Examined Life: Film Analysis

826 Words2 Pages

Philosophy questions many ideas or statements. For example, the Examined Life asks, does life have meaning? This idea was analyzed, experienced, questioned, discussed and concluded in many different ways. There was a common thread between the Philosophy film, the Apology, our class discussions and the video, Examined life. We often ask ourselves, are we obligated to other people?
In the book, Philosophy Film, by Mary M. Litch, it examines the question briefly, “Does life have meaning?” To explore this idea, a question must be asked, than an argument must be formed, which requires critically thinking to concluded the discussion. This question is a basic question that can be answered through ones deep and disciplined thinking with multiple answers. The purpose of this book is to understand the foundation of Philosophy as well as its expression through film.
In the Apology, Socrates is on trial for his so called, “corruption of the youth,” because of his philosophies. He is straightforward and confused about the chargers brought up against him. Socrates raises an argument in his defense and believes he has no reason to be sorry. Socrates believes if he is punished and killed, no one would around to enlighten the people. This view draws a connection to the question posed, “Are we …show more content…

I really enjoyed what philosopher Avital Ronell, from the film, Examined Life, said about our need for meaning. Humans tend to want and crave meaning. Ronell expressed that individuals need to see the arbitrary moment, and leave things open. She suggested people stop questioning why things are happening and see them for what they are. She reminded me to accept the moment, and don’t question why situations are happening. This has been helpful for my current situation because lately I have been overthinking and not accepting the moment. Ronnell’s view of meaning brings me peace and to focus on the here and

Show More
Related

  • Comparison Between Crito And Apology by Plato

    1631 Words  | 4 Pages

    Plato's The Apology is an account of the speech. Socrates makes at the trial in which he is charged with not recognizing the gods recognized by the state, inventing new gods, and corrupting the youth of Athens. For the most part, Socrates speaks in a very plain, conversational manner. He explains that he has no experience with the law courts and that he will instead speak in the manner to which he is accustomed with honesty and directness. Socrates then proceeds to interrogate Meletus, the man primarily responsible for bringing Socrates before the jury. He strongly attacks Meletus for wasting the court¡¦s time on such absurd charges. He then argues that if he corrupted the young he did so unknowingly since Socrates believes that one never deliberately acts wrongly. If Socrates neither did not corrupt the young nor did so unknowingly, then in both cases he should not be brought to trial. The other charge is the charge of impiety. This is when Socrates finds an inconsistency in Meletus¡¦ belief that Socrates is impious. If he didn¡¦t believe in any gods then it would be inconsistent to say that he believed in spiritual things, as gods are a form of a spiritual thing. He continues to argue against the charges, often asking and answering his own questions as if he were speaking in a conversation with one of his friends. He says that once a man has found his passion in life it would be wrong of him to take into account the risk of life or death that such a passion might involve.

    Read More

  • Examined Life, All That Heaven Allows

    870 Words  | 2 Pages

    In week one, I immediately found myself interested and alert as I tried to absorb as much as possible from Examined Life. It was difficult to find a balance between taking as many good notes as possible, and making sure not to miss anything these eight philosophers had to say. I took to heart many of the thoughts and ideas that were shared throughout the film. The first thing that struck a cord with me was that it is not necessary to find meaning. At first that sounds contrary to philosophy at its core, because I find that is usually what we ponder; the meaning of whatever it is we are thinking, doing, or discussing.

    Read More

  • The Innocence In Plato's The Apology Of Socrates

    1352 Words  | 3 Pages

    After reading “The Apology of Socrates”, I feel very strongly that Socrates was innocent in the allegations against him. “The Apology of Socrates” was written by Plato, Socrates most trusted pupil, who in fact wrote everything for Socrates. Numerous times in his defense, Socrates points out ways that what he is being accused of is false. The point of this paper is to show how Socrates did this, and to explain how he proved his innocence by using these quotes. He uses a lot of questions to the accusers to prove his points and is very skilled in speech and knowledge. This essay’s purpose is to explain why I think Socrates was innocent, and how he proves that in his speech.

