Simple distinction are made when one is innocent, innocence allows ones to make decisions or judge others by simple distinctions. However, as ones grow up, simple distinctions may not exist or makes sense at all, subsequently, causes the loss of innocence and maturity. In To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, two children- Jem and Scout- starts off as innocent children. As the story transitions from the peaceful town life to the intense court battle, more and more aspect from different people starts to display in front of these children. One of the kids, Jem thought the court was always a fair place when he discovers that it is full of prejudice towards people of different races. People such as Tom Robinson has no chance to win after the accusation. …show more content…
Furthermore, Scout discovers that poorer people such as the Cunninghams are not savages but people with good will. In addition, the Cunningham judges people based on simple distinction before the trial, which makes him more mature as he considers the evidence before other factors. At last, Innocence in these people fades away when they see the multi facet of people they thought different previously. Therefore, through my own observations and the characters in the novel, this I have learned: Innocence is lost when simple distinctions no longer makes sense to the one who experienced it. Jem experiences the lost of innocence when he comes to a realization that simple distinctions and truth may not exist.
In the story, Jem and Scout watches the trial from the balcony. Because of Atticus’ convincing argument, Jem thinks that Atticus and Tom Robinson is going to win the trial. However, after a long discussion among the juries, Tom Robinson gets proven guilty. After the trial, Jem refuses to talk about the event and cries. He later reveals that he thought people in Maycomb were the best, now, he no longer does. Because Jem is innocent, he thinks that the trial is fair and equal, and evidence is the only part that matters, however, Jem fails to acknowledge racism as a factor to the result of the trial. After the trial however, he sees that people prejudice against black people, and he acknowledges the fact that racism do exist. Moreover, he realizes that racism is much more powerful that evidence, and it was racism that lost Tom Robinson the trial. Lastly, Jem’s realization that simply truth does not exist makes him more …show more content…
mature. Scout becomes more mature as she realizes simple distinction between people may not exist.
In the first week of school, Scout comes in conflict with Walter Cunningham, out of nicety, Jem invites walter to dine with them. On the dining table however, Scout calls Walter’s eating style is barbaric and he belongs with the savages because he is poor. After the trial, Atticus tells Scout that the Cunningham almost gave Tom acquittal. Surprisingly, Scout decides to invite Walter Cunningham to dinner with her. In the beginning, Scout calls Walter barbaric because she associates being poor as barbaric, she thinks about the simple truth and associate likely aspects together. However, she realizes that the Cunningham is good welled and lives with less prejudice despite their poor living conditions. Therefore, she matures as she sees people with their actions instead of making simple distinctions. Lastly, Scout matures because she no longer makes mindless assumptions with simple
distinctions. Walter Cunningham becomes more mature as he realizes simple distinction between people may not be true or exist. The night before the trial, Walter Cunningham comes to the Maycomb Jail to kill Tom Robinson with a group of others, there, he meets Atticus who is trying to stop him. Walter Cunningham stops the attack after Scout comes to him and tells in a story about his son. In the trial, Walter is selected as one of the juries, after hearing Atticus’s evidence, he wants to acquit Tom Robinson despite Tom’s race. Walter Cunningham may seem malicious at first, however, that is because that he associates Tom Robinson’s race with immoral or evil and believes what others say. However, after listening to the evidence Atticus provides, he thinks that Tom Robinson is not guilty despite his race. He considers the evidence before anything else and thinks that evidence should decide if a person is guilty or innocent. Walter Cunningham now rejects the simple distinction he believed in before and matures. In conclusion, Jem, Scout, and Walter Cunningham matures throughout the story when they realizes that simple true and distinctions do not exist. Jem matures as he realizes simple true of right or wrong does not exist, and that other factors affect the outcome. Scout matures as she realizes simple distinction may not classify people, people who are poor doesn’t mean they are impure. Lastly, Walter Cunningham matures as he realizes simple distinction are inaccurate, and that the black race isn’t classified as evil. Above all example illustrate that people predicts outcome by simple true when one’s innocent. However, when the prediction is incorrect, they realizes that simple true may not exist and everything is multi-facet.
