Ethan Couch Case Study

593 Words2 Pages

The justice system has changed for people that has excessive wealth and those who are less fortunate. Those that are more privileged take advantage of the justice system instead of setting the example for those who can't afford paid lawyers or lawyer at all. Richer people have the intentions that they can get away with crimes because they can afford the bail they know their going to get. People that have higher income are capable of getting off on their cases faster than somebody that is lower class or middle class, there is many example cases that somebody that is rich got getting off earlier.
Rich people are capable of getting off easier and in the Ethan couch case you could see that wealth was the main reason he wasn’t convicted when the crime was first committed. Ethan couch is was about 16 years old when he was in a car crash that ended 4 innocent lives. Ethan couch was sentenced to 720 days in jail and probation. His psychologist Dr. G. Dick Miller arrived on the stand to testify the reason for on Couch's behalf. Miller had a supported a claim that Couch's wealthy upbringing and a lack of consequences for his actions caused him to suffer from "affluenza." This is a prime example of rich people getting off easier Couch was released with less time and blaming his …show more content…

In the Kate Meckler case she was only sentenced to 5 days of community service after stealing $2,000 in clothes in Saks. Kate Meckler comes from a particularly wealthy family, her father is the CEO of mediabistro.com and grandfather Herman Meckler was an actor who had movie roles in hit movies such as “Amadeus” and “Hair”. So why was she stealing out of Saks? The answer is Kate Meckler knew she would be about to get off earlier than anybody that is in the lower class. Since that are within the higher class are exempt from rules and/or laws that is imposed on

Open Document