Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of western civilization
Materialism society
How did western civilization affect ancient civilization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of western civilization
In contrast to the Europeans, Gandhi's perspective on the modern concept of civilization is not of one of endearment, but rather he believes in the presence of a negative correlation between the progression of society, and the preservation of moral and cultural values. For instance, he starts by explaining that the primary purpose behind civilization is to further promote "bodily welfare [as] the object of life" (Gandhi 1). This description is hinting at the transformation that has occurred in society going from a people-centered community to a materialistic one. In addition, Gandhi continues by noting how members in upper-class parts of society exploit the poorer working class for the sake of monetary gain. For example, he says that "[now] they are enslaved by temptation of money and of the luxuries that money can buy" (Gandhi 1). This quote depicts the corruption …show more content…
In conclusion, according to Gandhi, no one can possibly profit from the adoption of the English lifestyle.
Furthermore, he then turns the typical European identification ideology against them, the British in particular, by mentioning reasons why modernity, or at least their desire for it, will ultimately lead to their own demise. Throughout the entire chapter, Gandhi explains to the reader how the technological, intellectual, and economic advancements of the West may seem like it has a positive impact at first glance, but instead is causing them great harm. For example, such advancements are creating a mindset of laziness, greed, and prejudice amongst the Europeans. For this reason, he later refers it as a "Satanic Civilization" that "is eating into the vitals of the English nation. It must shunned" (Gandhi 1). As exhibited in the quote, just as the Europeans used foreign people's primitive culture to claim their superiority, Gandhi, who sees the progression of their civilization more a regression of culture and moral values, uses this against them. In
In a letter from Gandhi to Lord Irwin addressed as “Dear Friend,” he stated, “ Whilst therefore I hold the British rule to be a curse, I do not intend harm to a single Englishmen or to any legitimate interest he may have in India…. And why do I regard the British rule a curse? ...Even the salt [the peasant] must use to live is so taxed as to make burden fall heaviest on him…” (Document A). Gandhi refers to Lord Irwin as “Friend” so that as he reads the letter he is not seeing himself as a higher power. Gandhi was opposed to the British rule because they placed a high tax on the salt that the poor men and/or women need to
In Annawadi, the slum setting of the book “Behind the Beautiful Forevers,” nearly everything falls under the law of the free market. Things that most countries deem “basic rights,” the Indian people of Annawadi have to pay for. Clean water, education, and medical attention from hospitals are just a few things that are exploited by police officers, gangs and slumlords. The liberalization of India caused the country to begin a process of economic reform. People from the countryside flocked to the cities to find work in the new booming economy that no longer depended on its agriculture. With the increase in population around the bustling cities, came competiveness for opportunity. This competiveness made poverty rates skyrocket, making corruption (and corrupt activities) in Annawadi the only clear way of making it out of the slums. “In the West, and among some in the Indian elite, this word, corruption, had purely negative connotations; it was seen as blocking India’s modern, global ambitions. But for the poor of the country where corruption thieved a great deal of opportunity, corrupti...
To begin with, one must find a peaceful approach to defeat discrimination. According to the text, on “from Letter to Viceroy, Lord Irwin”, Gandhi stated “My ambition is no less than to convert the British through non-violence and thus make them see the wrong they have done to India.” This evidence shows that Gandhi wants to be heard without using violence. Another example is on lines 17-24 which says “It has impoverished the dumb millions by a system of progressive exploitation…reduced politically to serfdom…sapped foundations of our culture…degraded us spiritually.” This evidence reveals that Gandhi is showing the effect the British is having a right now in India.
The English government’s harsh ruling gave way to famine, death, and the overall unhappiness of Indian people for many long years. They have not let this impact them forever, though. As Gandhi stated, “You must not lose faith in humanity. Humanity is an ocean; if a few drops of the ocean are dirty, the ocean does not become dirty.” This has been true for India: despite the hardships placed upon them by Europe, they continue to pick up the pieces of their destroyed economy and rise above their disastrous
...yway. How can what Britain did be considered good for India? It can’t. At least, not if India’s value is in it’s people. The British did however bring peace to a nation collapsing on itself. And provided India with ‘proper’ education and standards. Communication, transport, industrialization, sanitation all improved and slavery, internal relations conflicts and unacceptable practices all ceased. So Britain’s rule could also be considered the best thing to happen to India. If India’s value were instead measured by western standards considering India before British rule in comparison to after. Everything has it’s price, all that can be truly verified is that British imperialism's impact on India was both positive and negative. It just depends from which side you choose to view it, the colonizers or the colony.
