Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Civil disobedience full essay
Oppinions on civil disobedience
Negatives of civil disobedience
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Civil disobedience full essay
CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE AND REBELLION
“Civil disobedience and rebellion becomes a sacred duty of a person when the state becomes lawless and corrupt”. These are the words spoken by Mahatma Gandhi; a leader of the independence movement in the British ruled India. Civil disobedience is disagreeing with the government in a peaceful way whereas rebellion is doing the same thing in a violent way. These actions are provoked when the people don’t like something that the government is doing. They are necessary ways to help protect people’s treasured rights, to publicize an issue and overthrow an unjust government or gain independence. For these reasons, civil disobedience and rebellion are both equally necessary to obtain an effective democracy.
People use civil disobedience and rebellion to claim freedom and denied rights. It is also used to overthrow a tyrannical government. According to principle no. 3 from the declaration of independence; it is the government’s duty is to protect the people’s unalienable rights. The government is not to seize or deny people of their rights and liberty or the government is classified as tyrannical. In the 1700s American colonies were under the rule of the British government. The colonists lived under the British monarch, King George III. The king then started to take an
…show more content…
advantage of the colonists. He used the colonies to pay off the British’s debts in the French and Indian war which took place between the French and the British. The British gained land but they owed more than 2 million dollars. To pay it off, the king taxed the colonists. The colonists had the right of taxation with representation which was violated since the colonies had no representation of the government. The colonists were unhappy and they used civil disobedience; wrote letters to King George, organized rallies and boycotts to show that they didn’t like King George taxing them. The taxations continued anyway. The king further took away the colonist’s freedom to trade by ordering that the colonies could only trade with Great Britain. The colonists now started getting angry. They were leaning towards rebellion to get their rights back. King George paid no heed to the colonists but instead took away their rights to vote for their state representative. He also sent soldiers to their homes so that people would not rebel. The colonists were furious, the rebelled against the British. After seven years of war the colonists gained independence. This is evident in source 5 which has a picture of the colonists pulling down the statue of King George to show that they were done with the king. This also showed them as being independent. They regained their rights and freedom and transitioned to a government who was going to protect their rights like it was meant to do, or transferred from monarchy to democracy. The colonists used rebellion i.e. American Revolution to make the government better since they were able to create a government by the people, of the people and for the people which was not possible under the rule of King George, monarchy. People were also much happier after the rebellion. Rebellion and civil disobedience will help publicize an issue. Most of the time, publicity will help bring justice to an unjust situation. It will make the people aware about the actions of the government. This will result in people actively participating in the issue. This will also result in the government being corrected if necessary. This is well supported by the case of Freddie Gray that took place recently. On April 12, 2015, four officers on bicycles attempted to stop Freddie Gray and another man, who ran after seeing police at the intersection of W. North Avenue and N. Mount Street. Police caught and arrested Gray in the 1700 block of Presbury Street. Police said Gray stopped voluntarily and they did not use any force. The officers asked for a van to take Freddie to the police station. At that time Freddie asked for an inhaler but it was not provided to him. Freddie is placed in leg irons and put back in the wagon. Multiple witnesses tell The Sun (a newspaper) they saw Gray beaten but the police says evidence including an autopsy disputes their accounts. Under police care, Freddie Gray was severely injured. His spine was 80% damaged. This incident showed police negligence and brutality. This atrocious behavior from the police department caused series of outbreaks. The people who heard of this incident made sure Freddie and his family got justice. They also became more violent, rebelled as incident similar to this occurred. This publicity made the government better because now, people are aware of the unfair and brutal behavior of the police department. The civil disobedience and rebellion have made the law take action against injustice, thus making united states a better place. Rebellion and civil disobedience is extremely useful in obtaining rights, overthrowing a tyrannical government and publicizing an issue.
