Essay On The Difference Between Northern And Italian Renaissance

1189 Words3 Pages

With the ending of the medieval age during the 15th century, many European nations began to experience a new artistic revolution. Often mislabeled as simply the “Renaissance,” this period of renewed interest in arts had unique distinguishing factors for every individual region. The two most popular Renaissance are the Italian Renaissance and the Northern Renaissance, including France, England, and Germany etc. Although both were similar in that they emphasized a greater utilization of techniques to create more realistic photos, portrayed religious themes, and were inspired by the Classic era, the Northern and Italian Renaissance had two clear differences. The two movements were primarily different due to the mediums used to create the art and …show more content…

After gaining fame for great works such as the Pieta and David, Pope Julius II commissioned Michelangelo to repaint the Sistine Chapel. Already, a distinguishing factor of the Italian Renaissance presents itself. In the Italian Renaissance “wealthy patrons sponsored the arts,” whereas in the Northern Renaissance “no wealthy patron who wanted grand paintings were sponsoring them, [so] artists focused on daily life and ordinary people” (ArtsColumbia.com). The subject matter is greatly tied in with the patron of the arts, and this fact is reflected by Michelangelo’s masterpiece. The fresco portrays a popular story within the Catholic faith, the creation of man, which is directly linked to the patron of the piece, the pope. Michelangelo did not attempt to relate a personal message or story. The religious subject is very common for the Italian Renaissance as the main financiers of the works were rich people within the …show more content…

As previously noted, Northern Renaissance artists had a greater tendency to draw everyday life events and common people. This painting is precisely that, a portrayal of a common, Netherland wedding. Bruegel is simply attempting to offer a snapshot of life for peasants in a highly accurate manner. The common bagpipes, servants, plain bread, are all perfectly normal for peasantry life. Works such as this would be extremely rare during this time period as nobleman and church members had no interest in such affairs. Despite multiple complex theories, as observed by Google’s Art & Culture page, “it is far more in keeping with Bruegel’s humanistic conception of himself to see the painting as a neutral observation without further intent” (Google Arts & Culture). There is no intended underlying or secret message. The painting utilizes the popular technique of linear perspective that was rediscovered during the Renaissance to generate a feeling of space and depth on a two-dimensional medium. The second difference between the Northern and Italian Renaissance can be found when looking at the medium. According the theworldartist.com, in the Netherlands, “painters were improving upon oil paint, which...allowed for variation in light, texture, tone, and value” in comparison to the previously dominant medium of tempera paint before the Northern Renaissance (theworldartist.com). Although the painting

Open Document