More handpicked essays just for you.
Internet addiction and its effects
Internet addiction and its effects
What are the causes of Internet addiction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
FAMILY COMMUNICATION PATTERN AND INTERNET ADDCITION Family by its nature is a social unit wherein children grow up and it acts like the socialization agent. Children receive their earliest and most consistent socialization here in the family. In a family it is very important as to how parents cater the needs of their children and how children take care of them in return. Parents as well as the child are very important part of the developmental process, as it is the parents who will shape the children as what they will become. The parent child relationship influences each other and together they shape the relationship they engage in it. Family is a social unit where in all the members living together is related to one another. Family is regarded …show more content…
The family communication pattern consists of two primary dimensions. They are family’s conversation orientation and the other being family’s conformity orientation. Conversation orientation refers to the degree to which family communication patterns are characterized by an open and unrestrained exchange of ideas. In contrast, conformity orientation refers to the degree to which family interactions are characterized by an emphasis on homogeneity of attitudes, values, and beliefs (Koerner & Fitzpatrick, 2002). All the families fall either in high or low combinations of these two orientations. Depending upon what the family falls, there are four types of patterns. They are- consensual, pluralistic, protective and …show more content…
Thus, making each and every individual member of the family isolated themselves into their own things. Also, this type of family members will have lower self esteem, well being and social dysfunction. The protective type of family communication pattern, which is low on conversation whereas high on conformity. Such families showed higher levels of internet addiction than the pluralistic type of pattern which includes family conversation but away from conformity (Tajalli, et.al.
A family is a group of people consisting of the parents and their children who live together and they are blood related. The family is always perceived as the basic social units whether they are living together in the same compound or at far distance but are closely related especially by blood. Therefore, the family unit has had a great influence on the growth and the character traits possessed by the children as they grow up and how they perceive the society they live in. the family also shapes the children to be able to relate well with other people that are not part of their family and with a good relationship it impacts to the peace achieved in country. This paper addresses the reasons as to why the family is considered the most important agent of socialization. It’s evident that families have changed over time and they have adopted different ways of living. This paper also tackles on the causes of the dramatic changes to the American family and what the changes are. Different people with different race, gender and preferences make the family unit and this makes the difference in marriages. This will also be discussed in this paper.
In understanding others, one must first understand our own family background and how it affects our understanding of the world. Conversely, family systems draw on the view of the family as an emotional unit. Under system thinking, one evaluates the parts of the systems in relation to the whole meaning behavior becomes informed by and inseparable from the functioning of one’s family of origin. These ideas show that individuals have a hard time separating from the family and the network of relationships. With a deeper comprehension of the family of origin helps with the challenges and awareness of normalized human behaviors. When interviewing and analyzing the family of origin, allow one to look at their own family of origin
Fitzpatrick and Ritchie (cited in Schrodt 2009) analyzed family communication patterns and proposed a 3 dimensional family communication environment instrument (FCEI) to identify what holds the family together and strong. In the test, they found that 'family expressiveness','structural traditionalism' and 'conflict avoidance' constitute those 3 dimensions and that each dimension co-influences one another. The research also specifically stressed out children from the families sharing similar family communication schemes tend to expect to share the same strengths with their future family. For many years, a series of analysis about family strengths grew into a trend, called the 'family strengths framework' and it became widely used in the health care area, mainly focusing on problem-solving and detecting success of a family and their resilience (MacAllister, cited in Smith & Ford 2013). DeFrain and Stinnett (cited in Schrodt 2009) asserted that every family has its own strengths and those strengths can be categorized, mostly sharing the similar qualities as the previous studies had confirmed.
