Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impacts of colonialism in africa
Impacts of colonialism in africa
Impacts of colonialism in africa
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impacts of colonialism in africa
The Rwandan genocide was an appalling and an atrocious event in which over eight hundred thousand people were killed. Long held ethnic tensions and the shortage of land combined to create a perfect storm of circumstances resulting in a genocide. As a way to assess the damage done after the genocide, we, as a class, conducted a mock-negotiation over land disputes in a small Rwandan village. The origins of the ethnic tensions in Rwanda can be traced back to the age of European imperialism in the late 1800s and early 1900s. First Germans and then the Belgians took colonial power in Rwanda. Prior to the colonization, “The majority Hutu, ruling Tutsi and smaller Twa minority intermarried and shared the same language, religion, and culture,” ("Brief …show more content…
Paul Kagame, leader of the RPF, established himself as Rwanda’s most capable leader. He eventually became President of Rwanda in 2000, when he “ultimately established a unity government led by the Tutsi RPF political party,” (Florance). Today, Rwanda has made great progress under Kagame’s leadership. “Rwanda is now the safest, cleanest country in Africa, with no slums and virtually no begging or street crime. It has one of highest sustained rates of economic growth on the continent,” (Grant). Furthermore, “the death penalty has been abolished, and English adopted as the official language. There is a national health system, 19 out of 20 children are now in school,” (Grant). This is incredible progress for a country recovering from a genocide just a short time ago. But, the ethnic divisions do still appear in Rwanda today. Kagame’s government is mostly Tutsi, and the majority of Rwanda’s upper-class is Tutsi. Kagame leads Rwanda with a strong hand, allowing almost no negative press or opposing political views. He has created “divisionism”, a new law that prohibits anyone from encouraging ethnic separation (Grant). Overall, the genocide and its causes remain with the Rwandan people today. Ethnic identification and separation does not disappear overnight, and there are still issues with distributing land as demonstrated by our negations; but Rwandans are currently moving forward without ignoring or hiding from …show more content…
People’s views, desires, and needs were very different and at sometimes completely opposite from someone else’s. As I stated earlier, it was difficult for my role to get a voice in the negotiation; but once the first claims were made, I seized an opportunity to propose a possible solution. Although the other groups were hostile to my intentions, once I suggested a possible compromise the other members took it up and finalized the details. I was surprised by how quickly and how much easier the negotiation was once a possible compromise was on the table. Therefore, I found the negotiation on the smaller details easier than I had
The Rwandan genocide occurred due to the extreme divide between two main groups that were prevalent in Rwanda, the Hutu and the Tutsi. When Rwanda was first settled, the term Tutsi was used to describe those people who owned the most livestock. After the Germans lost control over their colonies after World War I, the Belgians took over and the terms Hutu and Tutsi took on a racial role (Desforges). It soon became mandatory to have an identification card that specified whether or not an individual was a Hutu, Tutsi, or Twa (a minority group in Rwanda). The Tutsi soon gained power through the grant of leadership positions by the Belgians. Later on when Rwanda was tying to gain indepe...
Lewicki, J. R., Barry, B., & Saunders, M. D. (2011). Essentials of negotiation (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill. ISBN-13: 9780073530369
During the 1900’s two deadly wars were raging on, the civil war in Sierra Leone and the genocide in Rwanda. The civil war in Sierra Leone began in March 1991, while the genocide began in 1994. Combined these two wars killed upward of 1,050,000 people, and affected the lives of all the people that lived there. The conflicts in Sierra Leone and Rwanda occurred for different major reasons, but many little aspects were similar. Politics and Ethnicity were the two main conflicts, but despite the different moments rebellions and the murder of innocent people occurred in both places.
The definition of genocide as given in the Webster's College Dictionary is "The deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group." This definition depicts the situation in 1994 of Rwanda, a small, poor, central African country. The Rwandan genocide was the systematic extermination of over eight hundred thousand Tutsi, an ethnic group in Rwanda, by the Hutu, another ethnic group in Rwanda. In this essay I will briefly describe the history of the conflict of the Hutu and Tutsi, the 100 days of genocide in 1994, and the affects of the massacre on the economy and the people of Rwanda.
For over a half of a century in Rwanda, the Tutsi and Hutu people had fought back and forth over supremacy, due to a racial battle driven by discrimination and severe torment. The Tutsi and Hutu societies were pressed alongside one another by foreign colonialist powers up to 1994 when a something had finally sparked.
