Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Assess the role of the United Nations as an international organization for the maintenance of international peace and security
Short summary of the un peacekeeping essay
A Critical Analysis Of The Role Of United Nations In Peacekeeping And The Effect On International Security
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
United Nations (UN) peacekeeping operations has proved to be very vital in promoting peace and security and curbing inter and intra state conflicts and humanitarian crises. Today UN is engaged in 39 missions around the globe to promote peace. These missions encompasses variety of components such as: military, police, political, civil affairs, human rights etc. However central of any peacekeeping operation is its political process without which root of the conflict cannot be addressed and lasting peace cannot be ensured. In such process one of the key factors is peacekeepers’ dealing with armed groups or spoilers. Because of the diversity of these armed groups and security situation of that particular country, UN has always faced difficulties to find ‘one size fit all’ solution to deal with these armed groups. UN peacekeepers need context specific and holistic strategy to deal with these groups both at operational and tactical level. In the past UN achieved both successes and failures in dealing with these groups. UN achieved considerable success in Cambodia, East Timor, Mozambique, Eastern Slovenia and Sierra Leone. In contrast in Somalia, Rwanda, Darfur and …show more content…
Credibility and Influence. UN is the most influential and credible organization in the world to deal with any security issues of the world. “The global reach and intergovernmental character of the UN give it considerable influence” Membership of all independent states automatically makes it credible third party and mediator in any conflict. Besides, UN with its functional agencies such as: UNICEF, UNHCR, UNDP, WFP, WHO etc. conduct various programmes for the betterment of the world which further enhance its credibility. Though UN is not out of controversy, but there is no alternative available for the world community. The regional organizations such as: NATO, African Union etc. sometimes take lead role in mitigating conflicts, but their credibility in the eyes of the world is no match with that of
"Peacekeeping and Peacemaking." Reading and Remembrance . N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Jan. 2014. . (tags: none | edit tags)
In August of 1992, President George Bush Sr. sent US soldiers into Somalia to provide humanitarian relief to those Somalis suffering from starvation. The major problems in Somalia started when President Mohammed Siad Barre was overthrown by a coalition of opposing clans. Although there were several opposing groups, the prominent one was led by Mohammed Farah Aidid. Following the overthrow of Barre, a massive power struggle ensued. These small scale civil wars led to the destruction of the agriculture in Somalia, which in turn led to the deprivation of food in large parts of the country. When the international community heard of this, large quantities of food were sent to ease Somali suffering. However, clan leaders like Aidid routinely hijacked food and exchanged it for weapons leaving thousands to starve to death. An estimated 300,000 Somalis died between 1991 and 1992 (Clancy 234-236). US soldiers were later sent into Somalia to capture Aidid, but when the operation got bloody, displeasing the American public, Clinton withdrew troops (Battersby 151). In The Morality of War, Brian Orend outlines ethical guidelines that should be followed in all three stages of war: jus ad bellum, jus in bello, and jus post bellum. Orend states that a nation can be moral going into war, but immoral coming out of one. Did the US act justly in all facets of the Somali conflict? The United States espoused all the guiding principles of jus ad bellum but right intent, upheld the principals of jus in bello, and clearly failed to uphold several aspects of jus post bellum during the armed humanitarian intervention in Somalia.
helping thousands of people who are incapable of this power. Canada has been a leader
The system the UN currently has offers some perspective on the idea of conducting and participating in war. But...
“a violent struggle among state and non-state actors for legitimacy and influence over the relevant population(s). Irregular warfare favors indirect and asymmetric approaches, though it may employ the full range of military and other capacities, in order to erode an adversary’s power, influence, and will.” This definition is broad and has led many military leaders to simply describe irregular warfare as anything that is not regular war. If leaders turn to this over simplified definition, then one can logically and incorrectly infer that non-violent operations such as humanitarian assistance and disaster relief are forms of irregular warfare. The problem with classifying irregular warfare as a distinct and separate form of warfare is that stakeholders must in turn dedicate resources solely for the purposes of dealing with...