Also Jem was affected negatively by racism by a loss of his innocence. Jem states while he walks out of the courtroom “ It ain't right Atticus”(Lee 285). Jem now knows that Tom should have won but he didn’t just because he is a black man facing a white woman. When Jem angrily said, “ I never wanna hear about that court case again, ever, ever you hear me?”(Lee 331). This quote proves that Jem has lost his innocence because he knows that Tom Robinson should have had a fair trial but he didn't so he doesn't want to hear about it.
Recently, I have read both a Raisin in the Sun and To Kill a Mockingbird, both considered literary classics. They share a number of similar themes and character that face similar situations. Ultimately, they have extremely different plots, but address the same issues; some that were common around the time they were published, and some that carry relevance into current times. What I wish to bring to light in this essay is that in both novels, there are many characters that lives’ hit a shatter-point in the course of the story. This shatter-point is where the characters’ lives are irrevocably changed, sometimes for the better, sometimes for the worse. What I’m going to explore is how these characters cope with the emotional fallout of what the aforementioned shatter-point left in its wake.
During the court scene a lot of difficult things happen and it becomes a very hard case for Atticus to solve and explain. Jem and Scout are both very upset about Tom Robinson being accused of the things he didn’t do. Atticus begins to tell Jem that it’s going to be okay and that he wants Jem to not worry about what the outcome is. Atticus is trying to teach him that even if the case doesn’t go the way they wanted and the way that it was supposed to go, that they still did the right thing and that they would keep trying to help Tom Robinson in any way they could. This is what Atticus tells Jem, “Link, that boy might go to the chair, but he’s not going till the truth’s told.” “Atticus’s voice was even. And you know what the truth
He also starts to think more about whats right instead of thinking what others will think about his decision. For ex amble when Dill is hiding under Scout‘s bed he calls in Atticus much to his friends dismay. Jem again shows maturity when Scout is beating Walter Cunningham and Jem stops it because he know that the Cunninghams don‘t have money and therefore he cant help it that he doesn‘t have lunchmoney. Jem understands that instead of fighting him they should treat him with respect and he asks Walter to come have lunch at their house.
Jem knew from the start that Tom Robinson had no chance in winning a case against the Ewells. However, he deluded himself into thinking that that maybe the jury will be accepting and open-minded in that one case. Of course, that’s not what happened in the end; Tom Robinson is found guilty, causing Jem to question whether or not Maycomb is really the same as he remembered it from his childhood. This change in Jem especially shows when Scout comes to ask him about Hitler’s hatred towards all Jewish people during the Holocaust; Scout ends up comparing what her teacher said in class versus what that same teacher said outside the courthouse after the trial, and Jem was instantly reminded of the verdict:
Loss of Innocence in Killing a Mockingbird Maycomb was an old town, but it was a tired old town when I first knew it. In rainy weather, the streets turned red slop; grass grew on the sidewalks, the courthouse sagged in the square. " (Lee 9). This environment, as Scout Finch accurately describes, is not conducive to young children, loud noises, and games. But, the Finch children and Dill must occupy themselves in order to avoid boredom.
Innocence is defined as the state of being not guilty of a crime or other wrong act. The definition does not have any exceptions depending on race, age, gender or other physical characteristics. Yet in the south, the innocence of a guilty white man, is more important than the innocence of an innocent black man. In the novel, To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, is about a young girl named Scout who lives in Maycomb County, Alabama. The novel is separated into two parts, the first part is about the adventures of Boo Radley. While the second part is about the trial of Tom Robinson. In the first part of the novel, Scout along with her brother Jem and her friend Dill investigate the mysterious life of their neighbor, Boo Radley. Boo has not left
In the courtroom that night it is revealed that the alleged crimes of Tom Robinson, a decent Negro man, most likely did not happen. As Atticus says in his closing argument, "The state has not produced one iota of medical evidence to the effect that the crime Tom Robinson is charged with ever took place. It has relied instead upon the testimony of two witnesses whose evidence has not only been called into serious question on cross-examination, but has been flatly contradicted by the defendant. The defendant is not guilty, but somebody in this courtroom is” (Lee 271). Showing the clear innocence of Tom Robinson due to lack of evidence, Scout thinks that the white jury will do the right thing only to find out that they still, unfairly, accuse him of being guilty. Scout and her brother, Jem, get very upset when they hear the verdict, however, it allows them both to learn the lesson that the county is unfair towards anyone who is not white. The county demonstrates this evil racism due to the social divisions in Maycomb between the whites and the blacks and because the whites see the blacks as unworthy of rights and freedoms. It was not just the trial itself that displayed evil in the world, but the comments and arguments surrounding the case did
