Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethics is a crucial aspect of effective leadership
Ethics in organizations and leadership
Ethics is a crucial aspect of effective leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethics is a crucial aspect of effective leadership
Jessica Waggoner (2010) stated in her thesis, there are three requirements of leaders allowing them to capitalize on their ability to influence ethical conduct. These three requirements are “achieve an understanding of ethics; serve as a role model in making ethical decisions; and develop and implement a plan of action for promoting ethical conduct on the part of his or her staff” (Waggoner, 2010). This paper attempts to define ethics and leadership and how they combine to create ethical leadership. It will explore the traits of an ethical and unethical leader as well as what influences or contributes to unethical behavior. It also discusses how employees, leadership, and the environment can lead to or contribute to unethical behavior. …show more content…
Ethical leaders are humble, concerned for the greater good, strive for fairness, take responsibility, show respect for each individual, and think about the long-term consequences, drawbacks, and benefits of the decisions they make in the organization (Leigh, 2013). Ethical leaders influence the values of the organization by setting high ethical standards and act in accordance with them in order to serve as role models for their followers. These types of leaders are perceived as honest, trustworthy, courageous and demonstrating integrity. The more the leader "walks the talk", by translating internalized values into action, the higher the level of trust and respect he generates from followers (Leigh, 2013). Unethical leaders follow a different path.
Unethical Leadership Behavior Unethical leadership refers to leaders acting in a manner inconsistent with agreed upon standards of character, decency, and integrity and which clearly violates moral standards and fosters distrust from subordinates (Chandler, 2009). This type of behavior could promote and set into motion unethical conduct by the leaders subordinates. According to Dexter Dunphy, Emeritus Professor in the School of Management at the University of Technology Sydney Australia, at least three levels of unethical behavior can be identified and defined (Oates &Dalmau, 2013). The three levels are rejection, non-responsiveness, and
…show more content…
Unethical leaders use these weaknesses for their own gain without regards of the consequences to themselves or the subordinates. Non-responsiveness concerns itself with operating from a position by which the leader measures success only in terms of what they may gain thru exploitation of others especially when power or monetary gain is involved and the leader shows little or no concern for laws or regulation (Oates & Dalmau, 2013). The third level of unethical behavior is compliance. Compliance is doing the minimum required by law while continuing to exploit and use others to achieve this minimum. Unethical leaders are narcissistic, greedy, cheat, lie, and do not care who they step on or hurt to achieve their goals and
There are unethical leaders from almost every professional, industry, or any type of business. Corporate executives like Kenneth Lay and Martha Stewart were taken before the court for poor ethical practices. Leaders of pharmaceutical companies have been found knowing about distribution of unsafe products. Leaders at Coke Cola were found guilty of racial discrimination and leaders of cruise ships fined for dumping waste in the ocean. News reports exposed Wall Street analysts who created phony reports, made profits, and pushing worthless stocks, left citizens questioning if they should invest their money. Leaders of the world’s largest retailer, Wal-Mart, were cited for practices of employee abuses and gender discrimination. Questions emerged in the news whether leaders of the tobacco i...
Meeting the ethical challenges of leadership casting light or shadow is authored by Craig E. Johnson. This book takes an interdisciplinary approach to leadership and ethics. The first part of this book looks at the topic of the shadow side of leadership. This explores the abuse of power and privilege, mismanagement, and inconsistency in her leadership. Part two, looking inward examines the role of character development and the nature of evil, forgiveness, and spirituality. Part three looks at the ethical decision-making processes and provides theories and tactics. Part four looks at ways leaders can disseminate information in a variety of situations. The book teaches new terminology, key principles, decision-making formats, and important elements of ethical contexts.
Looking at the first word in ethical leadership we see, as stated in the Webster-Merriam dictionary, ethical is defined as “following accepted rules of behavior: morally right and good”. When we think of someone who is ethical we, first, think of someone who ‘follows the rules’. By following the rules I mean someone who in the eyes of the majority is morally sound. Having strong morals is what I believe the key is to an ethical person. On the other side of the definition of ethical is defining it as having inside oneself the desire to do what’s right over what is wrong. When we speak about someone who is ethical this desire is one that is not dependent on external forces i.e. no one can sway an ethical person’s mindset.
Currently, leadership is generally understood as a person with insight and wisdom of guidance, which expected to be efficient in management responsibilities like planning organizing, and monitoring performance (Kandola, 2004, p. 144). In addition, making ethical decision is important to individuals who value and take seriously institutional...
Visionary and ethical leadership are at the forefront of organizational success. The visionary leader can see where they want to be and blaze a trail to the finish line. Ethical leaders lead by knowing and doing what is right. The purpose of this essay is to showcase Andrew Carnegie’s visionary leadership while examining his struggle with ethical leadership. Andrew Carnegie was a Scottish immigrant who moved to New York in 1848 (Luke, n.d.). He worked his way up the ladder from a poor immigrant to a pivotal figure in history. This essay begins examining the visionary leadership characteristics of Carnegie. It showcases his vision, the path he took and the results of his dedication. Furthermore, several examples of Carnegies visionary leadership is tied into the SNCOA course fourteen curriculum. The next section focuses on Mr. Carnegies ethical leadership challenges. The section overviews the areas in which ethics were not considered. In addition, examples and comparisons of the absence are taken into account. The final section correlates the visionary leadership and lack of ethical leadership as it relates to my personal experience. Furthermore, this section reveals the impact and changes to my leadership style. We begin the essay with a look into Andrew Carnegie’s visionary leadership.
