Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on Frankenstein
An essay on victor Frankenstein
An essay on victor Frankenstein
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Society tends to believe that moral principles are what keeps it together. In the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, she portrays many ethical unsound actions that Victor finds himself into. Ethics can be defined as rules of behavior of right and wrong that are accepted by an individual or society. One ethically unsound action Victor made was playing god by creating a artificial being. The second reason is when Victor encountered the creature and was selfish because he put his loved ones in danger. The final reason is how he didnt think of the consequences of his actions when creating a life. Victor as many believe, plays god. Victor says, “A new species that would have blessed me as its creator and its source, many of the happy and excellent natures would owe their being to me.” (Shelley,24) Victor has a dedication on creating life and even successfully attempts to renew life by creating an artificial being out of human corpses. He also states, “The teachers of this science have promised impossibilities, and they performed nothing. The modern masters...have acquired new almost unlimited powers.” (Shelley, 45,46) He is comparing science to god. Victor’s decision was very poor and an unethical choice because human beings are living creatures, we shouldn't play …show more content…
god even after death. Victor was a very selfish person and he put his loved ones in danger.
Victor says, “For the first time, I had felt what the duties of being a creator was, and that I ought to have rendered him happy before I complained of his wickedness. These motives had urged me to comply to his demand.”(Shelley, 116 ) Victor is saying how the creature wished for a companion and threatened him so he felt like he needed to help out the monster. Victor says, “I had knew a thousand fearful accidents that might occur, even the slightest that would have disclosed a tale to thrill it all had connected with me with horror.”(Shelley, 184) Victor made an unsound decision by not telling his loved ones in danger by being
selfish. Victor doesnt think about the consequences of his actions. Victor creates life, when his creation comes to life it wasn't what he expected it to be. Victor states, “I had desired it with ardour that had far exceeded with moderation, now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream had vanished, breathless horror and disgust had filled my heart.”(Shelley, 59) He perceives that he has made a terrible solecism. Victor also says, “Mingled with this horror, I had felt the bitterness of disappointment.”(Shelley, 60) Human beings are flawed and capable of making mistakes but what makes this an unsound step of Victor and unethical is that he should have thought about his consequences. In conclusion, throughout the course of the novel Victor lingers into the gray area between what is right and what is wrong. Victor’s decisions portray his questionable morals and ethics in which he is ultimately digging in his own grave. Victors egotistical personality and desire for scientific discovery lead to his own demise. All of his unsound actions had certain unethical paths. This all lead to Victor’s three most ethically unsound actions.
...or was not thinking of others in his actions, but only of himself. He did not consider the tumult the abnormally large creature could cause in the world, nor what the feelings of the monster would be towards him if he abandoned him. Victor also did not contemplate the safety of his friends, as he had the chance to stop the creature’s misdoings but failed to do so, risking the life of his friends. Therefore, Victor was a selfish being, who only concerned himself with his wishes and never evaluated the situation of his loved ones, ultimately causing their demise. The misfortunate events that occurred through Victor’s life could have been prevented, and also discontinued when Victor had the chance. However, Victor’s irresponsibility overcame these opportunities and he in turn, caused misfortunes for himself as well as his loved ones.
In the novel, Victor’s constantly told that he’s unable to follow through with his creation of life. Victor’s arrogance and determination drives him to prove the people wrong, For example, Victor says, “Who shall conceive the horrors of my secret toil as I dabble among the unhallowed damps of the grave, or tortured the living animal to animate the lifeless clay?” (55) This quote shows Victor’s willingness to follow through with his experiment, to a great extent. Victor’s arrogance pushes him through these times, because he knows that he’s capable of completing his creation.
“I do know that for the sympathy of one living being, I would make peace with all. I have love in me the likes of which you can scarcely imagine and rage the likes of which you would not believe. If I cannot satisfy the one, I will indulge the other.”
Although humans have the tendency to set idealistic goals to better future generations, often the results can prove disastrous, even deadly. The tale of Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, focuses on the outcome of one man's idealistic motives and desires of dabbling with nature, which result in the creation of horrific creature. Victor Frankenstein was not doomed to failure from his initial desire to overstep the natural bounds of human knowledge. Rather, it was his poor parenting of his progeny that lead to his creation's thirst for the vindication of his unjust life. In his idealism, Victor is blinded, and so the creation accuses him for delivering him into a world where he could not ever be entirely received by the people who inhabit it. Not only failing to foresee his faulty idealism, nearing the end of the tale, he embarks upon a final journey, consciously choosing to pursue his creation in vengeance, while admitting he himself that it may result in his own doom. The creation of an unloved being and the quest for the elixir of life holds Victor Frankenstein more accountable for his own death than the creation himself.
Literature often works as depicted act of betrayal. Many people, friends, and family may portray a protagonist, but they will likewise be guilty of treachery or betrayal to their own values. In the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, there is acts of betrayal between Victor Frankenstein and the monster. In the Novel Victor Frankenstein is a betrayal of life itself because it should be given naturally and not created by a scientist man. The monster is actually the one who is majorly betrayed, he may look like a hideous dangerous monster on the outside but, not one within himself. From the beginning of the novel, Victor betrays the monster, and this betrayal is seen on many levels throughout the novel. The tragic figure in Mary Shelley’s horror novel Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein, is truly the instrument of betrayal to his creation of the monster because life should be given naturally not by creation of suffering and horrific which is made by man.
