Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Experience of court observation
Court observation theory
Court observation theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Experience of court observation
For the court observation assignment, I visited the Tolland County Courthouse. I went to court on Tuesday April 4th, 2017 from 11am to 12:30pm. The matters I observed in the courtroom regarded a restraining order from an ex-girlfriend to her ex-boyfriend. The details involved in the case included the welfare of their three-month-old baby and the custody battle.
When we arrived at the location, we struggled to make sure we were parking in the correct location. The sign at the nearest parking lot said the parking was for “court business”. We weren’t sure what “business” was defined as. To ensure we were in the correct place we called the courthouse for confirmation. Walking into the courthouse was intimidating. There were two security guards
…show more content…
The conversation seemed more casual with the judge because the couple has been there before. Both the man and woman fought back and forth, and the security guard found it comical because of how immature they were acting. As the conversations continued, the guard was laughing. I was surprised by how relaxed the conversations were with the judge. The woman interrupted the judge multiple times and showed messages on her phone as evidence. The woman was on her phone while the judge was speaking. The man had paperwork, and hard copy evidence that seemed more professional; He addressed the judge as “your honor” and said “if I may” when showing evidence. The attire of the woman was extremely casual, sweatpants and a sweatshirt, looking like she just rolled out of bed. That was also surprising because in a situation like a custody battle, I would assume the mother would want to make herself look presentable and taken care of. It was interesting how the judge discussed her thoughts with the two people. She told them they needed to act like adults. The topics of discussion included the health of their baby boy. The alcohol consumption of the father was questioned because of his drug history. The mother was concerned about that. The judge brought up the controversy that both grandmothers are overstepping in the child’s life. One problem that arose was the woman’s mother tried to get the father
Courtroom 302 is one of the busiest courtrooms in the United States and that isn’t always the case, but the processes are still the same. According to our textbook, (Neubauer, D.W. & Fradella, H.F., 2017, p. 13) “The overwhelming majority of crimes involve burglary and theft.” Which Courtroom 309 gives many cases that involved some sort of theft or robbery, like the case that mentioned earlier. It also gives a great representation of the flaws that our criminal justice system
Analysis / Ruling of the Court. The district court granted the employer’s motion for summary judgement on the sexual harassment claim due to the fact that Sherry Lynch treated both men and women equally in this case; that is, she behaved in the same vulgar and inappropriate way towards both genders. For this reason, Smith’s gender was not a contributing factor to the harassment, which is one of the conditions that would have to be met for the sexual harassment claim. The appellate court agreed and affirmed the district court’s judgement. The district court ended up excluding evidence pertaining to the sexual harassment claim because the sexual harassment claim had been dismissed on summary judgement, and because the court decided that the details of the harassment bore little relevance to the retaliation case whereas this evidence would be unfairly prejudicial to Hy-Vee. The appellate court affirmed the district court’s judgement. Smith did not offer any specifics on what evidence she would have wanted to present, which made it hard for the court to determine whether this evidence was material to the retaliation case or not. In her opposition to the motion in limine, she said she only wanted to discuss the harassment case in general, including mentioning that Lynch had harassed/touched her inappropriately. Hy-Vee had no objection to this, and Smith got to present this much evidence in the trial. Therefore, the appellate court found that she waived any objection to the
I attended the Bail court on Monday, February 22 at the Ontario Court of Justice in Scarborough. After some searching, I found the court assignment sheet posted outside a clerk's office. It had listed each courtroom number and what they were assigned to hold. Courtroom 412 was bail, courtroom 406 was guilty pleas, and 407 was first appearance. When I approached courtroom 412, I saw the crown counsel have a brief conversation with a colleague. They were critical of the Judge being late – the court was scheduled to reconvene at 2pm. She sarcastically stated that 'he must need a longer lunch b...
The following assertion intends to provide an in-depth insight into my personal experience observing a trial in the Supreme Court of Victoria. This paper will outline a selection of many pressing issues noticed throughout my observation, more specifically those regarding the law and language in legal arenas along with symbolic and architectural traditions that reinforce prejudice towards those from a low socio-economic background and ethnic minority groups. Furthermore, it will argue how symbolism, architecture and practices within a court are in place to create a power dynamic and reinforce the courts British-'western' sovereignty and royal-like wealth which in turn intimidates members of the community especially from ethnically diverse or disadvantaged groups. I intend to demonstrate the power and authority of judges and the courts by drawing comparisons between the judges status in a court room with royalty and religious pastors, through the observation of attire, title and actual positioning in a court room.