Palmer, D. 2009. Business leadership: three levels of ethical analysis, Journal of Business Ethics. 88(3): 525-536.
With so many constant changes today with different generations, legal and political circumstances and ever-changing and improving technology sources, organizations have new and recurring issues arising every single day. The reasons for these issues vary widely and develop because of so many different situations. The outcome of the situation depends on many factors including the issue at hand, the management style and the ethics of the organization to simply name a few. These outcomes can certainly make or break an organization if not handled appropriately. The issue I have found to be the most significant is leadership. Within leadership, there is the opportunity for many issues in itself.
This manifests in a leaders tendency to overrate themselves and their work. People typically view themselves on a higher level than their peers, which can have them overlooking their own short comings. Also, people are more inclined to take credit for success and blame external factors for failures. Lastly, there are conflicts of interest. Hughes et al. (2014) cite that “we may be conscious of potential conflicts of interest, but even then, though, we misjudge our own ability to discount the extent to which the conflict actually biases our perception of the situation in our own favor” (p. 149). All of these are biases impact moral reasoning. When leaders allow these biases to impact their behavior and decision making, it results in an unhealthy organizational culture and unethical climate. Conversely, when leaders fully understand these biases and continually work towards improving their moral reasoning, they can positively affect organizational culture and create an ethical climate, which ultimately influencing all organizational
Some of the common causes of unethical behavior in the workplace are: 1) extreme emphasis on profits, 2) loss of corporate loyalty, 3) fixation on personal advancement, 4) probability of not getting caught, 5) immoral quality set by top management, 6) indecision about whether act is wrong, and 7) reluctance to stand up for what is right
This person does not send out strong messages about ethics and leaves followers unsure about where he or she stands on moral issues. Ethically neutral leaders appear to be self-centered and focus exclusively on the bottom line. Sandy Weill, former Citigroup CEO, typifies the ethically neutral leader. Weill stayed on the sidelines when it came to ethics, rewarding his managers according to their results. It was during his tenure that Salomon analyst Jack Grubman continued to promote Winstar Communications even as it was heading for bankruptcy.
“Ethical leaders within an organization cannot make every ethical decision by themselves” (Ferrell, 2015). In centralized management, the top people make all of the decisions. There are still however many opportunities for lower level employees to make unethical decisions. Management can promote ethical behavior at every level by being a good example and following its own code of conduct. The ethical environment should also be closely monitored. When someone makes a really great ethical decision, that person should be recognized. By rewarding good behavior, others will naturally want to receive these rewards as
The other part reflects a genuine commitment to the ethical leadership. Also, some recommendations are mentioned in next part which depicts the improvement in ethical leadership behavior in the organization. Ethical leadership is properly demonstrated in this part. Defining Leadership Leadership is the procedure of directing individuals as a single unit to attain an ordinary objective.
Leaders are dishonest. Although some are unintentionally dishonest, it can lead to the deterioration of trust between the leader and his or her followers. An ideal leader is effective when there is trust established between both the leader and the followers. According to Michelle Bligh, trust is an “expectation or belief that one can rely on another person's actions and words and that the person has good intentions to carry out their promises” (21). Leaders gain trust when they are consistently honest and communicate well with their followers. In return, followers respect an honest leader and obey commands without issues. Respect causes a positive environment because authoritative figures and subordinates can rely on each other to achieve the
Ethical leadership organizational ethics and socially responsibility are inseparable (Johnson). Leadership is not a inherited gift or family heritage; it is not a degree from an ivy league graduate school. Becoming a leader is an intentional process of growth that must be lived out experientially (Mullane). Ethical leaders demonstrate three distinctive characteristics, knowledge, action and character. Leaders have to have the ability to say “yes” or even “no” to a never ending series of challenges. A leader needs to be able to define their values, character and leadership style. When accepting the role of leadership you become encumbered by ethical issues and concerns. .
Burns stated that leadership is one of the most observed and least understood phenomenon on earth; however, I believe that if we are able to understand Huxham and Vangen’s proposed cyclical connection, we are in turn allowing for a better understanding of leadership. From this, I understand that leadership is in part a product of leadership legitimacy, with the bulk of the product originating from predetermined structures, process, and participants. This not only affects leadership effectiveness, it also effects the role ethics and accountability plays. Ethics is crucial to the influence of power, tools, and skills used by leaders. For example, if the executive director of Bridges, a non-profit in Memphis, wanted to add more programs the way she would motivate her employees to do so should be in an ethical yet efficient way. However, if she decides to make use of her ability to manipulate her employees in an unethical manner, she would still be acting as a leader despite the tactic used to do so. Despite the opportunity to not do so, leaders in public administration, more specifically those in the public sector, should use ethics as they serve in their various leadership roles since their implementation and carryout of a policy directly impacts those around them. Likewise, accountability is also held at a constant for leaders in the public sector. Much like with their ethical values, leaders are to be able to effectively implement action that they can be held accountable