Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Integration between science and religion
Similarities between science and religion
The influence of science in religion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Integration between science and religion
John Lennox hails from “Northern Ireland” and a long line of Christians. Both his parents and grandparents were “evangelical Christians” and they raised him in the same faith (Lennox). For many children and adolescents, their parents provide a pillar of support for their faith that ensures that they have a good foundation in hopes that they do not leave the Christian faith. Countless youths fall away from the faith when they separate from their parents because of this reliance. Unlike many who grow up in the Church, Lennox’s parents gave him space to take ownership of his faith. They also encouraged him to read a variety of texts that explored other “world views,” not only the Christian one (Lennox). Due to his parents’ actions, Lennox was …show more content…
He also lectures at Oxford’s “Wycliffe Hall” and “Centre for Christian Apologetics” (“About | John Lennox”). Lennox and his spouse, Sally, have three full-grown children and “seven grandchildren” at the moment and “live near Oxford” (“About | John Lennox”). Apart from his deep involvement in academics and the pursuit of knowledge, Lennox has written numerous books and participated in many debates. Some of his most famous works his book “God’s Undertaker” and include “The God Delusion Debate” against Richard Dawkins. Both of these works shed light on Lennox’s beliefs and his reasons behind them. Lennox firmly believes in finding the truth no matter what it may be. Even in his own book, “God’s Undertaker,” he fears that he may “distort the truth” due to his use of out of context quotes which one may misinterpret (13). Regardless of whether his opponents are atheist, relativist or any other views he wishes to hear them out and carefully consider their arguments. This is apparent during his constant participation in debates and discussions around the …show more content…
He requires reason and logic to back up any possible beliefs or conclusions to ensure the validity of what he believes. For Lennox, “it’s ultimately a question of truth” regardless of the majority opinion on the matter (Lennox). If Christianity never made any sense in the first place, he would not waste his time believing it for he seeks truth before all else. This leaves no room for the “blind obedience” of fideism that is rife within the Christian community (Lennox and Dawkins 8). By linking science and religion, Lennox opens a door that seems firmly shut to many. This connection allows for the use of a more evidential based reasoning for validating ones beliefs. It also dispels the ever-present idea that religion and science are polar opposites that cannot be reconciled in any manner. Instead, science transforms into a strong pillar for the faith that provides a sound reasoning and defense against the constant onslaught of doubts and arguments brought up by atheists and other
In 1936 a sixth-grade student by the name of Phyllis Wright wondered if scientists pray, and if so, what for. She decided to ask one of the greatest scientists of all time, Albert Einstein. A while later he wrote a letter back to Phyllis with his response. Understanding the context and purpose of his response assist in analyzing its effectiveness. After receiving a letter from such a young student, Einstein aimed to provide Phyllis with a comprehensible answer. He intended for his response not to sway her in one way or another, but to explain science and religion do not necessarily contradict each other completely. By using appeals to ethos, pathos, and logos, Einstein achieved his purpose by articulating a response suitable for a sixth grade
Science and faith are generally viewed as two topics that do not intermingle. However, Andy Crouch’s work, Delight in Creation, suggests that there is an approach to both faith and science that allows support of scientists in the church community. There is an approach that can regard science as a career that can reflect the nature of God.
The American Evangelical Story: A History of the Movement, by Douglas A. Sweeney. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2005. 208 pages. Reviewed by Susan L. Schulte.
On the one side, the vocal religious right, mainly in the US, promises Hell and damnation for those who do not believe their version of the truth. On the other side, equally extremist views, put forward by Dawkins and his ilk, further alienate the moderates. By reading the media, it would seem that there is little room for compromise between the two sides, especially when prominent politicians become involved” (Shuttleworth)
Evans, C. Stephen. Critical Dialog in Philosophy of Religion. 1985. Downers Grove, IL. InterVarsity Press. Taken from Philosophy of Religion - Selected Readings, Fourth Edition. 2010. Oxford University Press, NY.
Hitchens, Christopher. God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. New York: Twelve, 2007. Print.
"Where Was God? An Interview with David Bentley Hart." Where Was God? An Interview with David Bentley Hart. N.p., n.d. Web. 02 May 2014.
Karen Armstrong’s A History of God is an extremely thorough and comprehensive piece of work which explores the complexities of how human beings have perceived God historically and presently. Karen Armstrong, a British journalist, is well-known for her published works, which include Through the Narrow Gate and The Spiral Staircase, typically concerning comparative religion. As a former nun, Armstrong is able to reflect not only about her experiences, but also her spiritual awakening in which she discovers and relates the intricate fundamentals of the three major monotheistic religions: Judaism, Christianity and Islam. The purpose of this review is to provide an elaborate analysis of how effectively Karen Armstrong was able to demonstrate her
Science and Religion dialogue has been a bitter-sweet topic for many people over the years. The controversy is not only common between one sole community, but affects a variety. The beliefs held about these topics has the potential to personally effect an individual, whether it be positively or negatively. In the United States, we draw only a fine line between religion and science, often failing to realize that the two benefit each other in copious ways but are not meant to interpreted in the same way. Due to this perspective, people seem to be influenced to pick one or the other, when in reality we should treat both science and religion with the same respect and recognize that they are completely separate from one another, along with having individual purposes. John F. Haught, a distinguished research professor at Georgetown University, published a book titled, “Science & Religion: From Conflict to Conversation”. In it he evaluates each side, persuading the reader that the truth is that both realms may benefit from each other despite the differences emphasized. John F. Haught introduces his audience with four approaches on Science and Religion. Haught’s third approach, contact, is of major significance to aid in the response of: “Does Science Rule out a Personal God?”
“The lack of conflict between science and religion arises from a lack of overlap between their respective domains of professional expertise—science in the empirical constitution of the universe, and religion in the search for proper ethical values and the spiritual meaning of our lives. The attainment of wisdom in a full life requires extensive attention to both domains—for a great book tells us that the truth can make us free and that we will live in optimal harmony with our fellows when we learn to do justly, love mercy, and walk humbly.”
Religion and science are complementary elements to our society. The notion that religion and science should not be merged together, does not mean neglecting to understand the parallel relation between these two concepts and will result in a better understanding of our surroundings. This will put an end to our scientific research and advancement because we will be relying on answers provided by religious books to answer our questions. If we don’t argue whether these answers are right or wrong, we would never have studied space stars or the universe or even our environment and earthly animals. These studies have always provided us with breakthroughs, inventions and discoveries that made our lives better.
Many atheists have used science as a way to disapprove the existence of God. Science is not an accurate way of disapproving the existence of God(2). Scient...
...wever, in the best interest of advancing education and an enlightened society, science must be pursued outside of the realm of faith and religion. There are obvious faith-based and untestable aspects of religion, but to interfere and cross over into everyday affairs of knowledge should not occur in the informational age. This overbearing aspect of the Church’s influence was put in check with the scientific era, and the Scientific Revolution in a sense established the facet of logic in society, which allows us to not only live more efficiently, but intelligently as well. It should not take away from the faith aspect of religion, but serve to enhance it.
Reverend Father Gerard Manley Hopkins was English poet from the Victorian Age. He became critically acclaimed after his death, and his fame was grounded mainly from his use of imagery in his poems, given that he was from a period of highly traditional writing. Hopkins’ religious poems featured ones that were “light” and ones that were “dark”, which he used to exemplify his conflict between faith and doubt. “God’s Grandeur” is one of his light poems, and “I wake and feel the fell of dark, not day” is one of his dark poems, and a comparison between the two will show just how strong his conflict really was.
Stenmark, Mickael. How to Relate Science and Religion. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2004.