Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Recommendation of Nike
Effects of corruption on society.doc
Corruption and its effect in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Recommendation of Nike
Ethical Companies with Unethical Practices Introduction American business should not be permitted to claim it is an ethical firm if it ignores unethical practices by its international suppliers. For the purpose of this assignment I will use the Nike Company to highlight its unethical practices. Despite the popularity of Nike in the American market, it has been accused of exploiting employees abroad. The corporate social responsibility stipulates that a company should maximize its profit and minimizes its cost in operations and manufacturing, also at the same time benefit the community it operates in. This paper will further elaborate on the global strategy employed by Nike Company as it outsources its goods and the unethical issues its practices. Nike has been accused of violating labor and human rights, deficiencies in health and safety conditions, low wages and poor working environments. Most businesses in the world use outsourcing of goods abroad to improve competitive advantage and minimize the cost of its production. Nike uses Greenfield outsourcing by hiring start up companies and independent contractors to provide manufacturing of footwear. The outsourcing business practices are very profitable to Nike. However, at the same time the company has attracted international attention because of its unethical practices in these outsourced working conditions and environments. Nike is engaged in designing, developing and marketing of products, footwear, equipment and apparel. It sells athletic footwear worldwide and the major buyer of its products is the United States. Products from Nike are made by independent contractors based in third world countries manufacture footwear products like Thailand, China and Indonesia (Bartley and C... ... middle of paper ... ...90.2 (2011): 425-451. Coakley, Mathew, and Michael Kates. "The Ethical and Economic Case for Sweatshop Regulation." Journal of business ethics 117.3 (2013): 553-558. Dawkins, Cedric E. "Labored Relations: Corporate Citizenship, Labor Unions, and Freedom of Association." Business Ethics Quarterly 22.3 (2012). Lipschutz, Ronnie, and James K. Rowe. Globalization, governmentality and global politics: regulation for the rest of us?. Routledge, 2012. Moriarty, Jeffrey. "How much compensation can CEOs permissibly accept” Business Ethics Quarterly 19.2 (2009): 235-250. Stevens, Betsy. "The ethics of the US business executive: A study of perceptions." Journal of Business Ethics 54.2 (2004): 163-171. Vachani, Sushil, and James E. Post. "Creating Socially Responsible Value Chains: Role of Companies, Governments and NGOs." International Business and Management 28 (2012): 17-44.
Corporations in the United States have proved time and time again that they are all about profit and not about what is good for America. One example of this is the fact that many corporations have factories in other countries, or buy from other corporations that do. Nike (an athletic shoe and clothing company) produces most of their shoes and apparel in factories in other countries, including Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, China, Vietnam and Malaysia. According to Nike’s factory disclosure list released May 2011, only 49 of it’s over 700 factories are located in the U.S. (Nike, Inc.) This means that thousands of jobs that could be filled by needy Americans are instead being filled by workers in other countries. This reason that Nike and other corporations outsource is very simple, it is very cheap to do so. In an excerpt from Jeffrey St. Clair's book “Born Under a Bad Sky” the author describes the vast differences between Nike’s production costs and retail prices. “In Vietnam, it costs Nike only $1.50 to manufactu...
Brooks, Leonard J. Business & Professional Ethics for Directors, Executives, & Accountants. Mason: Thompson South-Western, 2004. p227.
Many people in our society today are constantly asking, "Why do sweatshops exist?" The answer to this question is that companies like Nike and Wal-Mart use sweatshops to produce their goods for a much cheaper rate, to reduce the cost of their products. The problem with sweatshops is that the workers are subject to hard work in often times poor conditions for minimal pay. But although many people may condemn sweatshops, there are some advantages that many people overlook when arguing against sweatshops and their practices.
Cohen, S., Grace, D. (2010). Business ethics: Canadian edition. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press.
Pfeiffer, R., & Forsberg, R. (2005). Ethics on the job: cases and strategies (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.
Nelson, K., & Trevino, L. (2004). Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley
This paper will give a brief introduction about the history of Nike Sweatshops which will shed the light on their public image and their manufacturing process. It will further move to the suggested alternatives, what facts impact them, their stakeholder and their impact on the economic as well as social basis. In the end, it will discuss if the given choices are legal and ethical or not.
Nike Incorporated is the number one leading sportswear and equipment provider in the world. They manufacture anything from casual clothes to sports equipment, shoes to socks, and basketballs to golf balls. As a result of its massive success, Nike employs nearly 30,000 people worldwide while manufacturing in 700 shops around the globe and has 45 offices outside the United States. Its extensive reach into the global market has Nike producing more exclusive products than any other manufacturer in the world. Nike’s headquarters is located in the metropolitan area of Portland, Oregon.
Many global companies like Nike, Inc. are seen as role models both in the market place as well as in society in large. That is why they are expected to act responsibly in their dealings with humanity and the natural world. Nike benefits from the global sourcing opportunities, therefore areas such as production and logistics have been outsourced to partner companies in low-wage countries like China, Vietnam, Indonesia and Thailand. As a result the company is limited nowadays to its core competencies of Design and Marketing.
Svensson, Goran & Wood, Greg 2007, ‘A Model of Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 77, pp. 303-322.
Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2013). Business ethics: Ethical decision making and cases: 2011 custom edition (9th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Norman, W., & MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the bottom of the "triple bottom line". Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 243-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq200414211
These corporations are both large franchise companies and smaller independent companies. One corporation that has been under fire has been Nike. Nike is an American company that was started in 1964 by Phil Knight and Bill Bowerman. Originally founded as an apparel outlet in the sports industry, Nike has grown to be one of the biggest sponsors for athletes worldwide. Throughout its many years in production, Nike has proven to be beneficial for the developed world. Nike has offered a resource for athletes as well as an array of cheap athletic wear for all people. However, with cheap production costs come hard labor and poor worker rights for those in developing countries. Nike has been known to say that they have worked very hard to create jobs overseas, but what they fail to mention is the jobs they have created are sweatshops, where the workers are treated in less than acceptable environments. These workers are also being paid little to nothing, which makes it extremely hard for them to provide for themselves let along their
Tricker, b., & miller, c. (2012, September 6). Corporate Governance. Corporate Governance. Retrieved April 3, 2014, from http://corporategovernanceoup.wordpress.com/2012/09/06/business-ethics-is-the-bedrock-of-corporate-governance/
The “need” for these products is pushed heavily on society through advertising, with a particular focus aimed at young, hip audiences. Companies create the “need” for the logo. With the need for the logo in high demand, in what better way, for the companies, is there to gain huge profits off of their products than having them made in countries such as: Taiwan, Vietnam, and Thailand? Yet that is not the sole reason for production overseas, there are other reasons that companies, such as Nike, produce in countries such as these, which can include the following: the ability to severely underpay their employees, and having them work long hours in hazardous conditions that would not be legal in places such as the United States. Companies are consciously operating under conditions such as these, which help to create further inequalities, while also contributing to pollution in the areas where the production is