Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Morals exposed in the crucible
Essays on The Crucible
Essays on The Crucible
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Morals exposed in the crucible
Perfection is nonexistent As Leonard Cohen once said, “There is a crack in everything, that's how the light gets in”. Nothing in life is perfect, and people are not an exception. One of the most efficient ways to demonstrate a flaw is irony. Through the use of irony in The Crucible, Arthur Miller highlights man’s inevitable fallibility. Failure to recognize one’s own flaws is an exceptional example of situational irony. Similarly, in the play, John Proctor forgot to recite the commandment prohibiting adultery, the one he actually committed. Seeing it as “a small fault” (Act 2), John Proctor confesses to not knowing all the commandments saying that among him and Elizabeth, they knew them all. In a similar way that John Proctor treated his flaw, the government of Massachusetts Bay Colony treated the offense of adultery: without …show more content…
That exact scenario occurred in Act 3 of The Crucible when Elizabeth Proctor chose to tell a lie in order to protect her husband. An attempt to defend his wife’s honor, “She only thought to save my name” (Act 3), did not work resulting in the shift of opinion towards his wife by other characters since Elizabeth was always accepted as an honest, law-abiding, and fundamental member of the community. By turning her back on others and choosing to protect her loved one, Elizabeth violated the teachings of her religion. In reality, there are multiple excerpts in the Bible in which telling lies is justified. For example, the midwives who cared for an infant Moses lied to the servants of the Pharaoh in order to conceal his Hebrew origins thus saving his life (Exodus 2:1-10). Just like for the them, not everything in the eyes of Elizabeth Proctor was black and white leading her to commit and evil in order to prevent an even greater evil from happening: though, she did not
‘The Crucible’ is a great example of morally ambiguous characters. A plethora of characters with blurry ethics exist within the world of ‘The Crucible’, this makes it difficult to distinguish who is truly good and who is evil. Arthur Miller has a fantastic approach to how he displays his characters and their moral standpoints. Adultery, lying, and even the suspicion of witchcraft, within the community brings out the worst in the townspeople. John Proctor is an example of how thin the lines are drawn between a complete saint and a damned sinner.
Abigail Williams in the play The Crucible shows many signs of Narcissism also known as Narcissistic Personality Disorder throughout the play. “Narcissistic Personality Disorder is estimated at a 1% of the general population and 2% to 16% in clinical populations.” (Groopman) Narcissism plays a small part in the world but has a strong effect on the people who are in that 1% that have this disorder. “People with Narcissistic Personality Disorder demonstrate an apparently paradoxical combination of self-centeredness and worthlessness.” (Groopman)
They say “Honesty is the best policy”, but that isn’t necessarily true especially for those who lived in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692. Honesty may have been a good trait for someone to have, but during the witch trials people rethought that. In The Crucible, Arthur Miller portrayed many people as good puritans. Always loyal and honest throughout their lives, and avoiding any sins that they possibly could. But there were people who had to sin to save their lives or even to save their reputation. Abigail Williams was just an young girl who turned to lying in order to save herself during the Salem Witch Trials. At the same time, Elizabeth Proctor was not agreeing with the witch business that she was accused of. You could tell lies during this time, and no one would think that you were turning too sins because the entire town was becoming obsessed about all those accused of possible witchcraft. While some were being accused, others were avoiding the truth when confessing. Like when Abigail never confessed to drinking blood when she was with Tituba and Betty. In The Crucible, Honesty was portrayed
In the first scene of the second act of the Crucible, Elizabeth is with John. John reveals that he was with Abigail and he admitted the betrayal. There are many different ways Arthur Miller enforced his claim. Through emotional appeal, figurative language, and tone, the author has successfully used literary elements to support John’s argument with Elizabeth.
“The supreme irony of life is that hardly anyone gets out of it alive.” -Robert A. Heinlein. In the short story, “The Possibility of Evil”, the author Shirley Jackson uses irony to develop the traits of the protagonist, Miss Strangeworth, in her small hometown. Throughout the story, there are many examples of irony as Miss Strangeworth goes through her normal day. Irony is an engaging literary device used by authors to expose underlying intentions which become critical to the development of the plot.