The most common negotiation that was used several times was voting for the majority just to get it over and done with. A few examples would ...
Rwanda was a German colony but then was given to Belgium “who favored the minority Tutsis over the Hutus, exacerbated[exacerbating] the tendency of the few to oppress the many”(History.com). This created a feeling of anger towards the Tutsis, because they had much more power than Hutus. The RPF decided to create a government consisting of a Hutu and a Tutsi holding the highest government positions. As the RPF took control of the government, “some two million Hutus – both civilians and some of those involved in the genocide – then fled across the border into DR Congo.
Africa has been an interesting location of conflicts. From the conflict between Ethiopia and Eritrea to the revolutionary conflict in Libya and Egypt, one of the greatest conflicts is the Rwandan Genocide. The Rwandan Genocide included two tribes in Rwanda: Tutsis and Hutus. Upon revenge, the Hutus massacred many Tutsis and other Hutus that supported the Tutsis. This gruesome war lasted for a 100 days. Up to this date, there have been many devastating effects on Rwanda and the global community. In addition, many people have not had many acknowledgements for the genocide but from this genocide many lessons have been learned around the world.
The Rwandan Genocide “It is our responsibility to empower the powerless while giving voice to the voiceless” -(Irwin Cotler “Six Lessons from the Rwandan Genocide”) When the Rwandan Hutu majority betrayed the Tutsi minority, a destructive mass murdering broke out where neighbor turned on neighbor and teachers killed their students; this was the start of a genocide. In this paper I will tell you about the horrors the people of Rwanda had to face while genocide destroyed their homes, and I will also tell you about the mental trauma they still face today. Hutu and Tutsi Origins When Rwanda was first settled, the people there raised cattle, the ones with the most cattle were considered “Tutsi” and everyone else was ‘Hutu”.
"Recovery after the Rwandan Genocide. Ideas and Events Which Are Shaping Rwanda's History and Its People." Recovery after the Rwandan Genocide. Ideas and Events Which Are Shaping Rwanda's History and Its People. N.p., Dec.-Jan. 2014. Web. 09 Apr. 2014
Percival, Valerie, and Thomas Homer-Dixon. "Getting Rwanda wrong. (genocide in Rwanda)." Saturday Night. v110. n7 (Sept 1995): p47(3). Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. K12 Trial Site. 12 Apr. 2010 .
The first common theme is the importance of clear strategic intent and big picture thinking in negotiations. Before taking the Negotiation Behaviour unit, I always perceived negotiation as a fixed-pie, a zero-sum gain situation, where one party wins and the other party loses. This belief has often led me to a competitive behaviour in negotiation by trading the big picture thinking with the need to win, getting too detailed too quickly, leading to a positional approach instead of having a broad goal and explore for ways around problems to create value and get the best outcome.
Colonization by both the Germans and Belgium's outlined religion in, the country of Rwanda.Early colonization by the belgians and Germans brought few changes to the landscape of rwanda.Although religious views such as Roman Catholicism were instilled upon the culture of Rwanda.These religious views broke the already existing tribal affiliated and indigenous views of the early people.The growing fascination among Europeans drove the Belgians to change the government in Rwanda.To change the goveremnt in Rwanda, the Belian sused religion to gain piower in goverment.The people in power (those of the Roman Catholic Church due to colinization) placed the Tutsi in power in the goverment,and left the Hutus to farm land.The determinination of who was in power we...
Middleton, John. "Rwanda." Africa: an Encyclopedia for Students. Vol. 3. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 2002. Print.
Negotiations always occur between parties who believe that some benefit may come of purposeful discussion. The parties to a negotiation usually share an intention to reach an agreement. This is the touchstone to which any thinking of negotiations must refer. While there may be some reason to view negotiations as attempts by each party to get the better of the other, this particular type of adversarial negotiation is really just one of the options available. Among the beginning principles of a negotiation must be an acknowledgment that the parties to a negotiation have both individual and group interests that are partially shared and partially in conflict, though the parameters and proportions of these agreements and disagreements will never be thoroughly known; this acknowledgment identifies both the reason and the essential subject matter for reflection on a wide range of issues relevant to a negotiation. (Gregory Tropea, November 1996)