Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Political skill and ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Political skill and ethics
Political ethics and scandals are the forefront of the Canadian political system, as month rarely passes when the public is not engaged, by a new revelation of misbehaviour within the political system. As corruption is directly assimilated within the Canadian political system, as scandals are simply demonstrable breakdown of politics in relation to corruption and ethical behaviour within the political realm. The Airbus scandal of 1968 has been the longest running scandal in Canadian history, as many Canadian politicians consider the scandal to be “the biggest scandal in Canadian history (CBC New Online, 2005).” As the Airbus affair has lasted over 15 years, with many questions still left un-answered. The Airbus scandal, regarded to be one of the most …show more content…
prolific and longest running scandals in Canadian political history. The political ambiance is still entrenched within the political system. As the Airbus affair left many Canadians to question ethical behaviour within the Canadian political system and the government as a whole.
In the early months of 1994 an investigative journalist named, “Harvey Cashore”, had received a tip in regards to the European consortium (Johnson, 2010). The tip had alleged that Airbus Industries had paid bribes to Canadian politicians during the former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney era, in exchange for the crown corporation (Air Canada) to purchase 1.8 billion dollar order from Airbus industries (Johnson, 2010). This would launch a 15-year investigation into Brian Mulroney and Karlheinz Schreiber a German Canadian businessman and his alleged role in the Airbus affair (Johnson, 2010). The political relationship between both the former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and Kariheinz Schreiber has spanned over twenty-five years. Brian Mulroney in an interview with RCMP had “denied his friendship with Schreiber, claiming he was just an acquaintance with whom he had a couple of cups of coffee (Mair, 2007).” As this begs the question what was the real relationship between Brian Mulroney and Karlheinz Schreiber? In the early months of 2007, Schreiber had filed an affidavit against, Brian Mulroney. The affidavit filed
by Schreiber lawyers contained information, to the business and financial dealings between Schreiber and Mulroney (Karlheinz Schreiber A Businessman, Unknown). In the affidavit Schreiber had revealed that the secret agreement between both Mulroney and Schreiber allegedly came to effect two months after Mulroney had left office and was serving as a member of parliament (Oliphant Commission, Unknown). After the affidavit was published Brian Mulroney had admitted to receiving $225,000 in cash on three separate occasionally from scriber from 1993-1994 (News Staff, 2009). Mulroney had argued to the courts that the payments were for legal consulting work done by his firm, Ogilvy Renault (Mair, 2007). Schreiber still insists the cash payments were to lobby the government. Section 24 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms stipulates that “sitting public office holders, are required to report any serious offers of outside employment to the ethics commissioner within seven days of receiving them (Public Policy Issues, Unknown). The cash payments from Schreiber to Maloney were not reported. “Throughout the duration of the political scandal between Mulroney and Schreiber, the former prime minster had played an imminent role throughout the scandal as he wore “three different hats (Public Policy Issues, Unknown).” As that phrase is used to describe the political power which Mulroney possessed, as he was the Canadian prime minster, a member of parliament and a former office holder (Public Policy Issues, Unknown). The direct relationship between Schreiber to Maloney has been described as unique (Oliphant Commission, Unknown). The Airbus Affairs, regarded to be one of the prolific and longest lasting scandals in Canadian history, but the chapter still has not been closed pending, many unanswered questions. The Mulroney administration claims that discussions between Mulroney and Schreiber in regards to Airbus were not initiated while Prime Minster Mulroney was still in power (Mair, 2007). Given the continually changing version in correlation to Mulroney and Schreiber discussions, an un-answered question is, what was the purpose of the multiple cash payments of $225,000. One of the biggest remaining unanswered questions is, did Schreiber bribe members of the Mulroney administration and if so who were there payoff made to in parliament (Mair, 2007). As the Airbus Scandal sent waves through the Canadian Political system, it has tarnished the reputation of the once beloved Brian Mulroney and lobbyist Karlheinz Schreiber.
