Despite few things being more important to people than their or a loved one's health, the World Health Organization (WHO) has recently ranked the United States of America 24th in analysis of healthy longevity, 18th in infant mortality and 43rd in average life expectancy amongst nations of the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) - the United States of America is not the greatest country in the world (“GHO”). Health care policy in the United States differs from most other democracies in one important way: the role the government plays. Opposite to many other democracies around the world, United States health care is privately ran thus mirroring its’ politics: vast, complex and controversial. A paradox exists within America’s current health care system; we spend a far larger share of our income on health than any other industrialized country; yet, we are far from having the healthiest population. The United States must follow the example set by our worldly counterparts and incorporate health care into our government’s agenda rather than allowing it to be managed by private incorporations whose only goal is profit. America is prized for its capitalistic free market economy providing incentives to be rich and encouraging innovation, however; maximizing one’s health benefits at someone else’s expense is not advantageous to a health care system. Capitalism produces inequality, private ownership and exploitation …show more content…
for profit - encouraging the poor to stay poor and the rich to stay rich. The fundamental goal of capitalism is to seek the path that yields the highest benefits. Capitalism manifests the mindset that someone who can not afford health care does not deserve it due to the fact that they “did not work hard enough”. The self-interested behavior of people in charge of different aspects of America’s health care system trickles down, affecting the well being of the patients. Capitalism led to the creation of the conflict theory, outlining the inequality between the proletariat (poor) and the bourgeoisie (rich). The disparity between these different groups affects who has access to medical care; including who has access to hospitals and the ability to be covered by insurance. Karl Marx, a German philosopher and political activist, developed a criticism for capitalism, known as marxism. Marxism is a political and economic philosophy that advocates for equality before the law including equal education, health care and gender roles. In addition, marxism aims to abolish private businesses and private property bridging the gap stated within the conflict theory. Moreover, marxism forms the foundation of the rational choice-exchange theory, believing that people behave rationally according to their best interests. The rational choice-exchange theory impels individuals to ponder the purpose of the health care system. Does it really exist to keep people healthy? Is it a capitalistic competition to earn the most money? (INSERT PERSONAL RELATION) (INSERT CRITICAL ANALYSIS) It can be agreed that nations both rich and poor consider health care a basic right.
In fact, Article 32 of the Constitution of the Italian Republic assures: The Republic safeguards health as a fundamental right of the individual and as a collective interest, and guarantees free medical care to the indigent. No one may be obliged to undergo any health treatment except under the provisions of the law. The law may not under any circumstances violate the limits imposed by respect for the human person. (The Constitution of Italian
Republic) In contrary, the United States health care system is driven by a mixed and imperfect market designed to benefit private companies more than the sick people it is supposed to be helping. Wealthy individuals within America can pay to be covered by the best medical care, whereas, the middle class have limited access to medical care because either they earn just enough to not qualify for a government health care plan, such as medicare, but can not afford the deductibles nor premiums of private insurance or their occupations do not provide them with an insurance plan. Middle class citizens of the United States are left to ask themselves whether going to the hospital will benefit them more in the long run or will the outrageous hospital bills outweigh said benefits. Leading individuals to skip hospital visits and be sicker longer or simply never get better. Many people have no choice but to skip hospital visits for minor illnesses due to the cost, allowing something that can be easily treated to become a much larger problem. The United States of America now spends $2.3 trillion a year on health care, accounting for one-seventh of the gross domestic product (GDP). Canada, France and Germany, on the other hand, provide universal health coverage but only spend 8-11% of their GDP’s. In America, costs are not only high but they are increasing faster than any other good/service we purchase. For the price we pay many would expect American health care to be world class, but do we get our money’s worth? The sad truth is no. Despite major advances in medical technology, the average American still does not live as long as the average Canadian and the chances that your baby will live beyond their first year is 50% lower in the United States than if your baby was born in Japan (“The World Factbook”). It is a common belief in America that more care is better care, yet there is little to no evidence that high costs and more care translate into healthier patients, and as president Bush’s Council of Economic Advisors agrees, “buying more health care is not necessarily equivalent to buying more health” (“Policymaking for Health Care”). The economics of America’s current capitalistic health care provide no incentive to keep costs under control. