“I began the creation of a human being” – Victor (54). These exact words from a delusional character from the novel Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, would change the phase of the characters life. The novel Frankenstein is about a man named Victor and how his life changed after his imagination got the best of him.The novel appears to be a monster story but on the contrary, it's actually a story about human nature. Through the characters of Frankenstein’s monster, Victor, William, and the De Lacey family. Shelley shows human nature means being judgmental and being judged. Human nature is the way of life of being judgmental and judged. In the novel,the act of human nature has occurred numerous times. One was when The monster was shot once the boy seen Frankenstein even after he saved a girl's life. Another example was when Victor the creator of the monster was disgusted by his creation. …show more content…
There are many examples of human nature or how the characters show human nature.
One is when the monster was walking in the woods and he saw a girl fall into a rapid stream. When he saw her he tried saved by dragging her to shore. After he saved her the person she was with came and took her away and he shot the monster. “But when the man saw me draw near, he aimed a gun, which he carried, at my body and fired”(169). The monster didn't mean any harm but because the monster didn't look like a human he got shot. It would have been different if it was regular person. Since the creature didn't look exactly like him he instantly judged
him. Another scene was when william met the monster in the woods.When William ran into the monster he first stared at him. The monster says “I could seize him and educate him as my companion and friend” he shows that even after being shot and dealing with judgmental people he still wanted to be friends with a human(170). The monster grabbed William and he started screaming and yelling.William says”Hideous monster! Let me go”(171). William said his father's name was Frankenstein. The monsters says ”you belong then to my enemy”(171). So he tries to kill him. William did As many humans would have done if they seen something that wasn't normal, Scream and yell that's just human nature. The last scene that showed an act of human nature was when Victor the person who created the monster was disgusted with his own creation. Victor threatens him and tells him to leave. Victor says “Be gone, vile insect! Oe rather stay that i may trample you to dust” Victor show how much he dislikes the monster(113). He was the most judgmental person the monster probably met or talked to considering that he made him look the way he does.I believe that victor caused the obliteration of the monster because he continuously tell him go away and threatens him. Victors says “I may extinguish which I so negligently bestowed(113). To the monster being human is judging people by what they look like. To everyone else being human means looking like a normal person and having normal features. Being human doesn't only mean looking normal, it's having a Heart. The monster had heart but his appearance wasn't normal. In most of the scenes when monster showed heart or act of human. Human nature crumpled it up and threw it away. In some cases human nature isn't always a good thing. Whenever he tried to do something nice or tried to make friends. He always found himself getting hurt physically and mentally and his hate towards humans grew.Do you believe that human nature is being judgmental and to be judged or is there more to that? Bibliography Shelley, Mary. Frankestein. Barcelona: Vicens Vives, 2008. Print.
In one example, when the monster was good he recanted a story about his life after he was created, he left his place of home and went on a journey. He was scared and lost until he met people along the way. They were nice to the monster and made him
Although humans have the tendency to set idealistic goals to better future generations, often the results can prove disastrous, even deadly. The tale of Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, focuses on the outcome of one man's idealistic motives and desires of dabbling with nature, which result in the creation of horrific creature. Victor Frankenstein was not doomed to failure from his initial desire to overstep the natural bounds of human knowledge. Rather, it was his poor parenting of his progeny that lead to his creation's thirst for the vindication of his unjust life. In his idealism, Victor is blinded, and so the creation accuses him for delivering him into a world where he could not ever be entirely received by the people who inhabit it. Not only failing to foresee his faulty idealism, nearing the end of the tale, he embarks upon a final journey, consciously choosing to pursue his creation in vengeance, while admitting he himself that it may result in his own doom. The creation of an unloved being and the quest for the elixir of life holds Victor Frankenstein more accountable for his own death than the creation himself.
“I now hasten to the more moving part of my story. I shall relate events that impressed me with feelings which, from what I was, have made me what I am” (Shelley 92). Frankenstein’s Creature presents these lines as it transitions from a being that merely observes its surroundings to something that gains knowledge from the occurrences around it. The Creature learns about humanity from “the perfect forms of [his] cottagers” (90). Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein offers compelling insights into the everlasting nature versus nurture argument. Her husband, Percy Bysshe Shelley wrote, “Treat a person ill, and he will become wicked.” Shelley believes that the nurture of someone, or something, in the Creature’s case, forms them into who they become and what actions they take. While this is true for Frankenstein’s Creature, the same cannot be said about Victor Frankenstein.
When Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein is analyzed, critics comes to a conclusion about Victor Frankenstein's creation. The creature invokes the most sympathy from the readers than any other character in the novel. Because he is abandoned by society which manipulates the creature to do evil things despite his good heart. Therefore Shelley's message throughout the novel is that a person is not born evil, they are made evil.
“I was benevolent and good; misery made me fiend” How far and in what ways is the creature a victim of Frankensteins thirst for knowledge?
Throughout the history of mankind, the question of what it means to be a human being has been contemplated for centuries. Numerous philosophers have read and debated this significant question and it is still reflected upon today. Frankenstein, written by Mary Shelley plumbs the depth of this question with the example of a creature who is spurned by humanity despite being human in character. The discernment of creature from man is still misconstrued as shown in this tale, but its importance lies in the message Frankenstein that appearances matter very little when it comes to being human. The creature’s human qualities of its emotions, desire for companionship, and intelligence set it apart as uniquely human from simply a base and barbaric monster
In Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley’s novel “Frankenstein”, the monster’s account of his life from the day of his “birth” is distinct to the audience. As the monster constructs a narrative of his life from the day of his “birth” throughout his development in the novel, he has a request for his creator, Victor Frankenstein, too—to create a female partner for him. Although Victor Frankenstein does not fulfill the task he was requested to do, the monster persuaded him to agree to and to fulfill the task of creating a female partner for him. The monster uses ethos, organic imagery, and tonal shift to persuade his creator, Victor Frankenstein, to fulfill the task.