This supports the importance of family because it shows how without one member of the family, everything seems to be unbalanced, and the connection between relatives is unstable. But, with the help of
Family has always been the basic building block of society. It is the structure where its members are born, raised, educated and developed into members of the society. Its primary role is to provide an environment where children learn skills, moral and values. Frequently when people think of family, what first comes to their minds is the traditional image of a couple (father and mother), and their children, however, this role model of the traditional family is expiring more and more each day. Now a days, families around country are challenging this stereotype. As modern society becomes more tolerant to divorce, homosexuality, and more, the structure of many families has been dramatically affected by the way society sees
(Wright & Leahey, 2013, p.124). These categories do not determine whether a family is healthy or not, rather it is the family’s own judgment on if they are functioning well or if their is need for improvement. There are nine subcategories in this model per Wright & Leahey (2013) and include: (a) emotional communication, (b) nonverbal communication, (c) verbal communication, (d) circular communication, (e) problem solving, (f) roles, (g) influence and power, (g) beliefs, and (i) alliances and
The field of family communication is a largely understudied field of communication sciences. Family members use relational maintenance behaviors in order to maintain their relationship with various members of their family. These relational maintenance behaviors have mostly been studied in the context of romantic relationships. Relational maintenance behaviors vary in context, but these behaviors help people maintain positive, healthy relationships. This paper’s focus will be on the relational maintenance behaviors families take part in and the effects these behaviors have on family communication patterns (FCP).
The family communication pattern theory has two important types of communications. Conversation orientation, the first is to describe their characteristics. Family members are encouraged to participate in conversations about any topic. Families that are high on conversation, orientation believe that open and constant communication is necessary for a good and satisfying family life. They interact often, freely and deliberately without controlling the time spent together and the topics they discuss. Having a low conversation, orientation are families that view interpersonal communication not as important and unnecessary, they don’t interact with each other and limit topic
I’ve never really known a lot about the interactions of my family, but when I was doing research for the genogram project, I noticed a few trends start to emerge. Some of the dominant behavioral patterns found in my family include practicing religion, racism, getting at least a high school education, owning a business, divorce, and cohabitation.
Families in the Americas have dramatically changed over the past 60 years. As the years go by, they continue to become more diverse. The functionality and structural beliefs of a family have great effect to this diversity, becoming dependent of the cultures that are made up of this function.
"A family is a small social group of people related by ancestry or affection, who share common values and goals, who may live together in the same dwelling, and who may participate in the bearing and raising of children. They have a physical or emotional connection with each other that is ongoing" (Vissing, 2011) and is the foundation of all societies. They can be formed by a grouping of father-mother-children or even more complicated combination of relatives. In the primary stage of family life in the United States, everyone from every generation lived together in one house. Subsequently, the idea of traditional family evolved and a married couple with children is at present, often called the traditional family. There are many types of families; however, this paper will focus on the traditional family. It will describe how the functionalist perspective, conflict perspective, and the interactionism theory apply to the sociological institution known as a family. It will explain some of the similarities and differences between the sociological theories in regards to families and how they affect the family members.
The family is a societal institution which initiates the positive and negative process of social interactions between people. Over the last few decades what constitutes the family has changed all over the world. Family in today’s environment is diverse in nature and may go beyond the scope of parents and children. Families can consist of variations in relationships such as close relatives, stepparents, half siblings and extended non-biological family members. Normally, immediate family members live in the same house, nearby, until the child reaches a specified age and maturity to go into the world and start their own family. Most often members of the families have intimate and personal relationships with each other. Within the family there is a continuation of social interactions between members that can influence and shape peoples responses and reactions to their larger societies.
What is a family? A family is two or more people consider themselves to be blood related, or related by marriage, or adoption. Our families are who we love. We as families look different in so many ways. A family’s caregiving unit might have a couple, a mother, a father, and children. A family could also be a single parent and child, a group of siblings, a small or large group of friends. A family defines itself in many different ways. Families are the foundation of how our society and how it works. It is how we come into the world and nurtured and given the tools that we need to go out into our world. We are both capable and healthy or not our families influence our lives either in a good way or a bad way. While families
Family is arguably the most important social institution in an individual's life. A family is defined as a group of individuals that are related through blood ties, adoption or marriage, that form an economic unit, where the adult members are responsible for the upbringing of children. As a social institution, families change over time, but are usually the first and most important social part of an individual’s life. Education also prepares young people for entry into adulthood and is therefore a form of socialization.
Everyone is born into some form of family, with the family taking the responsibility of nurturing, teaching the norms or accepted behaviors within the family structure and within society. There are many types of families, which can be described as a set of relationships including parents and children and can include anyone related by blood or adoption. Family is the most important, “for it is within the family that the child is first socialized to serve the needs of the society and not only its own needs” (Goode, 1982).