Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Increasing crime among youth introduction
Nature of crime among the youth
Nature and extent of youth crime
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Increasing crime among youth introduction
Ethan couch killer of four only sentenced to 10 months of probation. Ethan couch is a teenager who killed four an injured 10 others and use the defense of affluenza and only got 10 months of probation. Ethan couch should be tried as an adult because of the severity of the crime, his age, and it is in the best interest for society.
Ethan couch should be punished as an adult because of the severity of his crime. The Texan teen who used the now infamous “affluenza” after killing four people in a drunk accident. The reason I chose this as a piece of evidence is because he was underage drinking and killed 4 people. Also, couch is currently accused of violating his probation which prohibits him from drinking, driving, and
…show more content…
Couch and his mother were arrested 11 days later in Mexico after him and his mom ran to Mexico. The reason I chose this is because if he is running away from a police already he shouldn't be free. Also, he got caught because he called to get a pizza. I use this piece of evidence because he just carelessly ordered a pizza and it shows that he is not the smartest. This shows that you can couch should be tried as an adult.
Ethan couch should be tried as an adult because of his age. Church was arrested for manslaughter at the age of 19. If Ethan couch is doing things this dumb and Reckless at this age he needs to get punished so it doesn't get worse. Also, lawyers given two weeks to change judges Minds about 19 year old killing four people. At being the age of 19 you finish technically an adult and should have the feeling punishment for his crimes. This shows up Ethan couch should be tried as an adult.
Many people will say that couch to make it charged as an adult because he didn't know what was wrong and bad he was doing. Nevertheless Ethan did kill four people while drunk driving it because it was underage drinking. Therefore Ethan couch should be tried as an adult because killing four people and underage drinking and not be excused by ,he didn't know what he was doing. Ethan should be tried as an
There was a presumption against the teenager’s plea for bail due to the fact the adolescent had partaken in an activity classified as a serious indictable offence. He was brought to the jurisdiction of Campbelltown Children’s court since his age was less than 18 years old where he was charged with the murder of Wayne Boyce.
The tragic case of Larry and Brandon is a compelling story. It is a reality that stunned the city of Oxnard California when a 14-year-old boy named Brandon McInerney fatally shot a fellow classmate, Larry King, twice in the back of the head. The incident occurred in a computer lab where Brandon ran off after committing the crime. As a result of his actions Brandon McInerney was tried as an adult and was sentenced to 21 years in prison with no chance of parole. He will be released at the age of 39. Now the underlying question is was Brandon’s sentence a just resolution or should he have received more or less years in prison. The truth is that I believe Brandon’s verdict was a fair and just punishment, however I don’t believe that he should have been tried as an adult. There’s no question about it what Brandon did was horrible. He killed a kid in cold blood and ran off after doing it. He knows what he did and now he has to suffer the consequences. But Brandon was only 14 years old when this had taken place.
When you think your average baseball player, what do you think of? The player usually has all of his arms, legs, and no physical disabilities. Anyone who plays baseball would think it is hard to imagine that a person born without a right arm is able to play the game and let only be able to be a pitcher. Jim Abbott faces all the odds and has ten-year career in the major leagues. Abbott had to faces many obstacles throughout life and his playing career. Jim Abbott grew up being picked on since he didn’t have a right arm. When Abbott was younger he would use a steel hook as right hand and other children were afraid of him. Also, they called him names like Mr. Hook.
It is sad to see youth with so many energy and potential get sent to jail at an early age. The crimes most of the young children commit are usually something that could have been prevented. Adnan Syed, a high school student in Baltimore in 1999 had a different case than the other young children that get sent to jail every day for drug and theft majority of the time. He is sentenced for life in prison because the judge believes that he have murdered his ex-girlfriend Hae min Lee. Adnan Syed is not guilty for the murderer of Hae min lee because there is no proof that he did nor is there a motive for him to kill her.
There are countless reasons why Ethan Couch should not have received probation. The first reason is the fact that Mr. Couch was driving under the influence. Ethan Couch was sixteen years old which means, he was practicing under aged drinking. Drinking under the age of twenty one is illegal; Mr. Couch
Throughout and for many years there has been a lot of controversy on how to trial someone who has committed a crime under the age of 18. A lie will be a lie even if it 's serious or innocent and that 's why just like a crime will always be a crime, no matter what the situation is. The age of a person who has committed murder shouldn 't be an issue or a complication. Many advocate that the juvenile is just a child, but despised that I believe that is no justification or defense for anyone who does a crime. America and the nation need to apprehend that juveniles that are being conducted to life in prison is not just for one small incident or crime, but for several severe crimes according to Jennifer Jenkins, Juvenile Justice Information
The decision of whether young criminals should be tried in juvenile courts or adult courts has created a lot of controversy throughout the years. Juveniles should be tried as juveniles. The ones who are tried as adults often undergo a very harsh punishment, considering the fact that they are very young. Being tried according to their age is fairer.