I had the opportunity to read Frankenstein by Mary Shelley several years ago and it became one of my favorite books. My initial feeling was sorrow, what a wonderful story that has been slowly destroyed by Hollywood through the years. We think of Victor Frankenstein as a mad scientist trying to destroy mankind, and the monster having bolts in his neck with very little intellect. Mary Shelley’s book is completely different from the Hollywood version we are accustom to. The monster is intelligent and has emotions, the mad scientist or Victor was scared of his own creation due to his appearance. The monster initially showed no signs of evil in the novel, but where did he learn it from? Who is the real evil monster
The representation of human nature in literature can reveal an author’s or director’s views on the flaws in the characters and societies. This is evident in the texts, Frankenstein by Mary Shelley and Mystery Road by Ivan Sen, as they both make interpretations on the deadly sin, Greed. There are many character traits that make up human nature; greed is one such example, representing a flaw in people that drives an intense, destructive and selfish desire for something. Through Shelley’s characters, Victor Frankenstein and Robert Walton, she portrayed examples of greed and selflessness through their unabated obsession for knowledge and intention to help others. Shelley has used allusion and characterisation to portray their human nature. Similarly,
“Frankenstein” by Mary Shelly explores the concept of the body, life, ‘the self’ and most of importantly humanity, which is repeatedly questioned throughout the novel. The definition of humanity is the quality of being humane or in other words someone that can feel or possess compassion. Despite all the facts against the “monster” in “Frankenstein” he is indeed what one would consider being human. Humanity isn’t just about ones physical appearance but also includes intellect and emotion. Some people argue that the “monster” is not a human for he was not a creature that was born from “God” or from a human body. That being said, the “monster” is not only able to speak different languages, he can also show empathy - one of many distinct traits that set humans apart from the animals. Both the “monster” and his creator, Victor, hold anger and feel a sense of suffering throughout the novel. Victor is a good person with good intentions just like most individuals, but makes the mistake of getting swept up into his passion of science and without thinking of the consequences he creates a “monster”. After completing his science project, he attempts to move forward with his life, however his past – i.e., the “monster” continues to follow and someone haunt him. While one shouldn’t fault or place blame on Frankenstein for his mistakes, you also can’t help but feel somewhat sympathetic for the creature. Frankenstein just wants to feel accepted and loved, he can’t help the way he treats people for he’s only mimicking how people have treated him, which in most cases solely based on his appearance. Unlike most of the monsters we are exposed to in films past and present, the character of the “monster” ...
In the novel "Frankenstein" by Mary Shelley, the relationship of external apperence and internal feelings are directly related. The creature is created and he is innocent, though he is seaverly deformed. His nature is to be good and kind, but society only views his external appereance which is grotesque. Human nature is to judge by external apperence. He is automatically ostracized and labeled as a monster because of his external apperence. He finnaly realized that no matter how elequintly he speaks and how kind he is, people will never be able to see past his external deformities. Children are fearful of him, Adults think he is dangerous, and his own creator abandons him in disgust. The creature is treated as a monster, therefore he begins to internalize societies view of him and act the like a monster.
Sometimes, in novels like Frankenstein, the motives of the author are unclear. It is clear however, that one of the many themes Mary Shelley presents is the humanity of Victor Frankenstein's creation. Although she presents evidence in both support and opposition to the creation's humanity, it is apparent that this being is indeed human. His humanity is not only witnessed in his physical being, but in his intellectual and emotional thoughts as well. His humanity is argued by the fact that being human does not mean coming from a specific genetic chain and having family to relate to, but to embrace many of the distinct traits that set humans apart from other animals in this world. In fact, calling Victor's creation a `monster' doesn't support the argument that he is human, so for the sake of this case, his name shall be Phil.
Throughout the year Professor Prudden has been teaching us the idea of the individual and when and how it came about. We have studied The French Revolution, Scientific Revolution, Colonialism, and Reformation, all stressing what made this time period important to the individual. We finished the class reading the novel Frankenstein with does a great job of demonstrating a man or “monster” creaking his own being. We have already determined that an individual is; the habit or principle of being independent and self-reliant. Mary Shelley demonstrates individuality through Frankenstein and leads to his internal isolation and loneliness. She shows that uniqueness is the most important aspect of individualism not only through Frankenstein but Victor
Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein expresses human nature specifically through the character of the “Creature” and his development. The Creature has an opportunity to explore his surroundings, and in doing so he learns that human nature is to run away from something so catastrophic in looks. The Creature discovers that he must limit himself in what he does due to the response of humans because of his deformities. I feel that Mary Shelley tries to depict human nature to running away from the abnormal, which results in alienation of the “abnormal.” Even today, people have a prejudice against someone or something that is abnormal, and these people will act differently towards this abnormality that is put in front of them. In the novel, Shelley seems to suggest a conception of humanity that is deeply influe...
When it comes to the development of someones behaviors and mannerisms the argument of nature versus nurture often emerges. In Mary Shelley’s horror novel Frankenstein, published in 1818, the antagonist, Frankenstein’s Monster, is the epitome for the nature versus nurture argument. The story takes place in Europe where Victor Frankenstein, a mastermind of science, takes his studies to the next level by giving life to a creature that resembles a deformed man; he then abandons his creation. Frankenstein's monster becomes a murderous fiend, but the question remains, was he born this way or did his environment shape his abhorred ways? Though we cannot discount the influence of nature or hereditary in the monster’s case, people become who they are