Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Freedom of expression vs censorship
Why internet censorship shouldnt be a thing essay
Why should we not have internet censorship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Freedom of expression vs censorship
Introduction
The Internet as we know it is based upon the principles of being “free and open”. No single government, company, person, or entity known to man has complete and absolute control over the web (Google - Take Action). However, as with any medium of knowledge, there will always be those who wish to censor it, for better or worse. Censorship can be defined in many ways. In the context of the Internet, censorship may be defined as the act of suppressing or controlling the access and flow of information to achieve a means. This is a deeply ethical issue because the unrestricted flow of information can be a dangerous thing. However, it is also a philosophical issue pertaining to the concept of free speech.
Ethics of Internet censorship at a societal level
The ethics of internet censorship at a societal level depend on whether the society as a whole agrees whether censorship is morally permissible. Both sides of the argument often hold several key arguments. The pro-censorship side contends that censorship is necessary to protect society. There are usually several three key concerns in which this side presents.
The first is that censorship is necessary as society deems certain things to be socially taboo. This moral based argument includes various forms of pornography, racism, excess violence, hate crime, misogyny, abuse, et cetera. These are things that are commonly censored in other forms of media. The idea is that if society already accepts censorship of these things in various mediums, then the Internet should be no exception (McGahan). One such example is how various forms of pornography are illegal in different states.
The second argument is a legal argument that states the government is simply exercising its...
... middle of paper ...
...ploads/2/3/2/5/2325547/internet_censorship_and_economic_growth_in_china-b_minteh.pdf (Global Vision Institute) http://www.simoncolumbus.com/wp-content/2011/04/PYW-Ameer-Boscher-Diop-Hadlich-Manz-Political-Economy-of-Internet-Censorship.pdf (Sinom Columbus) http://archive.wired.com/wired/archive/5.06/china_pr.html (Wired on GFC) http://www.theatlantic.com/china/archive/2013/04/how-internet-censorship-is-curbing-innovation-in-china/275188/ (Bao, The Atlantic) http://internetcensorship.weebly.com/sociological.html http://chineseculture.about.com/od/mediainchina/a/Internet-Censorship-in-China.htm http://business.time.com/2011/10/26/can-chinas-economy-thrive-with-a-censored-internet/ (Schuman, Time Business) http://www.dalberg.com/documents/Open_for_Business_Dalberg.pdf http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lindsay-hoffman/internet-censorship-a-thr_b_4395167.html
Works Cited
The authors of these passages have very different ideas about censorship. After evaluation, I will determine which passage states a stronger argument. I believe that Passage 1 provides a stronger argument than Passage 2. Passage 1 states that his argument is “There are many problems with censorship.” The author has many strengths throughout his argument.
... good and safe concise decisions. Censoring laws on the internet now are important to protect kids most; and all others at risk. We need more laws enacted against exploitation and privacy against potential harm while using the internet. We are supposed to protect the weak. Therefore as a whole we can prosper in future generations hand in hand with our technological advancements.
Thesis: Although some people believe that censorship is adequate to select what things does the society will be good and can live around it while others believe that there should be no censorship because it takes away your right of expression of freedom.
"Internet Censorship." What does this mean to us? What is restricted? Censorship is summarily defined as the suppression of objectionable material. That means that material such as pornography, militant information, offensive language, anti-religion, and racism would be restricted in use. Freedom would not only be restricted to material placed on the web, but also what you could access, and where you could explore. Should the right of Freedom of Speech be taken away from us on the Internet? Having stated this, should there be any restrictions and if so, what's the limit of censorship?
that some of the material that is on the net needs to be filtered and regulated. The word censorship is defined as examining any material and prohibiting what is objectionable, according to Webster’s II dictionary. Censoring the internet is a violation of the first ammendment rights of every citizen in the United States. There are two general truths that some people feel are attitudes towards censoring the internet. The first is that very few people admit to favoring it. The second is that no matter who you are, in a matter of minutes spent surfing the net almost anyone can find something that they find to be offensive. In fact, some web surfers feel that the truly inappropriate things are inspired by one’s own religion. For example, the Nurenberg Files website showed pictures of mangled fetuses with the photograph, name, and address of some abortion clinic doctors.
Abstract: This paper examines the use of Internet technologies (specifically SafeWeb.com) to counteract invasions of personal privacy and censorship. The paper begins by exploring the methods by which governments, corporations, and commercial agents invade personal privacy. It also discusses Internet censorship on the corporate and governmental levels. It then proceeds to discuss SafeWeb.com, a technology that allows Internet users to surf the Web privately and view censored content. The paper finishes by exploring some of the ethical issues raised by Internet privacy and censorship in specific relation to SafeWeb, concluding that the application of SafeWeb in circumventing the authority of governments and corporations is inherently unethical.
Remember the day when you could say anything you wanted without worrying about someone telling you, “That’s not correct”or “don’t say that.” Yes? Everybody does. Many long to live in that era once more; they long to be able to speak their mind in public without anyone thinking they are weird or crazy. Lately it seems as though you have to retain your thoughts inside your mind and not say anything. Many college campuses and websites have started to establish rules which prevent people from saying what’s on their mind and writing or saying something which may harm others.