However, there are major disadvantages to rebellion and civil disobedience. First, rebellion and disobedience will cause destruction. It will harm property and may even claim lives. In spite of that the benefits of rebellion and civil disobedience outweigh its disadvantages. Through civil disobedience and rebellion we can gain peace and also be happy. Besides, many people also think that you are not really living your life without your rights. To sum up, civil disobedience and rebellion will certainly help structure an effective
democracy.
There are times throughout the history of the United States when its citizens have felt the need to revolt against the government. There were such cases during the time of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau, when there was unfair discrimination against the Afro-American community and Americans refusing to pay poll taxes to support the Mexican War. They used civil disobedience to eventually get legislation to stop the injustice brought against them and their nation. Civil disobedience is defined as refusal to obey civil laws or decrees, which usually takes the form of passive resistance. People practicing civil disobedience break a law because they consider the law unjust, and want to call attention to its injustice, hoping to bring about its withdrawal.
“No radical change on the plane of history is possible without crime,” This quote from Hermann Keyserling is just one of many statements that help describe the meaning and true raw power of Civil Disobedience. Civil disobedience as defined by Merriam Webster is the “refusal to obey governmental demands or commands especially as a nonviolent and usually collective means of forcing concessions from the government”. The most promising and understandable of the definitions of Civil Disobedience would be that given to us by Gandhi from India “Compassion in the form of respectful disagreement”. Even the Veterans Fast for Life from here in the United States must agree when saying, “when leaders act contrary to conscience, we must act contrary to leaders.” To understand why civil disobedience is so important in our lives you must first look into your heart and realize that the integrity of mankind has no need of rules.
Civil disobedience has its roots in one of this country’s most fundamental principles: popular sovereignty. The people hold the power, and those entrusted to govern by the people must wield
Civil Disobedience occurs when an individual or group of people are in violation of the law rather than a refusal of the system as a whole. There is evidence of civil disobedience dating back to the era after Jesus was born. Jesus followers broke the laws that went against their faith. An example of this is in Acts 4:19-20,”God told the church to preach the gospel, so they defied orders to keep quiet about Jesus,” In my opinion civil disobedience will always be needed in the world. The ability to identify with yourself and knowing right from wrong helps to explain my opinion. Often in society when civil
In the Theory of Justice by John Rawls, he defines civil disobedience,” I shall begin by defining civil disobedience as a public, nonviolent, conscientious yet political act contrary to law usually done with the aim of bringing about a change in the law or policies of the government”.
Henry David Thoreau, well known for his work Civil Disobedience, discusses and argues for a sustainable government for the American populace. The motto: “That government is best which governs least” (part 1, paragraph 1) carries on and supports several claims Thoreau makes throughout his essay. His response states: “I ask for, not at once no government, but at once a better government. Let every man make known what kind of government would command his respect…” (part 1, paragraph 1) which strengthens Thoreau’s point of view about the American government and the type of government he desires. Thoreau also applies figurative language and central ideas to make his points strong, convincing, and engaging toward the reader about a “better government”.
The use of civil disobedience is a respectable way of protesting a governments rule. When someone believes that they are being forced into following unjust laws they should stand up for what they believe in no matter the consequences because it is not just one individual they are protesting for they are protesting for the well-being of a nation. Thoreau says ?to resist, the government, when its tyranny or its inefficiency are great and unendurable.? People should only let wrong and right be governed by what they believe not the people of the majority. The public should always stand for what is right, stand when they think a government is wrong, and trust in their moral beliefs.
Henry David Thoreau effectively portrays his disagreement with the government. He formally points out and describes the shortcomings of the government of his time; as well as, he describes the so called benefits of the governing body. In his work, Civil Disobedience, even the title speaks out on his position with the government. He provides a very clear stand on his argument and provides very valid points which, to this day, still hold true.
