Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethics case studies in psychology
Ethical issues within psychology
Arguments for bias in the media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethics case studies in psychology
Decision-making is an essential and crucial part of psychologists’ work. Because these decisions immediately or in a long perspective affect others, psychologists bear direct responsibilities to the society and those with whom they work.
One of the components that ensure right decision-making is a professional competence, which is not limited to the professional and scientific knowledge and appropriate skills, but also encompasses familiarity with laws, regulations, and policies. The standards on competence are addressed in the Section 2 of the APA Ethics Code, which includes important positions on boundaries of competence, bases for scientific and professional judgments, maintenance of competence and even discusses the importance of dealing
…show more content…
In reality this process if far more complicated. As Kimmel (1991) points out, despite the existing set of ethical standards there are individual differences in ethical decision-making among psychologists that result from cultural and personal characteristics, interests, and values. Differences in sex, age, training, experience, as well as differences in the area and type of employment influence ethical evaluations made by individual psychologists. While these biosocial and professional factors can be recognized and the role that they play in dealing with ethical dilemmas can be acknowledged, there is not only …show more content…
The question here is should researchers be trusted to make ethical decisions by themselves, relying on their professional competence, experience, and knowledge of ethical principles and standards; or should researchers be overseen by the formal committee to ensure that their work is ethical? Examples of some institutional ethics regulation cases and comparison of research ethics protocols in the academy with journalistic practices described by Haggerty (2004) certainly demonstrate the profound bureaucratization and expansion of the regulatory system. It also shows how inconsistent and sometimes inadequate the system is in interpreting and applying central concepts of research ethics such as “harm”, “risk”, “anonymity”, “informed consent”, “research”, and
During the process of research, professionals collect data or identifiable private information through intervention or interaction. While this is a vital part of the scientific and medical fields, every precaution must be taken by researchers to protect the participants' rights. Ethics, outlined by the Belmont report; requirements, described by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS); and regulations, laid out by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are verified by an Institutional Review Board (IRB). This procedure assures that all human rights are safeguarded during the entire research process.
It also, gives the foundation for classifying the conduct of the professional and to provide a measurement in which the ethical standard is being enforced. Limitations cannot cover all aspects of the situation. The ethical code can consist of a restricted range. Furthermore, codes can have a possible conflict with others with some common behavior (p.272). Human service professionals must be aware that conflicts does exist. Individual professionals who are a part of one or more organization can run into conflict that may cause problems. The professional must develop ethical thinking skills to assist them to determine the ethical dilemmas that they may face. It is crucial for the helper to clearly understand situations from ethical
This paper is on a Harvard case study of Pat Parker, a lawyer who conducts political oppositional research and prepares reports. The work is done by contract between Parker and the candidate's campaign. The scenario is that Parker previously provided a report to a campaign, two years later; a group of lawyers who supported the candidate's opponent wants to buy the report plus other materials. The three parts of the paper include: the legal analysis, the ethical analysis and the recommendation for action. The paper considers contract law, copyright law, campaign statutes and codes of ethics. Bibliography lists 6 sources. Pat Parker conducts research grant applications (R01) to investigate ethical issues in human subjects research. The Code of Federal Regulations - Protection of Human Subjects (45 CFR, Part 46) provides a regulatory framework that all Parker-supported researchers must follow. Recent developments in biomedical and behavioral research, however, including the rapid growth of new interventions and technologies, increasing involvement of foreign populations in clinical research, and concerns about financial conflicts of interest among researchers, challenge investigators' abilities to interpret and apply the regulations (Buergenthal, 1995). Other situations (e.g., research with vulnerable populations, the use of data banks or archives, research on stigmatizing diseases or conditions) may present difficulties for identifying strategies, procedures, and/or techniques that will enhance/ensure the ethical involvement of human participants in research. The purpose of this program announcement is to solicit research addressing the ethical challenges of involving human participants in research in order to inform and optimize...
