Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Examining brutus from julius caesar
Essay brutus in julius caesar
Essays on the greatness of julius caesar
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Examining brutus from julius caesar
Julius Caesar Persuasive Essay
Did Brutus do the right thing when he joined the conspiracy against Julius Caesar? Brutus had a decision to make in the beginning of this play; should he kill Julius Caesar or not. I believe Brutus should not have joined the conspiracy to kill Caesar, for many reasons. One reason is many people looked up to Caesar, and there had to be a reason so many people followed Caesar. Also, the people in the conspiracy did not give Caesar a chance to even rule. Brutus is considered an honorable man and also Caesar's best friend, he could have used both of those things to help support Caesar as a leader.
In the beginning of Act 1 people were decorating for Caesar's return. The Cobbler states “ Seriously, though, we took the day off to see Caesar, sir, and celebrate his triumph.” (I,i,31-32). This statement shows that the Romans did follow Caesar. Julius Caesar also had much success in his lifetime. Caesar had contributed to the reformation of the Rome into the orderly state and helped prevent Rome from demolition. Many people of Rome looked up to Caesar and loved him even after he had killed Pompey.
The people involved in this conspiracy to assassinate Julius Caesar did not give him a chance to even be a true leader. They killed him way before they even got a chance to see what Julius Caesar could have done to
…show more content…
help Rome. Julius Caesar could have done many great things for Rome and the People of rome but he was never given the chance to do so. He could have done so many great things for Rome but it was never seen because he was killed. If he could have gotten a chance it might have been way different then the conspirators thought he would be as a leader of Rome. Many people looked up to Brutus. They thought he was an honorable man, it was said many times throughout the play. He was also considered Caesar's best friend. Brutus was one of the closest people in Rome to Caesar. Those two things alone could have been used to help Caesar make good decisions for Rome, but that wasn't an option to him. He still thought that killing him was the only option which is proved when this was said, “Our purpose necessary and not envious”(II,i,178), . When the conspirators came to Brutus with the notion to join their conspiracy against Caesar, they knew Brutus is an honorable man. When the conspirators said, “But what of Cicero? Shall we sound him?...For his silver hair will purchase us a good opinion And buy men’s voices to commend our deeds It shall be said his judgment ruled our hands. Our y“Our purpose necessary and not envious”(II,i,178)youths and wildness shall no whit appear, But all be buried in his gravity.”(II,i,140-141...144-149), they knew this could be used to their advantage, just like Brutus being honorable could be used. Many people including Brutus and the conspirators, thought that killing Caesar was the only option they had.
If brutus really fully believed that killing his best friend, Julius Caesar, was the only option, then why did he had to literally talk himself into joining the conspiracy? It was not the only option considering the people of Rome began to love Caesar even after he defeated Pompey. They did not need to kill him in order to stop him from becoming a leader. Whether or not he joined the conspiracy, the conspirators wanted Caesar dead. He did not need to go behind his best friends back and kill him when there was many other
options. I do not believe it was right for the conspirators, including Brutus to kill Caesar. Caesar hardly got to prove to them what he was going to do. If killing Caesar was really the right thing to do he would not have had to talk himself into joining the conspiracy and killing his best friend. Especially when he had many other options. Just because Brutus is the protagonist, does not mean that what he did was right.
Basically Caesar had many people disagree with his actions so they assassinated him.
In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, one must read the text closely to track the shifting motivations and loyalties of each character as the play progresses. An important factor that must be kept in mind while reading is the degree of loyalty, in other words, the degree to which characters act out of a motivation to help others. Throughout the play, each character's current degree of loyalty to others is clearly exhibited by words or behavior – this holds true for the characters of Brutus, Cassius, Antony, Portia, and Calpurnia. The focus on loyalty is critical because before the play ends an even-handed justice is meted out to a number of people who fail to live up to an expected standard of loyalty to others.
