Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Child abuse a social concern
Child abuse a social concern
Juvenile and adult justice system alike
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Child abuse a social concern
The Juvenile Court System was established in 1899. The goal of the system was to act as parens patriae (the State as parent), which was the rationale for the right of the State to intervene in the lives of children in a manner different from the way it intervenes in the lives of adults. As stated by the U.S. Department of Justice, “The doctrine was interpreted to mean that, because children were not of full legal capacity, the State had the inherent power and responsibility to provide protection for children whose natural parents were not providing appropriate care or supervision,” (1999). A key element of the juvenile justice system is to focus on the welfare of the child and to rehabilitate them so that they do not make similar mistakes as …show more content…
Feld in Abolish the Juvenile Court (1999), there are inherent flaws in the juvenile justice system because it cannot act as a social welfare system and also provide criminal social control. Juvenile courts punish delinquents in the name of treatment but deny them protections available to criminals (Feld, 1999). Youths whom judges remove from their homes and incarcerate in intuitions for long periods of time receive substantially fewer procedural safeguards than do convicted adults. Juvenile courts provide inadequate social welfare and lack the necessary resources needed to treat these …show more content…
Science supports the notation that the frontal lobe is not fully developed until an individual is in their late 20’s. One of the biggest concerns with juveniles is their impulsivity and lack of judgment, both of which are controlled by the prefrontal cortex. It is alarming to me to hold a juvenile fully accountable for their actions when unlike adults; part of their brain has not been fully developed. Biologically, they are not yet mature and their executive system is not full functioning. In addition to the profound physical changes of the brain, Deborah Yurgelun-Todd of Harvard University states that adolescents also undergo dramatic hormonal and emotional changes. For example, testosterone being one of the hormones that has the most dramatic effect on the body is closely associated with aggression and increases tenfold in adolescent boys (2004). Juveniles suffer from significant neurological deficits that may increase delinquency; therefore holding them to the same standards as adults is
The book “No Matter How Loud I Shout” written by Edward Humes, looks at numerous major conflicts within the juvenile court system. There is a need for the juvenile system to rehabilitate the children away from their lives of crime, but it also needs to protect the public from the most violent and dangerous of its juveniles, causing one primary conflict. Further conflict arises with how the court is able to administer proper treatment or punishment and the rights of the child too due process. The final key issue is between those that call for a complete overhaul of the system, and the others who think it should just be taken apart. On both sides there is strong reasoning that supports each of their views, causing a lot of debate about the juvenile court system.
In the US, the history of the Juvenile justice system has taken many years to reach where it is now. There are three main milestones in this history which include In re Gault, house of refugee and early facilities. The In re Gault was the time that the Supreme Court made a decision 1967 to legalize the constitutional rights of the juvenile justice system. The second milestone includes the house of refugees which was very first establishment of a juvenile justice system back in 1850. It became operational in the year 1855. The third milestone was the official
Juvenile court is a special court that deals with under age defendants that are charged with crimes, who are neglected, or out of their parent’s control. The average age of the Defendants are younger than 18, but juvenile court doesn’t have jurisdiction in cases in which a minor is charged as an adult. The procedure of juvenile court is to involve parents or social workers and probation officers in order to achieve positive results and prevent minors from future crimes. However, serious crimes and repeated offenses can result in the juvenile offender being sentenced to a prison, with a transfer to a state prison when they reach adulthood. According to the film “Prison States”, Christel Tribble’s was a 15-year-old from Kentucky who was diagnosed
Similarly, going along with the prior rebuttal of the importance of differentiating juvenile’s characteristics and actions of that of an adult, science is compiling more evidence of its vitality. Many adults can look back and reminisce about an action he or she did when younger and say, “Wow I cannot believe I did that.” Science has proven the reason behind that is because an adolescent’s brain has not yet fully matured. Tsui states “Studies conclusively established that the brain of an adolescent is not fully developed, particularly in the area of the prefrontal cortex, which is critical to higher order cognitive functioning and impulse control” (645). The facts of scientific research need to be taken into consideration when distinguishing
Juvenile Courts in the United States find their origins in English custom and law. As early as the 16th century, poor laws and chancery courts were meant to protect minors, either through allowing the government to take custody, or protect their property rights respectively. These actions were justified by the legal philosophy parens patriae, which holds that the government is the true guardian of the needy and infirm, including dependent children, which gives the government authority to act on behalf of a child. This philosophy was the original guiding principle that the juvenile system held at the turn of the 20th century, although the juvenile system began to shift back towards crime control and the adult system during the late 20th century.
The Juvenile Justice system, since its conception over a century ago, has been one at conflict with itself. Originally conceived as a fatherly entity intervening into the lives of the troubled urban youths, it has since been transformed into a rigid and adversarial arena restrained by the demands of personal liberty and due process. The nature of a juvenile's experience within the juvenile justice system has come almost full circle from being treated as an adult, then as an unaccountable child, now almost as an adult once more.
Throughout the years there has been limitless legal cases presented to the court systems. All cases are not the same. Some cases vary from decisions that are made by a single judge, while other cases decisions are made by a jury. As cases are presented they typically start off as disputes, misunderstandings, or failure to comply among other things. It is possible to settle some cases outside of the courts, but that does require understanding and cooperation by all parties involved. However, for those that are not so willing to settle out of court, they eventually visit the court system. The court system is not in existence to cause humiliation for anyone, but more so to offer a helping hand from a legal prospective. At the same time, the legal system is not to be abuse. or misused either.
