Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Media influence on public opinion
Media influence on elections conclusion
Media influence on public opinion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Media influence on public opinion
There are many important factors which influence voting behaviour, some more so than others, for example one of the most important is social class. Social class is determined by the registered generals classification, which is based on males of working age, people are classed on occupation, for example, the higher the social class, the better the job as social class 1, known as professionals, are people like doctors or accountants and social class 6, known as unskilled workers like cleaners. It has been tested and proven that most of the time, the higher the social class i.e. 1 and 2 vote Conservative and the lower social classes vote Labour, for example, in the 1997 general election, 42% of social classes 1 and 2 voted Conservative compared with only 21% of social classes 5 and 6. For Labour, 61% of social classes 5 and 6 voted for them compared with only 31% of social classes 1 and 2. However, social class mobility has led to many people moving up the social class ladder, but some have retained their working class background, one of which is to vote Labour. Family background plays a significant part in political attitudes. Children will normally vote for the same party as their parents. Also, the neighbourhood you live in can have an influence. There are, however, people who do not vote for the party of their class, for example, the Conservatives would not win any elections if they had not captured enough working class votes, for example, the 1992 election, 38% of social classes 5 and 6 voted Conservative. The media also have an impact on voting behaviour. It is the main source of information about government and politics and contributes to the democratic process as it encourages political awareness amongst the public. There ... ... middle of paper ... ...l choice affected the labour party in 2005 after the controversial invasion of Iraq and people opted to vote for different parties. For example in 2005 anti-war party the respect party won Bethnal green seat in parliament and overall in the UK the labour vote decreased 33% because people didn’t agree with the Iraq war. However this example could be linked to race as it was mostly Muslim voters who turned against voters. Similarly the economy was the biggest issue in 2010 and people said they trusted the conservatives over Gordon Brown in terms of the economy. In conclusion, it is quite clear that there are many factors which influence voting behaviour, some more important than others. For example, the media and social class are very important factors. Recently gender has become less important in influencing voting behaviour and rational choice is also important.
Kelly, R. 2008. It is only made things worse: A critique of Electoral System in Britain. The political quarterly 79(2):260-261.
Singh, S., & Judd, T. (2013). Compulsory Voting and the Dynamics of Partisan Identification. European Journal of Political research, 52(2), 188-211. Retrieved from http://journals1.scholarsportal.info.proxy.bib.uottawa.ca/details.xqy?uri=/03044130/v52i0002/188_cvatdopi.xml
Diversity is part of the American lifestyle. America is a country built on capitalistic principles, where a countries’ economy is controlled by a small number of people. People who tend to have power in the society tend to separate themselves from the rest. Looking back at different time period of American history diversity has shaped up the lives we live as Americans, whether it is because of gender, sexual orientation, race, religion, socioeconomic background, and capabilities/ disabilities, there is always diversity in society. Although, diversity is increasingly being viewed positively, and as much as people are proud of their differences. There will always be a way for human beings to diversify themselves into groups in which share similar interests.
In conclusion, it can clearly be seen that, because of the inequality to vote, gender, religious and race exclusions were pronounced side effects. Gender exclusions were shown through the inequality to vote due to the views of women in society. Religious exclusions were expressed through the uneven opportunities to vote through the prejudice set against the religions. And, racial exclusions were shown through the lack of the ability to vote be the intentional discrimination that these races were victims of. While others may say that these exclusions of groups can be seen through other actions, voting inequalities straightforwardly shows this. This is because when only specific groups can vote, it can be seen that the other groups are unfairly treated to their franchise.
During the second half of the past century the notion that, political science should be treated as a science became extremely popular among academics specially in the United States. One of the most prominent exposers of this school of thought was Anthony Downs, who developed a theorem to explain in a rather economic sense, how and why voters behave in a certain way when it comes to voting. Downs did not only applied his theory to the way voters behave, he also used it to explain the way political parties align themselves when it comes to elections in a two and a multiparty system nevertheless this essay will analyze Downs’ claims about a two party system only. This essay argues that the Downs’ model has proven to be accurate in many cases throughout history, nevertheless it makes a series of assumptions about voters and parties that can not be considered realistic neither in 1957, when he published his paper An Economic Theory of Political Action in Democracy in 1957 nor in 2013. This essay also acknowledges that fact that this theory might help to explain how parties behave but it is by no means the only explanation. Furthermore this essay will prove that it is a multiplicity of factors rather than an economic theory what can help us understand why parties behave the way they do. In order to support the argument previously stated this essay will state and critically analyze a number of Downs assumptions, then his theory will be outlined. Then it will carefully consider how effective it has been at predicting the way in which parties align themselves by examining the behavior of political parties during general elections in different countries.
