Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
High incidence of urinary catheter infections
High incidence of urinary catheter infections
Catheter associated urinary tract infection: a quantitative literature review research article
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: High incidence of urinary catheter infections
In the article “Using Evidence-Based Practice to Reduce Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections”, by AJN, the author states how catheters are causing urinary tract infections among adult patients in healthcare facilities. The purpose of healthcare workers reading the article, “Using Evidence-Based Practice to Reduce Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections”, is to provide better care to their patients with a Foley catheter and to try and prevent a urinary tract infection associated with a Foley catheter. This article affects the nursing process by presenting it with further education, and affects the patients by giving them a better catheter experience.
“Using Evidence-Based Practice to Reduce Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections”,
affects the nursing process by presenting it with a seven step problem-solving approach to obtain evidence to help reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections (C.A.U.T.I.). Nurses who read this article can better understand the seven step approach, and also to educate themselves on the growing problem of C.A.U.T.I.s. C.A.U.T.I.s also affect the nursing process by establishing a reminder system to reassure a timely catheter removal (Magers, T, 2013, pg 35). Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) will not only affect the nurses but also the patient. When the nurse fully understands how catheters can cause urinary tract infections the patient can then get the desired outcome of the catheter. Patient care will also be more effective when the nurses understand the proper management of the catheter, when finished reading this article. In conclusion, “Using Evidence-Based Practice to Reduce Catheter-Associated Urinary tract infections” impacts the healthcare by giving a better experience of catheters and teaching the staff how to prevent C.A.U.T.I.s among the patients with catheters. The experiment behind this article has shown to decrease C.A.U.T.I.s by twenty-six percent (Magers, T, 2013, pg. 39).
BioPatch, and alternatives like Tegaderm CHG, are an important first step in helping prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections (CBIs). As CBIs rank among the most frequent and potentially lethal nosocomial infections, the need for a device to cut down infections at the insertion site has increased. The growing numbers of infections has driven companies to consider a three-tiered approach: a maximal aseptic barrier at insertion, proper site maintenance, and hub protection. With BioPatch and alternative products catheter sites receive that maximal aseptic barrier to prevent bacteria growth.
The Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model provides nurses with a system to formulate a practice question, appraise both research and non-research evidence, and to develop recommendations for practice (Dearholt & Dang, 2012). This model guides nurses through the evidence-based research process with ease and minimal difficulty using a problem solving approach.
The topic that I chose is interventions used to reduce catheter associated urinary tract infections(CAUTI). This type of infection is acquired from the use of urinary catheter while in the hospital. According to the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, urinary tract infections are responsible for 40 percent of all hospital-acquired infections annually, with 80% of these hospital acquired infection caused by use of indwelling urinary catheters. When any type of tubes or catheters are introduced in the body it serves as a medium for infection. Urinary catheters are used during surgery to prevent injury to the bladder. It is also used for urinary retention or bladder obstruction. The implementation of evidenced based practice when providing care
Central lines (CL) are used frequently in hospitals throughout the world. They are placed by trained health care providers, many times nurses, using sterile technique but nosocomial central line catheter associated blood stream infections (CLABSI) have been a dangerous issue. This is a problem that nurses need to pay particular attention to, and is a quality assurance issue, because CLABSI’s “are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and health care costs” (The Joint Commission, 2012). There have been numerous studies conducted, with the objective to determine steps to take to decrease CLABSI infection rate, and research continues to be ongoing today. The problem is prevalent on many nursing units, with some patients at great risk than others, but some studies have shown if health care providers follow the current literature, or evidence based guidelines, CLABSIs can be prevented (The Joint Commission, 2012). The purpose of this paper is to summarize current findings related to this topic, and establish a quality assurance (QA) change plan nurses can implement for CL placement and maintenance, leading to decreased risk of nosocomial CLABSIs.
What is meant by evidence-based practice and how is this different from an historical standpoint.
Within this essay Evidence based Practice will be identified and the significant effect it has on the nursing profession, barriers will also be explored in the implementation of Evidence Based Practice.
The article I read was entitled Occupational Performance Needs of Young Veterans. The framework discussed in this article is post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, major depression, and alcohol abuse/ dependency. The clients were young Veterans (aged 20-29 years of age) who served in the Iraqi war. While some former soldiers did have physical disabilities, a majority of the former soldiers suffered from psychological disorders. The main reason that I chose this article is that I have two cousins (Nick and B.J (Lyman)) who served in the Afghanistan and Iraqi war so this article really hits home from me.
