More handpicked essays just for you.
Student athletes should be paid as they create revenue
Student athletes should be paid as they create revenue
Should college students be paid for sports
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
One of the most popular debates in collegiate sports is whether or not student athletes should get a cut of revenue that they produce. There are many pros and cons to each side, but one side stands out more than the other. Student athletes should not get paid simply because it would detract from the purity and passion of the game, basketball and football are the only ones bringing in money, and colleges give out scholarships.
Student athletes get the opportunity to play the game that they love, while getting free or close to free education. If colleges were to pay college athletes the purity and passion of the game would be lossed. “...would turn them into employees,” (Williams 23) athletes would have the mindset that they are getting paid
…show more content…
so why would they need to try. It is like in the NBA, they get paid millions and it isn’t as competitive as college sports. College athletes are putting in work to try and make it to a bigger college or the big leagues. In the NBA, they can say they’ve made it and take a step back. Some college athletes would still try and go bigger, but most would “take a step back”. If athletic departments started to pay student athletes that would consider themselves as “employees” which then there focus for academics is lost. Academics should be everyone’s number one priority, because fewer than 2 percent will become professional athletes. If you don’t focus on academics you will end up with a bad outcome. If you do focus on academics as well, when you come out of college you will have a degree to fall back on when you don’t make it to the pros. “Paying students to play would shift their focus away from academics.” (Williams 23) Paying athletes will make them lose focus and they won’t have any degree when they come out. Paying college athletes would simply make there focus for academics and passion for the game will be absent. Other collegiate sports besides football and basketball don’t bring in anything close to what they bring in.
“The NCAA takes in about $800 million in revenue from the ‘March Madness’ men’s basketball tournament.” (Majerol 15) this is only for a month and is only for men’s basketball. Men’s basketball and football bring in hundreds of millions of dollars, but what about all the other sports. Sports such as softball, baseball, wrestling, lacrosse, soccer, field hockey, and many other collegiate sports do not bring in nearly as much as men’s basketball or football. So, what does it mean for those student athletes? Paying student athletes means colleges would have to pay every player in every sport and on every level. Every level means NCAA, NAIA, and NJCAA. Division I athletes bring in billions of dollars in revenue, but that is only at the division I level. How are other divisions supposed to find enough money to pay their athletes? The NCAA makes way more than colleges and universities in the NAIA and NJCAA. Even though they bring in millions and millions of dollars, they also “...distribute more than 90 percent of its revenue…” (Nocera 23) so in the end colleges and universities don’t have the money to pay anyone. They would struggle for equipment and other necessities. In the NAIA and the NJCAA sports don’t bring in as much money as the NCAA schools. If the court were to pass a law, colleges and universities would go broke, or they would have to cut
activities. Every college hands out some sort of scholarship to student athletes. “$2.7 billion in athletic scholarships NCAA schools award each year.” (Majerol 14) this isn’t including the other levels, including NAIA and NJCAA. This means that colleges and universities are losing its money to get a student athlete to play for them. When given a scholarship you are giving out a “discount” or free tuition and fees, books, room and board, supplies, and in some cases living expenses. “Many top universities give athletes free tuition, books, housing, meals, and money…”(Williams 22) some athletes will get free meals which contradicts many division I athletes statements on how they don’t have food. Scholarships have many perks which can take a lot of money out of the program. When they give out scholarships they are taking out the money in which people could be getting paid with. Though, if you pay athletes scholarships will be most likely taken out, because they won’t have enough money. With scholarships they hand out thousands and thousands of dollars which if they paid athletes they wouldn’t give them that much. Playing on a full ride or on some sort of scholarship, is basically meaning you are getting your education and athletics for free. Colleges and universities are basically already paying student athletes by paying for them to play there. There has been many controversy over this topic. It is one of colleges most talked about debate and every side has its pros and cons. Student athletes should not get paid, because colleges and universities don’t have enough money to go around. Simply because it would detract from the purity and passion of the game, basketball and football are the only ones bringing in money, and colleges give out scholarships. Not paying student athletes would be more beneficial for the athletic department, program, and the student athlete.