Realizing Ethical Issues Helps You Avoid Unethical Behaviors In this age of change, the human society is progressing rapidly on various fields. However, the ethical problems are becoming increasingly severe. According to the teaching notes of “In It To Win: The Jack Abramoff Story,” “During the Bush Administration, Abramoff was the most influential lobbyist in Washington, D.C. His excesses led to his downfall and that of Congress members with whom he was closely connected, including aides, business associates, government officials, and lawmakers.”
The first blatant ethical issue in the Adelphia scandal stems from the idea that the Rigas family used corporate money for personal use. Nearly $12.8 billion was used to start construction on a personal golf course on their own private land and even more to cover the expenses of the use of the company aircraft for personal reasons. The use of this money was then hidden thro...
Corruption is an individual and institutional process where there is a gain by a public official from a briber and in return receives a service. Between the gain and the service, there is an improper connection, (Thompson p.28). The two major categories of bribery is individual and institutional corruption. Receiving personal goods for the pursuit of one’s own benefit is personal fraud. An example of individual distortion is the financial scandal involving David Durenberger. Organizational corruption involves “receiving goods that are useable primarily in the political process and are necessary for doing a job or are essential by-products of doing it,” (Thompson p.30). An instance of institutional fraud is the Keating Five case. There are also times where there is a mixture of both individual and organizational corruption in a scandal. An example of this diverse combination is James C. Wright Jr. actions while he was the Speaker of the House.
The Watergate Scandal and the resignation of President Nixon was the beginning of American’s mistrust of politicians. This can be viewed as a positive effect. As a result three important open record reforms created. The first of the reforms is the Sunshine Act in 1976. This requires government agencies to conduct meetings that are open to public, with a few exceptions. In 1978, the Ethics in Government Act requires public officials to disclose financial and employment records. The Presidential Records Act, also initiated in 1978, required preservati...
1985 became branded as the Year of the Spy by American press as a result of a string of high-profile espionage arrests. One of the most notorious cases from this time period is that of Aldrich Hazen Ames. In his thirty year employment with the Central Intelligence Agency’s Directorate of Operations, Ames compromised the second-largest number of CIA assets so far as is known; he was alleged to have disclosed virtually all of the CIA's active Soviet agents, many of whom were later executed or imprisoned. Ames received substantial payments for the information he provided- money that he had used years earlier to purchase a new Jaguar automobile and a $540,000 home, with cash, in Arlington. Apparently, these seemingly large expenditures by an employee making less than $70,000 a year had not raised questions at the CIA. For this research paper, I wanted to know how Aldrich Ames was so successful in engaging in espionage activities for almost a decade without attracting any attention whatsoever to himself, and also how this case in particular has transformed the counterintelligence practices of the United States Intelligence Community.
The Pacific Scandal was an unfortunate happening where a man named Sir Hugh Allan had bribed the Conservative party when they were in a time of financial need. They rewarded him with a contract to build a railway, on the condition that he would remove any American hold on the contract- however, he couldn’t meet this requirement, as he had used American money to fund the Conservatives’ campaign in the first place.
Lastly, by holding unlawful job negotiations with a Pentagon official, the Boeing former financial officer was seen to be breaching the utilitarianism principle. Moreover, concealing of the findings of the internal studies regarding gender’s pay further illustrates this ethical lapse in Boeing.
The Watergate Crisis concludes that the profoundly memorable and intensely appalling atrocity, Watergate, “tested our system and ourselves.” Genovese does not merely tell of the events of Watergate, he goes on to dissect the effects of the incident. In the preface, the author tidily summarizes the influence of this crisis by stating that “time has not altered the sting of Watergate. It remains a profoundly sad and unnecessary scar on the political landscape.” This book delves into how presidential corruption is the worst possible offense because it results in the deep-seated distrust of the government.
Corruption is a persistent problem that plagues the world and it knows no boundaries. Transparency International defines it as the “abuse of entrusted power for private gain” (2013). For the purposes of this thread, ‘corruption’ is defined as any individual, collective, or structural act or process that permits the use of public authority or position for private gain. This definition captures the broad and many ways individuals and institutions abuse power and the public trust. In regard to whistleblowing, much conflict stems from the context in which the whistleblower is viewed.