Ethan Couch grew up with parents who did not teach him the proper differences between right and wrong. They spoiled him with anything that he could ever want because they were wealthy. Unfortunately, because of this he did not hear the word no being used often when it came to things he wanted. These were some of the defenses used in court against declaring that the actions of Ethan Couch on the night of the accident that he caused while drunk was not his fault. His parents had allowed him to live at his house, that was meant to be sold, alone. He was with a group of his friends and they were drunk and all of them decided to get in a car drunk and drive. This resulted in a mass car accident killing few, but injuring many.
If children are too young to vote, drink alcohol, drive, and go watch rated R movies, why should they be tried as adults? It has always been an issue if whether an adolescent, under the age of eighteen, convicted of violent crimes should be tried as an adult or not. There are children as young as eleven years old that are being sent to adult prisons (Krikorian 2003). In such cases the jury does not take into consideration the fact that they are too young to stand trial, their brains are not fully developed, and that they are capable of rehabilitating.
Ethan Couch, a 16 year old teenager, caused an accident that involved more than 14 people, killing four and injuring another. After the police arrived, Couch was then later taken to court, the court's decision left couch with 10 years of probation. In addition to couchs sentence he is to attend a rehab center due to his unstable condition of affluenza. Once Couch left the rehab center, he worked with his father in his place of business. This didn't last long for him and his mother fled to Mexico. After two weeks of searching, couch and his mother were found and taken into custody where they were immediately transported back to the United States. This would have never happened if the decision by the justice system had been harsher. Their initial
Jake Evans, a 17-year-old teenage boy, murdered his mother and sister by firing multiple gunshots at home in Texas (Brown, 2012; Walsh, 2012). After this heinous act, he made a 911 call to inform the dispatcher what he had done with a calm voice. Evans’s cold-blood double homicide case led the media to depict him as an malevolent adolescent, even the judge hearing over Evans’s case refused to drop the capital murder charge against Evans (Winter, 2013). The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that individuals who are under the age of 18 at the time of their offense should not be sentenced to death or life without parole (Miller v. Alabama, 2012; Roper v. Simmons, 2005). Evans’s public defender requested to try the boy with murder instead of capital murder which has only two punitive sentencing outcomes in Texas--- life without parole and death penalty (Douglas, 2013). However, both sentences would be unconstitutional to Evans because he was 17 years old when he committed offense (Winter, 2013). As the judge insisted to charge Evans with the capital offense, once Evans was convicted, the judge, however, will face another issue which is how to deliver a lawful and appropriate verdict. Therefore, to resolve the problem, the Texas District and County Attorneys Association is attempting to revise the law without violating the initial Supreme Court ruling (Winter, 2013). When the public and the media encounter cases like Jake Evans’s, they tend to overemphasize on what the defendants have done and how to punish them rather focus on what happened to the juvenile offenders while growing up and what drove them to their actions. The purpose of this essay is to shift from the unjust emphasis on one portion of cases, the legal process, to how this al...
Guilty! As the gavel hits the sound block, everyone is amazed at the verdict. This teenage boy is sentenced to a life in prison without parole. As you read this in newspapers, magazines, and even online, what goes through your head? You may be thinking, “Why is this teen being tried as adult, he is just a kid?” While he is “just a kid”, and this is a widely held opinion, but it is not mine. Should minors who commit violent crimes be tried as adults? Absolutely. Just because minors are young they do have the ability to know what is right from wrong. Since these minors have committed the crime, they need to be held accountable. If a minor has acted as an adult, they need to be treated like adults. Lastly, minors need to know that their actions have consequences, no matter what age.
Teens who commit violent crimes should be tried as an adult. Anybody who aims a weapon at a minor or an adult without a logical reasoning are dangerous. People don’t have the potential to know what the threatening individual will be like in 5, 10, or 15 years. Minors are able to understand what the consequences are if they commit a violent crime.
“should juvenile offenders be tried and punished as adults?” I deliberately think that all juvenile offenders should be tried and penalized as an adult because even though they are children, they still should be able to comprehend right from wrong, especially when there are dire situations. Now days children are way more intelligent than you think, with all this new technology, you can’t take anyone for granite. The frequency of young children committing these dreadful crimes has escalated enormously for the past couple of decades. There needs to be some type of justice for these innocent victims that are being affected or even killed by these juvenile offenders. As long as you understand what you did was wrong, then you should be tried and convicted as an adult as well. These juvenile systems let x amount of children off the hook when they reach a certain age, which is outrageous for the reasons of these heinous crimes that these immature children commit.
All the evidence I provided proves adolescent’s brain do have the capacity to understand the consequences of their actions. If an adult commits a murder and a juveniles commits the same murder but they are sentenced differently, that will not be just or fair. A crime is a crime so it is only fair that adolescents must be trailed the same as an adult. If juveniles that commit heinous crimes are tried as adults then our society will be surrounded by fewer criminals who bring safety to our communities. In conclusion, juveniles must be trialed as adults to create a safer environment for