Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on greek literature
Themes in greek myths related to today
Essay on greek literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
1. Euthyphro first defines piety as to what he is doing now which is prosecuting his own father. This definition did not satisfy well with Socrates. Socrates explain that the definition is more like a pious action. He wants to know the form itself that makes pious actions pious.
2. Euthyphro next defines piety as what is dear to the gods is pious, what is not is impious. Socrates approves the definition but also said that it contradicts itself. There were errors for instance gods do not also see eye to eye on some matters such as just and unjust. This definition is impossible because what is loved by the gods are also considered hated by the gods. Therefore, same things both determine are pious and impious. Euthyphro’s answer cannot be applied
…show more content…
Euthyphro then defines piety as commerce or exchange gifts for favors. Socrates question this if gods benefit anything from the gift. If nothing, piety can be seen as a form of trading.
4. I believe laws is what determines what’s wrong and what’s right. Though, there are some people that might not agree with this. For example, a husband is stealing medicine for his sick wife and they’re poor but it’s the only way to save her. The husband still broke the laws but others felt he did right. That’s why there’s a phrase that says, “Sometimes you have to do the wrong thing for the right reason”.
5. Socrates’ method is like a cross examination. He examines and ask questions to Euthyphro’s definition of piety. Socrates clearly knows that Euthyphro does not fully understand and leads Euthyphro to a series of contradicting his original statement of piety.
6. Socrates does not believe the oracle. He acknowledges that he is not wise at all and decides to challenge. He decided to question three groups which were politicians, poets, and the craftsmen. He found that each group believed to be wise themselves and had a great deal of knowledge in other areas which they don’t. Its seems as if they were overcome with ignorance and pride. Socrates conclude that it is wise to not know rather than thinking we know
…show more content…
He considered himself a blessing to society. Socrates refers himself as a gadfly because he is concerned for the society virtue. He believes there will never be a man like him and that it will causes more harm for the city.
10. Socrates did not plead for his life because he thought why should a person plead for a lesser charge if that person knows they are innocent.
11. If people were to always follow the laws, there would no prisons nor crimes. People would be good citizens. There would not even be chaos and the society can maintain peace.
12. I think that society might unbalance if everybody only accepts the verdicts. There could be some people that don’t accept and might feel injustice.
13. If Socrates dies, some things will be lost such as father and friend. Though, his knowledge still continues to this modern society.
14. A Good Life for me is living in the moment, having self-awareness, and just be happy. There are things that should be valued like family, friends, and life. They are individuals that can never be part of your life again if you were to lose
During the dialogue, Euthyphro defines, “Piety means prosecuting the unjust individual who has committed murder or sacrilege, or any other such crime, as I am doing now, whether he is your father or mother or whoever he is.” Given this Euthyphro overarching principles can be summarized as divine law requires to prosecute the offender no matter who she or he is. Also, the ideology should be what befits humans as well. Socrates is fine with how Euthyphro accounts the factual evidence of his father’s misguided acts. What Socrates takes problem is how Euthyphro uses greek mythology to highlight that taking action against your parents is the correct direction of action. Due to the fact that mythology isn’t confirmed to be true in any sense, socrates feels as though this is extremely inappropriate. Euthyphro actions should be based on divine law with results in him being impious. Socrates ultimate principles can be summarized as respect for parents should be the ultimate law combined with whatever does not befit the gods shouldn’t befit everyone else. Insert another
Socrates defense at his trial was not strong enough to convince the Athenians to set him free of all charges. He was not prepared properly for his defense; yet, he managed to convince a large majority of the judges to find him not guilty of charges, but not enough to send him free.
Socrates put one’s quest for wisdom and the instruction of others above everything else in life. A simple man both in the way he talked and the wealth he owned, he believed that simplicity in whatever one did was the best way of acquiring knowledge and passing it unto others. He is famous for saying that “the unexplained life is not worth living.” He endeavored therefore to break down the arguments of those who talked with a flowery language and boasted of being experts in given subjects (Rhees 30). His aim was to show that the person making a claim on wisdom and knowledge was in fact a confused one whose clarity about a given subject was far from what they claimed. Socrates, in all his simplicity never advanced any theories of his own but rather aimed at bringing out the worst in his interlocutors.
Socrate’s first expresses his belief that piety is able to be expressed in simple terms towards the beginning of Euthyphro. He asks the question (to which Euthyphro agrees), “is the pious not the same and alike in every action…and
Euthyphro’s second definition of piety is “the pious is what the gods love”. Socrates takes this idea and
Socrates, in his conviction from the Athenian jury, was both innocent and guilty as charged. In Plato’s Five Dialogues, accounts of events ranging from just prior to Socrates’ entry into the courthouse up until his mouthful of hemlock, both points are represented. Socrates’ in dealing with moral law was not guilty of the crimes he was accused of by Meletus. Socrates was only guilty as charged because his peers had concluded him as such. The laws didn’t find Socrates guilty; Socrates was guilty because his jurors enforced the laws. The law couldn’t enforce itself. Socrates was accused of corrupting Athens’ youth, not believing in the gods of the city and creating his own gods. In the Euthyphro, Socrates defends himself against the blasphemous charges outside the courthouse to a priest Euthyphro. Socrates looks to the priest to tell him what exactly is pious so that he may educate himself as to why he would be perceived as impious. Found in the Apology, another of Plato’s Five Dialogues, Socrates aims to defend his principles to the five hundred and one person jury. Finally, the Crito, an account of Socrates’ final discussion with his good friend Crito, Socrates is offered an opportunity to escape the prison and his death sentence. As is known, Socrates rejected the suggestion. It is in the Euthyphro and the Apology that it can be deduced that Socrates is not guilty as charged, he had done nothing wrong and he properly defended himself. However, in the Crito, it is shown that Socrates is guilty only in the interpretation and enforcement of Athens’ laws through the court system and its jurors. Socrates’ accusations of being blasphemous are also seen as being treasonous.