Throughout the years there has been limitless legal cases presented to the court systems. All cases are not the same. Some cases vary from decisions that are made by a single judge, while other cases decisions are made by a jury. As cases are presented they typically start off as disputes, misunderstandings, or failure to comply among other things. It is possible to settle some cases outside of the courts, but that does require understanding and cooperation by all parties involved. However, for those that are not so willing to settle out of court, they eventually visit the court system. The court system is not in existence to cause humiliation for anyone, but more so to offer a helping hand from a legal prospective. At the same time, the legal system is not to be abuse. or misused either.
When I first entered the courthouse, I was amazed at how large and modern it looked. I was expecting a smaller building with one courtroom, but this courthouse exceeded my expectations. With different
I've researched about the volunteer program in phoenix, and it is named COPS "Citizens Offering Police support" This program is running through out all Phoenix Arizona departments. The volunteer organization is dedicated to helping the Phoenix Police Department and the community. Today, they have almost 200 volunteers working in a variety of units within COPS department. They also have university and college students interns working on their career paths with program. The COPS Program brings the community into the police family. Volunteers working shoulder to shoulder with police officers and our support staff can see the difficulty and value of the police mission. Although it isn't easy to just become apart of the support system, it's more
Bring the proper documentation, during your court trial or hearing, you or your attorney will have the opportunity to explain the facts of your case to the Judge or Commissioner. Make sure your paperwork is organized and that it supports your claim. Examples include receipts, contracts, letters, bills and photos. If you plan to enter your paperwork into evidence during your trial or hearing, bring 4 copies (1 original and 3 copies). You must give the Court the original, give one copy to the other side, keep one copy for yourself and have the third copy available should you decide to use it when questioning a witness. Bring a pencil and paper with you to take notes about your case.
(-- removed HTML --) (-- removed HTML --) The proceedings are private. Courtroom proceedings are out in the public for everyone to hear. (-- removed HTML --)
For my observation paper, I chose to write about my visit to the Mesa County District Court, which is located at 125 N Spruce St in Grand Junction. The date of my visit was June 12th and I was there from 8:00 a.m. until 9:30 a.m. This paper is based off my own court appearance. The good thing, I had a lawyer and he did all the work, and I sat there and observed everything.
The attorneys as well as the judge did an exemplary job of listening to what the individuals for each side had to say. One of the characters told of growing up gay and when his parents discovered his journal they were extremely upset and sent him to NARTH (National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality), he admitted that he did not commit to the therapy, he just wanted to survive. By sitting through all of the therapy sessions without really listening this character was engaging in pseudo listening. As well as being in a large group courtroom environment the characters also engaged in communication within their close proximities such as face-to-face. While participating in face-to-face conversations the various characters were able to pay attention to each other’s words as well as their expressions and
I think that they should ban court storming in sports. Court storming is when a top team losses to either a low ranked team or to thier rivals, when the underrated team wins thier fans jump over the barricade and rush on the court and end up lifting up the home team, the bad part about this is players can end up gettiing hurt or players could end up get agrivated at the fans for bumping into them, so at rare times a player will swing at the fan for pushing the player. People and groups are arguing towards the topic of court stroming,” fans pinned a coach in the corner and one of the fans elbowed a player” this is part of the problem with court storming, it is not only dangerous to other fans it can be dangerous twords players and
The courts have the function of giving the public a chance to present themselves whether to prosecute or defend themselves if any disputes against them rise. It is known to everyone that a court is a place where disputes can be settled while using the right and proper procedures. In the Criminal court is the luxury of going through a tedious process of breaking a law. Once you have been arrested and have to go to court because of the arrest, you now have a criminal case appointed against you. The court is also the place where a just, fair and unbiased trial can be heard so that it would not cause any disadvantage to either of the party involved in the dispute. The parties are given a chance to represent themselves or to choose to have a legal representative, which is mostly preferred by many.
The courtroom is a place where cases are heard and deliberated as evidence is produced to prove whether the accused person is innocent or guilty. Different courtroom varies depending on the hierarchy and the type of cases, they deliberate upon in the courtroom. In the United States, the courts are closely interlinked through a hierarchical system at either the state or the federal level. Therefore, the court must have jurisdiction before it takes upon a case, deliberate, and come up with a judgment on it. The criminal case is different from the civil cases, especially when it comes to the court layout. In this essay, I will explain how I experienced a courtroom visit and the important issues are learnt from the visit.
Due to this distance and the English deficiencies of the defendant, he talked to the Judge via his lawyer. Thus courtroom architecture resulted in the defendant being isolated, dehumanised and neglected as a part of their court experience. This architectural aspect served to emphasize the literal and metaphoric separation between the magistrate and the defendant. The spatial dimensions of the District Court created a power dynamic that the public is submissive to the judge. This defied themes and expectations for courtroom