Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theories of causation in crime
Effective treatment for sexual offenders
Criminogenic needs of sex offenders
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Theories of causation in crime
Etiology theories for the criminal behavior As listed above there are many theories that scholars believe may be the caused for this criminal behavior. As stated above, when treating sex offenders, many psychologists do not focus on the criminal act itself, but rather the risk factors and theories that may have caused this criminal behavior. The primarily focus of the treatment is to identify the sexual deviant patterns and behaviors of the offender (CSOM, n.d.). Some of these factors and theories are attachment, sociocultural, behavioral, and biological. Behavioral theory states that the offender learns this type of criminal behavior by exposure from their environment (CSOM, n.d.). In essence, the offender learns this type of behavior by …show more content…
These messages are within their environment and stems from music, films, norms, television, and cultural structures (CSOM, n.d.). For example, for as long as human beings been walking on the earth, music has been a key part in culture, lifestyle, and collective memory. According to Levitin (2012), music stimulates the cerebellum of the brain, and as it connects to limbic system, it forces different moods within a person. Therefore, as an individual engage in desensitizing messages, this may cause the individual to mimic their emotions to the type of music. Yackovich (2012) mentioned that many sex offenders suffer from emotional learning deficit. Although this may be true in childhood, but emotion are forever evolving. Other risk factor that must take consideration is childhood peer relations. Bartol and Bartol, (2012) believes that continual peer relation difficulties can contribute to social and emotional deficits. The biological theory states that due to the high levels of testosterone, individuals will engage in some type of sexual behaviors. When such levels are high, the individual’s sex drive and their sexual arousal patterns and behaviors will increase causing the offender to engage in many types of sexual deviant behavior. Within this theory, it is also worthy of noting that testosterone can cause high levels of aggression. When these levels …show more content…
In this approach, it holds the offender accountable of their internal controls and external controls. This prevention is performed by encompassing the offender with a treatment provider, polygraph examiner, and the supervision of a parole or probation officers (Travis, 1997). This model not only holds the offender accountable, but also provides support through flowing communication around the triangle as the treatment provider, polygraph examiner, and officers manage the offender (Travis, 1997). This treatment and intervention approach is also recognized as the victim-centered
Nature vs. nurture has been one of the oldest and most debated topics among psychologists over the years. This concept discusses whether a child is born into this world with their developmental work cut out for them or if a child is a “blank slate” and their experiences are what shape them into who they are. Over the years and plenty of research, psychologists have all mostly come to agree that it’s a little bit of both. Children are both born with some genetic predispositions while other aspects of the child’s development are strongly influenced by their surrounding environment. This plays into the criminal justice system when discussing where criminal behavior stems from. Is a criminal’s anti-social behavior just part of their DNA or is it a result of their upbringing? The answer to this question is not definite. Looking at research a strong argument can be made that criminals developed their anti-social patterns through the atmosphere in which they were raise, not their DNA.
1. Cesare Lombroso applied the methods of natural science (observation, measurement, experimentation, statistical analysis) to the study of criminal behavior. Lombroso rejected the classical theory of crime, associated with Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham, which explained criminal activity as freely chosen behavior based on the rational calculation of benefit and loss, pleasure and pain. Critically analyze both schools of thought and provide an opinion as to what theory you believe is more relevant.
I am going to look at two books, which explain why people become sex offenders. The first book that I looked at examines four theories. These theories are psychodynamic theories, behavioral theories, biological theories, and empirical theories. The second book that I looked at showed some case studies of men that had committed sex offences and looked at some of the different things that caused these men to offend.
Criminal behavior can mostly be explained by the Biosocial Branch of Trait Theory. Individual traits by themselves cannot determine criminality. Outside factors such as the environment along with certain personality traits is what causes criminal behavior.
Essentially, through a process of conceptual integration, different aspects of each theory can be used in conjunction to compensate for what each individual theory fails to explain, and thus can further both the scope and policy utility of the theories (Paternoster & Bachman, 2001). For instance, low self-control theory asserts that low self-control is the cause of crime all the time. This may be true for some criminals, but many criminals, like those involved in white collar crimes, do not adhere to the principles of low self-control. In addition, while low self-control theory is useful in explaining why individuals may act in a certain way, it does not explain the situations that must be met for a crime to occur (Brunet, 2002). On the other hand, routine activity theory describes the situational factors that must be present for a crime to occur, but it is more difficult to apply this theory to sexting because the offender and victim do not necessarily have to meet for the crime to occur (Wilsem,
There are many factors that are utilized to explain crime. These include things such as DNA, environmental contaminants, hormones, nutrition, and body chemistry can all play a role in criminal behavior and all of these determinants can be passed down through generations making human behavior determined by genetics to some degree. Violent behaviors have been linked to nutrition, vitamin deficiency and other conditions that affect the body. Body chemistry theories have all contributed to advances in understanding criminal behavior. Many studies have been done to link violence with body chemistry.