(O.I) Another negative effect imperialism has made on India is through the persecution of Indians. For a hundred years you have done everything for us. You have given us no responsibility in our own government," says Mohandas Gandhi in regards to the British rule. He also says that the British treat the Indians insultingly and without empathy (Doc 6,7,8).
Sigmund Freud, a psychologist and influential thinker of the early twentieth century, enumerates the fundamental conflicts between civilization and the individual in his writing, Civilization and its Discontents. He asserts that an individual’s primary discontent originates from civilization’s demand for conformity contrary to the individual’s search for instinctual freedom. Freud continues and postulates that the demands and laws forced onto the individual create the “super ego.” This super ego puts limits on one’s intrinsic desires and restricts them from pursuing different opportunities of happiness. Similar to Freud’s assessment of civilization, Friedrich Nietzsche, a German philosopher and cultural critic, illustrates a similar evaluation on communal living in his major work, On the Genealogy of Morals. In this writing, Nietzsche begins to examine the origin and meaning of different moral concepts, starting with “good”, “evil”, and “bad.” In this process he states that noblemen defined these terms and that the people around them are you talking about the noblemen or people in general? influenced and ultimately determined what was “bad” or “good.” While both thinkers addressed several different concepts, they had similar views on the influence of civilization and the unintentional effects it had on the individuals living in that society. While both Freud and Nietzsche discuss the pow...
Ideology, Knowledge and the escalation of new ideas led to a better life and society that made positive impacts on Western Civilizations. There were many idea’s that were explored and implement into the daily lives of the people and for the most part it turned out to be a good impact. Although there were some bad ideas that caused suffering to the society at the time. They learned from what they witnessed and created something that would work better for the most part. In this essay I am going to use some primary sources that support my idea that society benefited from the new “ideas” but I will also use an example to explain how it caused a negative impact too.
The process of society moving toward civilization affects the relationship between the society and individual. As the society and individual developing over time, these two processes seem to be further away from each other, yet the development of society restricts individual’s. This is a very controversial topic and being discussed in many literature works such as the poem,“Sunflower Sutra,” by Allen Ginsberg and the book, “Civilization and Its Discontent,” by Sigmund Freud. Both Ginsberg and Freud point out that civilization would negatively affect individual such that as civilization is forming in the society, individual starts to lose its true nature or instincts.
Part I: Replacement of power of individual by power of community constitutes the decisive step of civilization…the first requisite of civilization, therefore, is that of justice. According to Sigmund Freud, in his 1962 work Civilization and Its Development, civilization refers to the rules aimed to defending man from nature. Freud argues out that culture, a complex of symbolic meanings, is created to achieve immortality. Human beings fabricate culture, by weaving webs of significance, to reduce the anxiety and fear brought by “superior power of nature”(Freud, 28).
...and, yet in generalizing, Gandhi only succeeds in weakening his case against Western Civilization. For it is impossible for such sins to be totally non-exist in India, even before direct English influence, and therefore forces the two nations to be equal in this respect. Gandhi is placing India on too high a pedestal to claim credence.
The Indian people are further represented in the English's eyes by the description of India itself. The city, presumably a mark of civilization, is a rotting, festering thing that no English colonialist would consider urbane;
“The strongest physical force bends before moral force when used in the defense of truth.” - Mahatma Gandhi (Bondurant). Mahatma Gandhi was the main leader in helping India become independent through the principles of non violence, self-rule, and the unity of Hindus and Muslims. His full name was Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, but he was given the name Mahatma later on in his life. He wanted to see an united India without the rule of the British Empire. He accomplished this with passive resistance or resistance by non violence because he wanted to show that violence is not always the best answer.
Westernization is the process in which regional or local cultures become heavily influenced by western culture and society, which in turn leads to cultural homogeneity. Many countries all over the world are affected by westernization, including India which is a land of very deep cultural roots. This raises the question of how can the process westernization affect the rich Indian culture? With India’s increasing modernization it has been difficult to ward off the effects of westernization. Westernization has the power to bring about many positive as well as negative changes in a society. In the case of India it’s culture it has been negatively affected through the adoption of western centric ideologies, which have led to a rapid loss of rich Indian culture. Some notable effects of westernization in India are its adoption of a parliamentary system, and the acceptance and incorporation of western technologies and clothing into
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi- 2 October 1869 - 30 January 194 was the pre-eminent political and spiritual leader of India during the Indian independence movement. He is also known as Mahatma which means “The Great Soul”. He was committed to pacifism, that there should be no violence.(1) He had three concepts to follow in his life for independence of India: Satyagraha, Ahimsa and Swaraj.