Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
I. Introduction
A. Animals were not placed on this earth for human use.
a. What excuse can people use for harming animals?
b. I think all living things should be treated with respect.
B. Humane vs. Nonhuman
a. Taking away animal’s rights to independence
b. All animals feel pain and pleasure such as humans
i. There is documented medical proof
ii. Anyone in their right mind would agree.
II.History
A.1970’s British psychologist coined the term “specism” (Animal Rights)
a. Specism is considered prejustice and discrimination by humans to animals
b. Almost the same as racism
B. In 1980, PETA, (People for Ethical Treatment of Animals) was founded
a. A member of PETA, Tom Reagan, says that animal pain and suffering is part of
…show more content…
a bigger problem. b. Acknowledging the rights of animals requires people to cease using them, not just associated with pain and suffering. III.Animal Welfare A. Animal welfare is the main alternative of animal rights activists. a. Animal welfare understands human’s use of animals as a food source and research as long as animals are treated humanely. i. While animal rights activists do not agree, it is a way to help animals avoid pain without being used for food. ii. Proves that no one has to become vegetarian in order to help animals. B.
Animal welfare believes that “Animals should be treated as an ends, not means.
a. Ways that animal welfare activists try to protect the pain of animals include:
i. Zoos
ii. Agriculture
iii.Hunting
iv.Experiments
IV. Killing animals vs. humans
A. In a small cases under the Constitution is legal to kill human beings.
a. If someones life is in jeopardy and they used self defense to protect themselves it is legal to kill that person if they where trying to kill you.
b. This is legal for animals too because if that animal was threatening someones life it is also legal to take that animals life.
B. When is the line crossed for harming animals? Would a person harm their neighbor for blasting the radio on there own property?
a. No, humans do not kill humans for the smallest noise because they do not have that right.
b. All animals roaming do not know they are harmful and when they are just minding their own they should be left alone. Its like when a bear comes down from the mountains and it does not know it is dangerous towards people its just looking for food.
V. Conclusion
A. This is people that torture and abuse these poor, vulnerable animals and it should be
stopped. B. Animals have right and they have feelings and emotions like us and the abuse towards all animals should stop.
The author concludes by stating that it is “time to reestablish balance in the natural world—by accepting the idea that hunting is as natural as bird-watching.” Kristof relates a passive act to an act of aggression. While it is possible that both can bring a sense of pleasure to participant, the assumption that one person would get the same levels of enjoyment from both is hard to believe, especially considering that both actions are at the far extremes of the same spectrum.
A. I will talk to you about overpopulation of deer in Alabama, while convincing you why
...nimal rights yet I do question myself where to draw the line. I do not condone violence or harm against animals, yet I shudder at the thought of a mice plague and feel saddened by the extinction of our native animals by ‘feral’ or pest species. Is it right to kill one species to save another? I am appalled by the idea of ‘circus’ animals yet I will attend the horse races every summer for my entertainment. I think Tom Regan’s argument and reasoning for animal rights was extremely effective at making whoever is reading the essay question his or her own moral standards. Reading the essay made me delve into my own beliefs, morals and values which I think is incredibly important. To form new attitudes as a society it is important we start questioning how we view the lives of others, do we see animals as a resource to be exploited or as equals with rights just like we do?
The article mainly focuses on this issue, not mentioning the aspects of animal rights. The authors argue their points well but can have counter-arguments against some
When dealing with animal ethics I believe the question at hand is the purpose of the experi...
b. when it comes to toxicity they need to breed, test, and dispose animals as hazardous waste
“There can be many reason for animal cruelty, like any other form of violence, is often committed by a person who feels powerless, unnoticed, or under control of others. Some who are cruel to animals copy acts what they have seen or that have been done to them, others see harming an animal as a safe way to get revenge against--or threaten-- someone who cares about that animal”. (“Animal… Statistics”) Concerns towards abusing animals have gone up in the past. Although there are not many cases on animal abuse, many have occurred. Abusers are charged with Criminal Animal Abuse and then sentenced to life in prison. Some animals that are physically abused are sometimes rescued by Animal Control, and are taken it to an animal shelter. However, many shelters have not had the space to keep the animals so the workers would have to put them down (Carol Roach). Researchers have shown that the main animals getting abused are dogs, chickens, horses, and livestock (“Animal...
The single most important factor that sets human violence apart from aggression among lower animals is arguably the human’s greater technological capacity to inflict harm on another creature. These “tools of death” are readily available to humans and are vastly more lethal than even the most deadly natural equipment of any other species (Kleck, 670).
In any law case, no matter high or low, you always have to have reasons for why or at least how it happened. You don’t just say to the lawyer, “That person harmed me, destroy that person at once.” You wouldn’t, would you? Animals have to be justified to our standards!
The ugly truth is that animals are dying at the hands of their owners everyday, some in very violent ways that can be avoidable given the right solution. Slaughterhouses, puppy mills, dog fighting, and so on, are just a few examples of how animals are being treated badly by people. Animal cruelty is a form of violence which, un...
I will first look at the views of Peter Singer, who is a utilitarian. A
animal being stalked , just waiting to be killed . Now who are we to listen to ?
The abuse of innocent creatures is not an “exercise of dominion.” Humans have no right to treat the earth’s other inhabitants’ lives as if they are worth less than a human’s life. Proper procedures need to be put into action in order to protect the weak and defenseless from those that are stronger (Livingston, 2016).
Such experimentations enabled scientists to come up with concrete solutions and provide treatments and to understand if the new drugs produce adverse effects in monkey. For instance, polio vaccine was first tested on monkey and it has helped scientist to treat humans suffering or dying from poliomyelitis deceases. Despite the advantages of such medical experimentations on monkey, animal rights activists believe that any kind of drugs test on animal like monkey should be stopped. Philosophers like Tom Regan in “The Case for Animals Rights” believe that animals should have fundamental rights as humans, and also be protected from unnecessary humans’ aggressive actions. In addition, Peter Singer confirms Tom Regan’s standpoints about animals’ rights and believes that both humans and animals should have the same principles of rights. Regan stresses that unless humans’ mentality to accept that animals are important and they are aware of what happen in the world to them humans will continue to disrespect them and eat, use in science, hunt, and exploit in different ways. Regan’s ideology is that even though animals have “inherent values” which lack abilities that humans do, but their life is important and they can feel the pains. Regan illustrates that humans have biological, individual, and social needs and these needs should not penetrate into animals’ life. He believes that
Animal Cruelty has many forms, many reasons and most importantly many victims. It is a growing problem in today’s society. Many people may wonder why people abuse animals. The thought is simple, however the answer is a little more complex, there are three main types of animal cruelty. The three reasons are as follows: unintentional, intentional, and cruel intentions. I will discuss each one in more detail.