With the emergence of unethical practices found in international corporations, whistleblowing has been more and more common. A whistleblower is a person who exposes any kind of information that is deemed illegal, immoral, or dishonest. In SNC-Lavalin, the whistleblower was justified. In this case, the senior executives were paying bribes and taking money from mega projects won under the Gadhafi regime (Wikipedia, 2015, n.p). There are several issues in this case.
Known as a period of political scandal, many politicians engaged in bribes, lies, and abuse of power to further a political, social, and often personal agenda. The typical corrupt leader "will sell his vote for a dollar [...] turns with indifference from the voice of honesty and reason [...] his unalienable right may be valuable to him for the bribe he gets out of it" (166). Such politicians are an injustice to society because as they are elected by the people, they must act towards the betterment of the people, rather than for themselves. Furthermore, those who elect this politician to office merely underestimate their political and social responsibility because they "want the feeling that their own interests are connected with those of the community, and in the weakness or absence of moral and political duty" (167). Thus, under the control of the ruthless politician and the reckless voter, the true essence of democracy is
Boeing/Airbus Case Analysis Competition in the Commercial Aircraft Business. With only a few large companies across the globe (Boeing, MD, and Airbus), the commercial aircraft industry essentially exhibits the qualities of an oligopolistic competition with intense rivalry. Here is an analysis of competition in the commercial aircraft business using Porter’s Five Forces. Figure 1: Porter’s Five Forces Applied to Aircraft Industry. Barrier to entry: - High barriers to entry, to a certain extent, help understand the risks involved in operating in the aircraft industry.
In 2014, researchers from West Virginia found out that recent models of Volkswagen vehicles were emitting up to 40 times the allowed levels of nitrogen oxides (2). These vehicles had a special software that would determine when the vehicle was in laboratory testing conditions, and the software would then alter the vehicle 's functionality to emit the legal amount of nitrogen oxides allowed by the EPA. The software was found in around half a million vehicles in the United States. In addition to the bad publicity, the Volkswagen scandal will cost the company at least $15.3 billion dollars in compensation to the owners of the affected vehicles (3). In 2016, Volkswagen engineer James Liang pleaded guilty for being a crucial part in developing the illegal software (3). The software was created because Volkswagen was unable to meet the rigorous EPA emission standards. Therefore, a small team of engineers including James Liang decided to cheat the emission exams to allow Volkswagen vehicles to be sold in the U.S.
Leighton Holdings is charged not publicly releasing information on bribes which was paid by former executives to secure the contracts in Iraq but Leighton Holdings think it was insufficiently definite to be disclosed and in its defence filed by Melbourne City Investments in Victoria’s Supreme Court, Leighton Holdings claimed that the information was not expected to have effect on price or value. Melbourne City Investments (MCI) alleges Leighton breached disclosure laws and they did not provide any information about Unaoil bribe before October 03, 2013 and then again in October 3, 2013, Fairfax Media revealed that the former CEO Wal King was well known about bribery but he denied about that. Leighton Holdings was Australia’s 38th largest company but after all these, stock fell by 10%, then a further 4% and had a direct impact. Many Australian companies do not pay attention to bribery and corruption risks but after the case of Leighton Holdings bribery, everyone is aware.
Aviation security plays a vital role in the aviation industry, from protecting passengers, staff and aircraft. The aviation industry, more specifically airports and aircraft, make prime targets for malicious harm, crime, and other threats because of the vast amount of people that use air transportation. Although there are many risks that are posed to the aviation industry, we can only hope to have learned from the history of airport bombings, hijackings, and sabotage terrorist attacks. The aviation industry faces threats at each step of the journey, but assessing the risks properly will help deter and mitigate these threats. Conducting risk analysis in today’s aviation security is not only important to the aviation industry, but it is important