Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical issues to genetic testing
Genetic engineering ethical implications
Is genetic engineering ethical
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical issues to genetic testing
In class we watched the film "Gattaca". The movie follows the main character, Vincent, through a dystopian future that uses an advanced version of Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD). In our world PGD is a medical treatment that involves screening multiple embryos prior to implantation and pregnancy for possible genetic diseases, giving parents the ability to chose the healthiest of the bunch and discarding the rest. However, in the movie they have a much more advanced form of PGD treatment, that gives parents the ability to screen for desired traits other then just possible diseases. Both the movie and PGD itself bring up very controversial questions regarding topics like possible discriminations and the nature of the treatment. Although In a short article called "Off-The-Peg Offspring in the Genetic Supermarket" written by Colin Gavaghan, he tries to address some of these ethical concerns. Providing two approaches; a restrictive and laissez afire approach. He argues that we should offer a more laissez faire approach, as he believes it should also be freely available. In his article he addresses the concern for discarding the embryos, possible harm to the handicapped, and the nature of PGD. In his article he claims an 8-cell embryo cannot form consciousness and doesn't have the capacity to feel pain prior to ten weeks. He also attempts to question the concern for already existing handicapped people, sympathizing for them, but also making clear that we have no moral obligation to create more handicapped people for moral concerns regarding their population. As he tries to argue his support for PGD, Gavaghan acknowledges that there are possible reasons to be against PGD, but he also makes clear that he believes the benefit it has to society outweighs these moral concerns. In light of his argument, I agree that there are negative consequences to making the treatment available, that are also clearly portrayed in the movie. However, the treatment itself can prevent diseases, future suffering, and possibly increase the overall happiness in the
What is the social construct reality? The Thomas Theorem? (chapter 4) How might it be illustrated in the film? Provide specific examples.
Introduction Gattaca is an American science fiction (sci-fi) film directed by Andrew Niccol in the year 1997. In this story, people are divided into two races: they comprise of the Valid, which are born with superior genes, and the Invalid, which are born naturally with normal genes, they are also seen as inferior to Valid. The protagonist of the film, Vincent, born as an invalid is granted the identity of Valid from Jerome, who is half paralyzed to fight against discrimination in the civilization and fulfilling his dream. The director uses bars as significant symbolic barriers which represent how discrimination affects people in a society. In the earlier scenes of the film Vincent is seen in the shower, there are some bars which represent that Vincent is trapped in the discrimination of society.
In the motion picture Gattaca directed by Andrew Niccol questions the ability of allowing genetic potential, calculated by birth, to establish the fate of an individual. The determination of a person’s destiny proved impossible and preposterous as mankind were defined by their capability to make decisions on their own concerning their future. The film exhibits the problems in a genetically engineered society. Development of science technologies has advanced exceedingly to the extent where immediately after birth an infant’s destiny can be identified just by taking a blood sample. This gives a glimpse at the person’s future and the opportunity to discriminate: ‘…no longer determined by social status or the colour of your skin. We now have discrimination down to a science’. Society in Gattaca was divided into two classes valids and in-valids.
After the discovery of genetically altering an embryo before implantation, “designer babies” was coined to describe a child genetically altered “to ensure specific intellectual and cosmetic characteristics.” (“Designer Babies” n.p.). This procedure combines genetic engineering and In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) to make sure certain characteristics are absent or present in an embryo (Thadani n.p.). The procedure also includes taking an embryo to be pre-implementation genetically diagnosed (PGD), another procedure that doctors use to screen the embryos (Stock n.p.). An embryo’s DNA goes through multiple tests to obtain an analysis of the embryo, which will list all the components of the embryo including genetic disorders and physical traits such as Down syndrome, blue eyes, and brown hair, for instance (Smith 7). Although the use of PGD is widely accepted by the “reproductive medical community” and the modifying of disorders or diseases is to a degree, once the characteristics are no longer health related “72% disapprove of the procedure” (“Designer Babies” n.p.). At this point the parents make decisions that would alter their child’s life forever and this decision is rather controversial in the U...
In the 21st century, pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (a screening test used to determine if genetic or chromosomal disorders are present in embryos) can easily be achieve at a high price. This had help doctors predicted and prevented many babies with special features. As a kid, we learned in school that our genes define who we are as a person and without them, we all would look very alike and would act in the very same way. However, does our genetic served more than defining our personalities, likes, or dislikes? What if people were to look at your genes under a microscope, will they be able to tell beyond your cosmetic appearance and see things such as your goals and ambition? Gattaca did a pretty good job of proving this point of view
What do one think of when they hear the words “Designer Babies”? A couple designing their own baby of course, and it’s become just that. Technology has made it possible for there to be a way for doctors to modify a babies characteristics and its health. Genetically altering human embryos is morally wrong, and can cause a disservice to the parents and the child its effecting.