Genocide is a pressing issue with a multitude of questions and debates surrounding it. It is the opinion of many people that the United Nations should not get involved with or try to stop ongoing genocide because of costs or impositions on the rights of a country, but what about the rights of an individual? The UN should get involved in human rights crimes that may lead to genocide to prevent millions of deaths, save money on humanitarian aid and clean up, and fulfill their responsibilities to stop such crimes. It is preferable to stop genocide before it occurs through diplomacy, but if necessary, military force may be used as a last resort. Navi Pillay, Human Rights High Commissioner, stated, “Concerted efforts by the international community at critical moments in time could prevent the escalation of violence into genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity or ethnic cleansing.”
The just war theory is described by Thomas Massaro in his book Living Justice as the “principle that warfare might be justified under certain conditions” (108). The complexities involved with international relations makes determining a just war very difficult. Even though historically pacifism hasn’t gained much traction within Catholic circles, it currently is gaining popularity with many mainstream Catholics. With so many differing views on military action, one might ask, “What determines a just war? How can we balance the need for peace with self-defense?” An examination of criteria for a just war and critiques written on this topic might shed light on these two questions.
In this section, I will provide a brief history of U.S. military involvement on the African continent, starting with the Barbary Wars and working up through the current date. This historical documentation will highlight the change in the role the United States has played in Africa [post 9-11???]. Prior to 9-11, the United States’ interactions were mainly [capture summary here]. Since [?], however, the continent has faced a marked increase in violent extremism and terrorism leading the United States to partner with many African nations in counterterrorism initiatives. These, and other initiatives, mean an increasing number U.S. service members are deploying to Africa to take part in training, humanitarian issues and military operations. These military activities are run by United States African Command, a recently created combatant command.
Play IV: The Break - up of the Peace Force Act I: Scene I: The Harmony of the Peace Force I Team Narrator: It was a breezy morning near the base of the Peace Force which was on the continent of Survivor. Shant`e: “You know Lazoro, you could have been the leader of the Survivors. Did you ever try to take over the team?”
Justice would never be achieved by having UN peacekeeping. Having to choose a side to support against another side, and this is exactly opposite of the word justice. UN peacekeepers had made huge disasters in operating justice in many situations through history.
When considering the concepts of human rights and state sovereignty, the potential for conflict between the two is evident. Any humanitarian intervention by other actors within the international system would effectively constitute a violation of the traditional sovereign rights of states to govern their own domestic affairs. Thus, the answer to this question lies in an examination of the legitimacy and morality of humanitarian intervention. While traditionally, the Westphalian concept of sovereignty and non-intervention has prevailed, in the period since the Cold War, the view of human rights as principles universally entitled to humanity, and the norm of enforcing them, has developed. This has led to the 1990’s being described as a ‘golden
We can argue whether the most widely represented international organization, the United Nations (UN), provides true safety for all its member states. In my opinion, there is no clear answer. When we look into the past at the League of Nations (LN), the UN’s predecessor, what can we find? It was a multinational organization trying to maintain peace by all accessible kinds of sanctions, but it used armed intervention only in cases of crisis as the last possibility.
The United Nations Organization (UNO) has been at work for decades in order to make this world a better place to live in. This is done by giving the leaders from every country to come up and discuss the global happenings on a neutral platform in order to make sure that the concerns and the difficulties of each country are properly heard. Similarly, one aspect of the UNO is to monitor the global events by itself and, when the time comes, should interfere to make sure that such events do not have a long term impact on the political stability on the region.
Fifty-one countries established the United Nations also known as the UN on October 24, 1945 with the intentions of preserving peace through international cooperation and collective security. Over the years the UN has grown in numbers to include 185 countries, thus making the organization and its family of agencies the largest in an effort to promote world stability. Since 1954 the UN and its organizations have received the Nobel Peace Prize on 5 separate occasions. The first in 1954 awarded to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Geneva, for its assistance to refugees, and finally in 1988 to the United Nations Peace-keeping Forces, for its peace-keeping operations. As you can see, the United Nations efforts have not gone without notice.
One of the purposes of the United Nations is to “bring about by peaceful means and in conformity with the principles of justice and International Law, adjustment or settlement of International dispute or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace.”