“On the bandwagon” is a term used to describe people that jump on trends that most people are doing. In The Crucible, when Rev. John Hale was interrogating Tituba, she started accusing two other citizens in hopes that the masses won’t accuse her of undergoing witchcraft/ being a witch. She is seen accusing the people, “there is Goody Good … Aye, sir, and Goody Osburn” (47) which shows Tituba’s characterization as a liar and a deceiver. However, the bandwagon is seen after she has accused the two people in which many of the other young girls also start to accuse others in hopes of not being accused. For example, when Abigail states, “I saw Sarah Good, Goody Osburn, and Bridget Bishop with the devil,” (48) many of the other girls started to accuse
Arthur Miller juxtaposes appearance and reality in his play The Crucible by presenting multiple forms of irony which are consistently manifested throughout each act. With the use of verbal, situational, and dramatic ironical statements and situations, the audiences’ interest is developed, and the underlying meanings of the texts are able to be comprehended. Moreover, the Salem Witch Trials were full of ironical expressions and situations; therefore, the juxtaposition of appearance and reality in The Crucible brings this work of literature closer to life.
Irony is the expression of ones meaning by using language that usually signifies the opposite. There are three different types of irony; verbal, dramatic, and situational. Edgar Allen Poe uses verbal and dramatic irony in The Cask of Amontillado to depict a deeper meaning of Montresor’s hate towards Fortunato.
It is always shocking when someone that was generally well loved and respected is ruined. Because such people usually have few enemies, often times, the cause of their hardship is out of control hubris. Excessive pride can ruin even the most morally upright person by motivating them to do things they would never do unless they stand to lo. In Arthur Miller’s play, The Crucible, Miller utilizes the prideful nature of John Proctor and Mary Warren to demonstrate how arrogance can lead to the downfall of any kind of person, whether they are a moral person or a social climber.
At certain times it might feel right for some people to help the people that they love by lying. Elizabeth, Proctor's wife, does not tell the truth about her husband's affair in front of the society to protect her husband. She describes her husband as a “good and righteous man” in the court (Miller 113). However, that is not the truth. When a person loves someone, he or she would do anything to help that person. Some people choose the right way, while the others choose the wrong path. Elizabeth decides to lie for the first time just to save Proctor from the problems that he might face if the truth is revealed. Similarly, a teenage girl lies about her friend’s abortion to protect her. De Paulo says, “People tell these serious lies to protect something when the truth could threaten something that they really value” (Kelleher 1). In this case, the girl took the same step to save her friend. People do not want to see their loved ones suffer. As a result, they hide the truth to protect that person from danger. To protect others, they forget the bad outcomes and the trouble they might have to face for telling lies. Not only do people lie for others, but they lie for their own
Arthur Miller, one of America's greatest playwrights, living or dead, is a master of verbal irony. An examination of three strong examples of verbal irony in Millers play, The Crucible, will prove this out. While Miller started the genre of the tragedy of the common man, and is also know for his thoughtful and decisive plot lines, much of his fame, possibly can be attributed to his brilliant use of language generally, and his use of verbal irony in particular.
“It takes a man with real heart to make beauty out of the stuff that makes us weep.” –Clive Barker. Everybody makes mistakes, but only the people who recognize the good in those mistakes are the people who can be redeemed from them. In the play The Crucible by Arthur Miller, many characters are put in desperate situations. Each person learns new things and further develops from each experience. Proctor learns how important his name is, Hale experiences extreme guilt over his actions and Giles learns to think before he speaks. In conclusion, in desperate situations individuals who possess insight are able to experience redemption.
Martial betrayal forms a central basis for the relations between the main characters of Abigail, John Proctor, and Elizabeth Proctor. John betrayed his wife by cheating with Abigail, and throughout the course of the play, he attempts to redeem himself. This brings up an interesting topic of whether cheating can ever be justified. Elizabeth feels partially responsible because she was cold to him, and she believes that it was her coldness that led her husband to betray her. However is there ever an excuse for cheating? Can cheating on one’s spouse be justified if one’s spouse is not loving and well treating of their spouse? Martial betrayal still is relevant today, it is a human flaw that will not simply just disappear from our society. Even prominent figures such as Bill Clinton have been accused of such actions and society still contains several such cases of adultery.
Nine critical approaches are utilized when analyzing a piece of literature in order to appeal to a variety of critics. Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible can be interpreted from numerous approaches, but one lens that is unmistakable throughout is the psychological criticism. From a psychological standpoint, one gains access to the mindset of both the author and the characters within. In addition to this, the reader also acquires a greater understanding of the motivations, behaviors, and mental state that each character possesses. Through psychological criticism, one can obtain information on a character’s motivation, the likelihood of their actions, and which behaviors are consciously made.
The Crucible is a story that reveals those who are truly honourable and noble. The trials in the story also put these qualities to the test. There are many whose sense of honor is questionable, but there is also a handful of people who died with these qualities and who kept their word even to death. The irony in the story is that those who were pure at soul from the start were the ones who were accused of witchcraft, and those who accused and claimed to be innocent were the ones who deserved to be imprisoned or executed.