Okay, so we all know about the dinosaurs, right? How they lived millions of years ago; how a massive meteor or volcanic eruptions wiped them out; and how man has never seen a living dinosaur. . . but what if I told you I had enough compelling evidence to prove all of these big name scientists wrong? In other words, evolutionists who basically believe we came from rocks…..I know right!? Well hold on, because I'm getting ready to blow your mind and all of their theories out of the water with the evidence, facts, and stories of eyewitness accounts I have found. As we know it, or have been told, no living man has seen a living dinosaur but I have found strong evidence to prove otherwise. I will start with the earliest account known to man …show more content…
There are are 12 animals; 11 of these animals are alive today except for the 12th the dragon, I believe, as do many others, this is based on none other than the dinosaur. It doesn't seem very logical that the ancient Chinese, when constructing and making their calendar, would include a mythical animal with 11 common everyday animals. There are thousands of depictions of dragons such as art pottery and sculptures that closely resemble dinosaurs. To more ancient proof of their existence with man, I'm taking you to a 12th century Cambodian temple that was constructed in 1186 A.D. There are depictions of everyday life carved on the walls of this temple much like the Inca Stones. There is one very interesting one that depicts a stegosaurus looking dinosaur that people still regard as fake. Its very interesting to find so much evidence of something that is without a doubt is true; and yet the people that are supposed to be geniuses are just plain dumb and chose to disregard all of …show more content…
In 1977, a japanese fishing boat caught a very strange dead looking animal in their fishing net that weighed 4000 lbs. They caught this thing in their net from 900 feet down, quite a good ways down! They took sketches of the bone structure and it matched a plesiosaur. They also took tissue sample and said it matched 96% shark protein; so they claimed it to be a basking shark ...well it very well could have been. But, you have to think of this; apes and humans have almost the same DNA. They are similar but very different creatures; so they cannot say for sure what animal it was. I know what I think it was and I'm sure you do too .The Japanese government was so sure they even made a special stamp commemorating it. I have pictures of all the things I have told you about at the end of the essay just so you can see all this interesting stuff. On to the next interesting stories on the list we will go to the congo in south africa now the congo is roughly 55,000 square miles of swamp and dense jungle and it is 80% unexplored . Now all the way back to 1910 there are reports from missionaries who went into the swamp and said dinosaurs could still be alive ? In 1980 a group of scientists went into the cong to explore it but faced harsh conditions they said the mosquitoes landed on them at 1000 per minute the questioned the natives about the animals the one that caught their
Humanity became fascinated with the idea of evolution with the work of Charles Darwin and the Scientific Revolution. People began hunting for fossils that would prove that man had an ape derived ancestry (Weiner, 1955). After various years of searching, a piece of physical evidence was found in England that was said to confirm the theory of evolution (Weiner, 1955).This confirmation came from Charles Dawson’s discoveries from 1908, that were announced publicly in 1912 (Thackeray, 2011). Dawson was believed to have found the fossil remains of the “missing link” between ape and human evolution, the reconstructed skull of Piltdown man (Augustine, 2006). The material was found in stratigraphical evidence and animal remains that were, at the time, adequate enough to confirm the antiquity of the remains (Weiner, 1955). In 1915, another specimen, Piltdown man II, was found further proving this theory (Augustine, 2006). However, this was merely a hoax proven by fluorine relative dating in 1953; the artifacts and bone fragments discovered turned out to be altered to fit the proposed scenario (Augustine, 2006). The skull found was actually composed of a human braincase that was younger than the complimentary orangutan lower jaw (Falk, 2011). Both sections of the skull had been stained to appear to be from the same person of the same age (Falk, 2011).The perpetrator of this act was never caught and there are many theories proposed for the motive of this hoax (Augustine, 2006). Many people have been taken into consideration for this crime, such as Chardin, Woodward, Hinton, and Dawson (Augustine, 2006). Nevertheless, the evidence that proves that Dawson is guilty of this crime against anthropology is quite substantial compared to the evidence...
(blackdrago.com) “Dragon images have been found on the Ishtar Gate of Babylon, on scrolls from China, in Egyptian hieroglyphs and Ethiopian sketches, on the prows of Viking ships, in bas relief on Aztec temples, on cliffs above the Mississippi River and even on bones carved by Inuits in climates where no reptile could live.” (McNeil) Stories of dragons can be found all through history. Over five thousand years ago, ancient Sumerian cultures had dragon legends in their religions. Modernly, few still believe dragons exist, they can still be found in our movies, books and video
Martin is confident that the extinctions must have been caused by “something outside the normal experience of mammals.”