To pay or not to pay college athletes, that is the question. It seems like it would be a simple yes or no answer, but there are many underlying factors as to why paying athletes would be a negative. All universities vary in size and popularity, so how would it be possible to pay all athletes the same amount? Student is the leading word in the term “student-athlete”. They are not considered employees, which is what paying athletes would make them. While universities are making some profit off of the abilities of their athletes, college athletes make the personal choice to play a sport. Due to the differing popularity and size of universities and their athletic programs, there would be no fair way to pay all athletes. In addition, many athletes already receive compensation in the form of publicity, scholarships, and access to a high education, and therefore the NCAA and universities should not pay athletes.
College athletes should not be paid it will ruin college sports forever. Some people believe that college athletes should be paid by the school because of all of the hard work they put in however they shouldn’t be paid because there is no fair way to pay every college athlete. There are many reasons that college athletes shouldn’t be paid one of the main reasons is that colleges don’t have enough money, the second reason is that they already get money in the form of scholarships, and there is no fair way to pay each college athlete.
College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes would dramatically shift their focus away from where it should be - gaining knowledge and skills for life after college” (Lewis and Williams). This is very understandable because one of the biggest reasons college sports are so popular is because the athletes play for school pride and for bragging rights. They play because they enjoy the game, not because it is their job. Most people that disagree with the idea of paying the athletes fail to realize what really goes on behind the scenes. At most Universities around the country the bulk of the income the school receives is brought in through the athletic programs. In fact the football and basketball teams usually bring in enough money to completely pay for the rest of the athletic programs all together. To get a better understanding of how much has changed in the world of college sports a little history must be learned.
Tyson Hartnett of The Huffington Post once said “Even with any type of scholarship, college athletes are typically dead broke.” This quote regards a tremendous controversy that has been talked about for the past few years. He talks about whether or not college athletes should be paid for their duties. Despite the fact college athletes are not professionals, they should most certainly be paid for playing for their respective schools due to many factors. These factors include health risks and the income bring in for their colleges as well as to the National Collegiate Athletic Association.
College athletes attend post-secondary schools in order to receive an education and to participate in sports. “Student athletes participate in an organized competitive sport sponsored by the educational institution in which he or she is enrolled. Student athletes must typically balance the roles of being a full-time student and a full-time athlete” (“Student athlete” 1). Additionally, some people believe athletes should receive a salary. However, paying college athletes hurts the school, the sports, and the athletes.
... being paid. Many people prefer watching college sports over professional sports based on the idea that money isn’t involved in college sports. They are competing and giving everything they have for the love of their teammates, the love of their school, and above all, their love for the game. Paying athletes would ruin this standard of intercollegiate athletics. For all these reasons, college athletes should not be paid beyond their full ride scholarships.
College athletes should be paid because of the huge amount of money being made off of the use of their athletic ability. The college basketball and football games that everyone watches on TV is no longer just a game, it is a business. The colleges and arenas hosting such events are not doing it solely for the love of sport, they are doing it for the money that will flow generously into their banking accounts. The coaches also, they are not volunteers, they are not there just for their love of the game, coaching is their job. The athletic directors, coaching staff, and event staff are all doing their job to put food on the table. The fans are watching the game, the players, the ones who are making huge sacrifices to be on the court. The athletes are the only ones in this circle of business who are putting in the hours, maybe even the most hours, and not getting a paycheck. It is time for a change, the fans, the players, and the NCAA is ready for it, it just has to be done. However, there are those out there fighting the other side of this battle, saying there is no need for these student athletes to be paid. Both sides have good points but one of them has great points.
In conclusion, I think student-athletes should get paid for racking up revenue for their universities, the amount of time they spend in their sports, and by paying student-athletes, it may increase their motivation to reach academic success and steer them clear from unsolicited activities. The efforts of student-athletes must be acknowledged because they have given their best effort and countless hours of their time to represent their universities in the best way possible.