    Read More

  • Plato's Apology: The Argument For Corrupting The Youth Of Plato

    785 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Plato’s Apology, when Socrates is pleading his defence, he makes a good argument against the charges of corrupting the youth of Athens. This is evident when he states that, firstly, Meletus, the man who is trying to get Socrates executed, has never cared about the youth of Athens and has no real knowledge on the subject. Secondly, Socrates states that if he was in some way corrupting the youth, then he was doing it unintentionally or unwillingly, in which case he was brought to court for no reason. Finally, Socrates brings to light the fact that Meletus doesn’t have a single witness to attest to Socrates’ corruption. This is how Socrates proves his argument that he isn’t responsible for corrupting the youth of Athens.

    Read More

  • The Clouds By Aristophanes, The Apology, And The Republic

    1364 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are several charges laid against Socrates in his trial. Plato’s Apology divides these charges into two sets- the original charges and the new charges. The original accusations are: “Socrates does injustice

    Read More

  • Not My Life Film Analysis

    538 Words  | 2 Pages

    Opening: This Actors out sort of senseless one can hardly imagine how the life of driving character Alison Morgan can be as glad and placated as is appeared in the to start with, rather saccharine 20 minutes yet as the film advances it picks up quality and force. Alison discovers that her amnesia is really concealment for some dim insider facts in her own past and that of her spouse Steve. It's a really clear minor departure from Gaslight however inside of the bounds that excellent thriller figures of speech Paul A.

    Read More

  • To Live: An Analysis Of The Movie: To Live

    1024 Words  | 3 Pages

    The movie, To Live, is about the life of Xu Fugui and his family. Fugui is a rich man with a gambling problem. The Chinese Civil War is taking place during the beginning of the movie. When Fugui loses his property gambling, he is forced to join Chungsheng in the business of shadow puppets to make money for his family.. Fugui and Chungsheng are forced to join the army. After most of their fellow troops were killed, Fugui and Chungsheng were captured by the Communist Party. Fugui eventually returns home to his wife and kids, to find that his daughter survived a fever, but can no longer speak. The CCP is now in power of China and Fugui sees the man he lost his property to, being put on trial. The movie jumps to the time of The Great Leap Forward. During this time all steel items were collected by the government. Fugui was allowed to keep

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Film Imitation Of Life

    935 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the past, skin and gender were always an issue. If you’re colored (black), people look down at you. If you’re a female, you’re seen as a “living thing” whose purpose is to serve men. Set in New York in the 1950’s, Imitation of Life a drama directed by Douglas Skirk will not only play with your feelings and emotions, your tears will also betray you. The acting of Lana Turner, Susan Kohner, Sandra Dee, Juanita Moore, and John Gavin will surely give you mixed emotions. This marvelous film will also make you question your morals when having thoughts such as wishing bad things would happen to some of the characters, or feeling good after seeing a character miserable but in the end you’ll question yourself, does it have to end that way?

    Read More

  • An Apology From Socrates

    1717 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Apology is Socrates' defense at his trial. As the dialogue begins, Socrates notes that his accusers have cautioned the jury against Socrates' eloquence, according to Socrates, the difference between him and his accusers is that Socrates speaks the truth. Socrates distinguished two groups of accusers: the earlier and the later accusers. The earlier group is the hardest to defend against, since they do not appear in court. He is all so accused of being a Sophist: that he is a teacher and takes money for his teaching. He attempts to explain why he has attracted such a reputation. The oracle was asked if anyone was wiser than Socrates was. The answer was no, there was no man wiser. Socrates cannot believe this oracle, so he sets out to disprove it by finding someone who is wiser. He goes to a politician, who is thought wise by him self and others. Socrates does not think this man to be wise and tells him so. As a consequence, the politician hated Socrates, as did others who heard the questioning. "I am better off, because while he knows nothing but thinks that he knows, I neither know nor think that I know" (Socrates). He questioned politicians, poets, and artisans. He finds that the poets do not write from wisdom, but by genius and inspiration. Meletus charges Socrates with being "a doer of evil, and corrupter of the youth, and he does not believe in the gods of the State, and has other new divinities of his own."