There was a chief new discovery of fossil bones and teeth belonging to the earliest human ancestors ever discovered. The fossil bones predate the oldest formerly discovered human ancestor by more than a million years. The discovery was of fossil remains of a hominid that lived in present day Ethiopia between 5.2 and 9.8 million years ago. (Hominids include all species following the split as of the chimpanzees on the “human” side of the evolutionary tree.)
I was very intrigued by the findings of the Australopithecines. The idea that Lucy, the skeleton found in Hadar, Africa, was closely related to the human species was amazing.
One of the previous papers in English class required the class to pick a paper to explore, this question will be concentrated on further in the synthesis essay. What evidence do scientist have to prove that prehistoric sharks existed? The reason behind picking this question wasn’t just to find proof that these monsters swam the seas, but to learn more about them from different resources. One of the resources that were used was a chapter in Angelo Mojetta’s book Sharks, called “ The Birth Of A Legend”. The other resource that was used for information was an article in Discovery Channels website called “ Prehistoric Sharks”. Sharks and Discovery Channel are the two resources that led to many other questions about their different, and similar views on prehistoric sharks existence.
Sex, drugs, and disasters are both popular topics that grab public attention and scientific theories of the extinction of dinosaurs. While sex and drug hypotheses represent silly speculations, the disaster claim is good science: it provides testable evidence, has an impact on other scientific fields, and generates continuous research.
Fossil records from 12,000 years ago show the appearance of the Large Mammals followed by Paleoindian in Eastern North America. Another piece of the fossil record shows that the appearance of Paleoindian brought about the disappearance of the large mammals. Some people feel that, "there is evidence to suggest that rapacious hunting practice of the paleohunters in North and South America 12,000 years ago may have caused…The demise of the very animals they hunted" (Powell 1987). The evidence Powell suggests is that the extinction of a large mammal is usually followed by the appearance of humans in the fossil record. This coincidence is not only seen in the fossil records of North and South America but Europe and Asia as well. Powell shows that as human populations increased local extinctions of large mammals occurred. This was probably due to the fact that there were not many predators that could hunt the large mammals except man. For this reason it is also highly like likely that man and large mammals did not co-evolve which ultimately resulted in the extinction of large mammals.
The question of what caused the extinction of megafauna during the Late Pleistocene period is one that archaeologists have struggled to answer for decades, but why should it matter? Discovering with certainty the cause of megafaunal extinction would simultaneously prove or disprove any of the proposed implications of each existing theory regarding this massive extinction.
As archeological discoveries of bone fragments and fossils continue to support the existence of homo-sapiens
...ories of why dinosaurs went extinct abound, and as there is no theory yet to be truly confirmed as the “right one”, my theory of dinosaur cannibalism is also purely anecdotal. The discovery of the cannibalistic Majungatholus atopus in Madagascar is an important scientific find because it confirms a long-standing theory of cannibalism among certain carnivorous dinosaurs. Behavioral patterns of extinct animals are difficult to establish; however, these bones give authentication to previous unfounded beliefs about the ancient feeding practices of some dinosaurs.
Ever since we were young we have been fascinated by the dinosaurs. We have played with dinosaurs as children, watched documentaries as adults with interest, and watching movies with enjoyment. No dinosaur from the past strikes more fear in the present day to the average person then that of Tyrannosaurus Rex. For decades children have played with dinosaurs and had T-Rex dominating other dinosaurs by chasing them down and destroying them. We have seen it time and time again in movies. In Jurassic Park we saw T-Rex terrorize humans, cars, and other dinosaurs. We have even dreamt about it, but if a recent study is correct we are false in our fears.
The species A. afarensis is one of the better known australopithecines, with regards to the number of samples attributed to the species. From speculations about their close relatives, the gorilla and chimpanzee, A. afarensis’ probable social structure can be presumed. The species was named by Johanson and Taieb in 1973. This discovery of a skeleton lead to a heated debate over the validity of the species. The species eventually was accepted by most researchers as a new species of australopithecine and a likely candidate for a human ancestor.
In August 1995 Thomas E. Williamson and his crew discovered a fossil that makes computer simulation of ancient dinosaur sounds possible. Since then, there has been increased excitement throughout the geologic community and with those infatuated with dinosaurs. Two years later on December 5th the ancient sounds of a long extinct dinosaur could be heard throughout the New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science. Later this excitement spilled over into the entertainment industry when Steven Spielberg came out with “Jurassic Park III” which showed this experimentation.
An interesting rumor is that the Triceratops might have never existed. Studies show that as Triceratops’ get older their frills smoothen and their horns get sharper. As they age they start to look like a totally different dinosaur called the Torosaurus (figure 2). Paleontologist found plenty of older Torosaurus fossils but never any of younger Torosaurus’. Can the Triceratops be a younger Torosaurus? Nobody knows the answer to that infamous question.