Nature versus nurture has been argued in attempt to understand how criminals behave. The theory of what influences psychopath and serial killers’ violent and destructive pathways has not been agreed on till this day. Criminals such as psychopaths and serial killers have been researched for the past two decades. Scientists have found that genetics is a determining factor of who becomes a serial killer. It is important to understand the determinants involved within a serial killer, because if these social and environmental causes are discovered, they can be altered and controlled to reduce crime (Lykken, 1993). With more studies, we would therefore prevent mass murders and could assist in significant reductions of crime within society.
Biological theory is the concept that focuses on certain biological characteristics that are thought to be associated with an increased risk of engaging in criminal or deviant behavior (Bernard, Snipes & Gerould, 2010). Early biological theories tended to focus on the physical appearance as a distinguishing trait of criminals, whereas modern theories primarily argue that biology is one of many factors that contribute toward criminal behavior (Bernard, Snipes & Gerould, 2010). Early rape theorist included that of Johan Lavater, Fran’s...
Sexuality development has several factors that make up the complex process this process are all things associated with the brain and child development. There are several stages...
Psychological theories of criminal behavior emphasize criminal thinking patterns or personality defects. These theories emphasize individual differences in behavior and the approaches to thinking, feeling, and decision-making that make some people predisposed to committing criminal acts.
Strain theories of criminal behaviour have been amongst the most important and influential in the field of criminology. Taking a societal approach, strain theories have sought to explain deficiencies in social structure that lead individuals to commit crime (Williams and McShane 2010). Strain theories operate under the premise that there is a societal consensus of values, beliefs, and goals with legitimate methods for achieving success. When individuals are denied access to legitimate methods for achieving success, the result is anomie or social strain. This often leads an individual to resort to deviant or criminal means to obtain the level of success that they are socialized to pursue. This is the basic premise of strain theory. This paper will explore the evolution of strain theories by first examining their intellectual foundations which laid the foundation for Robert Merton’s theories of anomie and strain. Merton’s strain theory will be discussed in detail including the modes of adaptation that people use when faced with societal strain. Finally, the paper will conclude with the strengths and weaknesses of Merton’s strain theory and an examination of the criminological theories and social policies it has influenced.
Theories that are based on biological Factors and criminal behavior have always been slightly ludicrous to me. Biological theories place an excessive emphasis on the idea that individuals are “born badly” with little regard to the many other factors that play a part in this behavior. Criminal behavior may be learned throughout one’s life, but there is not sufficient evidence that proves crime is an inherited trait. In the Born to Be Bad article, Lanier describes the early belief of biological theories as distinctive predispositions that under particular conditions will cause an individual to commit criminal acts. (Lanier, p. 92) Biological criminologists are expected to study the “criminal” rather than the act itself. This goes as far as studying physical features, such as body type, eyes, and the shape or size of one’s head. “Since criminals were less developed, Lombroso felt they could be identified by physical stigmata, or visible physical abnormalities…characteristics as asymmetry of the face; supernumerary nipples, toes, or fingers; enormous jaws; handle-shaped or sensible ears; insensibility to pain; acute sight; and so on.” (Lanier. P. 94). It baffles me that physical features were ever considered a reliable explanation to criminal behavior. To compare one’s features to criminal behavior is not only stereotypical, but also highly unreliable.
The exploration has shown that hereditary qualities have incorporated with nature to make an individual a sex guilty party. Youngsters destined to a parent who had been blamed for the sexual offense will probably grow up to be sex guilty parties. Hereditary qualities have been distinguished to have a 20% to half danger of adding to a sex offense. Before, specialists have demonstrated that our hereditary cosmetics influences our sexuality. It decides our sexual introduction as we grow up.
Deviance is the behaviour that moves away from typical norms and values in society, such as burping or spitting in public. According to Howard Becker, social groups create deviance by making rules whose infraction constitutes deviant behaviour and by giving these rules to particular people and labelling them as outsiders. From this perspective, deviance isn't an action which the individual commits, but instead a consequence of application by others of the rules and sanctions to an offender. The deviant is someone to whom the label has successfully been applied; deviant behaviour is behaviour that individuals so label.
Different schools of thought propose varying theoretical models of criminality. It is agreeable that criminal behaviour is deep rooted in societies and screams for attention. Biological, Social ecological and psychological model theories are key to helping researchers gain deeper comprehension of criminal behaviour and ways to avert them before they become a menace to society. All these theories put forward a multitude of factors on the outlooks on crime. All these theories have valid relevancy to continuous research on criminal behaviour.