Some people may view censorship on the internet positively due to some of the content posted. Such as pornography, hate speeches and much more. But the real question is to what extent can we censor the internet. Children today do not learn everything from the internet, they can learn from the streets, the schools, and the friends that they converse with. If they really set their minds to search on the internet for this, they will find a way.
Censorship is problematic towards society because it violates the 1st Amendment of the Constitution; freedom of speech. The freedom to be able to express oneself but then limited to what is allowed to be said breaks this basic and important right (FlowPsychology). Censorship can also be seen as pro-dictatorship. Many analysts of censorship dispute that it can be used in dictator’s benefit to get in the population’s head specifically in times of civil tension. There have been many events where a dictator enforced censorship on news stations that included discussion of political issues against the government. (GreenGarage). Many issues including war, poverty terrorism, and epidemics are extremely critical toward society in present day. Suppressing the information that can limit the society from knowing the pure truth (FlowPsychology). The internet is one of the largest instruments used in multiple ways. It is used as a tool towards enhancing knowledge and providing information in seconds. The problem is some countries have internet censorship depriving the sources and fulfilling information it can provide for a population (GreenGarage). Censorship ultimately can disimprove people’ lives preventing many ideas like knowledge, learning, and
Internet is a powerful tool that allows users to collaborate and interact with others all over the world conveniently and relatively safely. It has allowed education and trade to be accessed easily and quickly, but all these benefits do not come without very taxing costs. This is especially true when dealing with the likes of the Internet. Countries in the European Union and Asia have realized this and have taken action against the threat of net neutrality to protect their citizens, even at the cost of online privacy. Internet censorship is required to protect us from our opinions and vices. Every country should adopt Internet censorship and regulation since it improves society by reducing pornography, racism/prejudice, and online identity theft.
The internet has been one of the most influential technological advancements of the twenty-first century. It is in millions of homes, schools, and workplaces. The internet offers not only a way of communicating with people around the world, but also a link to information, shopping, chatting, searching, and maps. This freedom to be anyone and to "go" anywhere right from the comfort of home has become a cherished item. However, there is always a down side to every up. Because of the freedom to post anything and access anything on the internet, the issue of regulation has arisen; for example, what should and should not be allowed on the internet? Who has the right to regulate this space that we cherish for its freedom?
Ever wondered the reason behind racial discrimination, sexual discrimination, children committing crime or violence? The main reason is that censorship is not properly imposed or there is a need of censorship in the society. Censorship is the suppression of ideas and information that certain people, individual, groups or government officials find it objectionable, offensive or dangerous on others. There are varieties of other definitions but all have in common the concept of withholding information and/or resources from those who seek it. Hence censorship is essential in society to eliminate discrimination on basis of race and sex, protect children, maintain stability and restore what censor sees as lost moral values. Censorship occurs when expressive materials like books, magazines, movies, videos, music or work of art are restricted to particular audiences based on their age or other characteristics. (http://www.ala.org/oif/intellectualfreedeomandcensorship.html)
It is the year 2014. The growth and advancement in technology and innovation lead to the birth of new channels of media. Back tracking to the 1950s, the primary source of media would have been printed such as newspapers, articles and magazines. The introduction of the televisions and cinemas in the late 20th century resulted in the production of masterpieces such as movies and dramas alike. Currently, the internet is the unified source for all kinds of media which gives allows us to freely express and exhibit our perspectives and ideas. On the other hand, this revolution in the media industry saw the production of certain media that are unsuitable for certain audiences. Thus, government bodies such as Malaysia’s Multimedia and Communication Commission are set up to selectively evaluate and censor contents to ensure that media would not be harmful to the public. Therefore, this essay strives to prove that censorship is sometimes justified.
The Internet provides a gateway for an individual to speak freely and anonymously without being targeted to what he or she said. With this said, one of the biggest issues concerning the Internet today is freedom of speech. The issue of free speech on the Internet has been a topic of discussion around the world within the past years. It is a unique communication medium and is powerful than the traditional media[2]. Because the Internet can not be compared equally to other mediums of communication, it deserves the utmost freedom of speech protection from the government. The restriction of speech on the Internet takes away from individual's rights and freedom from experiencing the Internet's benefits and uses. Information found on the Internet is endless and boundless and this poses the question, "should the government be allowed to regulate the information and content being transmitted or posted online?"
Censorship is blocking or hiding something that is considered unacceptable to the public eye or a group of a certain age. In looking at the effects of censorship on society, it is apparent that it can both be beneficial and harmful. Censorship is seen to be beneficial through preventing dangerous people from viewing government documents and preventing children from viewing inappropriate content. Censorship can be harmful when it comes to taking away rights declared in the Constitution and setting unequal standards for men and women. These examples show how effects censorship has on society can be both good and bad. Looking at facts and credible opinions is a way to truly see how censorship has negative and positive effects.