Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Examples of Situational Irony
Examples of Situational Irony
Examples of Situational Irony
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“Lamb to the Slaughter” “Lamb to the Slaughter” by Roald Dahl took place at the Maloney household, in the 1950’s. Mary Maloney is a married woman; her husband is Patrick Maloney. Meanwhile, Mary was pregnant. Mary loved Patrick, she enjoyed his presence once he arrived home from work. Mary would wait for Patrick to come home; she would even gather refreshments upon his arrival. Mary was compassionate and understanding of him, until one evening when he arrived from work. Patrick told Mary he was exhausted; although something seemed to be on his mind. Mary offered to retrieve his slippers, make him another drink, as well as cook him dinner, but he shockingly denied everything. Suddenly, Patrick asked Mary to sit down and listen to him. Despite of …show more content…
Mary’s love for him, Patrick announced that he going to divorce Mary.
He exclaimed that he fell in love with another woman; therefore, breaking Mary’s heart. Mary was in shock; she could not believe what she was hearing. Mary grabbed the lamb chop she was going to prepare for dinner, then suddenly slammed it onto Patrick’s head, killing him. This is an example of situational irony due to the fact that Patrick’s demise was unexpected. Mary understood that she needed to cover her tracks, she needed to hide the fact that she murdered Patrick. Mary decided to head to the grocery to store, to make it seem as though she was not home when Patrick met his sudden death. She acted normal at the grocery store, she did not want to act suspicious. Obviously she needed to act surprised when she saw her husband lying dead on the floor. Mary dropped her purse as well as her groceries, she even destroyed her items around him, to make it seem as though there was an intruder. Finally,
Mary called the police, crying. She choked out that Patrick was dead, she needed the police to come investigate. Police and detectives arrived; they immediately began searching for any possible clues. They came to the conclusion that Patrick had been hit in the head with something similar to a club, as well as it was unexpected. They even concluded that it was by someone he knows, due to the fact that he did not have his gun out. They questioned Mary, but they did not think it was Mary. This is an example of dramatic irony, because neither the police nor the detectives had suspicion for Mary. Although, the audience does know that it was Mary the killed her husband. Late that night, Mary offered the police and detectives her lamb chop that had been cooking in the oven, as well as coffee. As they were chatting about the crime, Mary was listening in on their conversation. One man said that the object used to kill him may be right under their noses, meaning it may be in the house. This made Mary giggle, because they what was used to kill Patrick is under their noses, they were eating the lamb chop. This is an example of verbal irony due to the fact that they meant that the object they are looking for may be in the area. Although, Mary took it literally, due to the fact that the lamb chop was under their noses. In the end, Mary was not caught for the murder of her husband Patrick. She dearly loved him; therefore, she could not handle the fact that he wanted to have a divorce. The police and the detectives investigated the case, but did not come to a conclusion. In the passage there were true clues. One true clue in the passage was that there was an enormous gash on the back of Patrick’s head, they could conclude that he was hit in the back of the head. There were red herrings, or false clues as well. One false clue in the passage was that their family room was destroyed, so the investigators could conclude there was an intruder; although, there was no intruder. Mary was not convicted of murder, even though she caused the shocking demise of her husband.
Patrick would go home and ignore her when all she wanted to do was make sure he wasn’t hungry. Mary was so in love with him she would wait on the couch because she was anxious to see her husband. She was a very loving wife and would do anything for her
Patrick’s muscle tightens as hear Mary coming closer to him. Is she suspecting something? He thought nervously, what should I do now? What should I say? He was lost in his thoughts when Mary walked up behind him and swung the big frozen leg of lamb on the back of his head. Patrick’s vision suddenly when darken and t-- to the ground with the sounds of overturning tables and crashing
This was to keep Mary quiet; the text accuses Patrick of caring more for his job
Striking, the boy conveyed an unparalleled impression. Deeper into this utopia however, his once charming disposition, slowly cracked to reveal his true monstrous nature. Out of the dream, emerged a nightmare. Malevolent, malicious, masks fell off to reveal a mentality concealed before. First impressions are not always accurate, sometimes underneath the perfection lies a different character waiting to be awakened. Take Mary Maloney in Roald Dahl’s “Lamb to the Slaughter” for example. Mary’s character development, along with her interactions with her husband, Patrick Maloney, and the detectives from his department reveal the theme of, “Seemingly “perfect” people have a dark side.”