    Read More

  • The Trail Of Socrates And The Apology Of Plato

    1011 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Plato’s Apology it seems that overall Socrates did an effective job using the 3 acts of the mind. The three acts of the mind are: Understanding, Judgment, and Reasoning. These acts are stragically used to rebut the charges made against him during trial. The two charges that are formed against Socrates are corrupting the youth and not believing in the gods. The first act of the mind that we will be looking at is, understanding. The question that needs to be asked is what does corruption mean? The accuser believe that Socrates in corrupting the minds of the children by introducing new concepts. Socrates is trying to teach and involve the minds of the youth by getting them to ask question. It is very important that people are always asking questions about why things are. The next question that needs to be address is what does not believe in the gods mean? Socrates believes in God but that is one god that rules the world, not multiple gods who together rule. They are mad that he has “created” his own god.

    Read More

  • The Apology Written By Plato

    910 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Apology Written By Plato, is a detailed account of the trial of Socrates, who was a great philosopher in Athens. Socrates was brought to trial based on charges of “corrupting the youth” and “not believing in the gods” (23d). The people of Athens believed Socrates was corrupting the youth because they simply did not understand his method of inquiry, which consisted of Socrates teaching them to question what they thought to be true. Socrates’ method of inquiry drove his listeners to question their beliefs and often brought them to a state of puzzlement, or a state Plato calls ‘aporia.’ There are many examples of the Socratic method present in The Meno, which is also written by Plato. The entirety of The Apology consists of Socrates explaining his methods, like those in the Meno, and telling the jury that his intentions were all for the best sake of the city of Athens, which he implies when he says he is “a gift from the god to the city of Athens.”

    Read More

  • Socrates was a Wise and Harmless Man

    1122 Words  | 3 Pages

    Some of the best sources of information about Socrates' philosophical views are the early dialogues of his student Plato, who tried to provide a faithful picture of the methods and teachings of the great master. The Apology is one of the many-recorded dialogues about Socrates. It is about how Socrates was arrested and charged with corrupting the youth, believing in no god(s) (Atheism) and for being a Sophist. He attended his trial and put up a good argument. I believe that Socrates was wrongfully accused and should not have been sentenced to death. Within the duration of this document, I will be discussing the charges laid against Socrates and how he attempted to refute the charges.

    Read More

  • Film Analysis: The Lives Of Others

    1151 Words  | 3 Pages

    Within the German Democratic Republic, there was a secret police force known as the Stasi, which was responsible for state surveillance, attempting to permeate every facet of life. Agents within and informants tied to the Stasi were both feared and hated, as there was no true semblance of privacy for most citizens. Directed by Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck, the movie The Lives of Others follows one particular Stasi agent as he carries out his mission to spy on a well-known writer and his lover. As the film progresses, the audience is able to see the moral transformation of Stasi Captain Hauptmann Gerd Wiesler primarily through the director 's use of the script, colors and lighting, and music.

    Read More

  • A Rhetorical Analysis Of Socrates 'Apology'

    1857 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Plato’s Apology, Socrates presents essentially what we consider to be a rhetorical work of art. He strongly and fiercely proves that his own personal and political convictions are not aligned with the view and beliefs of the majority of the population in Athens. Socrates has righteously shown and argued that he is, in fact, a faithful and loyal citizen who avidly cares about the well being of his people. He even claims that he always acts in the society’s best interest. Although he establishes himself as very much a part of his community he also

    Read More

  • Thrasymachus Definition Of Justice Essay

    523 Words  | 2 Pages

    Socrates questions Thrasymachus on why he adds the detail of the stronger to his definition of justice. Socrates than asks, if it is just for everyone to follow the laws that the ruler has made, if the ruler has made unjust laws. His argument is that people, even rulers make mistakes. This meaning that if a ruler makes mistakes on the law does that still make it just. It is a very conflicting argument to think about, if the rules are not just then why should they be followed but the rules were also put in place by someone who is supposed to know the difference between just and unjust and choose correctly. This relates to what Socrates says during his trial portrayed in the Apology. Socrates claims

    Read More

More about Examined Life: Film Analysis

Open Document