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan in other countries costs approximately $200-400 each, in America it costs around $1,500 and you would be able to stay in a dutch hospital for 7 nights for what it costs to stay in an American hospital for one, because the United States does not have a unified system that can negotiate between doctors, pharmaceutical companies and other providers. Due to the absence of government regulated price ceilings, health care providers are able to charge as much as they can get away with, which is a lot considering their is no price for living. “We are [...] the only advanced democracy on Earth,” 26th president of the United States of America, Theodore Roosevelt proclaimed, “that allows such hardship for millions of its people” (“Policymaking for Health Care”). Despite Roosevelt’s attempts, it has been nearly a century since he had called for health care reform. Reforming the American health care system is difficult due to the existence of the iron triangle consisting of congress, bureaucracy, and lobbyists. The iron triangle summarizes the relations between these branches of government and their effects on one another: congress wants to be re-elected, the bureaucracy wants to protect funding and jobs whilst lobbyists want to advance the interests of their constituents. Members of the iron triangle work to maintain the status quo by working together to achieve each of the members desires, which most times is not in the best interest of the people. The United States of America must adopt a single-payer health care system, a system financed by taxes that covers the costs of health care for every man, woman and child regardless of income. Today, the United States owes over $70 trillion for its 3 major entitlements: social security, medicare and medicaid. Bernie Sanders’ “Medicare for All” plan proposed in the 2016 election was estimated to cost over $6 trillion less than the current health care system over the following decade (Sanders). The United States needs to follow the example set by other developed nations and make health care a government ran program. Although many wish to limit the presence of government in American lives, as we move forward, the citizens of the United States must realize that the government must get involved to aid the current health care “market” in achieving an effective, efficient and fair outcome - which includes developing a centralized negotiation system. The United States of America must embrace a system that works not just for the upper class, but for everyone. Until that is achieved, the price of health care will continue to rise faster than any other nation in the world. The United States is falling behind in the global race of health care and must begin making strides in the right direction towards health care reform; building upon our current foundation and strengths. A paradox exists within America’s current health care system. The United States spends more on health care per person, and as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP), than any other advanced nation in the world but, all of that money has not made Americans healthier than the rest of the world. We have spent more yet end up with less with uneven coverage equating to uneven care. The United States must get on-board with the rest of the global community and establish a single-payer health care system as well as a unified negotiation system between the many fields of medicine in order to provide available, affordable health care coverage to not just some, but all of its’ citizens. The United States must establish health care as a basic right providing it as a freedom to all citizens. The United States of America is not the greatest country in the world - but it can be.
On a global scale, the United States is a relatively wealthy country of advanced industrialization. Unfortunately, the healthcare system is among the costliest, spending close to 18% of gross domestic product (GDP) towards funding healthcare (2011). No universal healthcare coverage is currently available. United States healthcare is currently funded through private, federal, state, and local sources. Coverage is provided privately and through the government and military. Nearly 85% of the U.S. population is covered to some extent, leaving a population of close to 48 million without any type of health insurance. Cost is the primary reason for lack of insurance and individuals foregoing medical care and use of prescription medications.
An issue that is widely discussed and debated concerning the United States’ economy is our health care system. The health care system in the United States is not public, meaning that the states does not offer free or affordable health care service. In Canada, France and Great Britain, for example, the government funds health care through taxes. The United States, on the other hand, opted for another direction and passed the burden of health care spending on individual consumers as well as employers and insurers. In July 2006, the issue was transparency: should the American people know the price of the health care service they use and the results doctors and hospitals achieve? The Wall Street Journal article revealed that “U.S. hospitals, most of them nonprofit, charged un-insured patients prices that vastly exceeded those they charged their insured patients. Driving their un-insured patients into bankruptcy." (p. B1) The most expensive health care system in the world is that of America. I will talk about the health insurance in U.S., the health care in other countries, Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, and my solution to this problem.
The facts bear out the conclusion that the way healthcare in this country is distributed is flawed. It causes us to lose money, productivity, and unjustly leaves too many people struggling for what Thomas Jefferson realized was fundamental. Among industrialized countries, America holds the unique position of not having any form of universal health care. This should lead Americans to ask why the health of its citizens is “less equal” than the health of a European.
There are several issues concerning the uninsured and underinsured patient population in America. There are many areas of concern the congressional efforts to increase the availability of health insurance, the public image of the insurance industry illustrated by the movie "John Q", the lack of good management tools, and creating health insurance coverage for all low income Americans. Since the number of uninsured Americans has risen to 43 million from 37 million in the flourishing 1990s and could shoot up even more severely if the economy continues to decrease and health care premiums keep increasing (Insurance No Simple Fix, 2001).
“Homelessness can be the cause as well as the result of poor health” (Wise, Emily, Debrody, Corey &ump; Paniucki, Heather, 1999, p.445). This is a reoccurring theme that has existed within the homeless population for decades. While programs to help reduce this constant circle are being put in place all over the country to provide medical services for the homeless to be able to go to, many are still finding that health care needs for individuals as well as homeless communities are not being met. Many studies have been completed that study both the opinion on healthcare by those who have access to sufficient health care and homeless people’s perceptions on health care administration. While many companies are working to provide more personal health care systems, it appears that the larger problem is with a lack of people know about the health care systems that are in place to help them. Companies are trying to advertise more often to inform homeless people that there is health care out there for them.