Picture a young couple in a waiting room looking through a catalogue together. This catalogue is a little different from what you might expect. In this catalogue, specific traits for babies are being sold to couples to help them create the "perfect baby." This may seem like a bizarre scenario, but it may not be too far off in the future. Designing babies using genetic enhancement is an issue that is gaining more and more attention in the news. This controversial issue, once thought to be only possible in the realm of science-fiction, is causing people to discuss the moral issues surrounding genetic enhancement and germ line engineering. Though genetic research can prove beneficial to learning how to prevent hereditary diseases, the genetic enhancement of human embryos is unethical when used to create "designer babies" with enhanced appearance, athletic ability, and intelligence.
Rather than leave genetics up to chance, technology offers expectant parents the opportunity to genetically enhance their children before they’re born. These genetically superior offspring are known as “valids” and are given the best opportunity in Gattaca’s society. For example, when Vincent, an invalid, borrows the identity of the valid Jerome Morrow, an interview to work for Gattaca consists only of a urine test. It’s assumed that his genes carry all his potential. There’s no need for him to answer questions his DNA can answer for him.
It is undeniable that rapid technological and scientific progress not only improves convenience and efficiency of our daily life, but also causes ethical concerns to humanity where science and technology intersect with society from different disciplinary aspects. In particular, preimplantation genetic technology could have altered society into a genetic hierarchy, establishing a dystopian society accompanied by genetic discrimination. GATTACA, made in 1997, is an intriguing science fiction film directed by Andrew Niccol, that delivers an insight into how the world has perceived genetic engineering and draws on challenges over reproductive technologies to facilitate eugenics, and the possible consequences of such technological developments for the individual and society if such progress goes unchecked. Niccol presents Vincent Freeman, the protagonist as a representative of those who are born naturally, therefore he is seen as imperfect and ‘invalid’, no matter how hard he attempts and holds a bigger dream than ‘valids’ who had their genes selected so they could be as perfect as possible, yet he is never accepted and treated as inferior, second-class citizens.
cause the sufferer to think that the problem is over with but it actually has not.
Sometimes my boyfriend and I will talk about if it is smart to even have children in this day and age (considering the overpopulation problem). After seeing this film I realize that it’s also important to discuss what you and your partner/spouse might do if your child were born with a disability. I feel like so many couples have children before they are ready, now I’m worried people have children without discussing possible problems they and their child could face! Perhaps I am overthinking the process of parenting, but what I can say is this- if I ever find myself considering parenthood, I want to be prepared for potential health problems.
One of these moral dilemmas is that genetic engineering changes the traditional dynamic that occurs between the parent and the offspring. This issue arose over the possibility of having a human embryo with three genetic parents which is now possible due to genetic engineering. The procedure in question “involves transplanting the chromosomes from a single-cell embryo or from an unfertilized egg into a donor egg or embryo from which the chromosomes have been removed”(Foht). The procedure itself is very useful for women with mitochondrial disorders but the issue involved with this is that the embryo would technically have three biological parents. There needs to be a real concern about “the way genetic engineering can alter the relationship between the generations from one of parents accepting the novelty and spontaneous uniqueness of their children to one where parents use biotechnology to choose and control the biological nature of their children”(Foht). There is a special relationship between children and their parents that may be disappearing very soon due to these techniques. Children could be born never truly knowing one of their genetic parents. If these procedures continue to prosper people will have to “accept arrangements that split apart the various biological and social aspects of parenthood, and that deliberately create
Prenatal genetic screening in particular is a polarizing topic of discussion, more specifically, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). PGD is one of the two techniques commonly used to genetically screen embryos in vitro; it is usually done at the eight-cell stage of division. PGD is most often performed when there is the risk that one or both parents carry disease-causing mutations. It is extensively used by high-risk individuals trying to conceive babes who will be free of particular mutations. PGD can test for over 50 genetic conditions and even allows for sex selection if there are underlying gender-associated medical conditions. When the results are satisfactory, the selected embryo is implanted into the mother’s uterus. While a controversial technique, preimplantation genetic diagnosis is one example of some of the good genetic testing can do, more benefits will be furthe...
Pray, Leslie A., Ph.D. “Embryo Screening and the Ethics of Human Genetic Engineering.” Nature.com. Nature Publishing Group, 2008. Web. The Web.