuality is highly abnormal and thus, undesirable. Although his beliefs and theories supporting this claim are subjective, there is evidence that can support his stance on this topic; we will analyze this claim in further detail and how it relates to his other views mentioned in this essay.
In history, mainstream Abrahamic religions have had a negative relationship with LGBT persons. Beginning during the Hebrew exodus of Egypt, the purity codes documented in the Hebrew Bible’s Book of Leviticus explicitly stated a slew of rigid rules that attempted to keep a new Israelite nation “clean”. As William Countryman argues in the article “Dirt, Greed, & Sex”, the bible sets a precedent for what is “clean” and pure as well as what is “dirty”. In this sense, dirty means where something doesn’t belong, or is out of place. The ancient Israelite text as well as some New Testament verses have been used by many contemporary Christian denominations to condemn LGBT persons to hell and to provide “moral reasoning” for supporting legislation that makes LGBT people second class citizens. Missionaries during the imperialist period of European history have also used these verses to spread hate around the globe, and many of these anti-homosexuality sodomy laws that were backed by christian colonial monarchies are still on the books in former colonies in Africa, Asia and Oceania. The spread of Islam, a religion that also considers the Hebrew texts to be holy scripture, has also had the same effect on the Swahili Coast, Horn of Africa, Persia, and Southeast Asia. These religious texts have been the basis for anti-LGBT laws across the world, and as Abrahamic religions spread, the tolerance for LGBT people in other societies declined.
Religion is a major aspect on why society believes that homosexuality is wrong and should not be accepted. Individuals who are against the LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender) community because of their religion believe that “homosexuality is a horrid transgression of God’s plan” (Bawer 74). They consider them sinners because they are going against God’s original intention; relationships should be between a man and a woman. Nia Augustin is a member of the Christian community and believes that supporting or being homosexual goes against her religion beliefs. In her interview, Augustin stated, “I have been told that the purpose of a man and woman being together is to reproduce, but a homosexual couple cannot do that, so that's not of God.” Homosexuality is sinful and wrong in the eyes of religious individuals because it involves sex that does not produce life. However, it is ironic that individuals that use contraceptives to prevent them from creating another life are not judged as cruelly by society. Even though homosexuals are not able to have children, they are still people and they deserve to be treated likewise.