Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of natural disaster
Effects of natural disasters on human life
Effects of natural disasters on human life
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of natural disaster
Catastrophic natural disasters and epidemics of disease can lead to drastic reductions in population size. This phenomenon is called a population bottleneck (nature.com). The loss of reproducing individuals means a contraction in the number of alleles being contributed to the gene pool.
Species with low effective populations are subject to the influence of genetic drift – a stochastic evolutionary mechanism that moves an allele towards fixation, regardless of what fitness advantages or deleterious effects it may have (Wright, 1931). The bottle-necking of a population is expected to result in a decrease of genetic diversity, demonstrated by a decline in heterozygosity and the loss of alleles at a locus. These proxies for genetic diversity are influenced by different aspects of the bottleneck. While levels of heterozygosity are affected by how quickly the population grows following the release of the bottleneck, the number of alleles at a locus is affected by how narrow the bottleneck is (Nei et al., 1975). Although a bottleneck is expected to reduce genetic variation, there are several mechanisms that can skew the outcomes and limit this loss. Gene interactions (epistasis), dominance, and linkage disequilibrium can restrict the loss of, and, in some cases, inflate genetic diversity. Furthermore, inbreeding is common following a bottleneck, but many inbred families may be selected against if they are carriers of deleterious alleles (Cheverud et al., 1999).
The release of a bottleneck occurs when population size is allowed to increase again. This population growth is accompanied by increasing genetic diversity and movement towards the original levels of heterozygosity. The rate of return of genetic variation can depend on just how ...
... middle of paper ...
... several metrics did not provide the authors of this study with sufficient evidence to accept the idea of a population bottleneck roughly 70,000 years ago. However, they felt they had ample data supporting a bottleneck in human evolutionary history approximately 2 million years ago (Hawks et al., 2000).
Though it cannot be decided in absolute terms either way, there is a plethora of information to support the concept that a bottleneck occurred in the late Pleistocene era, following the eruption of Mount Toba. Knowledge of the effects of volcanic events allow for the recognition that harsh living conditions likely followed the eruption. From this it’s logical to infer even a small contraction in population size. Current genetic research indicating recent population expansions, as well as reduced genetic diversity throughout the human race further support the notion.
One of the phenotypes was poorly adapted for capturing wildloops. What is a possible explanation for why the nonadaptive alleles for this phenotype do not get removed from the population entirely over the course of many generations?
The literature does provide evidence for my hypothesis and also provides a clearer picture as to how frequent and to what extent the interbreeding is believed to occur. Examining these articles will introduce the new findin...
There are arguments for both sides, however, I found the overkill hypothesis more compelling. The attributes toward such a massive event to human intervention seems beyond what the evidence actually provides. The early hominids expanded rapidly and were very innovative in how they developed their culture into that of hunter-gatherer-fishers. Being able to exploit their resources, the hominids themselves turned into a more dominant mammal within throughout the Late Pleistocene and Holocene eras.
Stringer, C. B. & Hublin, J-J. (1999). New age estimates for the Swanscombe hominid and their significance for human evolution. Journal of Human Evolution 37, 873–877.
...re key factors in the high rate of speciation. These conclusions are derived from the lack of correlation of phenotypic evolution with distance and differences in habitat. Instead, random individual dispersal creates frequent genetic bottlenecks. The observation that phenotypic variability decreases with increasing cave age challenges the traditional founder-effect concept, which claims that genetic variability increases with a growing population. The observation is more consistent with the founder-flush concept. However, the data has led to new questions regarding the factors that play into evolution, specifically the reaction between population density and stochastic events. Further investigation of the role that frequently replicating small founder populations plays in the generation of new species will increase knowledge of the complicated process of speciation.
Some individuals have developed different traits to help them in the process of intra-sexual competition. The organisms with more distinctive traits have greater reproductive success. More genes of those traits are then ‘selected’ and are passed onto the offspring of the organisms. Throughout time variability in these traits becomes
According to Darwin and his theory on evolution, organisms are presented with nature’s challenge of environmental change. Those that possess the characteristics of adapting to such challenges are successful in leaving their genes behind and ensuring that their lineage will continue. It is natural selection, where nature can perform tiny to mass sporadic experiments on its organisms, and the results can be interesting from extinction to significant changes within a species.