All of Roald Dahl’s stories seem to be brimfull of irony and wry humor, and “Lamb to the Slaughter” is no different. Mary Maloney, a pregnant, but cheerful woman is very much in love with her husband and we certainly don’t expect her to be of any trouble. It’s shocking enough to learn that her husband, who seems such a nice guy, is cheating on her and plans to move out. This changes the expectation of the story right off the bat, and we feel a compassion for the poor woman. We’re not sure how she’s going to cope with this news, especially since she’s six months pregnant with his child. So when she acts rather compulsively and strikes him over the head with the leg of lamb that was going to be his supper, we really are shocked. She’s acted
After she heard the news she convinces herself that he (Patrick) is still alive, she also speaks to herself/ practices her speaking to sound ‘normal’, and it shows how she felt about getting away with it. Mary Maloney was over tasked with the keeping of the house and being a doting wife to her husband, all she had going in her life was looking after her husband. Mary only wanted to be there for her husband, wanting to be with him no matter the problems they might have. Mary refused to see that her relationship was in rambles. To make her husband happy she took on as many tasks she could, along with keeping their marriage together as it was slowly falling apart. “Insanity is often the logic of an accurate mind overtasked”. (Oliver Wendell Holmes,
Near the middle of the story we see Mary exhibit her bad sinister character; her personality and feelings suddenly change when she murders her own husband by hitting him at the back of the head with a frozen lamb leg. After denying all of Mary’s helpful deeds, Patrick told her to sit down so that he can tell her something serious; the story doesn’t tell us what he says to her but Mary suddenly changes after he tells her something, her “instinct was not to believe any of it” (Dahl 2). She just responded with “I’ll get the supper” (Dahl 2) and felt nothing of her body except for nausea and a desire to vomit. She went down the cellar, opened the freezer, grabbed a frozen leg of lamb, went back upstairs, came behind Patrick, and swung the big leg of lamb as hard as she could to the back of his head killing him. This act of sudden violence shows how much she has gone ...
In the story, “She went downstairs to the freezer and took hold of the first object she found…” (Dahl, 2) What this means, is that Mary just pulled the first thing out, she didn’t have a plan for what to kill Patrick with. For example, “...That was better. Both the smile and the voice sounded better now. She practiced them several times more.” (Dahl, 2) This means, that Mary was practicing what to say to Sam and she still needed to figure out what her story was, it is more solid evidence that Mary didn’t have a plan beforehand. Another thing, Mary laughed at the end of the story when the detectives ate the lamb and didn’t expect anything. This proves, that Mary’s quick plan has worked, and Mary was laughing because she had gotten away with
Lamb to the Slaughter, by Roald Dahl, instantly grabs a reader’s attention with its grotesque title, ensuing someone’s downfall or failure. The saying “lamb to the slaughter,” usually refers to an innocent person who is ignorantly led to his or her failure. This particular short story describes a betrayal in which how a woman brutally kills her husband after he tells her that he wants a divorce. She then persuades the policemen who rush to the scene to consume the evidence. This action and Patrick’s actions show the theme of betrayal throughout the story which Roald Dahl portrays through the use of point of view, symbolism and black humor.
Now, with her husband dead, Mrs. Maloney must find a job to support herself and her child. Why would she bring that upon herself? All good questions with the same answer, Mary did not murder Patrick Maloney. During the case, the police found a suitable alibi for Mrs. Maloney, which was solidified by Sam the grocer. Sam told the police Mary acted normal and wanted to make Patrick a good supper, and the grocer even went to say it was impossible Mary murdered Patrick.
Have you ever been deep into a story that you want know what happens next. Many authors use different techniques to entice the reader to read more. In the story lamb to the slaughter, by Roald Dahl, the three literary devices that are used to advance the plotline include imagery, foreshadowing, and irony. To start, Dahl uses imagery to significantly impact the story. In lamb to the slaughter imagery was used the the character Mary , “swung the big frozen leg of lamb high in the air and brought it down as hard as she could to the back of his head”(Dahl).The way Dahl described how she swung the leg of lamb created a vivid and gruesome picture of the murder making it more suspenseful.
In Roald Dahl’s short story Lamb to the Slaughter, there are many examples of irony that help to develop the plot of the story that proves people are not always what they seem. One clear example of irony occurs when the reader doesn’t expect Mary, a pregnant woman who dearly loves her husband, to kill him with a leg of lamb. For example, in the text, Dahl says, “At that point, Mary Maloney simply walked up behind him and without any pause she swung the big frozen leg of lamb high in the air and brought it down as hard as she could on the back of his head” (4).
The short story “Lamb to The Slaughter” by Roald Dahl is about the death of a detective who has been murdered by his wife. As officers arrive they can’t seem to find the murder and the murder weapon. The short story Lamb to The Slaughter is interesting to read because the author allows readers to put their own perspective into the book. Another reason is the storyline and finally the theme.
Roald Dahl shows us how anyone can change their mind in the blink of an eye, and it shows us how you can incorporate irony into any story. To begin, in the story Mary is presented as a hard working, loving, pregnant wife who just wants what is best for her husband, but at the tables Mary strikes her husband in the head with a leg of lamb.
She is now methodical, coming up with an alibi and practicing holding a normal conversation in the mirror with the neighborhood grocer (Dahl 2). Returning home, Mary prepares to act shocked when she arrives to the scene of the crime, telling herself if she “found anything unusual or terrible when she got home..she would have to react with greift and horror” (Dahl 3). At this point, Mary is very calculated and in control. She knows how to react and what to do to avoid facing the repercussions of murder. Once back at home, she calls the police, and once they arrive she begins to play the part of a grieving wife, crying endlessly. But she was still well-organized and managed to manipulate the situation into her control. Knowing full and well all she needs to do is get rid of the evidence, her now calculating mood formulates a plan. Still under the rouge of a grief stricken wife, she asks the officers, “Would you do me a favor?...Why don’t you eat up the lamb in the oven?” (Dahl 4). This showcases how methodical she is, using the situation to her