American Psychological Association. (2014). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx?item=3
In psychology, ethics are important because they set boundaries and control the way psychology is used by a set of laws. Ethic codes mainly protect clients from misuse of psychology. Ethics are important because they refrain the psychologist from lying to a patient. They also give protection to the public, clients, and psychologist. Overall, ethics are used to protect the psychologist and client from harm, as well as give control to the behavior in order to ensure safe and effective treatment. http://www.efpa.be/ethics.htm
The primary weakness of the APA is that it only applies to professional conduct and not private life. According to Pipes, Holstein, and Aguirre (2005), "APA codes apply within their role as psychologists...they may, with impunity from the Code, demean individuals of a particular gender or a particular religion with whom they interact only on a personal basis" (p. 326). While the APA has enforceable standards, the preamble and general principles are aspirational and seek to create individuals whose professional character will successfully integrate into their personal lives. For example, Jenny 's consultation with Rhonda went from a professional consultation to a gossip session on other issues within organization; when they failed "to guard against personal, financial, social, organizational or political factors" (APA, 2010) that might influence their ability to objectively resolve the present ethical dilemma. While the APA provide ethical principles and a professional code of conduct provide a foundation for resolving ethical dilemmas, it is not exhaustive and individuals should seek and use other models to help them resolve their ethical dilemmas, such as the eight-step decision
The Ethical Decision Making Model is an ethical guideline that is useful in ethical dilemmas and what course of action to take. It’s a framework that allows professionals to analyze and make ethical decisions to the best of their ability. It gives counselors a protocol to determine the appropriate course of action when faced difficult challenge. These decisions are taking into account; reflect a concern for the interests and the well-being of all clients concerns. Counselors should keep in mind the Golden Rule: “Do onto others as you would want onto you”.
Throughout history, there have always been ethical issues in different professions. One of the professions that has more issues now is anything related to science and research. There is no doubt that research can do great good to society by discovering cures for illness and providing new technology that can make life easier for a lot of people. The issue with research is that it has become something that is open to anyone and the boundaries that it has are the ones that were created at least forty years ago. These boundaries must be reviewed so that the research that is not necessary for society or that can harm it are controlled or even prohibited. These boundaries are called Bioethics.
Ethics is the study of human behaviour which is right or wrong, i.e., doing right things to others, being honest, being fair and justice to others. Ethics in finance is a compartment to general ethics. In financial system it is all about trust. Innumerable numbers of organisations in India have cheated many highly ethical people who trusted them and their companies. Hard earned money has been put by many people in cash to seek their better living in the post retirement stage. No stringent actions have been taken on them. This is more predominant in India.
The article titled “Contemporary Ethical Analyses: A Shortfall in Scientific Knowledge” describes the ethics through the public’s eye. One of the major ethical issues brought up is informed consent.
The application of critical thinking when considering ethical decision making is not only important, it is imperative due to the fact that it is essential and vital to the method of formulating decisions and problem solving. Likewise, ethical decision making is the process of determining a position when the outcome may not be clearly defined, coupled with the possibility of opposing points of view fostering disagreements between parties. As we learned in today’s lecture, the components of critical thinking involves reasoning and analysis. It is the concept of connecting the understanding of ideas with a personal center in logic. According to Dr. Lau, in the article, A Mini Guide to Critical Thinking, the use of critical thinking is the ability
American Psychiatric Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychological Association (APA), Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx
The most important thing learned in classes is usually taught in the beginning as a foundation idea. I found systems thinking to be most important. All too many times, we jump to conclusions quickly. Since starting this class, I have caught myself multiple times trying to make a decision without gathering all of the relevant information. Now that I make it a priority to step back for a second and look at the bigger picture, I feel as though I make not only ethical decisions, but just day to day decisions more efficiently. Without systems thinking, one would not be able to fully understand the issue at hand, potentially leading to making the wrong ethical decision.
Ethics play a major part in individual daily lives. Whether it is in an individual career, business, or family there are ethical values. Based on cultural, economics and religious differences many time the standards of ethics may vary. Some ethical values may be stronger and others may have few rules/laws they may abide by. Ethics are based upon a persons or groups moral principles, as we know some peoples’ morals should be questioned. This is the reason that large organizations have set in place their own ethical principles that they want their members to follow. Any profession that deals with psychology not only follows the organizational ethical rules but that of the American Psychology Association (APA). The APA refers to the ethical guidelines, Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Students of The Chicago School of Professional Psychology also follow another set of ethical values known as the TCS Codes of Conduct. Both ethical guidelines focus on the “do’s and don’ts” of the psychology world and that of the school. Both altos discuss at length the consequences of an individual
Ethical considerations play a huge role throughout the report. According to Cooper and Schindler (2008), “Ethics is made up of norms or standards of behaviour that guide moral choices about our behaviour and relationships with others. The goal of ethics in research is to ensure that no one is harmed or suffers adverse consequences from research activities”. Privacy of participants was of the utmost importance to the author. All information collected was used for academic purposes only.