The demographic factors, education, income, and gender may affect a person's opinion in politics. Their education may come into play when they are watching the presidential debate on television, and they don't understand the terms the debaters are using. If they have a lower income, they are most likely for Obamacare. Their gender may help them decide their position on gun control. There are many demographic factors that may or may not make a person think different.
Such factors are their educational background, socioeconomic status, gender and other demographics. There will be a definite difference between a person who has an excellent academic background and a person who does not have such qualification. In the same way, socioeconomic status of a person also decides how well a person engages politically (Riedel and Sullivan, 2001). For instance, an individual who comes from a very lower class will not pay heed to political system of the country because his basic concern is to feed his children and family. His priorities will be different from a person who has all basic necessities. In the same way a middle aged person who has an adequate knowledge and experience regarding the political system of a country and a young person who is just an amateur will have significant differences of political attitudes and political efficacy. So attitudes and experiences also affect the political efficacy and ultimately the voting behaviors of the individuals (Sheerin and Celia Anne, 2007). Mass Media is one of the tools to build these attitudes and political
Understand American voter turnout rates from a historical point of view. There are several near and chronicled riddles of political investment. Keeping in mind the end goal to perform this, the pool of qualified voters. In this way, the voting methods and the political conditions including the races in a given period ought to be tended to. One relative confuses represent the way that America's voter turnout lingers a great distance behind different vote based systems. Reasons may incorporate America's individual enlistment necessity, which makes it awkward for residents to enlist to vote. Various components may incorporate voter weakness majority choices and the two-party framework. The United States maintains significant amounts of nonvoting
When it comes to voting there are some major issues of concerns of whom the voters choose to votes for. Some of these issues consist of party affiliation, group interests, the candidate themselves, the economy and policy issues. In the election
Denied a job, missed opportunities, dating issues, societal oppression, and political targeting – These are all common examples of what happens when classism exists. Class, the economic or social status of an individual, in America is extremely important and can be easily used as a weapon against the masses. Classism as defined by Merriam-Webster is the "prejudice or discrimination based on class" (Merriam-Webster, 2017). Using class, or economic status, as a view point for an individuals, or group's worth, has been happening for many years. The act of discriminating against someone(s) based on this is at the heart of classism. This discrimination could be passing someone up for a job opportunity. Denying an application to college, apartment,
The general opinion is that voters do not come in predefined groups. Cleavage divides voters by two: lawyers and opponents on a certain subject, or vote for a certain party.
In the US, mass media plays a significant role in politics. One of the key roles mass media plays in politics includes the airing of the platforms of various politicians. The media influences the view of people on politics and politicians. As the opinion of individuals is affected, the results of the votes are consequently changed (Holden, 2016).
Many people don’t want to believe that we are living in a social injustice environment in this country. They choose to ignore the fact that rich are getting richer while the poor are just getting poorer. The rich public schools are giving their students the necessary opportunities to live a decent life while the poor students are left out and have to struggle for those opportunities. The social injustice is visible to every citizen in this country and it continuing to grown; however, there is a few solutions to minimize and possibly to solve the social injustice problem we have in American. One of them is give equal education in all public schools so everyone can have an equal opportunities in getting the jobs and careers they choose. Second
The current role of mass media in politics has definitely played a significant role in how view and react to certain events and issues of the nation. Newspapers, magazines, television and radio are some of the ways information is passed onto many of the citizens. The World Wide Web is also an information superhighway, but not all of the sources on the Internet are credible. Therefore, I will only focus on the main three types of media: written, viewed, and audible, and how they affect whether or not democracy is being upheld in the land of the free. The media includes several different outlets through which people can receive information on politics, such as radio, television, advertising and mailings. When campaigning, politicians spend large quantities of money on media to reach voters, concentrating on voters who are undecided. Politicians may use television commercials, advertisements or mailings to point out potentially negative qualities in their opponents while extolling their own virtues. The media can also influence politics by deciding what news the public needs to hear. Often, there are more potential news stories available to the media than time or space to devote to them, so the media chooses the stories that are the most important and the most sensational for the public to hear. This choice can often be shaped,
To understand the concept of social inequality, one needs to explore how it occurs or functions. According to Charles Walker, “Social inequality refers to the ways in which socially-defined categories of persons are differentially positioned with regard to access to a variety of social ‘goods”. Social inequality, therefore, is an umbrella term. It is expansive in nature, as social inequality encompasses a variety of different inequalities; for example, gender, race, and structural inequality are all social inequalities, but they can differ widely in manifestation. The definition of social inequality can also change based on the perception of the individual who is defining the term.