Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on redistricting in texas
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on redistricting in texas
Kayla Carter NCTC Government 2306 Professor Huckaby October 15, 2014 Graded Assignment 1: Redistricting in Texas Every 10 years after the U.S. census the district lines for the Texas Congress are redrawn. However, during the 78th Texas legislature in 2002 and 2003 the district line were redrawn after they were drawn after the 2000 census. This new district map would favor the Republicans; this of course bothered the Democratic who lost seats within the Texas Congress. This was eventually brought to the U.S. Supreme Court which released its opinion in 2006. In 2001 the Texas Legislature was in a deadlock of a new district map to coincide with the census. Because they were unable to agree on a map the state law requires a Legislative Redistricting Board which includes: the Lieutenant Governor, the Speaker of the House, Attorney General, Comptroller, and the Land Commissioner, to take on the task of creating the district map. The Republicans were seeking a new map increase their control of the State Congress. However, the Democrats felt the minority votes were being diluted by gerrymandering, as well as, violate the Voting Rights Law. In 2002 the Republicans …show more content…
gained control of the State House of Representatives which then gave them control of both chambers of Congress put forth a bill to redraw the district line with help from Governor Perry and Senator Tom Delay. Tom Delay, who strongly promoted this second redistricting, left his seat in Washington as the House Majority Leader to work on getting this new map passed. According The New Yorker magazine “DeLay personally shuttled proposed maps among House and Senate offices in Austin” (newyorker.com) and with his help republicans were able to adopt their new district lines. The Democrats were strongly opposed to the consideration of a new map. In fact, during multiple special sessions call by Governor Perry they left the states jurisdiction to prevent the vote to pass by a two- thirds majority. Representative Berry Telford was quoted saying "We're fighting for our constituents with the only tool we have left, which was to use the rules of the House to break a quorum," (cnn.com) The Democrats were not only fighting for their constitutes some were also fighting for their jobs. Due to the new map some districts were eliminated such as Martin Frost how represented his district for 26 years the then ran in another district and lost the election. The newly proposed maps were being challenged before the U.S.
Supreme Court in 2006. The Democrats were arguing that the revised maps were unconstitutional because they violated the “one person one vote” aspect of the Voting Rights Act as well as using partisan gerrymandering. The Supreme Court heard a similar gerrymandering case prior the Texas’ case their opinion was “political gerrymandering — drawing a map to give one political party an advantage — violates the “one-person, one-vote” principle protected in the Constitution.” (nbcnews.com) the Supreme Court gave their opinion that “entire Texas plan is unconstitutional because the legislature rewrote a previous court-drawn map, three years after the most recent census, out of nothing more than a desire for Republican advantage.”
(washingtonpost.com) In 2010 during the 82nd Legislative Session the issue of redistricting arose once again. Similar to the past redistricting problems this again claimed discriminating against minorities. One description of the new districts “One district goes north 80 miles to Austin; across the street, another district begins that stretches more than 550 miles west to El Paso.” (huffingtonpost.com) The panel of judges was unable to prove if the new district line were intentionally drawn to discriminate against minorities. The ruling was then appeled to the Supreme Court and they undid the map and gave more democratic districts. With the upcoming election the issue of redistricting has come up again. However, the court will be unable to rule on this matter since the election is close. I believe the district line unfairly represent the growing population. I think it could be possible for the Democrats to start gaining more districts soon. Works Cited "DeLay’s Texas Redistricting Heads to High Court." Msnbc.com. N.p., n.d. Web. Gentilviso, Chris. "Texas Redistricting Maps 2012: Candidates Study New Setup." The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 29 Feb. 2012. Web. "Justices Affirm GOP Map For Texas." Washington Post. The Washington Post, 29 June 2006. Web. Lavandera, Ed. "Texas House Paralyzed by Democratic Walkout." CNN. Cable News Network, n.d. Web. Toobin, Jeffrey. "Drawing the Line." The New Yorker. N.p., n.d. Web.
Daniel Elazar created a classification scheme moralistic political culture of individuals, and traditionalistic to describe the political culture of the state. According to Elazar, Texas can be described as traditionalistic and individuals. Historically, the Texas political parties demonstrated a strong tradition, provincialism, and business dominance. The models, however, may weaken as the Republicans increase its power in the state and urbanization continues. Texas is the second largest state in the country and there are four different geographical regions: the Gulf coastal plain, the interior lowlands, Great Plains, and the basin and range province,
For almost fifty years, from 1827 to 1876, seven constitutions were adopted and implemented for Taxes and each one has its set of laws and contained specific ways, aimed at correcting the deficiencies and drawbacks of the previously adopted order. The Constitution of 1876 is the sixth one, which set the rules and laws for Texas government since the state has achieved its independence from Mexico in 1836. The constitution established the principles of Texas Democratic Government and specified the laws, which were applied to the three branches of government: legislative, juridical and executive.
The American way of living and thinking in Texas have changed tremendously over the past century. Political ideals are one thing that changes with time, and have transformed with the changing times well. The Texas constitution of 1876 was a landmark for the state and has been part of the state’s history since then. The Texas constitution of 1876 is still in use today but with all its harsh restrictions it is considered one of the most confusing of all the state constitutions. The constitution became one of the most prominent changes to Texas education system and politics.