In life, sometimes disagreements arise, yet we keep our opinions inward, we stay quiet about the issue. Other times, we fight back against the disagreements, and refuse to cave to the oppositions opinion. This is considered an act of disobedience. When displayed in a child’s character, it is usually considered normal. As an adult, however, when we speak up about our opinion and ask others to join us in common grounds, the act is viewed as civil disobedience. In his writings on civil disobedience, Henry David Thoreau tries to persuade his readers to change their views of the government by using ethos, pathos and logos. His works proved to be effective, and now, people have second thoughts about their government.
Civil disobedience is just because one should not follow laws that cause or lead up to slavery. The aftereffects of civil disobedience are not god-awful owing to the fact that when comparing an abusive treatment with a consequence of going against it; it is clear that it is better to practice civil disobedience than to not practice it and remain in pain of such that can be caused by slavery. Thoreau disputes his idea of revolting against a government during rough times by utilizing metaphor, imagery, and rhetorical questioning.
As humans are imperfect and irrational, they throughout history have formulated governments to deter and prevent crime, organize communities, and act in the best interest of the ruling group [majority or minority]. Since governments can be irrational and humans are emotional, disobedience to authority has and shall always exist in civilised society. True civil disobedience according to Erich Fromm and Mr. Thoreau is against an irrational authority and the focus of protestation is irreconcilable with oneself. Civil disobedience by citizens is intended to evoke change but is drastically different in methodology depending on the government type. The consequences of civil disobedience in mind, in this essay I hereby advise civil disobedience solely
“ There are as many views as there are different aspects of civil disobedience...the difference of views appears to be infinite. But there is general consensus that at least one common factor can be found, and that is, a willingness to respect and accept the relevant legal system. That is the marked difference between civil disobedience and open revolt or armed revolution,” ("Democracy Can 't Exist without Respect for the Rule of Law"). There are many differences between revolution and civil disobedience. Civil disobedience is nonviolent and respectful to the law. Armed revolution is a fighting against the government with weapons and an intent to destroy the government. Many may say that civil disobedience is a slippery slope and it will lead to revolution. Civil disobedience is very respectful and the only reason it is happening is because there are unjust laws. The people who participate in civil disobedience or peaceful protests are displaying respect for their government by helping it become better, rather than trying to overthrow
In the American industrial revolution, businesses and factories were booming, monopolies such as Carnegie steel and the Pullman company were generating astronomical sums of wealth, America as a country had a booming economy. Sadly, the average American worker was left out of the wealth these monopolies were making. The people had no voice, they were given drastically low wages and could barely earn enough money to eat. Due to the people being left out, some individuals and groups were becoming civilly disobedient to the companies they were working for, and they went on strike. These workers decided to not continue to work due to the corrupt and greedy companies they worked for. In the beginning, the government sided with the monopolies, the national guard was even used a few times to enforce people continue to work. Slowly but surely, the people won, and the government sided with the people and they started regulating business. The regulation of business in America today came about by workers being not content with their conditions, so they decided to be civilly disobedient and not continue to work. These are regulations and laws such as minimum wage, child labor laws, and regulation of what goes into products. These changes have had a positive impact on America as a whole.
The concepts of obedience and disobedience are evident from the beginning of one 's life. Young children are born with the tendency to do things that are against what they are told or what they know they should do. They don 't have to learn how to disobey; it is an innate behavior. This struggle between obedience and disobedience carries on throughout our lives. There are three major factors that can cause obedience and disobedience; authority, social pressure, and situations. Each of these vastly impact an individual 's behavior and cause them to act in ways they would normally not.
I am a pacifist; I do not believe in nor promote violence. I do, however, promote peaceful protest. The act of civil disobedience, of protesting something that is unjust, unconstitutional is well within our constitutional rights. The right to criticize our government is one that was given, that was fought for by our founding fathers. It is an act that affects our society in a very positive way; peaceful resistance encourages others to criticize a cruel and unfair government. Peaceful protests, strikes, and boycotts have the opportunity to gain the government's attention, to try and stop these so-called "anarchists". When we look back at Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., we see a hero. We see someone who is intelligent, who is not afraid to argue,