The National Collegiate Athletic Association, or NCAA, has said that the high revenue sports subsidize less profitable sports like lacrosse, soccer, and hockey (Majorol). The consensus is if universities, with vast amounts of funding, start offering a play and get paid initiative that the lesser colleges would struggle to compensate, from a declining recruiting class, and their less popular athletic programs would slowly fizzle to nonexistence. Hypothetically, as athletes recognize that they can get an education, play college sports, and also get paid like an employee they will start transitioning away from the lesser schools while creating a pool of players in the top schools. Not only would that turn out as a horrible situation for minor schools, but this also means that college sports’ would not be exiting to watch when the top four schools fight it out, in the tournament each year. Eventually, ratings and ticket sales would go down due to the loss of unpredictability in games. College athletics are only a portion of negatives that come out of paying student athletes, the athletes themselves are also in virtue of
The argument whether a student-athlete should be paid to play or not be paid is one that spans the ages. College sports are considered to be of amateur status by the NCAA. Therefore, they believe student-athletes should not receive a pay check to participate in a sport. However, on the other end of the spectrum, many critics believe that student-athletes should receive pay for play because not only are they participating in a sport, they are entertaining the spectators. They believe that if performers in the entertainment industry are paid, why not pay the college-athletes?
College football has been a sport in American society for decades. Yet the players playing the sport are not receiving their fair cut of the prize. It has been debated whether or not college football players should get paid for playing. The supporters say that the players are not being compensated fairly and the non-supporters say that the education the players receive is payment enough. They also say that the universities the players attend are providing them with the basic necessities so they should not get paid. College football players should be paid though because they put their bodies at risk, make a lot of money for their school, and the play to entertain audiences.
There has been an extensive debate over the years about college athletes being paid and I honestly don’t see why there is a debate about it at all. The NCAA has strict rules about players receiving benefits from the school in forms of helping players and their families in the form of paychecks or even helping pay bills. College sports bring in an enormous amount of money for the schools every year and are expected to be given nothing in return. Sports do not only bring in money to schools but also more students and fans. The NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) have taken several players’ records and rewards from them for the simple fact of getting benefits from the school and that is just not acceptable (Allen 115). Athletes are just like every other student in the way of having to pay for housing, food, bills, and more. Having to balance school and sports gives athletes no time to have jobs which means they do not have a way to bring in money to pay for the essentials of going to
In today’s society, one of the big controversies with sports is, should student athletes be be paid a salary? Some people believe that they should be paid and others would completely disagree. Even though they technically are being paid, they really are not. The only type of way the athletes would be paid is through financial aid or if they have a job. Only their education is being paid by the school. Although some people believe that they should be paid, it would not be a good idea at all. So college athletes should not be paid at all because they are basically being paid to study and play a sport.
College athletes should be paid! College athletes are often considered to be some of the luckiest students in the world. Most of them receiving all inclusive scholarships that cover all the costs of their education. They are also in a position to make a reputation for themselves in the sporting world preparing them for the next step. The ongoing debate whether student athletes should be paid has been going on for years. These athletes bring in millions of dollars for their respective schools and receive zero in return. Many will argue that they do receive payment, but in reality it is just not true. Costs associated with getting a college education will be discussed, information pertaining to the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), and benefits student athletes receive. First, I’ll start with costs associated with college and most of all why student athletes should be paid!
The NCAA makes around a billion dollars each year through college sports and their athletes. All college athletes work very hard to help their teams win games and sometimes sustain many injuries. Although college athletes are not paid money for playing the sports that they love to play they are still given scholarships which can be worth approximately $150,000. As revenue is gained by colleges through their sports none of the money being made is given to the athletes who make these sports happen and games be played. Even though college athletes are not being paid to play some people believe they should be paid due to how much money they make for their college and other people believe they should not be paid due to having players become less