Having grown up in the home of a lawyer, Jem understands the ways of the courtroom and recognizes Atticus’ behavior in court. When Tom Robinson is put on trial for being accused of raping Mayella Ewell, Atticus is appointed his attorney. As questioning continues, Atticus blatantly proves it was impossible for Tom to even commit the crime. Jem says to Reverend Sykes, "...don't fret, we've won it....Don't see how any jury could convict on what we heard" (Lee 279). Jem’s response to Reverend Sykes comment
A small city nestled in the state of Alabama, Maycomb has got its faults, just like any other place in the world, but one of its main faults or (pg.88) “Maycomb's usual disease,” as Atticus calls it in the book is prejudice. Jem and Scout learn a lot about prejudice when a black man named Tom Robinson is accused of raping a white woman named Mayella Ewell and their father, Atticus, is called on to be his lawyer. They realize the hate that people have buried deep within their heart when they see a black man accused of doing something only because of his color. On pg.241, Scout starts understanding this and thinks, “Atticus had used every tool available to free men to save Tom Robinson, but in the secret courts of men's hearts Atticus had no case. Tom was a dead man the minute Mayella Ewell opened her mouth and screamed.” As the case continues, up until the death of Tom Robinson, Jem and Scout learn more and more about prejudice and how the hate that people have towards others causes them to take wrong actions. They also see how unfair it is that a white man can get treated better and think of himself better than a black man only because he was born white. This prejudice and the trial cause Jem and Scout to get in argum...
During the trial, Jem has steadfast faith that the jury will not find Tom guilty. He believes that the undeniable evidence pointing toward Bob Ewell means that the jury has to acquit Tom of all charges (Lee 270). He has such great faith in the jury, that the verdict nearly crushes him. Scout remembers that “Judge Taylor was polling the jury: ‘Guilty… guilty… guilty… guilty…’ I peeked at Jem: his hands were white from gripping the balcony rail, and his shoulders jerke...
Tom Robinson’s trial, and in fact his entire life, was badly affected by racism. It is truly a testament to the corruption of society when a person who has earned a bad reputation is held in higher esteem than a person who was born with it, as is the case with Bob Ewell and Tom Robinson. Even though Tom was obviously honest in his testament, the jury sided with Bob Ewell because he was white. They made this decision despite the fact that the Ewell family was widely known to be a worthless part of society. Jem, not being racially prejudiced, could not understand this mentality. As Atticus pointed out, “If you (Jem) had been on the jury, son, and eleven other boys like you, Tom would be a free man.”
The illusion of innocence is deeply instilled in the outlook of children. Reality soon takes its grip as kids begin to grow and mature, and they lose their pure qualities that they have once possessed. Their father Atticus shelters Jem and Scout from the town’s disease, teaching them the act of sympathy and how to distinguish the good aspects over glaring at the imperfections of people. The loss of innocence portrayed in Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird is exposed as the lives of Jem, Scout, and Dill go through their racist and prejudice society, learning how the worlds dreamlike qualities is nothing more than just a childhood fable. The children’s judgment of people and society quickly sheds as Lee displays the harsh realities to Jem, Dill,
Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird: The Significance of a Mockingbird In a society surrounded by corruption, racism, and cruelty it is rare to find purity. Innocence is constantly being destroyed. For this reason, the harmless citizens need to be treasured and protected. Harper Lee’s classic novel To Kill a Mockingbird portrays the injustices of the 1930’s that expose the innocent to the malice of the society’s intentions. Some characters in the novel are characterized as harmless and pure and are symbolized by mockingbirds.
When one loses their innocence, it changes their outlook on life and causes them to have a sudden realization that the world is not as peaceful and bubbly as it seems. Throughout Harper Lee’s To Kill A Mockingbird, Scout learns many lessons about the reality from the adults in her life that cause her innocence to fade away as she matures. Scout witnesses prejudice, racism and hypocrisy in her small town of Maycomb, causing the tree of her innocence to lose its leaves and grow back into understanding.