This paper will discuss the history of the juvenile justice system and how it has come to be what it is today. When a juvenile offender commits a crime and is sentenced to jail or reform school, the offender goes to a separate jail or reforming place than an adult. It hasn’t always been this way. Until the early 1800’s juveniles were tried just like everyone else. Today, that is not the case. This paper will explain the reforms that have taken place within the criminal justice system that developed the juvenile justice system.
One of the fasting growing juvenile treatment and interventions programs are known as teen courts. Teen courts serve as an alternative juvenile justice, to young offenders. Non-violent, and mostly first time offenders are sentenced by their peers’ in teen courts. Teen courts also serve as juvenile justice diversion programs. Teen courts vary from state to state, and sometimes within the same state. With this program, all parties of the judicial setting are juveniles with the exception of the judge. Each teen court, is designed specifically to meet the needs of the community it serves. Teen courts were created to re-educate offenders throughout the judicial process, create a program with sanctions that will allow the youth not to have a juvenile record, and to also instil a sense of responsibility.
It wasn’t until the year 1899 that the first juvenile court was established in the state of Illinois. The primary difference between juvenile courts and adult courts was that the juvenile courts were civil in nature while adult courts were criminal. The benefit of a civil court was that the courts could focus on the youth, rather than the so-called offense, and have a range of options towards the youth 's rehabilitation. The legal doctrine of "parens patriae" formed the foundation of juvenile courts and meant that the state was given the authority to make decisions for the benefit of the child as a parent would. Parens patriae is in Latin for "parent of his or her country." It means that the state has the power to act as guardian for those who are unable to care for themselves, such as children or disabled individuals. For instance, under this doctrine a judge may change custody, child support, or other rulings affecting a child 's well-being, regardless of what the parents may have agreed to (Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary). The doctrine of "parens patriae" continues to the present time in the juvenile justice system as well as in schools. Does that mean that the juveniles had rights? Juveniles, in the 1960’s, who were in the juvenile court system did not have any Constitutional rights however, that changed in the year 1967 with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in In re
This paper describes the various legislations and movements that were established in 19th century to address the issue of juvenile justice system. It outlines the challenges faced by the legislation and movements and their implications in addressing the issues of the juvenile justice system.
The juvenile system was first established in the United States around 1899 when Illinois had their first court appearance including a juvenile. This then led to the Nation’s first juvenile system being created, which was for youth under the age of eighteen who have been convicted of crimes. Up until then, most youth were tried as an adult until the system was put into place. The system has different sections in which they youth is taken in such as: intake, adjudication, disposition, and post adjudicatory.
As discussed in previous chapters, parens patriae or “parent of the country” is the legal provision through which the state may assume ultimate parental responsibility for the custody, care and protection of children within its jurisdiction. It gives them a right to take care of minors and others who cannot take care of themselves. The state juvenile court is made up of purpose clauses that can fall into one or more of the five thematic categories. (Snyder and Sickmund 2006; 98) These five categories include balanced and restorative justice clauses, standard juvenile court act clauses, legislative guide clauses, clauses that emphasize punishment, deterrence, accountability or public safety, and clauses with traditional child welfare emphasis.
DJS.state.md.us finds that, in the nineteenth century trying youths separately from their adult counterparts became an apparent necessity. Social reformer’s attempts noted that sentencing a child in adult (criminal) court could yield a worse fate for the child than if the court took an alternate tack. Prior to 1899, when the initial juvenile court was founded, a young delinquent was treated as an adult regardless of their untested decision-making abilities. “The primary difference between juvenile courts and adult courts was that the juvenile courts were ‘civil’ in nature while adult courts were ‘criminal’.” (djs.state.md.us) Rehabilitative procedures remained steady until the 1980s when juvenile crime made a violent upsurge, instigating public opinion to deviate from genteel practices. Legal professionals once again began prosecuting the delinquents as adults, thus sending them to criminal court, and potentially adult prison. “But Scott and Steinberg note that lawmakers and the public appear now to be rethinking their views once more. A justice system that operates on the ...
Italy’s Working Paper Committee: Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Topic B: Juvenile Justice System Signatories: Italy, Chile, Ukraine, Republic of Korea, Ghana, Namibia, Poland, Norway Defines restorative justice as a means to help rehabilitate and guide juveniles to prosperous lives, Recalling articles 25 and 26 from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which provide special care and protection to children and assuring universal education, Referring to the Beijing Rules for assistance throughout every child and adolescent’s physical, social and mental development in order to Nations have recognized, in the charter, the inalienable dignity of all members of the human family, emphasizing the inherent value of every child and adolescent, without distinction of gender, religion, ethnicity, political opinion or nation of origin, being the foundation to a future prosperous society, Relying on the Convention on the Rights of the Child, therefore, requiring that the child is protected from discrimination or punishments based on their opinion or their guardian’s beliefs, 1. Urges the prevention of juvenile detention by introducing alternative measures as a component of restorative justice. It is suggested that: a) rehabilitation centers, b) therapy, c) community programs, d) house-arrest with special adjustments for school and therapy, e) the placement of juveniles in the custody of Social Services be used instead of the imprisonment of juvenile delinquents. These alternative measures will prevent the: i) physical, ii) sexual, iii) emotional abuse that youths are subjected to when constrained in confinements with adults; 2. Strongly Recommends that certain programs and actions not be taken as a means of alternative methods because of it’s detrimental effects on youths.