In recent years, the number of Americans who are uninsured has reached over 45 million citizens, with millions more who only have the very basic of insurance, effectively under insured. With the growing budget cuts to medicaid and the decreasing amount of employers cutting back on their health insurance options, more and more americans are put into positions with poor health care or no access to it at all. At the heart of the issue stems two roots, one concerning the morality of universal health care and the other concerning the economic effects. Many believe that health care reform at a national level is impossible or impractical, and so for too long now our citizens have stood by as our flawed health-care system has transformed into an unfixable mess. The good that universal healthcare would bring to our nation far outweighs the bad, however, so, sooner rather than later, it is important for us to strive towards a society where all people have access to healthcare.
Despite the established health care facilities in the United States, most citizens do not have access to proper medical care. We must appreciate from the very onset that a healthy and strong nation must have a proper health care system. Such a health system should be available and affordable to all. The cost of health services is high. In fact, the ...
The U.S. expends far more on healthcare than any other country in the world, yet we get fewer benefits, less than ideal health outcomes, and a lot of dissatisfaction manifested by unequal access, the significant numbers of uninsured and underinsured Americans, uneven quality, and unconstrained wastes. The financing of healthcare is also complicated, as there is no single payer system and payment schemes vary across payors and providers.
The US health system has both considerable strengths and notable weaknesses. With a large and well-trained health workforce, access to a wide range of high-quality medical specialists as well as secondary and tertiary institutions, patient outcomes are among the best in the world. But the US also suffers from incomplete coverage of its population, and health expenditure levels per person far exceed all other countries. Poor measures on many objective and subjective indicators of quality and outcomes plague the US health care system. In addition, an unequal distribution of resources across the country and among different population groups results in poor access to care for many citizens. Efforts to provide comprehensive, national health insurance in the United States go back to the Great Depression, and nearly every president since Harry S. Truman has proposed some form of national health insurance.
Paul Krugman, the author of “The Conscience of a Liberal,” argues that the reform needed for the health care system is a challenging and daunting task but needs to be addressed and improved. Krugman debates the morals and economics of the current system and exploits the inequalities the failing system. Similarly, T.R. Reid, the author of “The Healing of America, “argues that a possible way of reforming the problematic health care system is to have a cooperation between the insurance companies and the government in which the government regulates health care and provides insurance to all. On the other hand, Kevin C. Fleming, the author of “High-Priced Pain: What to Expect from a Single-Payer Health Care System,” argues that the single-payer health
With the United Nations listing health care as natural born right and the escalating cost of health care America has reached a debatable crisis. Even if you do have insurance it's a finical strain on most families.
Health reform and health policy has taken over in the United States in recent years. Medicaid is one of the top policies being implemented throughout our nation today. To understand how Medicaid and federalism cross paths with each other one must understand the basic definitions and concepts each one brings. Federalism is “system of government in which the same territory is controlled by two levels of government. Generally, an overarching national government governs issues that affect the entire country, and smaller subdivisions govern issues of local concern.” In short, federalism is a government system that has an overseeing central government over state government. While, “Medicaid is a health insurance program for low-income individuals and families who cannot afford health care costs. Medicaid serves low-income parents, children, seniors, and people with disabilities.” Medicaid is a test based welfare program for United States Citizens. Now the question is how does Medicaid intersect with federalism? These two intersect because Medicaid is a need-based program that is funded by the federal government and the state government and administered at the state level. The issue with Medicaid is that if it expands then a crowding-out effect may occur. Meaning, that the more the government spends on Medicaid then less they would be able to spend on other programs such as: education, transportation, or other state priorities. Medicaid is supposed to provide access to health insurance for approximately half of our nations uninsured citizens. Without Medicaid a vast amount of low-income citizens will go without having a healthcare insurance plan.
Living in a capitalist society, the richest Americans enjoy larger homes, nicer cars, better education and even health care. Even if we lived in a capitalist society where everyone had access to the same basic healthcare program, the rich would still be able to afford better care. The wealthy are able to pay more in co-payments, prescription costs, and the ability to go outside of the healthcare system in this country to seek help. When you have the disposable resources then the sky is the limit, where the poor have very limited options. They will be confined to their healthcare coverage program and do not have the luxury of seeking additional assistance. “Poor patients often receive less quality care in the hospital, have more barriers to recovery, and experience higher morbidity and mortality than do patients with higher incomes” (Dracup).
...ue to numerous medical errors. With the amount of medical errors that currently do occur which is a current health care issue it cost the health care billions of dollar each year to fix the mistakes that were made.
In terms of access, everyone is required to buy and maintain health care within the first 3 months of living within the country. If one cannot afford insurance, the government subsidizes for low-income families. This is extremely important to make sure everyone has health care. Access again is obtained based on what canton on...