Victor’s lack of compassion and sympathy towards the monster causes him to become angry instead of guilty. His cruelness to his creation made the monster kill and hurt the people he did but “when [he] reflected on [the monster’s] crimes and malice, [Victor’s] hatred and revenge burst all bounds of moderation,”(Shelley 325). Without compassion Victor thinks that the only way to stop the monster is to get revenge on him, instead of just giving him the empathy and kindness that monster craved. Victor realizes that "if he were vanquished, [he] should be a free man...balanced by those horrors of remorse and guilt which would pursue [him] until death. ”(Shelley 731).
As a tragic hero, Victor’s tragedies begin with his overly obsessive thirst for knowledge. Throughout his life, Victor has always been looking for new things to learn in the areas of science and philosophy. He goes so far with his knowledge that he ends up creating a living creature. Victor has extremely high expectations for his creation but is highly disappointed with the outcome. He says, “I had desired it with an ardour that far exceeded moderation; but now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart” (Shelley 35). Frankenstein neglects the creature because of his horrifying looks, which spark the beginning of numerous conflicts and tragedies. At this point, the creature becomes a monster because of Victor’s neglect and irresponsibility. The monster is forced to learn to survive on his own, without anyone or anything to guide him along the way. Plus, the monster’s ugly looks cause society to turn against him, ad...
If Victor had stayed around and showed the monster the real world, he might have not have went on to perform violent actions. This portrays Victor as a selfish character and gives more of an insight on his personal life. As a child, Victor is only interested in furthering his own knowledge and not worried about anyone else. He spent much of his time “drawing the picture of [his] early days... when [he] would account to [himself] for the birth of that passion which afterwards ruled [his] destiny” (Shelley 34), or otherwise a magnificent creation that would change his future. When constructing the Monster, he put all of his relatives in the back of his mind, and only focused on his own success and victory. This further explains the theme of being selfless and only doing certain things that will benefit
Social and Individual Responsibility in Frankenstein Mary Shelly wrote Frankenstein in a time of wonder. The main wonder was whether you could put life back into the dead. Close to the topic of bringing life back into the dead was whether you could create your own being, like selective breeding, but a bit more powerful. Close to where Mary lived, there was a man named Vultair who was experimenting with putting electricity through frogs to see if they could come back to life. With that going on close to her, as well as the fear of a revolution and the pressure on her to think of a ghost story, it is not surprising she thought of a horror story that would still be popular in the 21st Century.
Upon first discovering how to make life, Victor is overwhelmed with excitement and pride, feeling as though he has unlocked the greatest power on earth. His imagination is “too much exalted” by this newfound ability, and thus determines there is no “animal as complex and wonderful as man” for him to attempt as his first creation (Shelley 43). Frankenstein does not contemplate how he will react to or interact with the human he gives life to, or that he has created an extremely twisted parent-child relationship by creating a human from dead bodies. His general lack of concern regarding the consequences of his remarkable yet dangerous power is the root of the rest of the conflict between him and his monster throughout the rest of the novel, and it exemplifies Shelley’s underlying theme that science should not be pushed past morally and psychologically safe boundaries.
Frankenstein has been a classic for many years, and for many years to come. It strikes me to be one of the few horror stories one can actually read without vomiting, and instead, sympathize with. The book deals with a handful of things, as the moral dilemmas of interfering with nature. But, is it possible to connect this horror story with today's society?
In Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein secretly creates a monster without considering the consequences. After the creation of the monster and throughout Victor’s life he and the monster suffer constantly. Because Victor keeps his monster a secret from his family, friends and society, he is alone and miserable. The monster is also alone and miserable because he is shunned by society due to his grotesque appearance.
There is a fine line between a person 's morals and what they believe is right or wrong. First off, does one think that building a whole new life form would be ethical? Victor almost plays God when he builds his creation. He does not take into consideration the ethics or morals of science and technology. In order to build his creation, he also robs many graves to get certain body parts. That is just simply not right. It is not respectful to the families of the dead nor is it the norm in our society. However, Victor does not even think twice when he makes the decision to use these body parts. Just as many OCPD victims, he throws his moral and ethical codes out the window. He is only focused on building his precious monster. In today’s society, people take a second look in these situations, but for science’s sake some experiments are being performed that go against the moral values of many and could cause death. For instance, many are questioning if we should seek to treat incurable diseases or extend human life by using organs of genetically modified pigs or cells derived from human embryos. It is not moral to attempt to change the outcome of ones life by taking another. Humans are letting their selfish aspect get the best of them. This is along the same lines as what Victor tried to do. His method of making a life form could also be used to
The novel Frankenstein written by Mary Shelley is a work of fiction that breaks the ethics of science. Ethics is defined as rules of conduct or moral principles which are ignored in the story. The story is about a person named Victor Frankenstein who creates an artificial being. Victor abandons the being out of fear and the being is left to discover the outside world on his own and be rejected by people making the monster go on a violent rampage. Victor’s decision would affect him later on by the monster killing his loved ones causing Victor to suffer. Then Victor chooses to seek revenge on the monster and this choice will bring him to his death. In novel Frankenstein one might say that the main character, Victor, breaks the ethics of science when he plays God by creating his own being.
Mary Shelley expresses various ethical issues by creating a mythical monster called Frankenstein. There is some controversy on how Mary Shelley defines human nature in the novel, there are many features of the way humans react in situations. Shelley uses a relationship between morality and science, she brings the two subjects together when writing Frankenstein, and she shows the amount of controversy with the advancement of science. There are said to be some limits to the scientific inquiry that could have restrained the quantity of scientific implications that Mary Shelley was able to make, along with the types of scientific restraints. Mary Shelley wrote this classic novel in such a way that it depicted some amounts foreshadowing of the world today. This paper will concentrate on the definition of human nature, the controversy of morality and science, the limits to scientific inquiry and how this novel ties in with today’s world.