The legislative branch of America helps create the laws or legislation. Ideally, it works to create a society that is safe for all members. The State of California like the federal government has a bicameral legislature, in other words, composed of two chambers. The upper chamber is called the senate, while the lower is called the assembly. A unique process for the state level is that it allows for the initiative. This process circumvents the state congress and can create laws without their aide. In the state of California, every ten years, following a US census, which collects demographic information, state legislators draw redistricting plans for itself, California seats in the US House of Representatives, and the State Board of Equalization. There have been attempts to create a “non-partisan” redistricting commission, but this has been turned down by voters numerous times. Proposition 14, 39, 118, and 119 were all turned down by voters to create a non-partisan districting commission. Every decade a large portion of the state congress’s energy is spent on redistricting. In fact, two of the last four censuses, Supreme Court has had to step in to break a deadlock. In 1970, Ronald Reagan, a Republican, vetoed all together the Democratic redistricting plan. The Supreme Court had to step in and created its own plans for California to follow. Then in 1981, Democrats proposed redistricting as well as congressional delegation redistricting. The Republicans stopped this by adding referendums to the state ballot. Because it was too close to elections though, Supreme Court overturned these referendums in 1982. In 1984, they officially passed the new redistricting plan which was very similar to the original plans.
Newell, Charldean. "Inflexibility, Traditionalism, and Partisanship: The Texas Response to New Federalism." Review. Annual Review of American Federalism 12 (1981 (1983): 185-95. Publius. Oxford University Press. Web. 23 Mar. 2011.
The Texas Legislature is far too archaic to provide consistent leadership for a state government; Congress has become too enmeshed with the executive branch and leaves blurry lines drawn in its separation of powers. The ideal legislature would be a modernized version of what the Texas Constitution created.
Narrative History of Texas Annexation, Secession, and Readmission to the Union. Texans voted in favor of annexation to the United States in the first election following independence in 1836. However, throughout the Republic period (1836-1845) no treaty of annexation negotiated between the Republic and the United States was ratified by both nations. When all attempts to arrive at a formal annexation treaty failed, the United States Congress passed--after much debate and only a simple majority--a Joint Resolution for Annexing Texas to the United States. Under these terms, Texas would keep both its public lands and its public debt, it would have the power to divide into four additional states "of convenient size" in the future if it so desired, and it would deliver all military, postal, and customs facilities and authority to the United States government.
University of Texas at Austin. Texas Politics, The legislative Branch. Austin, 2nd Edition-Revision 94 2009, Liberal Arts Instructional Technology Services.
The political future of Texas has been widely debated since the 2012 election of President Bush. Barack Obama, since the state has always played a significant role in impacting national elections. Nationally, there was uneven support among minority voters in favor of the president and Democrats, and as a result there has been an increasing interest in the Hispanic population growth in Texas (Lawrence.) The speculation regards how the changing complexion of Texas voters will influence the political process, with political pundits broadly predicting that since the Latino population typically votes for Democrats, there is a possibility that Texas will eventually become a blue state.... ...
Every ten years after a census, politicians redraw the district boundaries that determine the house and state legislature. The problem with this system is that the same politicians who redraw the district boundaries are the ones who are being elected by the
Texas politics is an interesting ecosystem of power, rules and regulations. Of course, in typical Texas fashion, most of the politics we engage in we do our own way. From governors who stay in office for a decade to our extremely diverse demographics, Texas is extremely unique. This uniqueness of course comes with its critics, benefits, and downsides. This is particularly true with the Texas Court system compared to both the federal courts and many other states.
When gerrymandering occurs, a political party draws the boundaries of an electoral district in a way that helps their party win elections over the other parties. For example, if a Republican controls a state, and it appears like the party will lose a seat in the future, the Republicans will draw the district in a way to exclude as many Democratic voters as possible. Perhaps they will do this by removing a democratic stronghold from one district and adding it to another district that will either easily go Republican or will have a Democratic representative no matter what happens. Before 1964, the majority party could draw districts in any way they wanted to, and chaos ensued. Consequently, in 1964, the U.S Supreme Court legislated that the districts “had to contain equal population, and be as compact as possible” (“Gerrymandering”). Every ten years the U.S. issues a census to determine the population of each state. After this, each state receives their share of the 435 seats, and then the state gets to break the population into the corresponding number of districts. This whole process, known as reapportionment, takes weeks to determine, and in many cases, courts must determine the shape and area of each district. Even though the districts must contain equal population, gerry...
The constitution establish major governing institutions, assign institution’s power, place explicit and implicit control on power granted. All this gives the political legitimacy. The U.S constitution gives the base model for state constitution for Texas.
Our government here in Texas has three major parts that play a significant part in our decision making process. These levels have been deigned to decentralize power and make it more affective for the public's needs. The primary level is the Texas legislature. It is almost a given to say that everyone has at least heard of the legislature. Some variables that the legislature contains are the Lt. Governor, the Speaker of the house of Representatives and Committee Chairs. The Speaker acts as the presiding officer over the house and has two levels of power. These two levels are institutional powers which allow the officer to preside over the Legislative Audit Committee and Sunset Advisory Committee.
In 2008, California created a citizen-based redistricting commission where they voted in favor of Proposition 11, also known as the Voter First Act, which transferred the control of the redistricting process from the legislatures to an independent commission comprised of citizens. It is believed that it is the most efficient method to limit the influence of partisanship in the redistricting process. On the other hand, Texas, which comprises of 36 congressional districts, has had a history of using redistricting to dilute the influence of minorities. Therefore, it has turned a blind eye to partisan redistricting in which parties try to draw district lines to their own advantage. In 2003, Texas’s election districts have been redrawn when Republicans took control of the state government. From the redrawn districts, there were more than a million people that were added to the Texas population which produced districts that failed to give all of the state’s voters equal representation in Congress. These new arrivals were not distributed equally, and it was likely that they were disproportionately