Essay On Coca Cola's Impact On The Environment

In Australia, the Coca-Cola’s bottler known as Amatil, aimed to expand its bottling operations at a nearby plant thereby triple its water extraction to 41 million liters annually. However, such action by Amatil has led to one of the worst droughts in 100 years in Gosford, which is situated to the north of Sydney. Moreover, in the United States alone, Coca-Cola sells over 25 million polyethylene terephtalate bottles made from non-renewable resources. This material is used to manufacture millions of bottles of soda and juice each day. The company thus refuses to take back these bottles thereby going against its policy to use more post-consumer plastics. As a result, Coca-Cola contributes heavily in polluting the environment and doing little to conserve it by turning down recycling.

In India, Coca-Cola has been accused of instigating droughts since its carbonated and bottled water beverage lines rely on large volumes of water taken directly from municipal water systems tapped from local watersheds. The same instance has happened in the United States with damaging impacts on the water tables in places where bottling plants are located. Further, there are instances where traces of pesticide have been found on Coke products.

Coca-Cola’s Positive Impact on the Environment

Essentially, the company adopts CSR to protect its brand by joining into the World Wide Fund for Nature as a member in 2007. Through the WWF membership, the firm seeks to improve water usage on its operations by developing a framework to preserve water sources thereby offset the manufacture costs in the long run. As a result, Coca-Cola has used corporate social responsibility to increase the value of brand to the business. Therefore, the company prefers to invest more in-depth and long term approaches to reflect the company corporation social