Over the last 10 years evidence-based practice (EBP) has grown substantially and is changing the nursing care delivered to patients along with the nursing work environment. Nurses are more involved in the decision making process, and are making clinical decisions with better patient outcomes (Good, Fink, Krugman, Oman, & Traditi, 2011). With technology growing at such a fast pace, new and more effective medicines, medical devices, and procedures are developed daily. Digestible sensors that monitor your bodily systems and 3D printing of embryonic stem cells, blood vessels, and sheets of cardiac tissue that actually beat like a real heart, are significantly impacting the future of healthcare (Honigman,
Hi Kylee, thanks for you inputs and ideas. I like that you mentioned this, “First of all it gives a quick look into best practices as far as evidenced based practice goes. Second, I can read a literature review and decide if I need to look deeper into an article or if that article really does not pertain to my research study.” I agree with you because it is very important to understand the articles deeper, the key issues, the criticisms, the strength and weaknesses. Not only that, it is also important to know how they were applied and developed. Any why do we do literature review? To improve patient care-to deliver the best and safest way—EBP is proven effective, it works!
There are plenty of ways and practices available to managers, practitioners and educators to carry out their businesses for the persuasion of required goals, this vast array of choice and awareness make them ambitious to decide which one is workable and which one is not and this make them always keep on trying one and other technique, method or/and process and at this point according to Pfeffer and Sutton(2006) evidence rescue them to decide which one is the right one. This essay, focusing on this respect, will be a critical reading and analysis of strengths and weaknesses to Rousseau’s (2006) article on ‘Is there such a thing as “Evidence –Based Management”. This essay will first introduce how if evidence based management helps managers. Secondly, it will analyze Rousseau’s repeatedly references to the development in clinical and evidence based medicines and links it with evidence based management and what is the status of evidence based management practices. Thirdly, it will critically analyze the Rousseau’s use of story “Making feedback people friendly”. Followed by how there is variation between theory and practice. Fourthly, This essay will critically analyze Organizational Legitimacy, implementation of knowledge as an outcome of evidence based management and roles of schools, teachers, students in creating the environment for evidence based management.
In this section the researchers explain the complications that can occur based on non-adherence to a proper self-catheterization regimen. A spinal cord injury can cause an interruption in neural pathways which affect the function of the bladder causing urinary incontinence, urinary retention, urinary reflux, and recurrent urinary tract infections. These problems can ultimately lead to an increase in renal morbidity and mortality (Shaw & Logan, 2013) Later, in the discussion section of the article, the authors focus on the importance of nursing education to teach patients proper methods to perform and cope with ISC in order to eliminate these common occurrences in patients suffering from SCIs (Shaw & Logan, 2013). The perception of performing this task may vary from patient to patient. This research helps identify various educational approaches that could be taken to accommodate all patients. Therefore, the research is significant to nursing due to the fact that nurses are considered the primary educators and are expected to address practical issues with patients performing ISC and help them manage the psychological issues that are faced with this
The evidence based practice applies the standards and procedures of evidence-base, basic leadership to intercessions planned to enhance, or improve, the social or clinical issues of influenced people. The expectation and impact of evidence based practice is to move the premise of basic leadership about which mediations to offer from instinct, general guidelines, custom, and a straightforward, deliberate process in light of proof from logical research and on agreement among specialists. It can provide clear proven proof of an individual’s innocence or guilt.
In the twenty years I have been in school total, math courses have always found my weak spot. I remember the anxiety I felt as a child and teenager preparing for math tests. No matter how many hours I spent on homework and studying, I never felt prepared. Some people can grasp statistics naturally; however, I do not gravitate towards any mathematical data. Math is like a foreign language to me. When choosing to continue my education to obtain my Master’s Degree, I originally began looking for online colleges that did not require Statistics as a pre-requisition. The more I searched, the more compelled to Walden University I became. When talking with an enrollment advisor, I had to swallow my pride and fears and grasp taking Statistics because my
The way school systems develop effective teachers is to provide them with the supports and professional development needed to enable them to embrace the needs of their diverse students. School psychologists can be a lead collaborator to assist teachers in successful implementation of EBP’s. School psychologists can assist with evaluating the data, providing resources to utilize data informed decisions and interventions. Moreover, they can help evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention and adjust as needed to maximize the positive impact on student achievement.
This essay will explain the importance of scientific research and evidence based practice (EBP) in sports therapy, including the differences between qualitative and quantitative research. There are 4 sources that will be compared; these include a journal article (qualitative), journal article (quantitative), a trade journal article and a conference abstract. The quality of the sources will be evaluated, including strengths and weaknesses and how reliable those sources are today.