European Abolition of Slavery: The Legacy of Literature, Media, and Censorship

977 Words2 Pages

The British abolished the slave trade in 1807 and slavery in 1833; however, the French did not abolish slavery until 1848, due to many differences between the two countries, especially during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. The British generally understood the mindset of their slaves to a greater extent than the French, and by showing the British people the horrors of slavery they abolished it fifteen years before the French. According to Hochschild, the British were able to sustain a powerful and successful abolition movement because of their superior, widespread media and literature, and their complete absence of censorship. On the other hand, France lacked these stimuli for abolishing slavery, and they were also preoccupied with their own French Revolution of 1789 and the Haitian Revolution of 1791. Also, the monarchy before the French Revolution used royal censors, and after Napoleon took power in 1802, he employed an overwhelming amount of censorship that fully stifled the growth of literacy and prevented the spread of media and abolition literature in France. France's abolition movement was slower to develop than Britain's because the French citizens did not possess as much knowledge about slavery due to censorship, an inferior media system, and less widespread abolition literature, causing the population to have less motivation for the abolition of slavery.

With France going through a period of rapid changes from a monarchy to a democracy to a dictatorship, their literature and media were slower to develop and spread than Britain’s. Britain experienced a huge growth in the number of newspapers, especially daily publications, and it even began to have some established news outlets while France was still...

... middle of paper ...

...ormist religious groups like the Quakers caused the abolition of slavery, as Roger A. Bruns argues, and this reason is valid; nevertheless, no abolition movement would have been successful just because of religious groups. Moreover, Quakers and other non-conformist religious groups needed widespread media, literature, free press, and a literate audience to spread their abolition message to. Similarly, all other abolition groups and movements were successful only because of media and literature. France’s abolition groups were eventually able to spread their messages through media and literature, but French censorship and lower literacy rates hindered these groups’ progress, unlike in Britain where free press, a strong media system, easily accessible literature, and high literacy rates allowed their abolition movement to become popular and well supported more quickly.

More about European Abolition of Slavery: The Legacy of Literature, Media, and Censorship

Open Document