The article, “Everyone Knows Psychology Is Not a Real Science” by Christopher Ferguson is one that is written and further explained based on the work of a writer Lilienfeld in an article in the American Psychologist journal in 2012. It explores the public thoughtfulness of psychology, the misconceptions of psychology and generally discusses the issues associated with the science of psychology. The article argues that in order to reduce the controversial issues hovering around psychology, better methods should be devised in order to enhance the clarity of psychology as a science and further make changes to the rigidity of some its guiding theories.
One thing that is worthy of note in this article is that psychology as a field and discipline
…show more content…
According to Ferguson (2015), results from psychological researches lack generalizability which is due to the shaky methodologies utilized by researchers. This issue is one that can be resolved if credible policies can be put in place to regulate how researchers can conduct their researches and communicate their findings to the public. Also, the issue of replication was mentioned. Replicability is supposed to prove the objectivity of psychology as a science, but so far it has only added to the confusion because replication has limited researchers to a particular realm, thus, no progress is made. Although some areas in psychology are quite difficult to replicate, but this is not a problem peculiar to only psychology because other “real” sciences experience this too. Furthermore, there is a bias of editors not wanting to publish null results. This is simply because there is a lingering belief that a specific objective test must provide evidence for a particular theory. Adhering strictly this belief only questions the reliability of psychological …show more content…
The major critique according to Ferguson (2015) for the overstress of the influence of imitation and modelling on human behavior is that both researchers and the general public present it in a facile manner. But I believe that there should not be complexities when explaining human behavior, so I do not think that the influence of imitation and modelling on human behavior is overstressed or presented in a facile manner. Complexity when explaining a phenomenon such as behavior will only bring about unnecessary confusion. Also, it was stated that some psychological theories barricade scientific progress in the sense that researchers become so embedded and engrossed in a particular theoretical perspective which indirectly leads to the tendency to discard data that do not support their theoretical
As Fodor states in his 1997 papers conclusion one must not only attack the generalizations but also the evidence, predictions and then the generalizations don’t actually yield true results. As he simply states, “You have to actually do the science,” (Fodor, 1997. p.162). Once you do this you can clearly see that mental states can be multiply realized in so far that results are logically confirmed. Through examples and explicating why Kim’s conclusion is a fallacy I have shown that Fodor’s conclusion that psychology is a science is valid.
Behaviourist perspective is a study promotes experimental measures within understanding of observational behaviour. The understanding to observational behaviour corresponds to a response with the environment being...
The birth of psychology was in December of 1879, at Germanys University of Leipzig (Myers, 2014, p.2). In 1960, Wilhelm Wundt and Edward Titchener defines psychology as “the science of mental health” (Myers, 2014, p.4). However, two provocative American psychologists, John Watson and B.F Skinner, redefined psychology in 1920. They redefined psychology as “the scientific study of observable behavior” (Myers, 2014, p.4). The problem arose when psychologists realized people could not observe feeling or thought so they needed to come up with a new definition for psychology. We define psychology today as “the science of behavior and mental processes” (Myers, 2014, p.4). Psychology includes many subfields such as human development, social behavior,
Psychology has a number of different facets. As the science of psychology evolves more information comes into play and psychologist devices various schools of thought. Psychology being the study of the human mind means it is easier to find differences than consistencies. For example, in other areas of science one can perform case studies and when it comes to physiological issues some things are consistent certain “normal” cells are going to react the same way regardless of the person. if said cells do not do the same thing then experts know that something is wrong. However with psychology this is not always the case because from a mental standpoint people are different and then when one factors in life that makes a difference as well. Therefore
In the final step of evaluating conclusions, the research community makes an active conversation about what they have discovered, and they write down details about the study. Then, they publish their work in various types of journal in order to let others read and learn from them. In the Katrevich et al. (2014) study, the conclusions were published in North American Journal of Psychology. In this way, scientists can figure out a new idea to be tested or one that will change the thinking about some topics (King, 2016).
The development of psychology like all other sciences started with great minds debating unknown topics and searching for unknown answers. Early philosophers and psychologists such as Sir Francis Bacon and Charles Darwin took a scientific approach to psychology by introducing the ideas of measurement and biology into the way an indi...
The study of psychology began as a theoretical subject a branch of ancient philosophy, and later as a part of biological sciences and physiology. However, over the years, it has grown into a rigorous science and a separate discipline, with its own sets of guidance and experimental techniques. This paper aims to study the various stages that the science of psychology passed through to reach its contemporary status, and their effects on its development. It begins with an overview of the historical and philosophical basis of psychology, discusses the development of the various schools of thought, and highlights their effects on contemporary personal and professional decision-making.
This essay examines the advantages and disadvantages of using a method primarily for gathering research on human subjects that can be examined for later use. It will give a basic outline of the methods of investigation, their uses and their suitability. I will also look at the scientific method as a whole and examine the criticisms of this method using the writings of Hume and Popper.
Bergmann, G. (1956). The contribution of John B. Watson. Psychological Review, 63(4), 265-276. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/614292167?accountid=458
Psychology is the scientific study of the mind, brain, and behavior. In psychology, and all of the other sciences, relying on opinions is abandoned in order to find out which explanations best fit the evidence or data given. Science continually forces us to question our findings and conclusions. Over time, psychology has advanced greatly and a main reason for such progressiveness is because of the change in the research model used.
In terms of a traditional science, one key point is empiricism: a reliance on observations of behaviours instead of our logical reasoning, to further aid explanations of why humans act in certain ways (Valentine, 1992:5). In this way Psychology could be considered a science as psychologists are constantly monitoring behaviours some may perceive as common sense, for example Milgram’s study into obedience (1974). However, for an outcome of any observation to be correct, we must have faith in how it was measured. Two further questions arise from this in relation to Psychology as a scientific measure: whether Psychology doe’s mis-measure, and secondly whether, as some propose, Psychology is ordinari...
The mental health themed movie I choose was Inside Out by Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures. This 94-minute film introduces the main character and hosts an 11-year-old girl named Riley Anderson. Riley was born and raised in Minnesota and all of her loved ones including her friends resided there even her most beloved sports team hockey. Inside of Riley’s young mind, there are 5 psychological profiles which are Joy, Sadness, Disgust, Fear, and Anger which are broken down in a less complex interpretation of these emotions.
... a trial that lead to small changes in performance that seek to reduce the error on the next trial” (Gluck et al., 2014, p. 133). As students of psychology, it is important to realize that all tests are not fail proof. We shouldn’t become dependent on the results of the tests and surveys that we provide to the general public as though it is a “reliable indicator of the test taker’s ability and knowledge” (Gladwell, 2005, p. 56).
In this essay I am looking at where Psychology as a discipline has come from and what affects these early ideas have had on psychology today, Psychology as a whole has stemmed from a number of different areas of study from Physics to Biology,
Going up is hard, going up is hard sometimes especially when you grew up and move to a new place. A similar perspective comes from Inside Out; this movie was released in 2015 by Walt Disney Pictures and was produced by Pixar Animation Studios. In addition, this animation was directed by Pete Docter. The story is about a young girl who moved to another city, so she has to adapt herself to a new environment and a new society, which is a tough time for her. The story is very creative and touching, and the characters are interesting.