Summary Opinion: Brutus is guilty with the collaboration of assassinating Julius Caesar. When Caesar is crowned the new Emperor of Rome, Brutus was very envious of the power he possessed. Due to this jealousy and ambition for power, Brutus betrayed his closest friend. Although Caesar intended to better the conditions of Rome both economically and politically, Brutus believed them to be lies. He is guilty of killing Caesar since there was no reason to, and it also directly violates the law.
When Caesar says, ?do this,? it is performed" (I. i. 10-11 ). This sentence proves his devotion to Caesar, for if he did not love him he would not do his bidding with such enthusiasm. It is not inaccurate to say he most definitely would not join the conspirators. Another question is, if Brutus did not truly believe that Caesar was ambitious, would he have joined in plotting his death?
Some might argue that Brutus was not a patriot, but a betrayer, Brutus claimed to have a deep love for Caesar, but he conspired with traitors and assassinated Caesar by stabbing him in the back. I can’t argue that Brutus did not betray his friendship with Caesar, but when looking closely at the evidence it became apparent to me that Brutus was acting in what he felt was in the best interest of Rome. Brutus struggled with the idea of betraying his friend. He did love Caesar, but was concerned that his ambition would destroy Rome. Brutus made the final decision to be part of Caesars assassination after Cassius deceived him by planting fake letters convincing him that Caesar was up to no good. Brutus felt that he must act and act quickly before Caesar was crowned king. Brutus had no personal vendetta against Caesar, he was only concerned with the future of Rome. In Act 2 Scene 1 Brutus is struggling with how he will handle Caesar when he comes to the conclusion that his only choice is to kill him: “It must be by his death, and for my part I know no personal cause to spurn at him but for
Throughout most of the play Brutus is constantly internally conflicted. Does he do what he believes is best for Rome or stay loyal to his friend and leader? Should he assist in the murder of one person to benefit many? Although killing Caesar was in the end a bad choice, Brutus always tries to do what is best for Rome and for the people. However even though all of Brutus’ motives are good he still has the tragic flaw of pride, which ultimately leads to his downfall. The reason that Brutus gets caught up in the conspiracy is because Cassias appeals to his pride and flatters him with forged letters from the Roman people saying he is a greater leader then Caesar.
He has two opposing desires that he has to choose between. These are killing Caesar to preserve democracy in Rome and to save Caesar, since he is a friend of Brutus. A quote from J.L. Simmons that summarizes this well is, “Certainly the material lends itself to a conflict between private and public affections” (Simmons 64). Brutus wants to kill Caesar for Rome because the citizens of Rome want to preserve democracy and Caesar is preventing that by being dictator for life. A quote that puts this in other words is, “The ultimate factor in persuading Brutus to join the conspiracy is his belief that his countrymen wish him to act on their behalf” (Shalvi 71). Killing Caesar would be a choice made for not himself, but the citizens of Rome while saving him would be for himself and to preserve his friendship with Caesar. Saving Caesar would be a deed for himself and would strengthen his relationship with Caesar. He could have warned Caesar of the conspirators’ plans and put a stop to them. Brutus ultimately makes the choice of following through and assassinating Caesar. His plan was for this to be a honorable action, but it ended up negative on his behalf. The majority of the citizens in Rome did not take this lightly and wanted revenge for his actions. This is the main mistake made by Brutus that lead to his own
William Shakespeare’s play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is a story full of manipulation and jealousy that changes the way people think. Ancient Rome had umpteen different ways of handling situations that, in today’s world, would be considered unethical; such as battles that were very much horrifying and vivid. However, these battles were not important with the development of the plot. Shakespeare uses various ways of the idea of manipulation and betrayal to lead readers into the rest of the narrative.
