Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Full analysis about “The Pardoner s Tale”
The pardoner's tale literary analysis
Full analysis about “The Pardoner s Tale”
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Full analysis about “The Pardoner s Tale”
The Pardoner tells the story for the reasons of him showing how he is greedy, manipulative, and shameless. One reason the Pardoner tells the story is that he is greedy. The way to find out that he is greedy is by how he says it on his own. The Pardoner states, “. . . and all my antics are a joy to see. / The curse of avarice and cupidity . . .” (lines 16-17). The Pardoner right of the bat tells he is greedy with less than twenty words. He uses the term “antics and cupidity” which means the desire to gain wealth: greed. The Pardoner also says, “But let me briefly make my purpose plain; / I preach for nothing but for greed of gain / And use the same old text, as bold as brass, / Radix malorum est cupiditas.” (lines 41-44). He says he preaches for nothing, meaning what he tells others is a lie and does not mean a single thing. He uses the saying “Radix malorum est cupiditas” to fool those he is fooling which he clearly also states that the purpose he …show more content…
He has no care in the world of what he does for a living and seems like he does not plan to change either. He says, “Once dead what matter how their souls may fare? / They can go blackberrying for all I care!” (lines 23-24). He clearly has no shame by the way he talks about the poor souls once they pass. He claims that they can go “blackberrying” for all he cares; more less meaning they can go get lost after giving all their money to him. The Pardoner also states, “I mean to have money, wool and cheese and wheat / Though it were given me by the poorest lad / Or the poorest village widow, though she had a string of starving children, all agape.” (lines 66-69). The pardoner brags about what he wants to have, but in a way offends those who make his living. He mentions a poor widow with a bunch of hungry kids and still takes what his given to him. He shows no remorse for taking things that were in exchange for pardons, which all happened to be
At this point, the speaker's newfound empathy toward the killer prompts his diatribe about American support of capital punishment. He begins with a hypothetical portrayal of an audience chaotically discussing the meaning of the word "kill," each person exclaiming "how they spell it" and "what it means to them." Subsequently, he recounts a story about insensitive reporters at a hanging, followed by a claim that "we throw killers in one grave / and victims in another. We form sides / and have two separate feasts." While the speaker may seem to be utilizing the description of the audience and the story of the reporters in order to denounce the mindset of his peers, he is in fact condemning his own former mentality. By denying five times that he is a witness, the speaker avoids the guilt that results from involvement in the death of another man. Through his repeated use of the phrase "I am not a witness," he essentially enables and catalyzes the execution of the killer, dismissing his humanity and conforming to the opinion that he deserves to be killed; however, once the speaker recognizes his fault and his conformity to this mindset, the tone of the poem suddenly shifts. The speaker's empathy for the killer reaches its maximum when he fully understands the pain of the condemned and finally sees the killer as his equal, which prompts his own admission of guilt and prior indifference: "I am a
The narrator murders an old man who he is meant to be taking care of. He claims to have nothing against the man and says that he loves him. Regardless of this, he finds the mans filmy, vulture-like eye to be disturbing and thinks this is a valid enough reason to kill him. Montresor feels insulted by his colleague, Fortunado and believes that it is now his duty to end his life. Both claim to not have anything against his victim other than one small detail, being either and eye or an insult, and feel that they are justified in wanting them dead.They both meticulously plan out what they are going to do to their victim long before they carry out their actions. Neither the old man or Fortunado had any idea that their murderer had any reason to want them dead and had no way of anticipating what was doing to happen to them. The narrator smothers the old man with his mattress, chops up his body, and stuffs him in the floorboards. Montresor leads a very d...
One’s greed for power blinds their sense of pity for humanity which creates chaos in society because of their ignorance. In the text Danforth explains to Francis Nurse, “But you must understand sir, that a person is either with this court or he must be counted against it, there be no road between” (Miller 94). In this quote Danforth explains to Nurse that a citizen of Salem cannot be against the court’s justice system: One must comply with its rules or else they will be counted as guilty. Danforth claims power over the people through the court and anyone who does not obey his demands will be persecuted which shows that this trial is for himself and not for the town. For the sake of his power, Danforth apprehends innocent individuals who are not compliant thus foreshadowing the misfortunes of uninvolved people who are suspects. Without knowing, Danforth intends to create a disorder in society because of his need for more control, which justifies his inexperience and his abuse of authority. Danforth also tells Nurse, “And do you know that near to four hundred are in the jails from marble head to Lynn, and upon my signature? […] And seventy-two condemned to hang by that signature?” (Miller 87). Here Danforth attempts to intimidate Nurse by bragging with h...