In ancient republic Rome, piety was one of the highest virtues. The concept of pietas was a driving force in ancient republic Rome. Pietas was very important in Roman society and many romans lived revolved around it. Pietas means “dutifulness” (Sayre 86) but also has many other meanings. The meaning of “pietas” shaped the literature as shown in the pieces, such as a poem written by Vergil, called “The Aeneid”. As well as “On Duties” an essay by Marcus Tullius Cicero.
In the defense speech given by Socrates at the beginning of his trial, he hints at a definition of holiness. “..I live in great poverty because of my service to the god” (23C). Piety, according to Socrates, is defined by one who sacrifices his own necessities and luxuries in order to better service the gods; it is the willingness of one to please the god by way of a disservice to himself; a general forfeit of life-excesses as well as life requirements.
In the retelling of his trial by his associate, Plato, entitled “The Apology”; Socrates claims in his defense that he only wishes to do good for the polis. I believe that Socrates was innocent of the accusations that were made against him, but he possessed contempt for the court and displayed that in his conceitedness and these actions led to his death.
The dialogue began with the meeting of Euthyphro and Socrates before they went into the court in Athens. They all have their legal affairs to be presence in the court. Socrates was sued because he was accused by the misconduct of blasphemy, and in this way to confuse the youth. Euthyphro came to court because he accused his father of murdering slaves. Although Euthyphro was criticized by everyone, the ultimate judgement of his lawsuit was unwavering yet. Therefore, he must be convinced that his behavior is not blasphemy. Socrates said that he had been accused of impiousness, so he asked Euthyphro to help him find out what was pious and impious. Euthyphro said that piety is like he is going to do, reporting guilty of murder and other crimes, even if it was conducted by his parents, who are his direct relatives. Socrates pointed out his consent of such act is devout. However, this is merely an example of piety. There should be a general concept to clarify a pious act.
Euthyphro was arguing that by doing what the gods believe is holy and pious you are making them better, in other words you are taking care of them and it is like a kind of service that you are doing towards the gods. Euthyphro said, “The kind of care, Socrates, that slaves take of their masters” which meant that you are taking care of them in the sense that you are making them better and not actually caring for them (17, 13d). In other words, you are helping improve them and this is a service that the gods appreciate and want you to do. He believed that this service is improving the gods and that they like this service. The gods believe that being holy is a service towards them, therefore there should be a reason on why the gods use us and want to reward our holiness. He believes that the gods choose what is holy for a reason and should be approved by
In The Euthyphro, Socrates uses his Socratic Method to disprove the Divine Command theory to his friend, Euthyphro. According to the textbook, the Socratic Method is a method that Socrates would use to get to the foundation of his students beliefs. He would ask continual questions about a student’s belief or assumption until a contradiction was raised. By doing so, Socrates would force his students to question their own beliefs and truly discern why they believed them. Socrates applied this method to Euthyphro when Socrates and Euthyphro had a conversation in regards to the definition of holiness. During this conversation, Euthyphro states that holiness is what is agreeable to the gods. However, Socrates disputes this idea by stating that gods quarrel just as humans quarrel in regards to issues such as right and wrong, holy and unholy, and justice and injustice. With this reasoning, Socrates argues that what one god may view as right or moral, another god may view as wrong or immoral. Thus, an action may be acceptable and moral to one god and unacceptable and immoral to another, and what is considered to
Whenever Euthyphro gives Socrates a definition, Socrates finds a way to turn it around and make his point invalid. When Euthyphro says prosecuting his father is pious, Socrates then asks what the definition of piety is. What Euthyphro said was an example and not what Socrates wants; he wants the true nature of the idea. When Euthyphro says it is what is dear to the gods, Socrates refutes this by saying what is dear to one god may not be dear to another. Euthyphro’s third definition is what is loved by the gods. This is similar to his last definition and Socrates doesn’t accept it either. When Euthyphro says it is attending to the gods, in typical Socrates fashion, he counters it by defining “attending” as improving and the gods cannot be improved. Euthyphro’s fifth and final definition is making the gods happy through offerings and prayers. Socrates says that this is doing business with the gods and still does not improve them. Socrates manages to prove all of Euthyphro’s definitions wrong until Euthyphro get fed up and
On trial, with his life at stake, Socrates keeps his cool and defends his way of life as unassailably just. But he doesn’t justify the accusations at all. Socrates is not discussing and dismantling any one particular claim so much as he is laying out the method behind these
The interesting dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro demonstrates this Socratic method of questioning in order to gain a succinct definition of a particular idea, such as piety. Though the two men do not come to a conclusion about the topic in the conversation seen in Euthyphro, they do discover that piety is a form of justice, which is more of a definition than their previous one. Their conversation also helps the reader to decipher what makes a good definition. Whenever Euthyphro attempts to define piety, Socrates seems to have some argument against the idea. Each definition offered, therefore, becomes more succinct and comes closer to the actual concept of piety, rather than just giving an example or characteristic of it. To be able to distinguish between a good definition and a bad one is the first step to defining what Socrates so desperately wished to define: w...