Brutus cares for Caesar and thinks he is an admiral person, but Brutus also decides Rome is more important, which is why Brutus kills Caesar. Brutus also says Caesar was ambitious, but one can see this is not true and is actually the other way around. In “Caesar and The Corruption of Power” by John H. Collins, he explains that Cicero and everyone else believes in Brutus and that it is right and just for his reasons to kill Caesar. For example, “But Cicero never changed his mind about either the wisdom or the justice of the assassination”(Collins 450). Brutus convinces everyone, including Cicero, that everyone truly believes it is right for Brutus to kill Caesar.
The demise of the Roman Republics authoritative power is an event that still holds the focus of modern society. While he is often held accountable for the fall, Gaius Julius Caesar’s rise to power and continuing ambition was not the only factor that caused its eventual downfall. His involvement and inclusion in the creation of the First Triumvirate and the ongoing civil war between Pompey and himself brought around his rise to power, and his reforms quickly affected the social, economic and political structure of Roman society. His rule both started in civil war, and ended in it; ultimately causing an end to republican institutions.
The question of whether or not Julius Caesar deserved to die is a controversial question. His death wasn’t caused by natural causes, it was caused by the fears of the people who wanted to “save” Rome. These fears caused his murderers, who were known as the conspirators, to perform an action that changed history. An action that they would never be able to take back. An action that is known as murder.
Brutus was one of many Romans with noble bloodlines. Although Brutus was noble, he never used it to get ahead. There are many times when Brutus could have used the fact that he is truly noble but he didn’t. Many people argue that a noble man wouldn’t have killed Caesar. In some ways that is true, but Brutus’ case was different. A noble man would only for the good of others and that is what Brutus did. He killed Caesar because 7he was afraid of how powerful he could become. Even then he had a hard time doing it, and that is what separates Brutus from the other conspirators. Every other conspirator had little or no reason to kill Caesar. Brutus was willing to do anything for Rome. During his speech about Caesar’s murder Brutus stated “I have the same dagger for myself when it shall please my country to need my death” (III.ii.45-46). This shows how Caesar, this is my answer: not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more” (III.ii.20-22). He was too passionate about his country to let Caesar turn it into a dictatorship. Mark Antony and Octavius recognized that Brutus was the one noble roman. In his final speech mark Antony said “This was the noblest roman of them all. / All the conspirators save only he/ Did that they did i...
In the classical play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, a group of conspirators plot to murder an influential figure in their government in fear of his rise to tyranny. Among these conspirators includes Cassius, the primary conspirator responsible for gathering influential figures, such as Brutus and Casca, for Caesar’s death. One of the more notable accomplices and close friend to Caesar, Brutus, only endeavors to execute Caesar for altruistic objectives. Whereas most conspirators, including Cassius, propose to assassinate Julius Caesar because of their envy of his increasing amount of power.
Caesar is always looking forward to succeed and gain power. As they parade through the streets of Rome Casca tells Brutus how Caesar was offered a crown by Marc Antony. Although Caesar did not accept it and pushed it away he would have really wanted it. “Then he offered it to him again; then he put it by again; but to my thinking, he was very loath to lay his fingers off it” (I.ii.243-245). On the other hand, Brutus was not ambitious. Brutus joined the conspiracy because he was afraid that Caesar’s ambition will over power Rome. “Shall Rome, &c.' Thus must I piece it out: Shall Rome stand under one man's awe? What, Rome?” (II.i.656). He explains how Rome should not be ruled by one person, as agreeing to the conspirators and thus, joining them
Julius Caesar was a powerful king. Too much power even. That’s what conspirators Cassius, Casca, Cinna and many others thought. They believed in another individual who would be a better leader; Marcus Brutus. Brutus was noble, honorable, and ambitious. He had just enough ambition for him to be a good ruler. This wasn’t the case for Caesar. Caesar wanted so much power and right away too. He had ruled the Roman Empire; which was thought to be the entire world at the time. If there was more power to be absorbed, Caesar would have gone any length to achieve that power. This caused people to be afraid of him, and more importantly; despised him. It was one of his most fatal flaws! (No pun intended) Yes, maybe some people were too blind to see it, but the conspirators who took action, saw it.