The post-Civil War years between 1865 and 1900 were a time of immense social change and economic growth in the United States. This time period, commonly referred to as “The Gilded Age,” saw an end to Reconstruction, rapid industrialization, and new wealth. Despite these achievements, however, the era between Reconstruction and the beginning of the twentieth century was plagued by political stalemate, a decline of human values, increased materialism, and widespread corruption.
Another trait that is displayed by the Pardoner and a character in his tale is hypocrisy. Although the Pardoner is extremely greedy, he continues to try and teach that "Avarice is the root of all evil" (6). The characters in his tale display great hypocrisy as well. As the tale begins, the friends all act very trustworthy and faithful towards all of their friends. They nobly make a decision to risk their lives while trying to slay their friend's murderer. As they talk about their challenge, they pledge "to live and die each of them for the other, / As if he were his own blood brother" (241-242). At the end of the tale, the "brothers" begin to reveal their true nature. They all turn on each other in an attempt to steal the treasure for themselves.
In “The Pardoner’s Tale,” Geoffrey Chaucer masterfully frames an informal homily. Through the use of verbal and situational irony, Chaucer is able to accentuate the moral characteristics of the Pardoner. The essence of the story is exemplified by the blatant discrepancy between the character of the storyteller and the message of his story. By analyzing this contrast, the reader can place himself in the mind of the Pardoner in order to account for his psychology.
...t the law would eventually find him and force him to disclose the individual’s identities. I think his motives behind writing the story were to produce a thought provoking article that revealed the under ground operation of the drug manufacturing community. He wanted to shakes things up and report on something that was controversial and intriguing, however in the end he became a rat.
The pardoner telling a story about greed and saying that if you don’t repent you will get what’s coming to you. A great example of this is in line 289-290, “Thus these murders receive...
In Candide, by Voltaire, Candide struggles through a world torn by constant bloodshed and crime. As he travels, he and other characters are deceived, injured, and abused by the world around him. Voltaire’s Candide reveals another side of human beings’ hearts as he portrays humanity’s hamartias as greed, lust, and religion.
The Pardoner usually offers his pardons and relics for sale after delivering a sermon, but he readily admits to his companions that they are not real. By admitting his dupl...
*the narrator is looking back on what he has once witnessed long ago, and it's haunting him, makes him feel guilty and ashamed.
...us on deadly revenge. In each case, a retribution that is carried out in a cruel and callous fashion. The men fulfilling these actions are cold, calculating, and contemplative. They have painstakingly endeavored to seek retribution against what has plagued them: Fortunato and his insults to the Montresor and the old man’s piercing, chilling eye for the man from “The Tell-Tale Heart”. Driven to the point of madness by their own obsessions, they plot to murder their offenders. The tales are told each by the man who has indeed committed the crime. Each man’s insanity becomes more and more clear as they narrate confession; the Montresor with the unfailing ease with which he dictates his account and the man from “The Tell-Tale Heart” with his jagged and rough delivery. Their distinct mental instability calls into question to reliability of the report they give.
The major part of the story was mostly about the guilt of the narrator. The story is about a mad man that after killing his companion for no reason hears a never-ending heartbeat and lets out his sense of guilty by shouting out his confession.
Have no delight in passing away the time unless to spy my shadow in the sun and descant on mine own deformity. And therefore since I cannot prove a lover to entertain these fair, well-spoken days. I am determined to prove a villain and hate the idle pleasures of these days.” He says that since he was not made to be a lover, he has. no use for peace, and will willingly destroy peace with his crimes.
... truth to the Governor but instead he decided to let God decide Makar’s faith. Later that night Makar goes to Aksionov and confesses that he was the one who had murdered the merchant. He tells Aksionov that he will report first thing in the morning that he was the one that did it and that they will let Aksionov go. However Aksionov replies that he has nothing left to return to and this makes Makar beg for Aksionov’s forgiveness. He pardons Makar and tell him that God will forgive him. Aksionov has no desire to return home, but only hopes for his last hour in prison. When Makar had finished confessing to the guards, they sent for Aksionov’s release, but when they got there he was already dead. In the end one should not hold hatred against another, even if they had to suffer because of them. They know that God sees the truth, but waits for the right opportunity.