More handpicked essays just for you.
Relevance of confidentiality in counseling
Relevance of confidentiality in counseling
Relevance of confidentiality in counseling
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Caution and strict compliance with regulations, laws and following a proper client-therapist relationship will ensure a smooth ride for both a client and their therapist. Dual relationships and boundary breaking are perhaps the most fatal blow to that of said relationship. For a therapist to truly show compassion they must limit any instance of a dual relationship or boundary push. Erosion of one’s trust and guidance can build slowly over time if just the wrong thing is said. Through building dual relationships or breaking boundaries, this becomes all too apparent. To become a competent therapist that is filled to the brim with helpful resources, there are things one must limit. Perhaps the most dangerous thing a therapist can do with their client is to establish some sort of dual relationship. Essentially, a dual relationship is born through multiple roles between that of a client and a therapist (Zur 2014). These various roles can be seen through the lens of business, sexual connection, friendship, communal and even on an online setting. While not all dual relationships are necessarily bad, the clear majority can crush the trust or will to change that the client has. Dual relationships can demolish years of work that both the client and psychotherapist have worked so hard to obtain. …show more content…
Many practices across the globe have strict prohibitions against having any intimate relationship with any sort of client. Mixing emotion and intense connection between that of a therapist and a client is extremely dangerous. If anything, negative were to occur during said relationship, things such as suicide or loss of will to succeed will come into fruition. Abstaining from personal relationships like these limits any negative fallouts per said realm of dual
Throughout the second half of this semester, dual relationships have been emphasized as one of the most frequently encountered ethical dilemmas faced by behavior analysts in the field today. According to the class lectures, assigned text, and other articles that we have read, this is due to the fact that we interact with our clients and those caring for them in their natural settings. As a result, those we provide services to, and interact with, are in the places in which they feel the most comfortable, their homes or regular classrooms. This is in stark contrast to a formal office setting, which projects an atmosphere with both expected standards of acceptable behavior, and clear boundaries between client and the service provider. In an effort
Counselor should never have a dual relationship with a client it can bring a lot of ethics issue that affect the client and counselor. According to ACA "A.6.b. Extending Counseling Boundaries Counselors consider the risks and bene ts of extending current counsel- ing relationships beyond conventional parameters. Examples include attend- ing a client’s formal ceremony (e.g., a wedding/commitment ceremony or graduation), purchasing a service or product provided by a client (excepting unrestricted bartering), and visiting a cli- ent’s ill family member in the hospital. In extending these boundaries, counselors take appropriate professional precau- tions such as informed consent, consul- tation, supervision, and documentation to ensure that judgment
Ralph, the elected leader of the group of British boys in William Golding’s Lord of the Flies, strives to take the civilized society to which he is accustomed and apply it to society on the island on which he and the other boys are stranded. As leader, this task seems simple – tell the other boys what they each need to do and expect them to do it. Ralph fails to realize the difference between the rest of the boys and himself.
As a psychologist in a mental health profession, you should avoid conflicts of interest when providing any professional services to a client. Engaging in any activity with a client that makes the boundary between a provider and a client somewhat un...
Ultimately, a therapist or any psychologist of any sort should not have loose boundaries with their clients because it can lead to serious consequences and accusations. Having boundaries sets the tone of how the sessions will go. If the client is not respecting the boundaries then a referral may need to take place and if you aren’t practicing within said boundaries then more harm than good would surface from the
...f dual relationship there was also a possibility of the client becoming dependant on the therapist which could be seen as unethical by the BACP (2010).
Sexual relationships with previous client, resident, patient, consumers are considered dual relationships and are addressed in Statement 6 (above). He might be falling for a client which may lead to a sexual relationship. For obvious reasons it will not be in the best interest of client in helping with their problems. Judgment, reasoning, and responsibility to his client is compromised.
Research has shown that a strong therapeutic alliance is necessary for establishing a beneficial contact between the therapist and the client. If the therapist does not encourage the creation of a reliable therapeutic alliance from the beginning of the treatment, it will be hard to develop a constructive relationship with the client later. Establishing the therapeutic alliance will increase the chances of achieving the goal of the treatment because the clients will be willing to cooperate if they trust and respect the therapist. Clients are not likely to cooperate with therapists who impose their authority aggressively. Instead of imposing their authority on the patient, therapists should develop work with their patients by building a mutual relationship based on trust, understanding, and respect for the client.
Every client is unique, and regardless of the theoretical approach, I believe that the therapeutic relationship between client and counselor is critical.
“Civilization begins with order, grows with liberty, and dies with chaos” -Will Durant. Every human has a basic instinct of survival lying within them. This instinct to survive can be tested when one is placed in a state of prolonged anguish and panic. In the right environment, this instinct to survive can turn any civilized being into a beastly savage. William Golding’s novel, Lord of the Flies explores this idea of a civilized human’s ability to become a savage, when put in the right circumstance. In the beginning of the book, Golding’s main protagonists, Ralph, Piggy and Jack are symbols of civilization, order and hope. Once they are stranded on a desert island and left to their own devices, fear, the pursuit of power and human corruption turns the three boys into savages. Golding’s novel clearly depicts how without the structure of civilization, it is human nature for a person to revert back to its innate savagery.
Reflecting on my work as a therapist, I recognize the importance of the therapeutic relationship. For instance, in EFT the therapist, “the therapeutic relationship, characterized by presence, empathy, acceptance, and congruence, helps clients to feel safe enough to face dreaded feelings and painful memories (Greenberg, 2014).
The purpose of this essay is to discuss how dualism describes reality more accurate than materialism, idealism, and transcendental idealism. Even though dualism doesn’t describe reality one hundred percent just like the other theories about the nature of reality, it is the most accurate argument out of the four major theories about the nature of reality and substance. Dualism was a concept that was not originated by Rene Descartes but coined by him. The concept was that our mind is more than just our brain. The concept was not originated by Rene Descartes because the Bible explains that we are more than our body and brains. It teaches that we have a separate mind, soul, and spirit. One argument for dualism is that the physical and mental territories have different properties. The mental events have qualities such as what does it feel like, what does it look like, or what it sounds like. Another argument is the lack of any understanding of how any possible reaction can take place between the mind and brain. The essay will include reasons for favoring the Thomistic and Cartesian forms of substance dualism and the counter arguments that are against them.
According to Syne (2006), a dual relationship occurs when people take on multiple roles in their relationships with other people. While dual relationships exists in many different aspects of our society, dual relationships between a client and counselor bring a host of challenges and opportunities for the client and counselor from an ethical standpoint. Nigro and Uhlemann (2004) explain that because of the challenges presented by dual relationships, many counselors work to avoid and prohibit them. But from an ethical standpoint, such relationships do not always negatively impact clients. As a result, dual relationships tend to be one of the top ethical dilemmas reported by therapists.
Dual relationships in a psychological or therapist aspect can be common and sometimes unavoidable. An example of dual relationships in the psychology community would be a therapist having a student as a client. This can be known as a nonsexual dual relationship, which can be complex and can affect both counselors and the clients’ alike (Herlihy & Corey, 1992). Research has been conducted asking whether it is appropriate for students to be clients of their college counselors, with that question there were a broad array of opinions on the topic, some with interests in the dual relationships and some that were not. A major issue that could arise from a dual relationship like a therapist student relationship is that the therapist could have impaired