Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Argumentative essays:what technology has done to us
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Argumentative essays:what technology has done to us
Evaluating Ethos through Technology Logical and emotional appeals are two elements that Aristotle believed to be important in persuading an audience. Ethos also known as credibility is another important element in the attempt to persuade an audience. If the speaker is able to communicate the culture, language, and information to his or her audience, the audience will be more likely to perceive the speaker’s character, goodwill, and intelligence. But, these attributes can only be evaluated if the speaker personally delivers the messages and provides the proper researched information (Rottenberg &Winchell, 2012, p. 4) In fact, in the 1950’s, individuals would use dictionaries, encyclopedias, and books to research information. The information gathered was then used for the purpose of successfully arguing matters. The writer or speaker would adjust his or her ideas, facts, and terminology to its audience. But in this day and age, information can be accessed by clicking on an electronic device. Writers now present much of their work online, and by doing this, cannot gain the trust needed to persuade the audience to accept a claim. Therefore, the audience is unable to perceive the writer’s intention, trustworthiness, and expertness because technology has replaced the physical presence of the speaker. Moreover, technology has taken the place of the human factor and without it, facts, opinions, and language cannot be adjusted to the target audience. Aristotle names intelligence, character, and goodwill as the attributes that produce credibility (Rottenberg & Winchell, 2012, p.4). These factors are what create ethos. However, these attributes can become very difficult to evaluate when the physical presence of a person has been replaced w... ... middle of paper ... ...arget audience is discovered, information must be shaped for that audience in order to create believability and display goodwill and character. These factors are important attributes that produce credibility (Rottenberg & Winchell, 2012, p.4). However, if the speaker is displayed on an electronic device instead of in an actual room where interaction can occur, the speaker will be unaware of his or her audience. Without a target audience, information cannot be shaped around their specific specifications, and the audience will not correctly evaluate the writer’s or speaker’s ethos. Works Cited Rottenberg, A.R. & Winchell, D. H (2012). Elements of Argument: a text and reader (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s Thompson, J. (2012). You did what with your hands?. Retrieved from http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/beyond-words/201207/you-did-what-your-hands
He draws attention to his argument by using statistical evidence and methods of persuasion. The methods that the author uses to better explain his argument for this book include that of researched evidence, rhetoric, ethos, and logos. Examples of each can be found throughout the book. For the researched evidence, an example is all the quotes the author uses to better each argument of almost every paragraph of this book.
... a Moral Monstrosity.” In Dynamic Argument. Ed. Robert Lamm and Justin Everett. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2007. 425-26.
Persuasion is a very powerful weapon even against the most stoic of people. In the Tragedy, Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare Cassius, a high class politician with bad intentions persuades Brutus, an honorable, stoic high class politician and Casca to kill Caesar for the good of Rome, however, Cassius’ real goal is to get rid of Caesar because Caesar doesn’t like him. After killing Caesar, Brutus and Antony, Caesar closest friend, make speeches at his funeral in order to persuade the public. Cassius, Brutus and Antony’s use of Ethos, Logos, and Pathos in order to persuade the public, Casca, and Brutus shows that anyone can be persuaded by appealing to their emotions, motivations, and personalities.
Rottenberg, Annette T., and Donna Haisty. Winchell. The Structure of Argument. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2009. Print.
Both Moore’s and Gatto’s methods of argumentation are efficient although may prove ineffective in convincing some critical readers.
Ramage, John D., John C. Bean, and June Johnson. Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2001. Print.
...strong credibility. Instead, I am able to establish ethos by using a fair tone and relating to my audience similar to how Louie Giglio does when he is speaking. With effort, I can build ethos like Giglio by being honest, trustworthy, and fair.
When someone tries to persuade others to join in thinking or believing something, a process takes place. Those receivers of the information are to process what the source is saying and in turn decide whether or not to go along with the idea. But what if people do not always process information, and what if they merely go with the crowd? The Elaboration Likelihood Theory (ELM) developed by Social psychologists Petty and Cacioppo, illustrates how persuasion, or the presentation of facts in order to move someone or thing a certain way, takes place. This model “analyzes the likelihood that receivers will cognitively elaborate,” in other words break down the information gathered and determine whether or not the message is enough to persuade the receiver (Enfante, Rancer & Avtgis, 2010, p. 172).
In the editorial, Alex Lickerman claims that technology can separate people and pull them away from the physical world. He argues that people use electronic media to make confrontations with others easier. Lickerman points out that using the media blocks negative emotional replies that argumentative messages can make, and convince us we are not doing harm. He claims that internet users favor electrical relationship above a real relationship. Using an electronic system, you cannot receive the same emotional connection with someone if you cannot hear their tone of voice or read their facial expressions therefore receiving the connection in hiding. Lickerman points out the importance of never trading a real relationship with electronic
Today, most people live surrounded by technology. Everyday people are creating more new and advance technology with different programs, websites, and ideas to share with everyone. Connecting with people around the world is becoming effortless, instantaneous, and accessible with the technology that has been developed. Clive Thompson, a writer for the New York Times Magazine and Wired, points this out well in a passage within his book, Smarter Than You Think, called “Public Thinking”. Since technology made it easier to connect with others, people have been writing their thoughts, ideas, and opinions online and on their phone. Thompson believes that people have been able to improve their writing because the technology they use daily. With all
She insists that people tend to only look at how something is presented, not necessarily the actual content. In addition she maintains that people do not think critically as often, merely taking information as it is presented. When addressing this claim Turkle applies combination of ethos and logos. She establishes once again her credibility as a professor in addition to including cited a sources. In Turkle’s use of these appeals, she strengthens her case by both relating it to the audience, as well as improving her credibility by citing another source. , She employs these appeals skillfully and builds a strong argument that is supported by evidence and elevated by her professional opinion. However, her argument could still be improved upon by adding direction quotations or additional cited sources. Even so, Turkle’s argument is presented eloquently and enhanced by her skillful use of
Whitman, G. (2001). Logical Fallacies and the Art of Debate. Retrieved January 20, 2005, from http://www.csun.edu/~dgw61315/fallacies.html#Committing%20your%20very%20own%20logical%20fallacies
The purpose of an argument is to convince, to persuade, to lead the reader to follow a line of reasoning, and to agree with it. The chapter twenty in the Successful College Writing book shows how to read and write an argumentative essay. A good argument is made from some rules. An Argument must have an issue or an idea. The claim is used to defend the issue by the author. It is the author’s point of view. In some cases, the claim is not directly stated, but implied. There are three types of claims, namely claims of fact, claims of value, and claims of policy. Claims of fact can be proved. They become more interested when they discuss
Muller, G. and Wiener, H. (2009). To the point: Reading and writing short arguments. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
What are the topics that the arguments were intended to answer? At the core of this exercise is the ability to construct an argument with the building blocks of propositions, claims, conclusion(s), and a reason (premise) to support a conclusion (Arguments, n.d). Neither passage had claims that...