For instance, the human population trebled from about 1000-1350 and main reason is due to migrations (Davis, 245). Civilizations such as Vikings, Saracen, and Magyar migrated to Northern Europe and France (Davis, 250). Hence, the area of northern Europe and France was open and deserted and fully of resources such as food, animals and spaces (Davis, 250). Therefore, due to the affluent of quantity resources, this cause an attraction and driven a massive of people and civilizations to migrated in northern Europe and France. As results, there were increases and spread of population rapidly that filled the spaces and by 1300-1350 Europe was closed and the frontier was gone (Davis, 250). Furthermore, the drastic increased of human population in northern Europe and France led into a crisis of an economic and agricultural causing drought and poverty. Reason being there was a limitation and regulation. Limitation at some level of scarcity of one or more resources such as food, transport or space and regulation that brings the population to the limits set by the environment (Davis, 249). The increase of human populations totally occupied the deserted space and demands a higher quantity of food supply, in which creating a limitation and regulation in the population. For example, the pressure for land resulted in restriction of the use of forests, decrease in the size of the farms,
“No time has been found at which every genetic locus resides in a single African population.” (Wolpoff et al. 2000)
... as the tropics, and there is evidence that higher species diversity reduces the risk of infectious diseases in humans. For these reasons, it is critical that genetic diversity is preserved.
Heterozygote superiority. (n.d.). In World of biology. Retrieved from Gale Science in Context database. (Accession No. CV2431500311)
Hybridization is commonly defined as the interbreeding of genetically differentiated populations, where the gene flow between the two species has been reestablished. This process is more likely to happen in recently diverged populations that have a secondary contact, in which the isolation barrier has been removed. Hybridization can lead to a variety of evolutionary outcomes, depending on the fitness of the hybrids relative to the parental forms. Some of them will be beneficial, such as the effects of maintaining or increasing diversity through stable hybrid zones, the rescue of small inbred populations, the origin and transfer of adaptations, the reinforcement of reproductive isolation, and the formation of new hybrid lineages (Todesco, 2016). In the other hand, hybridization can also reduce diversity through the breakdown of reproductive barriers, leading to the merger of previously distinctive evolutionary lineages, and the extinction of populations or species.
At the time of the agricultural revolution, nearly ten thousand years ago, the population of the globe was no more than ten million. Today the world population is estimated at over six billion. In the last hundred years the population has more than tripled. With the population rising at an enormous rate of 1.7 million a week, the world as a whole is being drained of its resources. (Southwick, 1996) Different theories have prevailed on what will occur as the population continues to explode ranging from the Malthusian apocalypse to absolutely no effects at all. Over the last two centuries as agricultural and technological advancements came about, the planet's overall carrying capacity increased dramatically. It is estimated that the world could support over twenty times its current population living at 120 per square meter in 2000-story buildings. (Dolan, 1974) Overpopulation not only adversely affects the "environment," or nature, but also has a large impact on human societies today.
From wind-swept seeds to efficient flight mechanism, all animals and plants have evolved a variety of dispersal abilities and have an important role in understanding species survival and evolution. Dispersal is largely driven by needs for resource acquisition particularly to seek suitable breeding habitats. Individuals dispersing between populations aid in gene spread and as such dispersal is subject to natural selection. Three main evolutionary drivers are thought to result in dispersal - habitat instability, intraspecific competition and inbreeding (Johnson and Gaines 1990). But by entering unknown areas there are potential costs, from exposure to predation risks, to unknown resource availability and possible intraspecific competition (Koenig, et al. 1996). An organism’s ability to disperse is key to understanding how a species can spread to different areas of its fundamental niche (Kokko and López-Sepulcre 2006). But how does an organism do this? Evolutionary ecologists are aware that not only intrinsic factors constrain how organisms use their habitat, but the environment itself have implications for a species ability to colonise new areas (Holt 2003). Predicting how species will respond to environmental change such as their ability to track optimal habitats and adapt to changing conditions, depends on understanding these mechanisms will be important.
Seven and a half billion. Enough steps to walk around the globe a hundred and sixty times. Our planet is trying to provide and sustain for a colossal number of people which is expanding every single second. Now the concern that has been put forth by scholars come from the idea that the consumption and effects to our planet by our current society is an international security risk that greatly compromises the future generations. Confucius even mentions this at the earliest start of civilization by saying: